Can this be signed electronically?

Yes. Electronic signatures are valid under the federal ESIGN Act (15 U.S.C. ch. 96) and UETA as adopted by most states, provided intent, consent, attribution, and retention criteria are met.

When is notarization required?

Notarization is rarely required for internal design reviews. If a contract or jurisdiction specifically requires notarized approval, follow state notary rules or use RON where permitted.

How do I prove signer identity?

Use multi-factor authentication, documented identity checks, or PKI-based signatures for higher assurance. Record signer email, IP address, and timestamp in the audit trail.

What if a signer’s name differs from contract name?

Mismatched names can create enforceability issues. Ensure the signer’s legal name and authority are documented; attach evidence of signing authority if necessary.

How are revisions tracked?

Maintain a version log listing revision number, author, date, and summary of changes; store previous signed versions to preserve the approval history.

Can I revoke an approval?

Approvals can be rescinded by documented agreement of the parties; include a revision or revocation clause and retain the revocation record in the project archive.

Electronic Signature
Templates
Project Management
Project Management Design Review

Project Management Design Review

This template is fully customizable. Edit the text, fill out the fields, and send it for signature. Give it a try!

Project Management Design Review

Project Identification

Project Title

Project ID:

Review Date:

Client Client Contact Service Provider Project Manager (Provider)

Scope of Work (Design Review)

Describe the scope of the design review engagement, including objectives, documents to be reviewed, and coverage areas. This description forms the baseline for acceptance criteria and change order evaluation.

Out-of-Scope Items

Design Review Details

Design Phase: Design Version:

Review Location/Method:

Items Reviewed (check all that apply):

Discipline Checklist Architecture Structural MEP (Mechanical, Electrical, Plumbing) Interior / Finishes Landscape Code Compliance Accessibility Security Other (specify in findings)

Findings and Required Actions

Summary of Findings: provide a concise statement of noncompliance, risks, or items requiring revision. Each required action must include responsible party and due date for remediation.

Action Item 1 - Description

Responsible:

Due Date:

Priority:

Action Item 2 - Description

Responsible:

Due Date:

Priority:

Deliverables and Acceptance Criteria

List deliverables produced or amended as a result of this review and the acceptance criteria that must be met before deliverable approval.

Deliverable 1 Description Acceptance Criteria

Due Date:

Deliverable 2 Description Acceptance Criteria

Due Date:

Timeline and Milestones

Project Start:

Projected Completion:

Milestone 1

Due Date:

Owner:

Milestone 2

Due Date:

Owner:

Budget, Payment, and Change Orders

Total Budget / Fee Payment Schedule Change Order Process

Confidentiality and Use of Review Materials

All materials submitted for review and the findings generated by the Service Provider are confidential and may be used by the Client solely for the purposes defined in this document. Neither party shall disclose proprietary technical details of the other party's work without express written consent, except as required by law. This confidentiality obligation survives termination of this review engagement for a period of two years.

Governing Law and Compliance

This Design Review and any disputes arising under it shall be governed by the laws of the jurisdiction specified below. Each party warrants that it will perform its obligations in compliance with applicable codes, statutes, and regulations.

Governing Jurisdiction

Acknowledgment

By signing below, the undersigned representatives certify that they are authorized to bind their respective parties, that the information contained in this Design Review is accurate to the best of their knowledge, and that they accept the obligations, timelines, and payment terms set forth herein.

Client:

By:

Date:

Service Provider:

By:

Date:

What a Project Management Design Review Is

A Project Management Design Review documents the planned design scope, technical decisions, deliverables, schedule, and stakeholder approvals for a discrete project phase. It serves as a formal record of design intent used to align architects, engineers, contractors, and project managers before construction or implementation begins. The review typically includes drawings, specifications, risk assessments, assumptions, and a sign-off section that records who approved the design and when. For U.S. projects this document supports auditability, contract interpretation, and traceable handoffs between teams and third parties.

Why a Design Review Matters for Project Outcomes

A clear Design Review reduces rework, clarifies responsibilities, and documents approvals that control scope and schedule. It creates an evidentiary record useful for contract disputes, quality assurance, and regulatory compliance where applicable under ESIGN and UETA frameworks.

Who Typically Completes or Signs This Review

Project roles that prepare, review, or approve design reviews vary by project size and industry; the list below covers common participants.

Project Manager — Coordinates the review, consolidates comments, and issues the final document for sign-off.
Design Lead / Architect — Verifies technical solutions, confirms drawings and specifications, and signs to attest accuracy.
Client Representative — Reviews for requirements alignment, budget impacts, and provides formal approval or written exceptions.

Assign clear signer roles early to speed approvals and to ensure the review is binding for procurement and execution phases.

Typical Signatory Profiles

Project Manager

A Project Manager consolidates inputs from engineering, design, and procurement, documents schedule impacts, and holds final responsibility for routing the review and maintaining the official record of approvals.

Design Lead

The Design Lead attests to the technical completeness of drawings and specifications, records required design assumptions, and confirms that all discipline-specific comments have been resolved prior to signature.

Security and Compliance Features to Include

Encryption: TLS 1.2/1.3; AES-256 at rest

Audit Trail: Timestamped logs and signer metadata

Access Controls: Role-based user permissions

HIPAA (if needed): BAA required for health data

21 CFR Part 11: Support for FDA-regulated records

Certifications: SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001

Consequences of an Incorrect or Missing Review

Schedule Delays: Work stoppage and lost time

Cost Overruns: Change orders and added expense

Contract Disputes: Claims over scope and responsibility

Regulatory Exposure: Noncompliance with industry rules

Invalid Approvals: Signatures not attributed correctly

Data Loss: Missing audit trail or records

Common Preparation Mistakes to Avoid

Using vague scope language that leaves design intent open to interpretation and increases change order risk.
Failing to collect discipline-specific sign-offs, which often leads to overlooked conflicts in drawings and field issues.
Not preserving a complete audit trail or version history, complicating dispute resolution and contract reconciliation.
Delivering the review late in the procurement cycle, limiting bidders’ ability to price accurately and extending schedules.

Step-by-Step: Completing a Project Management Design Review

Follow these sequential steps to produce a complete, auditable design review that supports approvals and downstream construction work.

01

Gather Inputs: Collect drawings, specs, and prior review comments.
02

Compile Document: Assemble scope, assumptions, and risk register.
03

Route for Review: Share with stakeholders for consolidated comments.
04

Obtain Sign-off: Record signatures, dates, and approval notes.

Where to Send or File the Completed Review

Design reviews should be distributed to project stakeholders and stored in a controlled repository for future reference.

Internal PMO: Store the signed review in the project management repository.
Owner / Client: Provide a final signed copy to the client representative.
Contractor Team: Share approved deliverables with construction management.
Document Archive: Retain in records management for audit and closeout.

Essential Components of a Professional Design Review

A complete Design Review bundles technical content, decision records, and administrative metadata so teams can proceed with confidence and maintain a defensible audit trail.

Scope Statement

Concise description of included work, boundaries, and excluded items so stakeholders share the same expectations and change requests are tractable.

Drawings & Specs

Referenced drawings, specifications, and revision numbers to ensure the build team uses the approved set without ambiguity or misalignment.

Assumptions

Documented technical and scheduling assumptions that influence design choices and that later serve to evaluate change order validity.

Risk Register

Identified risks, likelihood, mitigation actions, and owner assignments to manage exposure during implementation and procurement.

Change Log

A concise record of revisions, author, and rationale so reviewers can trace why specific design changes occurred and when.

Approval Block

Clear signer roles, printed names, titles, dates, and method of signature (electronic or handwritten) to validate final acceptance.

How to Configure an Online Review Workflow

Map roles and automation steps to reduce manual handoffs and capture an unbroken approval chain when using a digital platform.

Field	Configuration
Signer Order	Sequential or parallel routing per role
Authentication	Email, SMS code, or stronger MFA
Notifications	Automated reminders and escalation
Archive Location	Document repository and retention tag

Digital Signing and Delivery Considerations

Choose a platform that supports secure eSignature, audit trails, role-based access, and common file formats used by design teams.

File Types: PDF, DOCX, DWG-compatible exports
Integrations: Connectors for SharePoint, Box, Procore
Authentication: Email, SMS, or advanced signer authentication

Typical Timelines and Deadlines for a Design Review

Set explicit deadlines for each review phase to avoid scope creep and downstream scheduling impacts.

Initial Submission Deadline:

Date by which the lead design package is submitted for review

Comment Consolidation:

Interval to collect and resolve stakeholder feedback

Revision Turnaround:

Time allocated for design team to issue corrected drawings

Final Approval Due:

Cutoff for signed acceptance prior to procurement

Closeout Archive:

Date to move signed review into long-term records

Real-World Examples of Design Review Use

These short examples show how teams use Design Reviews to accelerate approvals and reduce field change orders.

Optica Ventures LLC

Optica consolidated multi-discipline comments into a single review to shorten decision cycles.

Review centralized approvals across design and construction teams.
As a result, Optica reduced rework and improved clarity for contractors, enabling faster procurement and smoother site handoffs without multiple revision loops.

Martin Properties

A small developer standardized its design review template to capture site-specific assumptions.

Template included risk register and approval block.
Standardization made external reviewer responses consistent, cut comment resolution time, and reduced unexpected cost increases during bidding and construction.

eSignature Vendor Pricing Snapshot

Overview of typical entry-level pricing and common capabilities across major eSignature vendors; signNow appears first for column parity and comparison.

	signNow	DocuSign	Adobe Sign	PandaDoc	HelloSign
Starting Price	$8/user/mo	$15/user/mo	$14/user/mo	$19/user/mo	$15/user/mo
Free Trial	7-day trial	Varies	Varies	Varies	Varies
Bulk Send	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes
Audit Trail	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes
HIPAA Compliant	Yes	Yes	Yes	No	No
Envelope Cap	No cap	100 envelopes/user/year	Varies	Varies	Varies

Frequently Asked Questions and Troubleshooting

Answers to common execution and signing questions for Project Management Design Reviews, focused on avoiding approval delays and compliance issues.

Need help? Contact support

Can this be signed electronically?
Yes. Electronic signatures are valid under the federal ESIGN Act (15 U.S.C. ch. 96) and UETA as adopted by most states, provided intent, consent, attribution, and retention criteria are met.
When is notarization required?
Notarization is rarely required for internal design reviews. If a contract or jurisdiction specifically requires notarized approval, follow state notary rules or use RON where permitted.
How do I prove signer identity?
Use multi-factor authentication, documented identity checks, or PKI-based signatures for higher assurance. Record signer email, IP address, and timestamp in the audit trail.
What if a signer’s name differs from contract name?
Mismatched names can create enforceability issues. Ensure the signer’s legal name and authority are documented; attach evidence of signing authority if necessary.
How are revisions tracked?
Maintain a version log listing revision number, author, date, and summary of changes; store previous signed versions to preserve the approval history.
Can I revoke an approval?
Approvals can be rescinded by documented agreement of the parties; include a revision or revocation clause and retain the revocation record in the project archive.

be ready to get more

Join over 28 million airSlate SignNow users

Sign Now