Can the form be signed electronically?

Yes. Electronic signatures generally meet legal requirements under the ESIGN Act (15 U.S.C. ch. 96) and UETA where adopted, provided intent, consent, attribution, and reliable retention are established.

Is notarization or witnessing normally required?

No. Standard project critique forms rarely require notarization or witnesses unless the form is converted into a contract or affidavit that triggers state-specific authentication rules.

How long should I retain the signed form?

Retention depends on business and regulatory needs: keep during active project lifespan plus at least three years; follow IRS, HIPAA, or other applicable record rules.

Who must sign the document?

Primary author (project manager), a designated reviewer or sponsor, and any approver required by governance; record titles along with names and dates.

Can I amend the form after signoff?

Yes, but record the amendment as a new version with date, reason, and approvals. Maintain the original signed copy as part of the audit trail.

What supporting documents should be attached?

Attach key evidence such as schedule reports, budget variance summaries, defect logs, and stakeholder feedback to substantiate findings and recommendations.

Project Critique Form

This template is fully customizable. Edit the text, fill out the fields, and send it for signature. Give it a try!

Project Critique Form

This Project Critique Agreement is entered into by the following parties for the purpose of conducting a formal critique and evaluation of the project identified below.

Parties and Project Identification

Client Name:

Reviewer Name:

Project Title:

Project Reference/ID:

WHEREAS

WHEREAS, Client has engaged Reviewer to perform an independent critique and documented assessment of the Project identified above to evaluate performance against agreed objectives, quality standards, schedule, and budget; and

WHEREAS, Reviewer possesses relevant subject-matter expertise and shall provide observations, findings, and recommendations to assist Client in improving outcomes and informing future decision-making; and

NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises herein, the parties agree as follows:

Scope of Work

Reviewer shall perform a critique limited to the matters described below. The critique shall include inspection of documentation, interviews as necessary, written findings, and recommended remedial or enhancement actions.

Detailed Scope (describe specific tasks, documents to be reviewed, and deliverables):

Evaluation Criteria and Findings

The Reviewer will assess the Project using the criteria below. For each category, indicate a rating and provide brief commentary.

Design & Technical Quality — Rating (1-5): Design Commentary: Execution & Implementation — Rating (1-5): Execution Commentary: Schedule & Milestones — Rating (1-5): Schedule Commentary: Budget & Cost Control — Rating (1-5): Budget Commentary:

Payment Terms

Client agrees to pay Reviewer the fee set forth below in consideration for the critique services described in this Agreement.

Fee Amount (USD): Payment Schedule: Late Payment Fee:

Term and Termination

This Agreement commences on the Start Date and continues until the completion of the Scope of Work or the End Date, unless earlier terminated in accordance with this section.

Start Date: End Date:

Notice Period for Termination (days):

Either party may terminate this Agreement for material breach that remains uncured for the notice period above. Termination shall not relieve Client of payment obligations for services performed and documented prior to termination.

Confidentiality

Reviewer acknowledges that in the performance of the critique Reviewer may receive confidential or proprietary information of Client. Reviewer shall: (a) hold such information in strict confidence; (b) use the confidential information solely for the purpose of performing the Scope of Work; and (c) not disclose confidential information to any third party except with Client's prior written consent or as required by law. Confidential information does not include information that is or becomes generally available to the public through no fault of Reviewer or that Reviewer independently developed without reference to Client's confidential information.

Governing Law

This Agreement shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of: without regard to conflict-of-law principles.

Entire Agreement

This document, together with any attachments or schedules expressly incorporated herein, constitutes the entire agreement between the parties with respect to the subject matter and supersedes all prior and contemporaneous agreements, representations, and understandings, whether written or oral. Any modification to this Agreement must be in writing and signed by both parties.

Additional Findings and Recommendations

Summary of Key Findings: Priority Recommendations (actionable items):

Administrative Details

Location of Review:

Date of Critique Completion:

Attachments / Documents Reviewed (list):

Reviewer Certification

By signing below, Reviewer certifies that the critique was conducted objectively and that the findings and recommendations contained in this document are true and accurate to the best of Reviewer's knowledge. Reviewer further certifies that all fees owing under Payment Terms shall be invoiced and are due in accordance with this Agreement.

Client Printed Name:

By:

Date:

Reviewer Printed Name:

By:

Date:

What the Project Critique Form Is

A Project Critique Form is a structured post-project document used to record what worked, what did not, and recommended actions for future projects. It captures objective project details, stakeholder feedback, performance against scope, schedule, budget, and risks. Organizations use the form to surface root causes, assign corrective actions, and create an auditable record for continuous improvement. The document is typically completed by the project team and reviewed by sponsors and key stakeholders, then archived for lessons-learned and compliance purposes.

Why a Formal Project Critique Matters

A structured critique improves accountability, preserves institutional knowledge, and reduces repeat mistakes by documenting evidence-based findings and assigned follow-ups. It supports governance, audits, and better project estimating.

Who Typically Completes the Project Critique Form

Final review and signoff by the sponsor or governance board closes the critique and triggers any assigned remediation activities.

Project Manager — Leads completion, compiles inputs, and records corrective actions for closure.
Project Team Members — Provide operational feedback, log issues, and suggest process improvements.
Project Sponsor / Stakeholder — Reviews outcomes and approves prioritized action items.

Typical Signers and Their Roles

Alex Rivera, Project Manager

Responsible for preparing and consolidating the critique, Alex documents objective metrics, facilitates team input sessions, and ensures corrective actions are assigned and tracked until closure.

Jordan Lee, Program Sponsor

As sponsor, Jordan reviews findings, allocates resources for remediations, and signs off on the final critique to confirm governance-level acceptance and prioritization.

Core Elements to Include in a Professional Form

A complete Project Critique Form presents factual metrics, root-cause analysis, and actionable recommendations to support improvement and auditability.

Project Summary

Concise scope, objectives, timeline, budget, and high-level outcomes so reviewers can quickly understand context without consulting separate records.

Performance Metrics

Key measures such as schedule variance, budget variance, scope changes, quality metrics, and stakeholder satisfaction captured with dates and numeric values.

Root-Cause Analysis

Structured analysis (5 Whys, fishbone) showing evidence and causal links rather than opinions; supports targeted corrective actions.

Lessons Learned

Practical observations and process changes categorized by team, tools, procurement, and communication to inform future projects.

Action Plan

Assigned owners, due dates, priority, and acceptance criteria for each corrective action or process change item to ensure closure.

Approvals & Archive

Signatures, dates, version history, and storage location documented for governance, compliance, and later retrieval.

Essential Fields to Capture

Project Title: One-line project name

Project ID: Unique identifier

Completion Date: MM/DD/YYYY

Lead Author: Full name and title

Approving Sponsor: Name and title

Version: Revision number

Step-by-Step: Completing the Form

Follow these steps in order to gather evidence, prepare a balanced critique, and finalize approvals so the form is complete, auditable, and actionable.

01

Collect Inputs: Gather metrics, logs, and stakeholder feedback.
02

Aggregate Findings: Summarize successes, failures, and deviations.
03

Analyze Causes: Use root-cause methods and document evidence.
04

Assign Actions: Record owners, due dates, and priorities.

Configuring an Online Review Workflow

Typical online workflows route the form, collect signatures, and record audit data; set these fields when you build the workflow.

Field	Configuration
Reviewer Sequence	Sequential approval routing
Authentication	Email link or SMS code
Reminder Schedule	Auto-reminders at set intervals
Archive Location	Designated secure storage

Typical Submission and Approval Flow

A simple eSubmission flow reduces turnaround and preserves an audit trail; below are common sequential steps.

Prepare Form: Complete fields and attach evidence files.
Route to Reviewers: Send via email or signing link.
Collect Signatures: Obtain required approvals electronically.
Archive Record: Store signed copy with audit trail.

Digital Submission and eSigning Considerations

Ensure the chosen platform supports your organization’s security and compliance requirements including encryption and access controls.

Supported Formats: PDF and DOCX preserve content and formatting during signing.
Authentication Options: Email link, SMS code, or stronger KBA where required.
Audit Trail: Must record signer identity, IP, timestamp, and actions.

How This Form Differs from Similar Reviews

Compare common review documents to choose the right template and appropriate level of formality for lessons-learned capture.

Document Type	Project Critique Form	Post-Implementation Report
Purpose	operational lessons	formal compliance
Timing	at closeout	after stabilization
Approvals	sponsor required	governance board required
Typical Audience	project team	executive stakeholders

Typical eSignature Vendor Pricing and Features

Common vendor choices for signing and routing Project Critique Forms are shown below. signNow is listed first per vendor comparison conventions.

	signNow	DocuSign	Adobe Sign	PandaDoc	HelloSign
Starting Price	$8/user/mo	$15/user/mo	$14/user/mo	$19/user/mo	$15/user/mo
Free Trial	7-day trial	Varies	Varies	Varies	Varies
Bulk Send	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	No
Audit Trail	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes
HIPAA Compliant	Yes	Yes	Yes	No	No

Risks and Consequences of Improper Completion

Inaccurate Findings: May mislead decisions

Missing Approvals: Governance gaps arise

Broken Audit Trail: Weakens evidentiary value

PHI Exposure: HIPAA compliance risk

Contractual Impact: May affect remedies

Reputational Harm: Stakeholder confidence drops

Common Preparation Mistakes to Avoid

Relying on memory instead of documented evidence, which creates inaccuracies and weak root-cause analysis.
Failing to assign single owners for action items, leading to unresolved recommendations and process drift.
Using subjective language without metrics, making the critique hard to verify or to audit during reviews.
Neglecting to preserve version history and approvals, which reduces the record’s admissibility for governance or legal review.

How to Download, Save, and Share Final Records

Store signed critiques in standardized formats and record version metadata to ensure long-term accessibility and compliance.

File Formats

Export signed documents as PDF/A or PDF to preserve layout, metadata, and audit trail for long-term retention and easy sharing.

Version Control

Include version number, date, and a short change log in the document header so reviewers can trace edits and approvals.

Storage Location

Store signed files in secure document repositories with access controls, encryption at rest, and immutable retention where required.

Attachments

Attach supporting evidence—logs, screenshots, budgets—label each file clearly and reference it in the main critique body.

Common Questions About the Project Critique Form

Answers to frequent questions about eSigning, retention, signatory authority, and amendment procedures for the Project Critique Form.

Need help? Contact support

Can the form be signed electronically?
Yes. Electronic signatures generally meet legal requirements under the ESIGN Act (15 U.S.C. ch. 96) and UETA where adopted, provided intent, consent, attribution, and reliable retention are established.
Is notarization or witnessing normally required?
No. Standard project critique forms rarely require notarization or witnesses unless the form is converted into a contract or affidavit that triggers state-specific authentication rules.
How long should I retain the signed form?
Retention depends on business and regulatory needs: keep during active project lifespan plus at least three years; follow IRS, HIPAA, or other applicable record rules.
Who must sign the document?
Primary author (project manager), a designated reviewer or sponsor, and any approver required by governance; record titles along with names and dates.
Can I amend the form after signoff?
Yes, but record the amendment as a new version with date, reason, and approvals. Maintain the original signed copy as part of the audit trail.
What supporting documents should be attached?
Attach key evidence such as schedule reports, budget variance summaries, defect logs, and stakeholder feedback to substantiate findings and recommendations.

be ready to get more

Join over 28 million airSlate SignNow users

Sign Now