Can this be signed electronically?

Yes. Electronic signatures are legally valid under the ESIGN Act (15 U.S.C. §7001) and UETA where adopted, provided intent, consent, attribution, and retention criteria are met.

Does the employee need to sign?

Employee acknowledgement is recommended. Obtain employee signature or acknowledgement to confirm receipt and record any response to ratings.

Are notarization or witnesses required?

Not for standard performance evaluations. Notarization and witness requirements typically apply to wills, POAs, or deed-related documents, not employee reviews.

How long should copies be retained?

Retain final signed evaluations per federal and state rules; follow IRS and labor retention guidance and industry-specific rules like HIPAA for healthcare.

What if a field is entered incorrectly?

Correct via an agreed amendment that is signed and dated by relevant parties. Preserve earlier versions and an audit trail of changes for defensibility.

Can reviews be shared outside HR?

Limit access to authorized personnel. Sharing sensitive details may trigger privacy obligations under HIPAA or state privacy laws depending on content.

Electronic Signature
Templates
Miscellaneous
Performance Evaluation Model

Performance Evaluation Model

This template is fully customizable. Edit the text, fill out the fields, and send it for signature. Give it a try!

PERFORMANCE EVALUATION MODEL

This Performance Evaluation Model (the Model) is entered into by and between: Company Name: and Evaluator Name: .

WHEREAS

WHEREAS, Company requires a standardized, objective model for assessing performance of personnel, contractors and service providers engaged to deliver agreed services or goods; and

WHEREAS, Evaluator possesses the expertise and methodologies necessary to design and administer such assessments and to correlate evaluation results to compensation, remediation and development plans; and

WHEREAS, the parties wish to set forth the scope, metrics, scoring, confidentiality and use of evaluation outcomes in a binding model to apply to specified engagements and review periods.

SCOPE OF WORK

Evaluator shall design, administer and report performance evaluations in accordance with the criteria, schedules and procedures set forth in this Model. Evaluator's duties include definition of metrics, collection of objective data, compilation of ratings, preparation of written reports and presentation of findings to Company representatives.

Detailed Scope Description

Evaluation Period Start Evaluation Period End

PERFORMANCE METRICS AND SCORING

The Model uses weighted metrics and a defined scoring scale. Each metric will be measured against objective targets where feasible. The aggregate weighted score determines final rating and any performance-based adjustments.

Metric 1 — Name

Weight (%)

Target

Rating Scale

Comments on Metric 1 Metric 2 — Name

Weight (%)

Target

Rating Scale

Comments on Metric 2

PAYMENT TERMS

In consideration for services performed by Evaluator under this Model, Company shall pay Evaluator in accordance with the schedule and amounts set forth below. Payment is contingent upon delivery of reports and any required supporting data as specified.

Total Compensation Amount Payment Schedule

Late payments shall incur interest at the rate of per month on the unpaid balance, or the maximum rate allowed by law, whichever is less. Evaluator may suspend services if undisputed invoices remain unpaid after days' written notice.

TERM AND TERMINATION

This Model shall be effective as of Effective Date: and shall continue until End Date: , unless earlier terminated as provided below.

Either party may terminate this Model without cause upon days' prior written notice. Termination for cause may be effected immediately upon written notice for material breach that remains uncured for ten (10) days following receipt of written notice of breach.

CONFIDENTIALITY

All evaluation materials, raw data, individual scores, written reports and any deliberative notes (collectively Confidential Information) are the sole property of Company. Evaluator shall hold Confidential Information in strict confidence and shall not disclose such information except to Company personnel with a need to know or as compelled by law. Evaluator shall implement reasonable administrative, physical and technical safeguards to protect Confidential Information from unauthorized access, use or disclosure.

Notwithstanding the foregoing, Evaluator may use anonymized, aggregated data derived from evaluations for internal methodology development provided that such data cannot reasonably be re-identified and does not disclose performance of any identifiable individual or entity.

EVALUATION PROCEDURES

Evaluations shall be conducted by designated reviewers identified below, in accordance with the documented scoring methodology. Evaluator shall provide advance notice of evaluation activities and an opportunity for the evaluated party to review factual data prior to finalization of ratings.

Reviewer Role Review Frequency Scoring Methodology (Summary) Appeals Process

USE OF EVALUATION OUTCOMES

Final ratings may be used by Company for compensation adjustments, promotion or remedial action in accordance with Company policy. Any application of ratings to compensation or employment action shall be subject to the Company's internal review and applicable law. Evaluator makes no guarantees as to specific employment or compensation outcomes resulting from assessments.

GOVERNING LAW

This Model shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of , without regard to conflict of laws principles.

ENTIRE AGREEMENT

This Model, including all attachments and metric definitions, constitutes the entire agreement between the parties with respect to the subject matter hereof and supersedes all prior and contemporaneous agreements, proposals and communications, whether oral or written. Any amendment or modification must be in writing and signed by authorized representatives of both parties.

ASSESSMENT RECORD (TO BE COMPLETED BY EVALUATOR)

Subject of Evaluation Overall Weighted Score Final Rating Evaluator Comments Improvement / Development Plan Target Completion Date for Improvements

Company Representative Printed Name:

By:

Date:

Evaluator Printed Name:

By:

Date:

What the Performance Evaluation Model Is and when it applies

The Performance Evaluation Model is a structured template used to document employee performance, goals, competencies, ratings, and improvement plans. It standardizes review criteria across roles, captures evidence and reviewer comments, and records agreed next steps and timelines. Organizations use the model for annual or periodic reviews, probation assessments, promotion considerations, and performance-improvement plans. When completed accurately it creates a documented record of expectations, performance decisions, and any corrective actions tied to HR processes, personnel files, and, where applicable, compensation or disciplinary outcomes.

Why a consistent Performance Evaluation Model matters

A consistent model reduces subjectivity, creates audited documentation for personnel decisions, and supports compliance with employment law. Standard fields make comparisons and trend analysis possible while preserving a defensible record for promotions, terminations, or disciplinary actions.

Who typically completes or reviews this model

Use role-based permissions and version control so each reviewer completes only their assigned sections and the final signed copy is preserved.

Line managers complete criteria, ratings, and development actions; HR reviews for policy consistency and record retention.
HR administrators standardize templates, schedule reviews, and retain the official file in the personnel record.
Employees provide self-assessments and sign acknowledgement; executive reviewers approve calibration changes where required.

Who can sign and approve the completed model

Manager Signer

The direct manager listed in the employee’s HR record typically signs to certify the review occurred, summarizes performance findings, and confirms the development plan. Their signature documents managerial input used for pay and promotion decisions.

HR Approver

An HR representative or records custodian signs or timestamps to confirm policy compliance and placement in the official personnel file. HR signing also documents retention start dates and any privacy or disclosure notices.

Core elements included in a professional Performance Evaluation Model

A complete model should include identifying data, performance criteria, rating scales, evidence sections, development actions, and an approval/signature block so reviews are auditable and actionable.

Employee details

Name, job title, department, manager, employee ID, and employment start date to link the review to official personnel records.

Review period

Start and end dates for the performance period being assessed; clarifies the timeframe for evidence and goal evaluation.

Performance criteria

List of competencies, objectives, or KPIs with clear descriptions so each rating is tied to observable standards.

Ratings and scale

Numeric or descriptive scale (for example 1–5, or Exceeds/Meets/Below) with explicit definitions for each level.

Comments and evidence

Space for reviewer examples, employee self-assessment, and supporting documents referenced in the review.

Action plan

Development steps, timelines, owner assignments, follow-up dates, and signatures to confirm agreement.

Essential fields and required data points

Employee name: Full legal name

Job title: Current role title

Review period: MM/DD/YYYY range

Rating scale: Defined scale used

Reviewer name: Manager or assessor

Signature block: Signed and dated

Step-by-step: completing the Performance Evaluation Model

Follow these steps in order to complete, review, and finalize the evaluation while preserving an auditable record.

01

Prepare data: Gather goals, metrics, and supporting documents.
02

Complete ratings: Manager enters ratings and supporting comments.
03

Employee input: Employee provides self-assessment and response.
04

Finalize and sign: HR verifies, then sign and date the final copy.

Configure an online workflow for reviews

Set up role-based routing, required fields, and reminders so each review follows the same approval path and timing.

Field	Configuration
Required fields	Mark employee, reviewer, rating, and signature as mandatory
Routing order	Manager → Employee acknowledgement → HR approval
Notifications	Email reminders at customizable intervals
Access control	Limit edit rights to assigned reviewers

Where to send and how to file completed evaluations

Completed evaluations should be routed to HR and stored in the employee’s official personnel file, with copies provided to the employee and manager.

Manager delivery: Manager completes and sends to employee for acknowledgement
HR filing: HR receives approved copy for retention
Employee copy: Provide employee a signed PDF copy
Records system: Store final copy in HRIS or document repository

Options for digital completion and e-signature

Ensure the selected tool supports retention, access controls, and any required legal or regulatory safeguards before rollout.

File formats: PDF and DOCX supported
Authentication: Email, SMS, or stronger options
Integrations: Connect to HRIS and cloud storage

Typical timelines and filing expectations

Establish dates and reminders for each stage to ensure timely completion and to meet organizational or legal recordkeeping needs.

Annual review deadline:

Set firm date each year for completion and signatures

Probationary review timing:

Complete within the probation period timeframe

Follow-up check-ins:

Schedule interim reviews for improvement plans

HR filing timeline:

File final copy in personnel system immediately

Access requests:

Handle employee copy requests per policy

Key milestones during the review lifecycle

Track major milestones so reviewers and employees understand required actions and timelines.

01

Goal-setting

Agree objectives at start of period.

02

Mid-cycle check

Provide formative feedback and adjustments.

03

Final assessment

Manager completes ratings and comments.

04

Follow-up action

Implement development plan and monitor progress.

Common mistakes to avoid when preparing evaluations

Using vague or subjective language without examples reduces the document’s defensibility during disputes.
Failing to capture the review period dates or mismatching metrics can invalidate comparisons and reports.
Allowing unsigned or undated reviews into the personnel file may cause administrative and legal complications later.
Not preserving supporting evidence or emails referenced in the evaluation undermines performance claims.

Risks and legal consequences of incorrect or incomplete reviews

Discrimination claim risk: Insufficient documentation increases exposure

Recordkeeping violations: Failing retention may breach state rules

Employment dispute costs: Litigation and settlement expenses

Audit deficiencies: Regulatory audits may cite gaps

Data privacy breaches: Improper access risks HIPAA/CCPA issues

Statute of limitations: Missing dates affect legal defenses

Real-world examples of the model in use

These case notes illustrate how organizations apply the Performance Evaluation Model to improve recordkeeping and review cycles.

Martin Properties

Tim Martin used the model to centralize approvals and reduce turnaround time.

He noted mobile access helped field managers sign on-site.
"I can process and execute all of these documents online with 100% compliance and built-in security," enabling faster file retention and fewer missing signatures.

Fertility Centers of Illinois

John Butler cited integration with HR systems to automate filing and audits.

The API moved signed reviews into personnel records automatically.
"The airSlate SignNow team has been exceptional, responsive, the API has been great," which simplified compliance and record retrieval for audits.

E-signature vendor comparison relevant to completing Performance Evaluation Models

Cost and capability differences can affect security, HIPAA readiness, and bulk processing for high-volume review programs. Compare core plan attributes below.

	signNow	DocuSign	Adobe Sign	PandaDoc	HelloSign
Starting Price	$8/user/mo	$15/user/mo	$14/user/mo	$19/user/mo	$15/user/mo
Free Trial	7-day free trial	No	No	No	No
Bulk Send	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	No
Audit Trail	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes
HIPAA Compliant	Yes	Yes	Yes	No	No

FAQs and troubleshooting for the Performance Evaluation Model

Common questions about completion, signatures, storage, and legal validity with concise answers to resolve typical issues.

Need help? Contact support

Can this be signed electronically?
Yes. Electronic signatures are legally valid under the ESIGN Act (15 U.S.C. §7001) and UETA where adopted, provided intent, consent, attribution, and retention criteria are met.
Does the employee need to sign?
Employee acknowledgement is recommended. Obtain employee signature or acknowledgement to confirm receipt and record any response to ratings.
Are notarization or witnesses required?
Not for standard performance evaluations. Notarization and witness requirements typically apply to wills, POAs, or deed-related documents, not employee reviews.
How long should copies be retained?
Retain final signed evaluations per federal and state rules; follow IRS and labor retention guidance and industry-specific rules like HIPAA for healthcare.
What if a field is entered incorrectly?
Correct via an agreed amendment that is signed and dated by relevant parties. Preserve earlier versions and an audit trail of changes for defensibility.
Can reviews be shared outside HR?
Limit access to authorized personnel. Sharing sensitive details may trigger privacy obligations under HIPAA or state privacy laws depending on content.

be ready to get more

Join over 28 million airSlate SignNow users

Sign Now