Purpose
A concise statement of why the change is proposed and what operational outcome is intended, enabling quick reviewer orientation and context.
A complete CEAR ensures decisions are transparent, reduces downstream rework, and preserves an auditable trail of who approved scope and budget adjustments. It supports consistent governance and helps teams measure schedule and cost impacts precisely.
This routing pattern keeps roles clear and reduces ambiguity about authority and responsibility during change events.
| Field | Configuration |
|---|---|
| Routing Order | Sequential or parallel routing options |
| Authentication | Email link, SMS code, or MFA |
| Conditional Fields | Show fields only if certain answers selected |
| Retention Policy | Auto-archive to project repository for X years |
Ensure chosen tools preserve an audit trail and a printable, tamper-evident signed copy for project records and audits.
Submit CEAR at least 5 business days before milestone
Complete review within 3–5 business days
Aim for approval within 10 business days
Escalate unresolved items after 3 business days
Archive executed CEAR within 30 days
Requester finalizes CEAR and attaches evidence
Assigned reviewers evaluate impacts and comments
Approvers accept, reject, or request revisions
Approved changes are scheduled and tracked
A concise statement of why the change is proposed and what operational outcome is intended, enabling quick reviewer orientation and context.
Precise boundaries of work being added, removed, or modified, including affected deliverables, drawings, contracts, and subsystems for clear technical evaluation.
All stakeholders, responsible approvers, and accountable owners listed with roles and contact information to ensure correct routing and accountability.
A factual description of the change, including technical specifications, referenced documents, and any version control or drawing numbers.
Quantified schedule shifts, cost deltas, resource needs, and risk rating to support objective funding and timeline decisions by approvers.
Designated signature blocks for required approvers with dates and recorded consent, including space for conditional or staged approvals if needed.
Tim Martin implemented online CEAR routing to avoid site visits and paper delays.
John Butler used an eSignature-enabled CEAR process to centralize approvals across clinical, legal, and operations teams.
| Criteria | CEAR | Change Order | RFC |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary Purpose | evaluation | contract amendment | technical request |
| Contractual Effect | informal until approved | binding when executed | informal |
| Typical Approver | sponsor/pm | contracting officer | technical lead |
| Use Case | governance record | pricing/scope change | engineering clarifications |
| signNow | DocuSign | Adobe Sign | PandaDoc | HelloSign | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | $8/user/mo | $15/user/mo | $14/user/mo | $19/user/mo | $15/user/mo |
| Free Trial | 7-day free trial | No | No | Yes, limited | Yes, limited |
| Bulk Send | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | No |
| Audit Trail | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| HIPAA Compliant | Yes | Yes | Yes | No | No |