How do I find the full opinion?

Search the reporter citation '142 U.S. 18' in major legal databases, consult printed United States Reports in law libraries, or request certified copies from the Supreme Court clerk; confirm pagination and any parallel citations before drafting.

Correct citation format for briefs

Use the full reporter citation 'New Orleans & Northeastern R Co v Jopes, 142 U.S. 18' and include pinpoint page numbers for specific propositions; follow local court citation rules such as The Bluebook for exact form.

Can I rely on dicta from the case?

Dicta is persuasive but not binding; identify controlling holdings versus commentary. If your argument depends on nonbinding language, disclose its persuasive status and support it with binding authority or subsequent decisions.

How to check the case's subsequent history

Use citator services such as Shepard's or equivalent to identify overruling, negative treatment, or citing support; review later opinions and secondary sources to ensure the case remains good law for your jurisdiction.

Are electronic copies acceptable for filing?

Many courts accept PDF exhibits and electronically filed attachments; verify local e-filing rules and format requirements. For evidentiary originals or certified records, obtain court-certified copies per clerk instructions.

What retention period applies to case materials?

Retain active case files while proceedings continue and archive certified opinions indefinitely for research; if materials contain PHI follow 45 CFR §164.530(j) six-year retention and consult federal or state rules for additional obligations.

Electronic Signature
Templates
Other
New Orleans Ampersand Northeastern R Co v Jopes 142 US 18

New Orleans Ampersand Northeastern R Co v Jopes 142 US 18

This template is fully customizable. Edit the text, fill out the fields, and send it for signature. Give it a try!

Jury Instruction Template

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF , MISSISSIPPI

PLAINTIFF

VS.

NO.

and

DEFENDANTS

INSTRUCTION NO.

The Court instructs the jury that in a case such as this, where requested, the Court may instruct the jury on the measure of damages. The Court does not know whether you will reach the question of damages, because the Court does not know whether your verdict will be for the Plaintiff or the Defendants. The Court gives such instructions on the measure of damages so that you may be enlightened on all legal phases of the case, but you must not think that because these instructions have been given on this subject then you must award damages to the Plaintiff.

What this Supreme Court opinion is

New Orleans Ampersand Northeastern R Co v Jopes, 142 U.S. 18, is a United States Supreme Court opinion reported in volume 142 of the United States Reports at page 18. The published opinion contains the Court's statement of facts, procedural posture, majority holding, and any concurring or dissenting opinions. Practitioners, clerks, academics, and public records custodians consult the opinion for doctrinal analysis, historical context, and citation in briefs or scholarly work.

Why this opinion is useful to practitioners and researchers

The opinion serves as published authority that can inform legal arguments, historical study, and comparative precedent research; it helps users identify the Court's reasoning and the legal rule they may cite or distinguish in later matters.

Primary audiences who consult this opinion

Primary users include practicing attorneys, appellate advocates, law clerks, and legal scholars who cite or analyze historical Supreme Court opinions.

Litigators and appellate counsel citing precedent in briefs and motions.
Law students and researchers studying doctrinal development or syllabus statements.
Courts and clerks checking procedural posture and citation history.

Public records custodians and archival services also reference the opinion when maintaining historical court archives and public access catalogs.

Core elements of a professional case summary

A concise, professional case summary focuses on the citation, operative facts, procedural posture, holding, rationale, and final disposition so readers can quickly determine precedent value and applicability.

Citation

Include the full case name, reporter citation (142 U.S. 18), court, and decision date to ensure precise retrieval and accurate pinpoint references in briefs or memoranda.

Facts

Summarize only the operative facts and disputed events so that the holding can be directly connected to the material circumstances that produced the Court's rule.

Procedural History

Record trial court outcomes and any intermediate appeals; the procedural posture affects precedential weight and guides whether the opinion controls the issue at hand.

Holding

Extract the controlling legal rule stated by the majority and note any limiting language that confines the holding's application to particular facts.

Reasoning

Summarize statutory interpretation or common-law analysis, identify key precedents relied upon, and highlight doctrinal tests the Court used to reach its result.

Disposition

State whether the judgment was affirmed, reversed, or remanded and include any remedial instructions that affect downstream proceedings.

Essential reference fields for the case record

Case Name: New Orleans & Northeastern R Co v Jopes

Reporter Citation: 142 U.S. 18

Court: Supreme Court of the United States

Docket Number: Include docket number if available

Decision Date: Enter decision date as MM/DD/YYYY

Parties: Full legal names for all parties

Step-by-step: locate, analyze, and cite the opinion

Follow a structured process to find the opinion, interpret holdings, verify subsequent treatment, and apply the decision accurately in briefs or academic work.

01

Locate Opinion: Search reporter citation, court database, or law library records.
02

Read Carefully: Identify operative facts, holdings, and any limiting language.
03

Check History: Verify subsequent treatment and negative history in citators.
04

Cite Properly: Use full citation and pinpoint relevant page or section.

Where to obtain and distribute the opinion

Authorized sources for the opinion include court clerks, public records, subscription databases, and secure electronic delivery when permitted by local rules.

Court Clerk: Order certified copies or request docket entries.
PACER / Databases: Access full opinion text through federal electronic records.
Law Libraries: Use annotated reporters and historical collections for context.
Secure eDelivery: Share PDFs via secure systems following court privacy rules.

Preparing electronic copies and e-filing requirements

Digital distribution and e-filing require compatible file formats, signer authentication and adherence to local court e-filing rules.

File Formats: PDF/A or PDF preferred.
Authentication: Use secure multi-factor methods.
Integrations: Supports Salesforce, NetSuite, Google Workspace.

For electronic signature and secure sharing in compliance with ESIGN and UETA, consider platforms that offer audit trails, TLS/AES encryption, and BAA options for HIPAA-covered records; signNow provides these capabilities alongside integrations that simplify document routing and storage.

Timing and filing considerations

Deadlines for using or appealing from this opinion depend on court rules; verify specific filing and citation timing with the relevant jurisdiction.

Notice of Appeal:

Federal appeals commonly require notice within 30 days (FRAP 4(a)).

Motion for Rehearing:

Local rules set periods; often short (days to weeks).

Certiorari Timing:

Supreme Court petition deadlines vary; consult 28 U.S.C. guidance.

Citation Updates:

Check citator services regularly for negative or supporting treatment.

Document Access:

Request certified copies early to allow processing time.

Common pitfalls to avoid when using this opinion

Mis-citation: Omitting the reporter volume or page can prevent retrieval and undermine brief formatting requirements set by court rules.
Overreliance on dicta: Treating noncontrolling language as binding risks reversible legal error and weakens persuasive arguments.
Ignoring subsequent history: Failing to check for overruling or negative treatment can misstate authority and invite sanctions.
Incorrect contextualization: Applying the holding to materially different facts misapplies precedent and undermines credibility with courts.

Risks and professional consequences

Court Sanctions: Possible motion-level penalties.

Citation Rejection: Brief may be struck.

Malpractice Exposure: Client harm may trigger claims.

Reputational Harm: Damaged credibility before courts.

Wasted Costs: Unnecessary briefing increases fees.

Incorrect Relief: Misapplied precedent alters outcomes.

eSignature vendor comparison for secure copies and e-filing attachments

Use this vendor comparison to evaluate platforms for creating, signing, and securely sharing electronic copies of opinions or exhibits; signNow is listed first per platform data.

	signNow	DocuSign	Adobe Sign	PandaDoc	HelloSign
Starting Price	$8/user/mo	$15/user/mo	$14/user/mo	$19/user/mo	$15/user/mo
Free Trial	7-day free trial	Yes, limited	Yes, limited	Yes, limited	Yes, limited
Bulk Send	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	No
Audit Trail	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes
HIPAA Compliant	Yes	Yes	Yes	No	No
Envelope Cap	No envelope cap	100 envelopes/user/year	Varies by plan	Varies by plan	Varies by plan

Frequently asked questions about locating and using the opinion

Answers to common practical questions on finding, citing, validating, and retaining New Orleans Ampersand Northeastern R Co v Jopes for legal work and research.

Need help? Contact support

How do I find the full opinion?
Search the reporter citation '142 U.S. 18' in major legal databases, consult printed United States Reports in law libraries, or request certified copies from the Supreme Court clerk; confirm pagination and any parallel citations before drafting.
Correct citation format for briefs
Use the full reporter citation 'New Orleans & Northeastern R Co v Jopes, 142 U.S. 18' and include pinpoint page numbers for specific propositions; follow local court citation rules such as The Bluebook for exact form.
Can I rely on dicta from the case?
Dicta is persuasive but not binding; identify controlling holdings versus commentary. If your argument depends on nonbinding language, disclose its persuasive status and support it with binding authority or subsequent decisions.
How to check the case's subsequent history
Use citator services such as Shepard's or equivalent to identify overruling, negative treatment, or citing support; review later opinions and secondary sources to ensure the case remains good law for your jurisdiction.
Are electronic copies acceptable for filing?
Many courts accept PDF exhibits and electronically filed attachments; verify local e-filing rules and format requirements. For evidentiary originals or certified records, obtain court-certified copies per clerk instructions.
What retention period applies to case materials?
Retain active case files while proceedings continue and archive certified opinions indefinitely for research; if materials contain PHI follow 45 CFR §164.530(j) six-year retention and consult federal or state rules for additional obligations.

Explore Templates

LHWCA Procedure Manual Proof of Service of Notice of Lien FCA 1062 Form Child Protective Petition MHL Article 81 New York State Unified Court System FCA-1062 Child Protective Affidavit Motion for Order Approving Relative as Foster Parent

be ready to get more

Join over 28 million airSlate SignNow users

Sign Now