Establishing secure connection…Loading editor…Preparing document…

Order Granting Ore Tenus Motion for Extension of Time

This template is fully customizable. Edit the text, fill out the fields, and send it for signature. Give it a try!

AGREED ORDER OF DISMISSAL

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF

, PLAINTIFF

VS.

CAUSE NO.

, Individually,

and , DEFENDANT

THIS MATTER is before the Court on the joint ore tenus motion of the parties seeking dismissal, with prejudice, of all claims and counterclaims currently pending in this civil action, and the Court having considered the matter, and having considered that the parties have reached a compromise and settlement with respect to all of the claims and counterclaims alleged, is of the opinion that the Motion for Dismissal is well taken and will be granted at this time.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that all claims set forth in the Complaint filed by against individually, and are hereby dismissed, with prejudice, with being responsible for payment of his/her own attorney's fees and costs associated with this litigation.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that all claims maintained by in his/her individual capacity or d/b/a are hereby dismissed with prejudice with being responsible for all his/her own attorney's fees and costs associated with this litigation.

DATED this the day of , 20

CIRCUIT COURT JUDGE

Approved and Agreed:

Attorney for Plaintiff

Attorney for Defendant

Enter text✕
Prepare your document for signing right on this page
  • 01 Edit the text and complete the fields
  • 02 Click Sign Now and on the next screen add recipients and signature fields in SignNow
  • 03 Start your free trial to sign and send your doc
Sign Now

What an Order Granting Ore Tenus Motion for Extension of Time Means

The Order Granting Ore Tenus Motion for Extension of Time is a judicial order that memorializes a judge's oral (ore tenus) ruling extending a party's deadline in a pending matter. It records the court's grant of additional time to file pleadings, respond to discovery, or meet other procedural deadlines and becomes part of the case record once entered. This order typically includes the extended deadline, the scope of the extension, and any conditions imposed by the court. Parties should follow local rules for entry, service, and appeal rights when an ore tenus order is recorded.

Why This Order Matters for Case Management

An Order Granting Ore Tenus Motion for Extension of Time clarifies deadline expectations, prevents default or sanctions, and preserves procedural rights while the case proceeds. It formalizes the court's oral ruling into a recorded order, reducing ambiguity for litigants, counsel, and the clerk's office.

Why This Order Matters for Case Management

Who Typically Prepares and Relies on These Orders

Use by courts, litigants, and attorneys when an oral extension is entered and must be memorialized in the case file.

  • Trial judges and court clerks who record oral rulings and set new deadlines in case dockets.
  • Attorneys for plaintiffs or defendants seeking additional time to prepare filings or complete discovery tasks.
  • Pro se litigants who obtain an oral extension and need an entered order to avoid procedural default.

After entry, parties must serve the order per local rules and update calendars and filings to reflect the new deadline.

Essential Elements to Include in a Professional Order Granting Ore Tenus Motion for Extension of Time

A professional Order Granting Ore Tenus Motion for Extension of Time should be precise, include entry details, and support reliable service and recordkeeping in the court docket.

Effective Date

State the exact effective date and time of the extension; clarify whether the extension is tied to a filing event or a specified interval to avoid ambiguity about compliance and deadlines.

Scope

Specify which deadlines are extended (pleadings, discovery, expert disclosures) and indicate whether the extension applies to all parties or only to the moving party, preventing downstream disputes.

Conditions

Note any conditions imposed by the court, such as limits on further extensions, required status reports, or discovery schedules; include compliance obligations to avoid sanctions.

Entry and Docketing

Include space for the clerk's entry stamp, docket number, and entry date. A clear entry section helps clerks process the order and ensures precise case recordkeeping.

Service Instructions

State how the order will be served — e-filing notice, email to counsel, or certified mail — and confirm the service date to establish notice for appellate or compliance timelines.

Audit Trail

Record the origin of the ore tenus ruling (hearing date, judge, and reporter or recording) and attach a hearing transcript excerpt when available to strengthen the evidentiary record.

Step-by-Step: How to Prepare and Enter the Order

Follow this step-by-step sequence to prepare, enter, and distribute an Order Granting Ore Tenus Motion for Extension of Time.

  • 01
    Prepare: Draft proposed order reflecting the judge's oral ruling and expiration date.
  • 02
    Review: Confirm scope, conditions, and any restrictions discussed on the record.
  • 03
    Entry: Submit to the court clerk for formal entry and docketing.
  • 04
    Serve: Serve all parties and update case management systems and calendars.

Online Workflow Settings for Converting an Oral Ruling into an Entered Order

Configure an online workflow to convert an ore tenus ruling into an entered order, serve parties, and update dockets.

Field Configuration
Upload Document Upload proposed order template in PDF format
Place Fields Add judge signature, entry date, and clerk stamp fields
Set Routing Auto-route to clerk and all counsel after entry
Retention Settings Enable audit trail and set retention policy

From Oral Ruling to Entered Order: Typical Workflow

This flow explains how an oral court ruling is converted to a written order, entered, and distributed to parties using court e-filing and email.

  • Record: Note oral ruling and any on-the-record conditions
  • Draft: Prepare proposed order matching the judge's oral ruling
  • Entry: Clerk enters order and assigns entry date and docket number
  • Notify: Serve parties via e-filing notice and counsel email

Technical Requirements for Electronic Preparation and Distribution

Ensure the platform supports redaction, secure storage, and court-compliant PDF generation when preparing an entered order for service.

  • Formats: PDF/A or court-accepted PDF
  • Authentication: Email, SMS, or KBA options
  • Integrations: Court e-filing systems and case managers

Common Timing Expectations and Service Timing

Typical timing expectations for drafting, entering, and serving an ore tenus extension order are summarized below; local rules control exact deadlines.

Prepare Proposed Order:

Usually filed within 7 days of the oral ruling; check local rule

Clerk Entry:

Entry and docketing occur upon clerk review and signature

Service to Parties:

Serve immediately after entry by e-filing notice, email, or mail

Opposition Deadline:

Affected parties may seek clarification or modification promptly

Appeal / Reconsideration:

Time to move varies by court; consult local appellate rules

Sequential Milestones from Oral Ruling to Final Notice

Key sequential milestones from oral ruling through final docket entry and distribution are shown as numbered stages below.

01

Oral Ruling

Judge pronounces extension and any limiting conditions on record.

02

Prepare Order

Draft order reflecting terms, effective date, and scope for clerk review.

03

Clerk Entry

Court clerk enters the order, assigns docket number, and records entry date.

04

Service

Serve all parties per court rules and update litigation calendars.

Ore Tenus Order versus Written Motion for Extension — Key Differences

Compare ore tenus orders to written extension motions to choose the right approach for your case, noting different formality and filing practices.

Criteria Ore Tenus Order Written Motion
Formality oral-based written filing
Record Strength hearing record motion exhibits
Timing immediate relief hearing required
Typical Use short extensions longer or contested

eSignature Pricing and Feature Snapshot for Court Document Workflows

Pricing and feature snapshot for common eSignature plans. signNow appears first; plan features and starting prices are shown for comparison.

signNow DocuSign Adobe Sign PandaDoc HelloSign
Starting Price $8/user/mo $15/user/mo $14/user/mo $19/user/mo $15/user/mo
Free Trial 7-day free trial Varies Varies Varies Varies
Bulk Send Yes Yes Yes Yes Limited
Audit Trail Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
HIPAA Compliant Yes Yes Yes No No
Envelope Cap No cap 100 envelopes/user/year Varies Varies Varies

Practical Examples and Customer Insights on Electronic Order Workflows

Real organizations highlight how reliable electronic workflows and clear proposed orders reduce ambiguity and speed processing across legal and business settings.

Optica Ventures — Brian Fitzgibbons

A midsize legal services firm used electronic workflows to convert oral courtroom directions into entered orders more consistently across cases.

  • Reduced turnaround time for entered orders.
  • "The interface is simple and easy-to-use for our team; more importantly, it is just as easy for our customers." — Brian Fitzgibbons, COO, Optica Ventures LLC; the ease of use helped streamline document exchanges.

Martin Properties — Tim Martin

A regional real estate operator standardized entry of courtroom extensions to keep closings on schedule and coordinate counsel.

  • Faster execution of entered scheduling orders.
  • "I can process and execute all of these documents online with 100% compliance and built-in security. Whether on mobile or working offline, I can get forms back to their necessary parties efficiently." — Tim Martin, Founder, Martin Properties; this reduced in-person follow-ups.

Best Practices to Reduce Errors and Preserve Rights

Follow these practical steps to ensure accurate entry, timely service, and defensible recordkeeping for entered ore tenus extension orders.

Capture the on-the-record specifics
During the hearing, ensure the judge's exact language, limits, and timeframes are stated on the record or in hearing minutes. Request the court reporter to flag the ruling for transcription so the proposed order mirrors the oral ruling precisely.
Prepare a proposed order immediately
After the judge's ruling, draft a proposed order that matches the oral statements. Include entry blocks for clerk stamp and service instructions. Filing the proposed order promptly reduces the chance of misinterpretation or competing drafts.
Confirm service procedures and proof
Specify how service will occur — e-filing notice, email to counsel, or certified mail — and attach or file proof of service. Accurate service preserves appeal rights and prevents disputes about constructive notice.
Use clear dates and identifiers
Always use MM/DD/YYYY format for dates, include the full case caption and docket number, and avoid ambiguous phrases like 'within a week.' Clear identifiers help clerks and opposing parties comply with the new schedule.

Required Information and Data Elements for the Order

Case Caption: Exact party names as on case filings
Docket Number: Court-assigned number in full format
Judge Name: Presiding judge and courtroom division
Entry Date: Clerk's official docket entry date
Served Parties: List all counsel and pro se parties
Document Format: PDF/A preferred for court filings

Penalties and Risks of an Incorrect or Improperly Served Order

Misentered Deadline: Court may disregard extension
Late Service: Waiver of rights or sanctions
Incorrect Parties: Service failure, misnotice risk
Ambiguous Scope: Dispute over applicable deadlines
Missing Entry Stamp: Order not effective until entered
Noncompliance Sanctions: Monetary or evidentiary consequences

Common Mistakes to Avoid When Preparing This Order

  • Failing to memorialize the judge's exact on-the-record language, which creates ambiguity and invites conflicting drafts and disputes about scope.
  • Omitting the clerk's entry block or failing to request prompt docketing, which can delay the effective date and notice to parties.
  • Not serving the entered order to all parties promptly, risking procedural default or waiver of rights by the moving party.
  • Using vague date language instead of a precise MM/DD/YYYY entry, which leads to differing interpretations of compliance deadlines.

Frequently Asked Questions About Orders Granting Ore Tenus Motions for Extension of Time

Common questions about completing, entering, and serving an Order Granting Ore Tenus Motion for Extension of Time are answered below.


Need help? Contact support

Explore Templates

Rule 52 Findings by the Court Illinois Orders of Protection Journal of the Senate of the State of Vermont Consent and Oath of Guardian Ad Litem HB 780 Mississippi Legislature Publication 487 Rev 1 2006 Internal Revenue Service
be ready to get more
Join over 28 million airSlate SignNow users
Sign Now
Company
Forms
Pricing
Resources
Knowledge base
Other Products
© 2026 airSlate Inc. All rights reserved.