Establishing secure connection…Loading editor…Preparing document…

Project Management Change Management Model

This template is fully customizable. Edit the text, fill out the fields, and send it for signature. Give it a try!

Project Management Change Management Model

Project Identification

Project Title:

Change Management Model — Purpose & Scope

This Change Management Model sets forth the standardized procedure by which proposed modifications to scope, schedule, budget, design, or deliverables will be submitted, assessed, approved, implemented and recorded. It applies to all project workstreams, third-party engagements and subcontracted activities unless an express written exception is executed by both parties.

Change Request Submission

All change requests shall be submitted in writing using the form elements below. Emergency changes must be annotated as EMERGENCY and include the rationale and risk mitigation plan.

Date Submitted:

Impact Assessment

Estimated Effort (hours):

Estimated Cost Impact:

Evaluation Criteria & Decision Workflow

Change classification (select all that apply):

Decision Options:

Deliverables & Acceptance Criteria

Timeline & Milestones

Project Start Date:    Project End Date:

Budget, Payment & Change Order Fees

Total Budget / Not-to-Exceed:

Records & Change Log

The following table captures the historical record of change requests and their disposition. Each entry constitutes an auditable record that must be retained in project records.

Confidentiality

Each party acknowledges that any non-public information exchanged in connection with a change request may constitute Confidential Information. The recipient shall use Confidential Information solely for the performance of its obligations hereunder and shall not disclose it except as required by law or as expressly permitted in writing by the disclosing party. Reasonable safeguards shall be used to protect Confidential Information with at least the same degree of care the recipient uses to protect its own confidential information, but no less than reasonable care.

Governing Law & Dispute Resolution

This Change Management Model and any disputes arising out of or relating to the administration or implementation of change requests shall be governed by the substantive laws of the jurisdiction selected in the Project Agreement. The parties agree to good faith negotiation and escalation within their executive sponsor chain before pursuing formal dispute resolution.

Change Control Exceptions & Emergency Procedures

Emergency changes that are required to prevent imminent harm to persons, property, or project-critical operations may be implemented immediately by the Service Provider provided the Provider documents the reason, the affected components, mitigation steps taken, and notifies the Client within 24 hours. Such emergency changes must be retroactively submitted through the standard change request process within 5 business days for review and ratification.

Sign-Off Authority & Final Approval

The parties agree that only authorized signatories may execute approvals that bind their respective organizations to budget or schedule changes. Approvals documented in this Model constitute written authorization to proceed as described in the approved change request.

Client Printed Name:

By:

Date:

Service Provider Printed Name:

By:

Date:

Enter text

What the Project Management Change Management Model Is

The Project Management Change Management Model is a structured document and workflow used to describe, evaluate, and authorize changes to a project's scope, schedule, budget, or resources. It captures the change request, impact analysis, affected stakeholders, risk mitigation, approval decisions, and implementation steps. Organizations use the model to ensure consistent decision-making, auditable approvals, and traceable outcomes when multiple teams or external parties must coordinate. The model supports escalation rules, rollback criteria, and post-implementation review to measure results against original objectives and corrective actions.

Why a Formal Change Management Model Matters

A formal model reduces scope creep, clarifies accountability, and creates an auditable trail of decisions and approvals. It helps quantify cost and schedule impacts, aligns stakeholders, and supports regulatory compliance where required, relying on clear records that meet ESIGN (15 U.S.C. ch. 96) and relevant state UETA requirements.

Why a Formal Change Management Model Matters

Who Typically Prepares and Reviews the Change Model

Organizations use the model across project teams, PMOs, and stakeholder groups to standardize change decisions.

  • Project Manager — Prepares the change request, documents impacts, and proposes mitigation with schedule and cost estimates.
  • Change Manager / PMO — Validates scope impact, coordinates cross-team review, and enforces governance and prioritization criteria.
  • Business Stakeholders — Provide requirements impact assessment, sign approvals for scope or budget changes, and confirm acceptance criteria.

Use the model to centralize approvals, reduce rework, and make audit-ready records for internal and external reviewers.

Core Components of a Professional Change Management Model

A complete model balances administrative data, impact analysis, approvals, and implementation controls to make changes traceable and reversible when necessary.

Change Request

A concise description of the proposed change, originator name, request date, and a unique identifier to reference in audits and status reports.

Impact Analysis

Detailed assessment of scope, schedule, cost, quality, security, and compliance impacts plus alternatives considered and recommended option with rationale.

Stakeholder Matrix

List of affected parties, required approvals, notification plan, and roles for implementation and verification after deployment.

Approval Log

Sequential record of approvers, decisions, timestamps, and any conditions; used as the official authorization to proceed or reject.

Implementation Plan

Stepwise rollout tasks, responsible resources, rollback steps, communications schedule, and acceptance tests with measurable criteria.

Post-Implementation Review

Outcome assessment comparing expected versus actual results, lessons learned, and any follow-up corrective actions with assigned owners.

Step-by-Step: Completing the Change Management Model

Follow these sequential steps to create, review, and finalize a change request with clear approvals and implementation control.

  • 01
    Draft Request: Complete fields, attach supporting files, and include baseline version references.
  • 02
    Impact Review: Route to impacted teams for documented impact assessments and cost estimates.
  • 03
    Obtain Approvals: Collect required signatures in order defined by your governance matrix.
  • 04
    Schedule Implementation: Coordinate deployment window and record rollback criteria and verification steps.

Configure Your Digital Approval Workflow

Map form fields to routing rules and authentication methods to ensure the request moves automatically through required approvers.

Field Configuration
Approval Order Sequential or parallel routing based on priority and role.
Authentication Email link, SMS code, or higher-assurance method per risk level.
Conditional Fields Show or require fields based on category or priority selections.
Notifications Automated email alerts, reminders, and escalation rules.

Technical Considerations for Digital Completion

Ensure the chosen platform supports required integrations, authentication, and retention capabilities before digital deployment.

  • Integration Needs: Salesforce, NetSuite, Google Workspace connectivity
  • Authentication Methods: Email link, SMS code, or advanced signer verification
  • Export Formats: PDF/A, DOCX, or system-native exports

How the Digital Change Approval Flow Operates

A streamlined flow reduces manual handoffs: upload, map fields, route, sign, and archive with an audit trail for each action.

  • Upload Document: Attach the change request and supporting files.
  • Place Fields: Insert signature, date, and approval checkboxes.
  • Route to Approvers: System sends emails or links to each approver.
  • Archive Record: Signed package and audit trail stored for retention.

Typical Timelines and Internal Deadlines

Set clear deadlines for each stage to avoid approval bottlenecks and missed release windows; times below are typical internal targets.

Initial Submission:

Submit at least 10 business days before the planned implementation window.

Impact Review Period:

Allow 3–5 business days for technical and compliance assessments.

Approval Turnaround:

Target 2–3 business days for required approvers to respond.

Change Freeze Windows:

Avoid approvals during scheduled blackout or release freeze periods.

Post-Implementation Review:

Complete within 10 business days after deployment to capture lessons learned.

Key Milestones from Request to Review

Sequence these milestones to track progress and feed status updates into project dashboards.

01

Request Logged

Change request is entered and assigned an identifier for tracking.

02

Impact Assessed

Teams complete technical, schedule, and cost analysis.

03

Decision Recorded

Approvals or rejections are formally recorded with conditions.

04

Post-Implementation Audit

Finalize outcome, document deviations, and assign follow-up actions.

Common Mistakes to Avoid

  • Submitting incomplete impact analyses that omit downstream system or vendor effects, which leads to unanticipated cost increases and schedule slippage.
  • Using informal email approvals without a consolidated audit trail, making it difficult to demonstrate consent and sequence of approvals during audits.
  • Failing to define rollback criteria and verification steps, increasing the risk of extended outages or unsuccessful remediation after deployment.
  • Not aligning change windows with release schedules or blackout periods, causing missed release opportunities and stakeholder dissatisfaction.

Consequences of Poorly Executed Change Requests

Regulatory Breach: Fines or enforcement actions
Contractual Liability: Penalty claims or damages
Operational Disruption: System outages or lost productivity
Cost Overruns: Budget increases and rework
Audit Findings: Negative internal or external audit results
Reputational Harm: Customer trust erosion

eSignature Vendor Pricing and Feature Snapshot

Compare basic pricing and core features relevant to signing and routing change-management documents; signNow is listed first per table conventions.

signNow DocuSign Adobe Sign PandaDoc HelloSign
Starting Price $8/user/mo $15/user/mo $14/user/mo $19/user/mo $15/user/mo
Free Trial 7-day trial No No Yes, limited Yes, limited
Bulk Send Yes Yes Yes Yes No
Audit Trail Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
HIPAA Compliant Yes Yes Yes No No
Envelope Cap No cap 100 envelopes/user/year Varies by plan Varies by plan Varies by plan

Frequently Asked Questions About the Change Management Model

Answers to common questions about validity, electronic signatures, approvals, and retention for the change management model.


Need help? Contact support

be ready to get more
Join over 28 million airSlate SignNow users