Is an electronic signature legally binding?

Yes. Electronic signatures are legally valid for most commercial transactions under the ESIGN Act (15 U.S.C. ch. 96) and UETA where adopted. Exceptions include wills, certain court filings, and similar categories spelled out by statute.

Which authentication level should I use?

Choose authentication based on risk: email-only for low-risk approvals, SMS or SSO for moderate risk, and stronger methods or KBA for high‑risk or regulated processes requiring non‑repudiation.

What if a signer claims they did not sign?

Preserve the audit trail immediately. A complete trail with signer identity, timestamp, IP, and consent evidence strengthens enforceability and helps resolve disputes.

Can I require notarization for the form?

Yes, if local policy requires it for the record type. Remote online notarization (RON) is permitted in many states with identity proofing and recorded audio‑video; check state notary rules before relying on RON.

How do I correct a submitted form?

If an error is discovered, create a new version with a revision note and require re‑signing by affected parties. Maintain both versions in the retention record to preserve auditability.

How long must I keep completed evaluations?

Retain records according to applicable federal and industry standards: generally a minimum of 3 years for tax or financial relevance, 6 years for HIPAA contexts, and longer where state or contract terms require it.

Electronic Signature
Templates
Miscellaneous
Product Evaluation Form

Product Evaluation Form

This template is fully customizable. Edit the text, fill out the fields, and send it for signature. Give it a try!

PRODUCT EVALUATION FORM

This Product Evaluation Form and accompanying agreement set forth the terms under which the Evaluator will examine, test, and report on the product(s) described below for the Company. Completion and signature of this form constitutes acceptance of the terms contained herein.

Parties

Evaluator Name Company / Client Name

Recitals

WHEREAS, Company has developed or procured the product identified as Product Name: , Model/Version: , and desires an independent evaluation of its performance and compliance; and

WHEREAS, Evaluator represents that it has the qualifications, facilities, and methodologies necessary to perform the evaluation described herein and will perform the evaluation pursuant to the terms, confidentiality obligations, and limitations set forth in this form.

Scope of Work

Detailed Scope of Work

The Evaluator shall perform the tests, inspections, and analyses described above and shall document methods, equipment, environmental conditions, and results in a written Evaluation Report delivered to Company as provided in Payment Terms and Term sections below.

Product Details

Product Name Manufacturer Model / Part Number Serial / Batch Number

Manufacture Date:

Date Received:

Quantity Submitted:

Evaluation Criteria

For each criterion below, indicate pass/fail, assign a numeric rating where requested, and provide brief comments where applicable.

Functionality Pass Fail Rating:

Performance Pass Fail Rating:

Safety / Compliance Pass Fail Rating:

Usability / Ergonomics Pass Fail Rating:

Testing Methodology & Environment

Methodology / Test Procedures Test Environment (location, equipment, conditions)

Acceptance Criteria & Deliverables

Acceptance Criteria Deliverables (report, data files, raw logs)

Findings and Recommendations

Overall Rating Material Defects / Nonconformances Recommendations and Corrective Actions Attachments (photos, logs, certificates)

Payment Terms

Company shall pay Evaluator the fees described below in consideration for the services and deliverables. Payment is due in accordance with the schedule below. Late payments shall accrue interest as stated.

Evaluation Fee (total) Payment Schedule Late Fee / Interest

Term and Termination

This Agreement commences on Start Date: and shall continue until End Date: , unless earlier terminated in accordance with the provisions below.

Termination Notice Period

Either party may terminate this Agreement for material breach if the breach remains uncured for the notice period specified above. Termination shall not relieve Company of its obligation to pay for services performed and deliverables delivered prior to termination, subject to offsets for documented material nonconformance.

Confidentiality

Evaluator shall hold in strict confidence and not disclose to any third party any Confidential Information received from Company, except as required by law or as necessary to perform the evaluation. Confidential Information includes test data, design details, manufacturing processes, trade secrets, and any non-public reports. Evaluator shall use Confidential Information solely for the purpose of performing the evaluation and shall implement reasonable security measures to prevent unauthorized disclosure. Obligations of confidentiality shall survive termination for a period of three (3) years or longer if required by applicable law for certain technical data.

Governing Law

This Agreement shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of , without regard to conflict of law principles.

Entire Agreement

This form, together with any attachments and referenced schedules executed by the parties, constitutes the entire agreement between the parties with respect to the subject matter hereof and supersedes all prior agreements and understandings, whether written or oral. No modification is effective unless in writing and signed by authorized representatives of both parties.

Certifications

Evaluator certifies that the evaluation will be performed with professional care, in accordance with the stated methodology, and that results reported are true and accurate to the best of Evaluator's knowledge. Company represents that it has the right to provide the product and related Confidential Information for evaluation and that such disclosure does not violate any third-party rights.

Evaluator Name:

By:

Date:

Company Representative:

By:

Date:

What the Product Evaluation Form Is and when teams use it

A Product Evaluation Form is a structured document used to record objective assessments of a product's features, performance, compliance, and fit with business requirements. Typical uses include vendor selection, pre-release QA, procurement reviews, and post‑pilot assessments. The form standardizes criteria, captures evidence and reviewer comments, and creates a documented decision record that supports approvals, audits, and future comparisons across versions or suppliers. Organizations adapt the form to include scoring rubrics, mandatory fields, attachments for test results, and signature lines for accountable reviewers.

Why a consistent evaluation form improves decisions

A consistent Product Evaluation Form reduces bias, speeds comparisons across options, preserves an audit-ready record, and clarifies who approved each decision. It creates a single source of truth for future reviews and helps demonstrate due diligence for procurement, compliance, or audit purposes.

Primary users and how they interact with the form

Several functional roles typically complete or review a Product Evaluation Form depending on context and risk level.

Product managers and owners who define evaluation criteria and lead scoring across features and requirements.
Procurement and sourcing teams that compare vendor proposals, confirm pricing terms, and document vendor due diligence.
Compliance, legal, or security reviewers who verify regulatory, contractual, and data handling obligations before approval.

Assign clear ownership for completion, review, and final approval to avoid delays and ensure legal accountability.

Core sections that make the form effective

A professional Product Evaluation Form groups information to support repeatable scoring, evidence capture, version control, and clear authorization.

Product details

Clear identification: product name, version or SKU, vendor, and product URL or reference document to avoid ambiguity during comparisons.

Evaluation criteria

A defined rubric with measurable criteria (functionality, performance, security, compliance, cost) and scoring guidance to ensure consistent ratings across evaluators.

Evidence attachments

Space to attach test reports, screenshots, specification sheets, or third‑party certifications that substantiate scores and enable later audits.

Reviewer comments

Structured comment fields for each criterion and an overall assessment section for exceptions, mitigation actions, and recommended next steps.

Decision record

A summarized outcome field that records the recommended disposition (approve, pilot, reject), rationale, and any follow‑up required.

Authorization

Designated signature blocks and dates for responsible parties, plus fields for required approvals from procurement, legal, and product leadership.

Security and compliance elements to include

Encryption: AES-256 at rest

Transport security: TLS 1.2/1.3 in transit

Access controls: Role-based permissions

Audit trail: Detailed signing logs

HIPAA readiness: BAA available when required

Retention flags: Versioned recordkeeping

Risks if the form is incomplete or incorrect

Procurement delay: Missed contract start dates

Contractual exposure: Unvetted vendor obligations

Regulatory breach: Data handling violations possible

Audit findings: Insufficient due diligence documented

Incorrect decisions: Wrong product selected

Record loss: Retention noncompliance

Common preparation mistakes to avoid

Using inconsistent scoring rubrics across evaluators, which makes quantitative comparisons unreliable and weakens procurement decisions.
Failing to attach supporting evidence or test outputs, leaving scores unsubstantiated and increasing risk during audits or disputes.
Skipping required approvals or signatures, causing downstream contract invalidation or missed compliance checks during implementation.
Working from multiple template versions without version control, which creates confusion over the authoritative record and complicates retention.

Step-by-step: complete the Product Evaluation Form

Follow these sequential steps to gather information, evaluate objectively, and obtain required approvals.

01

Collect specifications: Assemble product datasheets, test plans, and vendor responses for reference.
02

Score criteria: Apply the rubric consistently for each criterion and record numerical scores.
03

Attach evidence: Upload test results, screenshots, or certifications supporting each score.
04

Approve and sign: Obtain reviewer signatures and record dates for the decision record.

How the review and approval flow operates

A clear routing path reduces turnaround time and ensures each reviewer sees relevant sections.

Prepare form: Populate product fields and attach required documents.
Assign reviewers: Send to technical, security, and procurement reviewers in order.
Collect input: Reviewers submit scores, comments, and attachments.
Finalize decision: Authorized signer records the final disposition and date.

Digital workflow settings to configure

Configure routing, authentication, and storage before distributing the form to reviewers.

Field	Configuration
Routing	Sequential reviewers with escalation rules
Authentication	Email match, SMS code, or stronger MFA
Notifications	Automatic reminders and due-date alerts
Storage	Encrypted repository with versioning

Technical considerations for eSubmission and sharing

Choose a platform that supports secure uploads, audit trails, and the required authentication level for signers.

File formats: PDF, DOCX supported
Integrations: Connects to Google Workspace and Microsoft 365
Authentication: Email, SMS, or SSO options

Typical timelines and processing expectations

Set clear review windows and enforce deadlines to keep evaluation cycles predictable.

Initial evaluation window:

7–14 calendar days for preliminary scoring

Technical review period:

3–7 business days depending on scope

Procurement decision deadline:

Typically 10 business days after final review

Vendor response time:

Allow 5–10 business days for vendor clarifications

Archived record timing:

Archive finalized form immediately after approval

Key milestones from draft to archive

Track milestone completion to measure cycle time and identify bottlenecks.

01

Draft prepared

Form is populated with product data and attachments.

02

Review cycles

Evaluators submit scores and comments during allocated windows.

03

Final approval

Authorized signer records the outcome and date.

04

Archival

Approved form and evidence are moved to secure storage.

How a Product Evaluation Form compares to an RFP checklist

The two templates serve different needs: evaluative scoring versus vendor solicitation and contract terms.

Criteria	Product Evaluation Form	Vendor RFP Template
Purpose	score products	solicit vendor proposals
Required Signatures	reviewers and approver	procurement and legal
Use of eSign	yes for approvals	yes for contract acceptance
Typical users	product, procurement	procurement, legal

Typical eSignature vendor comparison for form workflows

Basic pricing and capability differences affect cost and deployment for high-volume or regulated workflows; signNow is listed first for comparison purposes.

	signNow	DocuSign	Adobe Sign	PandaDoc	HelloSign
Starting Price	$8/user/mo	$15/user/mo	$14/user/mo	$19/user/mo	$15/user/mo
Free Trial	Yes, 7-day trial	Varies by plan	Varies by plan	Varies by plan	Varies by plan
Bulk Send	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	No
Audit Trail	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes
HIPAA Compliant	Yes	Yes	Yes	No	No

Real-world examples of practical use

Examples show how organizations use the form to speed decisions, preserve evidence, and support audits.

Optica Ventures

A venture firm standardized its evaluation form for portfolio diligence to reduce review time across partners

Scored vendors on identical rubrics to allow direct comparison
The standardized record improved transparency and made post‑deal audits and board reporting faster and clearer.

Martin Properties

A property management firm used digital evaluation forms for vendor software selection

Collected test reports and live demos in one place
The consolidated evidence and signatures enabled procurement to finalize vendor contracts without repeated in‑person meetings, saving days of delay.

Practical tips for accurate, efficient completion

Apply clear rules for scoring, evidence, and signoff to minimize rework and strengthen decision defensibility.

Standardize the rubric

Use a fixed scoring scale and definitions for each level of performance so evaluators apply ratings consistently and comparisons remain meaningful over time.

Require supporting evidence

Mandate attachments or test outputs for any non‑perfect score; documented evidence reduces subjective disagreement and helps during audits or vendor disputes.

Enforce version control

Keep a single authoritative template and track changes with version numbers and change logs to prevent use of stale forms that omit new mandatory fields.

Use authenticated eSignatures

Collect signatures with an audit trail that captures signer identity, timestamp, and IP address to support legal enforceability and internal governance requirements.

Frequently asked questions about form completion and electronic signing

Answers to common questions about legal validity, signature problems, and recordkeeping when using an electronic Product Evaluation Form.

Need help? Contact support

Is an electronic signature legally binding?
Yes. Electronic signatures are legally valid for most commercial transactions under the ESIGN Act (15 U.S.C. ch. 96) and UETA where adopted. Exceptions include wills, certain court filings, and similar categories spelled out by statute.
Which authentication level should I use?
Choose authentication based on risk: email-only for low-risk approvals, SMS or SSO for moderate risk, and stronger methods or KBA for high‑risk or regulated processes requiring non‑repudiation.
What if a signer claims they did not sign?
Preserve the audit trail immediately. A complete trail with signer identity, timestamp, IP, and consent evidence strengthens enforceability and helps resolve disputes.
Can I require notarization for the form?
Yes, if local policy requires it for the record type. Remote online notarization (RON) is permitted in many states with identity proofing and recorded audio‑video; check state notary rules before relying on RON.
How do I correct a submitted form?
If an error is discovered, create a new version with a revision note and require re‑signing by affected parties. Maintain both versions in the retention record to preserve auditability.
How long must I keep completed evaluations?
Retain records according to applicable federal and industry standards: generally a minimum of 3 years for tax or financial relevance, 6 years for HIPAA contexts, and longer where state or contract terms require it.

be ready to get more

Join over 28 million airSlate SignNow users

Sign Now