Is an electronic signature legally binding?

Yes. Electronic signatures are legally valid under the ESIGN Act (15 U.S.C. §7001) and UETA in UETA-adopting states when intent, consent, attribution, and retention are satisfied.

When is a BAA required for a review?

A Business Associate Agreement is required when the review contains protected health information being handled by a vendor; HIPAA rules and your legal team determine applicability.

Do I need notarization or witnesses?

Most administrative reviews do not require notarization; documents that create or transfer property rights or certain powers of attorney may require notarization or witnesses per state law.

What file formats should I archive?

Archive completed reviews as PDF/A or PDF with an embedded audit trail to ensure long-term reproducibility and readability across systems.

How can I audit who signed and when?

Use the platform audit trail to capture timestamp, IP address, and signer actions; retain logs in line with your retention policy for compliance and dispute resolution.

How do I revise or cancel a submitted review?

If a signed, completed review must be changed, create an amendment or withdrawal record rather than editing the original. Document the reason and capture approvals to preserve an auditable history.

Electronic Signature
Templates
Project Management
Project Management Application Review

Project Management Application Review

This template is fully customizable. Edit the text, fill out the fields, and send it for signature. Give it a try!

PROJECT MANAGEMENT APPLICATION REVIEW

Project Identification

Project Title:

Project ID: Client Name:

Service Provider Name: Project Manager:

Review Date:

Scope of Work

Proposed Scope of Work Out‑of‑Scope Items

Deliverables and Acceptance Criteria

Deliverable 1 — Description Deliverable 1 — Acceptance Criteria Deliverable 2 — Description Deliverable 2 — Acceptance Criteria

Timeline

Proposed Start Date: Proposed End Date:

Key Milestones (describe and provide due date)

Milestone 1: Due:

Milestone 2: Due:

Milestone 3: Due:

Budget and Payment

Total Contract Value Payment Schedule Change Order Process

Written change order required for scope, schedule or budget changes

Compliance, Risk and Security

Meets stated technical requirements

Data security and access controls documented

Third‑party dependencies identified and assessed

Risk Assessment and Mitigation

Review Findings

Technical Assessment Resource Assessment Schedule Assessment Budget Assessment

Recommendation

Approve as submitted

Approve with conditions (see conditions below)

Reject application

Conditions or Required Modifications (if any)

Acceptance and Warranty

Acceptance Test Period (days): Warranty Period (months):

Acceptance criteria will consist of demonstration of deliverables against documented acceptance criteria, remediation of critical defects, and formal written sign‑off by the Client. Final payment is contingent on Client acceptance in accordance with the payment schedule.

Confidentiality

Both parties acknowledge that certain information exchanged in connection with this project may be confidential. Each party agrees to maintain the confidentiality of proprietary information disclosed by the other party and to use such information solely for performance under this project. Confidential information shall not be disclosed except as required by law. Remedies for breach include injunctive relief and recovery of damages.

Confidential Materials Description

Confidentiality Duration (years):

Governing Law

This Review and any resulting agreements shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the state indicated below, without regard to conflict of law principles. Any disputes arising from performance shall be resolved by the courts of the same jurisdiction unless the parties agree otherwise in writing.

Governing Law (State):

Reviewer Certification

I certify that I have reviewed the application materials, conducted the assessments documented above, and that the recommendations reflect my professional judgment and the information available as of the Review Date.

Reviewer Name: Reviewer Title:

Client Name:

By:

Date:

Service Provider Name:

By:

Date:

What the Project Management Application Review Is

The Project Management Application Review is a standardized evaluation form used to assess project proposals, vendor submissions, or internal project requests. It collects project scope, objectives, resource estimates, timeline and budget data, risk assessments, and stakeholder approvals to enable consistent scoring and documented decisions. When completed electronically the review supports role-based routing, conditional fields, and a reproducible audit trail. The form is designed to produce a clear record of decisions that can be retained for compliance, internal audit, and later reference under applicable electronic records laws.

Why a Standardized Review Matters

A consistent Project Management Application Review reduces ambiguity, speeds decision cycles, and preserves evidence of approvals. It helps organizations compare proposals objectively and maintain an auditable record compatible with ESIGN and UETA principles for electronic transactions.

Typical Users and Roles

Typical users include project managers, procurement staff, finance approvers, and compliance reviewers who evaluate and approve project requests.

Project managers completing scope, timeline, and resource estimates for proposed initiatives.
Procurement and vendor teams assessing vendor fit, cost proposals, and contract readiness.
Finance and compliance reviewers verifying budget, ROI assumptions, and regulatory constraints.

Different stakeholders use the same form to ensure shared criteria, consistent scoring, and a single source of truth for approvals.

Representative Reviewer Profiles

Brian Fitzgibbons, COO

A COO or operations executive uses the review to validate strategic alignment, resource impacts, and high-level risk. Their review typically focuses on cross-department dependencies, budget authority, and whether the project meets organizational priorities before approving funding or escalation.

Kodi-Marie Evans, Director

A director or systems lead evaluates technical feasibility, integration effort, and staffing needs. Their narrative includes assumptions about dependencies, required third-party services, and any gating criteria that must be satisfied before work can begin.

Step-by-step: Completing the Review Form

Follow these sequential steps to complete a Project Management Application Review and preserve a clear, auditable record of decisions.

01

Prepare: Gather project documents and budget estimates before starting the form.
02

Populate: Enter scope, objectives, schedule, resources, and risk items in each field.
03

Evaluate: Score criteria consistently and add reviewer comments for material risks.
04

Approve: Capture electronic signatures and timestamped approvals for the audit trail.

Configuring the online review workflow

Set up routing, conditional fields, and authentication to match internal approval policies and maintain a reproducible audit trail.

Field	Configuration
Routing Order	Sequential or parallel approvers as required
Conditional Fields	Show or hide fields based on answers
Signature Types	Specify eSignature method and authentication
Notifications	Email or in-app alerts for pending actions

Delivery methods and technical requirements

Choose a platform that supports your file formats, integrations, and security requirements for electronic review and signatures.

File formats: PDF, Word DOCX, and editable Excel are commonly supported
Integrations: Connectors for Salesforce, NetSuite, Microsoft 365, Google Workspace
Authentication: Email OTP, SMS, or stronger ID verification as required

Typical eSubmission and signing flow

A clear, repeatable flow reduces friction for reviewers and preserves a complete audit trail for each approval.

Upload: Sender uploads the review form and supporting attachments.
Place fields: Add signature, date, and conditional fields for reviewers.
Send: System routes the document to approvers by role or order.
Complete: Signers authenticate, sign, and receive a copy plus audit log.

Typical timelines and response expectations

Establish clear internal deadlines for submission, review, and final decision to keep projects on schedule and maintain predictable processing.

Submission Deadline:

Date by which applications must be received to enter the current cycle

Initial Screening:

Typically completed within 3–7 business days after submission

Technical Evaluation:

Assigned reviewers complete technical checks within 5–10 business days

Decision Notification:

Applicants are notified of approvals or rejections per policy

Record Archival:

Completed reviews are archived according to retention rules

Key milestones in the review lifecycle

Track milestones from intake through archival so stakeholders know progress and escalation points.

01

Intake Received

Form submitted and attachments validated for completeness

02

Pre-Screening

Basic eligibility and budget checks performed

03

Full Review

Detailed scoring, risk analysis, and comments added

04

Approval & Sign-off

Final approvals captured with dated signatures and audit trail

Security and compliance controls to include

Encryption: TLS 1.2/1.3 in transit; AES-256 at rest

Audit Trail: Timestamped events, IP address, action history

Certifications: SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001, PCI DSS where applicable

HIPAA Support: BAA available to govern protected health data

Access Controls: Role-based permissions and SSO/SAML support

Accessibility: WCAG 2.0 Level AA considerations

Common risks and consequences to avoid

Invalid Signature: Incomplete authentication can weaken enforceability

Missing Data: Incomplete fields lead to rework and delays

Late Submission: Missed deadlines may forfeit funding or priority

Privacy Breach: Unauthorized access can trigger regulatory penalties

Retention Failure: Improper retention risks audit findings

Incorrect Routing: Wrong approvers can invalidate authorization

What a professional review form includes

A thorough Project Management Application Review combines structured data, clear evaluation criteria, and controls that support defensible approvals.

Cover Details

Project name, requestor, business unit, version number, and effective date so reviewers reference the correct submission instance.

Scope & Deliverables

Concise description of project deliverables, exclusions, and acceptance criteria to avoid scope creep and align expectations.

Schedule Estimates

High-level timeline, key milestones, and critical path items to assess feasibility and dependencies across teams.

Budget Breakdown

Line-item costs for capital and operating expenses plus assumptions used for forecast and ROI calculations.

Risk & Mitigation

Identified risks, impact ratings, and proposed mitigations to inform go/no-go decisions and contingency planning.

Approval Section

Named approvers, roles, signatures, and dates captured with an audit trail for compliance and future reference.

eSignature provider pricing snapshot (signNow listed first)

Compare entry-level pricing and core capabilities for common eSignature providers to evaluate cost and compliance fit for review workflows.

	signNow	DocuSign	Adobe Sign	PandaDoc	HelloSign
Starting Price	$8/user/mo	$15/user/mo	$14/user/mo	$19/user/mo	$15/user/mo
Free Trial	7-day free trial	No	No	No	No
Bulk Send	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	No
Audit Trail	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes
HIPAA Compliant	Yes	Yes	Yes	No	No

Frequently asked questions and troubleshooting

Answers to common questions about electronic completion, legal validity, authentication, integrations, and recordkeeping for review forms.

Need help? Contact support

Is an electronic signature legally binding?
Yes. Electronic signatures are legally valid under the ESIGN Act (15 U.S.C. §7001) and UETA in UETA-adopting states when intent, consent, attribution, and retention are satisfied.
When is a BAA required for a review?
A Business Associate Agreement is required when the review contains protected health information being handled by a vendor; HIPAA rules and your legal team determine applicability.
Do I need notarization or witnesses?
Most administrative reviews do not require notarization; documents that create or transfer property rights or certain powers of attorney may require notarization or witnesses per state law.
What file formats should I archive?
Archive completed reviews as PDF/A or PDF with an embedded audit trail to ensure long-term reproducibility and readability across systems.
How can I audit who signed and when?
Use the platform audit trail to capture timestamp, IP address, and signer actions; retain logs in line with your retention policy for compliance and dispute resolution.
How do I revise or cancel a submitted review?
If a signed, completed review must be changed, create an amendment or withdrawal record rather than editing the original. Document the reason and capture approvals to preserve an auditable history.

be ready to get more

Join over 28 million airSlate SignNow users

Sign Now