Can a feasibility review be signed electronically?

Yes. Electronic signatures are generally legally valid under the federal ESIGN Act (15 U.S.C. ch. 96) and state UETA laws where adopted. Ensure intent, consent, signer attribution, and reliable record retention. Exemptions (e.g., wills, some court filings) may still require wet signatures.

Do feasibility reviews require notarization or witnesses?

Most Project Feasibility Reviews do not require notarization or witnesses. When approvals are tied to land use, permits, or statutory filings, notarization rules or witness requirements may apply. Check state rules and RON availability; RON laws vary and may require identity proofing and audio-video recording.

How long should I retain signed reviews?

Retention depends on content: keep financial and tax-related records at least three years per IRC §6501(a). Healthcare-related documents fall under HIPAA 45 CFR §164.530(j) (six years). Maintain audit trails and signed PDFs to satisfy compliance and auditing needs.

What are common reasons for review rejection?

Rejections often occur due to incomplete fields, mismatched signatory names, missing supporting documentation, unsigned required approvals, or absent consent disclosures for consumer-facing records. Inadequate version control or missing audit trails also cause administrative rework and delay approvals.

Can an eSignature vendor meet HIPAA or 21 CFR Part 11?

Some eSignature vendors support HIPAA and 21 CFR Part 11 compliance. For HIPAA, a signed Business Associate Agreement is typically required. Evaluate vendor certifications such as SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001, AES-256 encryption, and 21 CFR Part 11 capabilities before relying on e-signatures.

How do I ensure signature authenticity and auditability?

Use clear signer authentication, time-stamped audit trails, and tamper-evident signed PDFs. Document signer intent and consent, capture signer contact and IP data, and retain certificates of completion. Where required, use higher-assurance methods such as two-factor authentication or PKI-based digital signatures.

Electronic Signature
Templates
Project Management
Project Feasibility Review

Project Feasibility Review

This template is fully customizable. Edit the text, fill out the fields, and send it for signature. Give it a try!

PROJECT FEASIBILITY REVIEW

Project Identification

Project ID Project Title

Client Name: Client Contact:

Client Address

Service Provider: Project Manager:

Project Manager Contact

Review Date:

Executive Summary

Purpose and Objectives

Background

Scope of Review

In-Scope Items:

Out-of-Scope Items:

Methodology

The review included the following activities (check all that apply):

Technical architecture analysis Vendor assessment Financial modeling

Stakeholder interviews Proof of concept / prototype

Feasibility Assessments

Technical Feasibility — Findings and Rationale Operational Feasibility — Findings and Rationale Financial Feasibility — Estimates and Assumptions

Estimated Total Cost: $ Anticipated Annual Benefit: $

Schedule and Milestones

Proposed Start Date: Proposed End Date:

Key Milestones

Deliverables and Acceptance Criteria

Deliverable 1 — Description Acceptance Criteria Deliverable 2 — Description Acceptance Criteria

Resources, Dependencies and Risks

Resource and Staffing Requirements Key Dependencies and Constraints Top Risks and Mitigations

Budget, Payment and Change Control

Total Estimated Budget Recommended Payment Schedule Change Order Process

Legal, Compliance and Confidentiality

Confidentiality: The information and analyses contained in this Project Feasibility Review are confidential and proprietary. Each party agrees to protect confidential information using at least the same standard of care it uses for its own confidential information and not to disclose or use such information except as required to exercise rights or perform obligations under this Review or related contractual arrangements.

Regulatory / Compliance Considerations

Governing Law: The interpretation and enforcement of this Review shall be governed by the laws of the state of without regard to conflict-of-law principles.

Recommendation and Decision

Recommendation (select one):

Proceed as proposed Proceed with conditions (specify below) Defer pending further analysis Reject / Do not proceed

Rationale and Conditions

Certification

The undersigned certify that the information contained in this Project Feasibility Review is true, accurate and complete to the best of their knowledge, and that the findings and recommendations reflect the assessments performed in accordance with the methodology described herein. The parties agree that any subsequent engagement to implement the project will be governed by a separate statement of work and contract.

Client Printed Name:

By:

Date:

Service Provider Printed Name:

By:

Date:

What a Project Feasibility Review Is

A Project Feasibility Review is a structured assessment that evaluates whether a proposed project is technically viable, financially justified, and aligned with organizational objectives. It examines scope, schedule, resource needs, cost estimates, risk factors, regulatory constraints, and stakeholder requirements to determine the likelihood of successful delivery. The review synthesizes quantitative analysis—budget forecasts, cashflow or ROI projections, and schedule modeling—with qualitative factors like market demand, legal compliance, and operational impact. Results typically include recommendations, go/no-go decisions, and conditions for proceeding. It supports executive decision-making.

Why a Feasibility Review Matters

Conducting a Project Feasibility Review clarifies project assumptions, reduces financial uncertainty, identifies regulatory or permitting hurdles, and uncovers key risks before significant resources are committed. The review improves decision quality and documents conditions needed to mitigate risks and meet stakeholder expectations.

Who Typically Prepares and Uses These Reviews

Typical users include project managers, business analysts, finance teams, legal counsel, and executive sponsors who assess feasibility and approve next steps.

Project managers and PMOs evaluating schedule and resource fit constraints.
Finance teams running cost-benefit and ROI sensitivity scenarios before approval.
Legal and compliance for permits, contracts, and regulatory reviews filings.

Smaller organizations may assign combined roles while larger enterprises use cross-functional committees to conduct more formal feasibility reviews.

Core Sections to Include in a Professional Review

A professional review organizes analysis into discrete sections to evaluate technical feasibility, financial viability, regulatory compliance, schedule realism, stakeholder impact, and identified risks for informed decision-making.

Executive Summary

Summarizes scope, objectives, primary conclusions, and the recommended decision (go, modify, or stop). Includes high-level cost estimate, key risks, and required conditions for approval so executives can act efficiently.

Technical Assessment

Details system architecture, build vs buy analysis, required technologies, dependencies, and feasibility of integrations. Highlights technical gaps, resource skill needs, and estimated timelines for prototype and production readiness.

Financial Analysis

Presents capital and operating cost estimates, funding sources, cashflow projections, break-even analysis, sensitivity testing, and a forecasted return on investment to inform budgetary and funding decisions.

Regulatory Review

Identifies permits, licenses, compliance requirements, and statutory constraints (environmental, zoning, data privacy, industry-specific rules). Recommends steps and timeline to secure approvals and maintain legal compliance.

Risk Assessment

Catalogs project risks, likelihoods, and potential impacts; proposes mitigation measures, contingency budgets, and triggers for reassessment. Includes residual risk rating and monitoring responsibilities.

Implementation Plan

Outlines milestones, resource allocation, procurement steps, vendor selection criteria, communication strategy, and success metrics. Provides a phased schedule and dependencies to transition from approval to execution.

Step-by-Step: Completing the Review

Follow these steps to collect data, analyze viability, document findings, and present a clear recommendation to decision-makers.

01

Gather Inputs: Collect scope, budget estimates, risk logs, and stakeholder lists.
02

Perform Analysis: Run cost models, schedule simulations, and technical reviews.
03

Draft Report: Summarize findings, recommendations, and conditions for approval.
04

Review & Approve: Circulate to sponsors, revise per feedback, and document decision.

Configure an Online Workflow for Consistent Reviews

Configure the digital workflow to automate data collection, approvals, notifications, and document storage for consistent and auditable reviews.

Field	Configuration
Initiator	Project manager email triggers start and assigns tasks.
Approval Sequence	Tiered approvals: sponsor, finance, legal in order.
Notifications	Email and in-app alerts for pending actions and deadlines.
Storage	PDF archival in secure repository with audit trail.

Where Completed Reviews Are Filed and Sent

Define where completed reviews are filed, who receives copies, and how approvals are reflected in source systems.

Submit To: Project archive, finance, and legal repositories.
Send Copies: Email to sponsors and assigned approvers automatically.
System Update: Write-back project status to ERP or PMO tools.
Retention: Archive signed PDF with metadata and audit trail.

Digital Signing, Formats, and Integrations

Choose a signing platform that supports secure eSignatures, audit trails, and integrations with your document repository and project systems.

File formats: PDF, DOCX, and exportable metadata.
Integrations: Salesforce, NetSuite, Google Workspace supported.
Security: AES-256 at rest; TLS 1.2/1.3.

Key Deadlines and Time-Sensitive Windows

Track internal deadlines for draft submission, stakeholder review, permitting windows, funding approvals, and final decision to avoid schedule slippage.

Submit draft report to PMO for initial review:

Four weeks before stakeholder review; allows time for revisions.

Stakeholder collective review and consolidated feedback window:

Typically two weeks; consolidate comments and assign owners.

Prepare and submit permit applications to relevant agencies:

Timing varies; allow 60–120 days for external approvals.

Align funding approval with organizational budgeting and cycles:

Expect finance review within 2–6 weeks before cutoff.

Board or executive final decision and documentation deadline:

Set date, record go/no-go decision, and archive signed review.

Milestone Sequence from Initiation to Decision

Sequence major milestones from initiation to decision, showing dependencies and expected durations to guide project governance and resource planning.

01

Initiation & scoping

Define objectives, scope, and stakeholders; gather base data.

02

Analysis & modeling

Perform cost, schedule, and risk analyses with sensitivity tests.

03

Review & validation

Review findings with stakeholders; validate assumptions and mitigations.

04

Decision & documentation

Record approval, conditions, and next steps; publish signed report.

Common Mistakes to Avoid

Incomplete cost estimates that omit contingency, escalation, or indirect expenses lead to budget shortfalls and false positive feasibility conclusions when assessed against actual expenditures.
Failing to identify regulatory permits or underestimating permit timelines can delay project start significantly and increase costs due to hurried compliance remediation or rework.
Using optimistic schedule assumptions without accounting for dependencies, procurement lead times, or resource availability causes repeated deadline slips and weakened stakeholder confidence.
Neglecting to document assumptions, data sources, and sensitivity scenarios prevents reproducibility of analysis and complicates later audits or change control decisions.

Potential Consequences of an Incorrect Review

Budget Overrun: Cost escalation and funding shortfalls.

Schedule Delay: Missed milestones and opportunity loss.

Regulatory Noncompliance: Permitting delays, fines, stop-work orders.

Contractual Exposure: Breach claims and vendor disputes.

Reputational Harm: Stakeholder trust erosion.

Decision Risk: Poor go/no-go leading to sunk costs.

Essential Fields and Security-Related Items

Project Identifier: Unique code or number.

Sponsor Contact: Name, title, email, phone.

Budget Summary: Total capital and OPEX figures.

Risk Register: Key risks and mitigation owners.

Approvals Log: Signatures, dates, and version history.

Supporting Files: Estimates, permits, quotes, and studies.

Typical eSignature Pricing and Feature Comparison

Compare common eSignature vendor pricing and feature availability relevant to executing Project Feasibility Reviews; signNow appears first for column alignment.

	signNow	DocuSign	Adobe Sign	PandaDoc	HelloSign
Starting Price	$8/user/mo	$15/user/mo	$14/user/mo	$19/user/mo	$15/user/mo
Free Trial	7-day free trial	No	No	Yes, limited	Yes, limited
Bulk Send	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	No
Audit Trail	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes
HIPAA Compliant	Yes	Yes	Yes	No	No

Real-world Examples of Feasibility Reviews in Use

Real-world examples show how feasibility reviews are used to speed decisions, integrate signatures, and document approvals across organizations.

Optica Ventures LLC — COO Brian Fitzgibbons

Optica Ventures used electronic feasibility reviews to standardize evaluation across deals and reduce administrative friction for investors and partners.

Improved turnaround for deal assessments.
By combining templated analysis with secure eSignatures and documented approvals, the firm reduced review cycles and made investor decisions more timely while preserving an auditable trail for compliance and audit purposes.

Martin Properties — Founder Tim Martin

Martin Properties digitized feasibility reviews for leasing and renovation projects to avoid delays caused by paper approvals and dispersed stakeholders.

Enabled faster landlord and contractor sign-off.
The digital process allowed remote signings, consistent recordkeeping, and clearer approval conditions, resulting in fewer schedule disruptions and documented conditions tied to contractor payments and milestone releases.

Frequently Asked Questions and Troubleshooting

Answers to common questions about preparing, signing, and storing Project Feasibility Reviews, with guidance on legal and technical issues.

Need help? Contact support

be ready to get more

Join over 28 million airSlate SignNow users

Sign Now