Is an electronic approval legally valid?

Yes. Electronic signatures are legally enforceable under the ESIGN Act (15 U.S.C. ch. 96, 2000) and UETA in most states when intent, consent, attribution, and retention are present.

How should I verify a signer’s identity?

Use layered authentication such as email confirmation plus SMS OTP or knowledge-based checks. For high-assurance needs, require two-factor authentication or a PKI-based digital signature.

When is notarization required?

Notarization is typically unnecessary for internal approvals; however, some states or contract types may require notarization for certain documents—verify state rules and contract language before relying on e-signatures alone.

Can I revoke or rescind an approved review?

Revocation should be documented in writing, routed through the same approval channels, and recorded with a dated amendment. Legal consequences depend on contract terms and timing of actions.

What supporting documents should I attach?

Attach budget spreadsheets, risk registers, change order forms, vendor quotes, and any regulatory or compliance certificates necessary to substantiate the approval request.

How long must I keep the signed review?

Retain according to applicable rules: minimum 3 years for tax-related records (IRC §6501(a)), 6 years for HIPAA-related records (45 CFR §164.530(j)), and longer where state law or company policy requires.

Electronic Signature
Templates
Project Management
Project Management Approval Review

Project Management Approval Review

This template is fully customizable. Edit the text, fill out the fields, and send it for signature. Give it a try!

Project Management Approval Review

Project Identification

Project Title:

Project ID: Review Date:

Client Name:

Service Provider Name:

Project Manager: Project Sponsor:

Scope of Work

Summary: This Approval Review documents the scope, deliverables, schedule, and budget status for the portion of work submitted for formal acceptance. The reviewer shall record any exceptions, required corrective actions, and conditions for acceptance below.

Detailed Scope of Work Out-of-Scope Items

Deliverables and Acceptance Criteria

Provide each deliverable, its description, due date, and objective acceptance criteria. The Service Provider warrants that deliverables substantially conform to the acceptance criteria below unless exceptions are listed in the Exceptions field.

Deliverable 1 - Name Deliverable 1 - Description

Due Date: Acceptance Criteria:

Deliverable 1 - Acceptance Status

Accepted as complete Rejected — see Exceptions below

Exceptions / Corrective Actions Required (if any) Deliverable 2 - Name Deliverable 2 - Description

Due Date: Acceptance Criteria:

Deliverable 2 - Acceptance Status

Accepted as complete Rejected — see Exceptions below

Exceptions / Corrective Actions Required (if any)

Project Timeline & Milestones

Scheduled Start Date: Scheduled End Date:

Milestone 1

Description: Target Date:

Complete Pending Delayed

Milestone 2

Description: Target Date:

Complete Pending Delayed

Budget and Payment

Total Contract Value Payment Schedule / Milestones Change Order Policy

All changes to scope, schedule, or price must be documented in a written change order signed by both parties prior to implementation. Change requests that will increase the Total Contract Value by more than require executive approval.

Quality Assurance & Acceptance Procedures

QA Verification Completed: QA Representative:

QA Findings / Comments

Confidentiality

Each party shall maintain the confidentiality of information designated confidential by the other party and shall not disclose such information except as required by law. Confidential information does not include information that: (a) is or becomes publicly available through no fault of the receiving party; (b) was rightfully in the receiving party's possession prior to disclosure; or (c) is independently developed without use of the confidential information. Remedies for breach include injunctive relief and indemnification as provided in the underlying contract.

Governing Law and Dispute Resolution

This Approval Review and any disputes arising from it shall be governed by the laws of . The parties agree to attempt good faith negotiation and escalation prior to initiating formal dispute resolution. Where escalation fails, disputes shall be resolved by binding arbitration or in a court of competent jurisdiction as specified in the primary contract.

Acknowledgements and Certifications

By signing below, the undersigned represent and warrant that they are authorized to act on behalf of their respective party, that they have reviewed this Project Management Approval Review and the referenced deliverables, and that acceptance or rejection and any listed exceptions are accurate to the best of their knowledge. Acceptance of deliverables constitutes authorization to proceed with subsequent dependent work and to trigger applicable payment milestones per the contract.

Additional Remarks by Reviewer

Client

Client Name:

By:

Date:

Service Provider

Service Provider Name:

By:

Date:

What the Project Management Approval Review Is

A Project Management Approval Review is a structured document used to capture formal authorization for a project or project change, including scope, budget, schedule, risks, and required sign-offs. It creates a single, auditable record of decision rationale, assigned owners, and any conditions attached to approval, and is commonly used by PMOs, sponsors, and governance boards to ensure consistent intake and oversight.

Why a Formal Approval Review Matters

A clear approval review reduces ambiguity, documents authority and conditions, and creates a retrievable audit trail for governance and compliance purposes.

Who Completes and Reviews This Form

Role-based routing and clear signature authority accelerate decisions and reduce rework caused by unclear responsibilities.

Project Manager — Prepares submission and attaches supporting materials for review.
PMO Analyst — Verifies completeness, conducts initial risk and impact assessment.
Executive Sponsor — Reviews summary, confirms strategic alignment, and provides final sign-off.

Core Components of a Professional Approval Review

A complete review captures purpose, scope, costs, schedule impacts, stakeholders, risk assessment, and specific approval conditions so reviewers can decide quickly and consistently.

Executive Summary

Concise description of purpose, objectives, and desired decision in plain language for leadership review.

Scope & Deliverables

Defines what is included and excluded, key milestones, and measurable acceptance criteria for the work.

Cost and Funding

Itemized budget request, funding source, and variance from baseline with contingency and approval thresholds.

Schedule Impact

Projected timeline changes, critical-path effects, and any dependencies that affect other projects.

Risks and Mitigations

Top project risks, likelihood, impact, and planned mitigation actions assigned to owners.

Signatures and Conditions

Named approvers, approval level, date, and any conditional language tied to the authorization.

Required Data Elements at a Glance

Project Name: Formal project title

Project ID: Unique identifier

Requestor: Name and role

Requested Change: Scope summary

Estimated Cost: Budget amount

Approval Status: Approved / Denied

Step-by-Step: How to Complete the Approval Review

Follow a consistent sequence to prepare, validate, circulate, and retain the approval review to minimize back-and-forth and preserve an audit trail.

01

Prepare: Assemble scope, budget, timeline, and risk attachments.
02

Enter Details: Complete fields exactly; include IDs and dates.
03

Route: Assign approvers in the defined order.
04

Record: Capture final signatures and archive the completed record.

Recommended Online Workflow Settings

Configure routing, authentication, and archive settings before sending to ensure secure, auditable approvals and timely reminders.

Field	Configuration
Approval Order	Sequential by role
Authentication Method	Email + SMS OTP
Notification Settings	Immediate email and two reminders
Archive Location	Secure cloud repository

Where to Send Completed Reviews and How They Flow

Completed reviews should route to the PMO archive, relevant budget owner, and the project record, with links to related contracts or change requests for easy reference.

PMO Archive: Central repository for governance records.
Budget Owner: Notification and financial approval copy.
Sponsor: Final sign-off record stored with project
Project File: Attach in project management system

Distribution and Technical Requirements for eSubmission

Ensure the chosen platform supports searchable archives, tamper-evident records, and role-based access controls to meet governance and audit requirements.

File Formats: PDF and DOCX preferred
Integrations: Salesforce, NetSuite, Microsoft 365
Authentication: Email, SMS, or stronger

Typical Timelines and Processing Expectations

Define explicit review windows and escalation timelines so approvers understand expected response times and the project can plan accordingly.

Submission to PMO:

Submit at least 5 business days before scheduled decision.

Initial Completeness Check:

PMO typically responds within 2 business days.

Review Window:

Approvers should complete reviews within 7 business days.

Final Approval:

Signed decision recorded within 1 business day of final signatory.

Implementation Start:

Begin only after required approvals and notices complete.

Key Milestones in the Approval Cycle

Use a milestone sequence to track submission, review, decision, and implementation so stakeholders can monitor progress and timing.

01

Submission

Request submitted with attachments and identifiers.

02

Completeness Review

PMO validates fields and supporting documents.

03

Decision

Approvers record their votes and conditions.

04

Implementation

Project team updates baselines and begins work.

Common Mistakes to Avoid

Incomplete attachments or missing project IDs create routing delays and often require resubmission to the PMO for clarification.
Vague cost estimates or unspecified funding sources lead to budget holds and extended review cycles by finance.
Incorrect or absent approver roles cause re-routing and can invalidate a decision if signature authority is absent.
Failure to record conditional approvals or exceptions leaves ambiguity about what was approved and who is accountable for follow-up.

Risks and Consequences of an Improper Review

Delayed Start: Project launch postponed

Cost Overrun: Unapproved expenses accrue

Contract Dispute: Vendor obligations questioned

Compliance Breach: Regulatory exposure possible

Audit Finding: Governance deficiencies noted

Reputational Harm: Stakeholder confidence reduced

Comparison: eSignature Vendors for Approval Reviews

This table summarizes common vendor pricing and key capabilities to consider when selecting an eSignature provider for structured approval workflows.

	signNow	DocuSign	Adobe Sign	PandaDoc	HelloSign
Starting Price	$8/user/mo	$15/user/mo	$14/user/mo	$19/user/mo	$15/user/mo
Free Trial	7-day free trial	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes
Bulk Send	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes
Audit Trail	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes
HIPAA Compliant	Yes	Yes	Yes	No	No
Envelope Cap	No cap	100 envelopes/user/year	Varies by plan	Varies by plan	Varies by plan

Real-World Examples of Approval Review Use

These examples illustrate how organizations use structured approval reviews to speed decisions and preserve compliance evidence.

Optica Ventures (COO)

The interface is simple and easy-to-use for our team.

Their process reduced turnaround on approvals significantly.
Brian Fitzgibbons, COO at Optica Ventures LLC, notes that consistent documentation reduced follow-up questions and sped decision-making while preserving a clear audit trail for investors.

Martin Properties (Founder)

I can process and execute documents online with compliance.

Mobile signing was essential on site.
Tim Martin, Founder of Martin Properties, describes using the digital review to obtain sponsor approvals while on site, cutting physical meeting needs and accelerating project starts.

Frequently Asked Questions and Troubleshooting

Answers to common questions on validity, authentication, notarization, revocation, and retention for Project Management Approval Reviews.

Need help? Contact support

Is an electronic approval legally valid?
Yes. Electronic signatures are legally enforceable under the ESIGN Act (15 U.S.C. ch. 96, 2000) and UETA in most states when intent, consent, attribution, and retention are present.
How should I verify a signer’s identity?
Use layered authentication such as email confirmation plus SMS OTP or knowledge-based checks. For high-assurance needs, require two-factor authentication or a PKI-based digital signature.
When is notarization required?
Notarization is typically unnecessary for internal approvals; however, some states or contract types may require notarization for certain documents—verify state rules and contract language before relying on e-signatures alone.
Can I revoke or rescind an approved review?
Revocation should be documented in writing, routed through the same approval channels, and recorded with a dated amendment. Legal consequences depend on contract terms and timing of actions.
What supporting documents should I attach?
Attach budget spreadsheets, risk registers, change order forms, vendor quotes, and any regulatory or compliance certificates necessary to substantiate the approval request.
How long must I keep the signed review?
Retain according to applicable rules: minimum 3 years for tax-related records (IRC §6501(a)), 6 years for HIPAA-related records (45 CFR §164.530(j)), and longer where state law or company policy requires.

be ready to get more

Join over 28 million airSlate SignNow users

Sign Now