Can this be signed electronically?

Yes. Under the ESIGN Act (15 U.S.C. §7001) and UETA, electronic signatures are valid if intent, consent, attribution, and retention requirements are met.

When is a notarization required?

Notarization is typically required only when a document must be acknowledged for recording or legal formality; check state rules if the evaluation will be used as formal evidence.

How do we prove signer identity?

Use email verification, SMS codes, knowledge-based authentication, or stronger methods; retain audit logs showing IP, timestamp, and authentication method.

What if an approver's name differs?

Correct mismatched names before signing; provide evidence of identity and approval to avoid challenges to the document's validity.

How long must we retain completed evaluations?

Retain per internal policy that meets federal minimums—e.g., IRS three-year standard—and any industry-specific rules such as HIPAA six-year retention.

How to correct a signed evaluation?

If changes are material, create a new version or amendment and route it for approval; do not alter the original signed file to preserve the audit trail.

Electronic Signature
Templates
Project Management
Project Management Evaluation Procedure

Project Management Evaluation Procedure

This template is fully customizable. Edit the text, fill out the fields, and send it for signature. Give it a try!

PROJECT MANAGEMENT EVALUATION PROCEDURE

Project Identification

Project Name Project ID Client Name Client Contact Service Provider Project Manager

Effective Date: Review Frequency: Weekly Monthly Quarterly At Milestones Other:

Purpose and Scope

Purpose: This procedure establishes the method, criteria and responsibilities for periodic evaluation of project performance to determine compliance with approved scope, schedule, budget and quality requirements. Evaluation results will inform acceptance decisions, corrective action and change order determinations.

Scope of Work (evaluation coverage) Out-of-Scope Items

Deliverables and Acceptance

Deliverables listed below shall be evaluated against the stated acceptance criteria. Acceptance requires documented evidence that criteria are met and formal sign-off by the Client Representative.

Deliverable 1 Description Acceptance Criteria 1 Deliverable 2 Description Acceptance Criteria 2

Timeline and Milestones

Project Start Date: Project End Date:

Milestone 1

Date:

Milestone 2

Date:

Budget and Payment

Total Contract Value Payment Schedule Change Order Process (financial approvals)

Evaluation Criteria and Scoring

The evaluation uses weighted criteria and objective evidence. Scores shall be numeric and normalized to an aggregate scale of 0-100. Scores below the minimum threshold will trigger corrective action.

Weights (enter percentages that total 100)

Schedule Adherence: Budget Compliance: Quality of Deliverables: Risk Management: Stakeholder Satisfaction:

Scoring Method and Evidence

Evidence types (select all that apply): Project reports Timesheets QA test results Stakeholder surveys Change logs

Minimum Acceptable Aggregate Score:

Non-Conformance and Corrective Action

If evaluation indicates non-conformance to requirements or a score below the minimum threshold, the Service Provider shall prepare a Corrective Action Plan (CAP) within the timeframe specified in this procedure. The CAP must identify root cause, corrective steps, responsible parties and completion dates. The Client reserves the right to withhold acceptance or payments pending satisfactory remediation.

Corrective Action Requirements

Reporting and Records

Evaluation reports shall document findings, scores, evidence, CAPs and decisions. Reports will be retained in accordance with contract record retention requirements and made available to authorized representatives upon request.

Report Recipients Record Retention Period

Confidentiality

Both parties acknowledge that evaluation materials may include Confidential Information. Each party shall maintain confidentiality of evaluation records and may only disclose such information as required by law or with prior written consent of the disclosing party. Confidential materials provided for evaluation shall be used solely for purposes of project oversight, acceptance and corrective action.

Governing Law

This procedure and any disputes arising under it shall be governed by the laws of the jurisdiction identified below without regard to conflict of law rules.

Governing Jurisdiction

Amendments and Change Control

Amendments to this procedure require written agreement of authorized representatives of both parties. Changes that affect scope, schedule or budget shall follow the change order process and be approved prior to implementation.

Procedure Amendment Notes

Roles and Responsibilities

The Service Provider is responsible for preparing evaluation evidence, addressing non-conformances and implementing corrective actions. The Client is responsible for timely review, acceptance decisions and approvals. Project Manager(s) for both parties shall coordinate scheduling of evaluations and maintain records.

Client Representative Service Provider Representative

Acceptance of Procedure

By signing below, the parties acknowledge that they have read, understood and agree to comply with this Project Management Evaluation Procedure. This signature evidences agreement to the terms contained herein and the responsibilities assigned to each party.

Client Name:

By:

Date:

Service Provider:

By:

Date:

What the Project Management Evaluation Procedure Is

The Project Management Evaluation Procedure is a standard document and workflow used to record, assess, and approve project performance at defined milestones. It captures project scope, deliverable status, risk and issue logs, stakeholder feedback, schedule adherence, budget variance, and recommended corrective actions. Organizations use the procedure to create an auditable record of evaluation findings, decisions, and approval signatures so that project governance, audit, and knowledge-transfer requirements are satisfied across teams and external reviewers.

Why a Formal Evaluation Procedure Matters

A documented evaluation procedure ensures consistent assessments, reduces disputes, and creates a single source of truth for project decisions. It supports governance, post-project reviews, and regulatory or contractual evidence needs while improving traceability of who approved which actions and when.

Who Typically Completes This Procedure

Project managers or assigned project analysts usually prepare the evaluation; stakeholders and approvers review and sign.

Project Manager — Prepares the evaluation, documents variances, and proposes corrective actions for approval.
Sponsor / Steering Committee — Reviews findings and authorizes major scope or budget changes in writing.
Functional Leads — Provide technical validation and confirm that corrective actions are feasible and resourced.

Use role-based routing so each approver receives the evaluation in the correct sequence and an audit trail is retained.

How to Complete the Evaluation Step by Step

Follow these steps in order to prepare, route, and archive the evaluation systematically.

01

Gather Records: Collect schedule, budget, change logs, and test reports before drafting.
02

Draft Evaluation: Summarize status, issues, root causes, and recommended actions.
03

Route for Review: Send to functional leads and stakeholders in role-based order.
04

Obtain Authorizations: Get required signatures and archive the completed record.

Typical eSubmission and Approval Flow

A standard electronic workflow reduces turnaround while capturing an audit trail of actions and approvals.

Upload Document: Attach the filled evaluation form to the workflow package.
Place Fields: Add signature, date, and approval checkboxes on the form.
Assign Signers: Enter approver emails and define signing order if required.
Send and Track: Send invites, monitor completion, and store the completed PDF and audit trail.

Typical Digital Workflow Configuration

Configure these settings to match your approval and security requirements before sending.

Field	Configuration
Authentication	Email link, SMS code, or stronger KBA where required
Signing Order	Sequential or parallel routing based on roles
Audit Trail	Enable IP, timestamp, and action logs
Retention Policy	Auto-archive to secure storage with retention tags

Platform and File Requirements

Ensure the chosen eSignature platform supports required integrations and security controls.

File Formats: PDF, DOCX supported
Integrations: CRM, ERP, cloud storage
Security: Encryption and detailed audit logs

Essential Elements of a Professional Evaluation Procedure

A complete procedure combines clear structure, required fields, controlled routing, and compliance-ready records to support governance and audits.

Scope

A clear description of what the evaluation covers, including project phases, deliverables, and excluded items for consistent interpretation.

Metrics

Quantitative measures such as schedule variance, cost variance, earned value, and quality indicators tied to the project baseline.

Risk Log

Documented risks, likelihood, impact, mitigation plans, and owners so issues are tracked and reassessed.

Decision Log

Recorded approvals and scope changes with dates and authorizing parties to support later audits and claims.

Signatures

Designated signature blocks for preparer, technical reviewers, sponsor, and quality assurance with dates and roles.

Archive Controls

Retention, access, and retrieval instructions to keep the evaluation discoverable for audits and lessons learned.

Security and Compliance Checklist

Encryption: TLS 1.2/1.3 in transit

Data at rest: AES-256 encryption

Audit trail: IP, timestamp, action log

HIPAA: BAA required for PHI

ESIGN / UETA: Legal recognition for e-signatures

SOC 2 / ISO: Independent security certifications

Key Risks of an Incorrect Evaluation

Governance Gap: Unapproved changes may be vulnerable to dispute

Audit Findings: Missing records can trigger compliance exceptions

Contract Liability: Unauthorized scope changes can create financial risk

Data Integrity: Incomplete audit trails may reduce evidentiary value

Regulatory Exposure: HIPAA or industry rule breaches can incur penalties

Operational Delay: Rework of approvals extends project timelines

Common Preparation Mistakes to Avoid

Using informal notes instead of the standardized evaluation form causes inconsistency across projects.
Missing signatory fields or incorrect signer order delays final approval and archival.
Not capturing version history leads to confusion about which evaluation was authorized.
Attaching incomplete supporting documents prevents reviewers from verifying findings efficiently.

Typical Timelines and Processing Expectations

Set clear deadlines for each step and communicate expected review times to avoid bottlenecks.

Submission Deadline:

Evaluator submits within 5 business days after the milestone completes

Reviewer Response:

Functional reviewers provide comments within 3 business days

Sponsor Decision:

Sponsor signs or rejects within 5 business days

Appeal Window:

Parties may request reconsideration within 10 business days

Archival:

Completed evaluation archived within 2 business days of final signature

Key Milestones and Processing Stages

Track these milestones sequentially to monitor progress from draft to archived record.

01

Draft Completion

Evaluator compiles findings and prepares the initial draft.

02

Technical Review

Subject-matter experts validate technical accuracy.

03

Stakeholder Approval

Business sponsors review recommendations and approve or adjust.

04

Final Archive

Signed evaluation and audit trail are stored in secure records.

Real-World Examples

These brief examples illustrate how organizations use structured evaluations to resolve issues and document approvals.

Optica Ventures LLC

A small investment firm standardized evaluations to speed approvals and reduce rework.

The process enforced consistent metrics across deals.
The result was clearer accountability and faster closure of investment milestones while maintaining an auditable record for investor review.

Martin Properties

A property manager used online evaluations during closings to collect signatures remotely.

Mobile signing enabled on-site verification.
This eliminated return trips, preserved a complete audit trail, and improved turnaround for lease and project approvals.

eSignature Pricing and Feature Comparison

Compare common plan criteria for typical eSignature vendors to assess cost and compliance alignment for your evaluation workflow.

	signNow	DocuSign	Adobe Sign	PandaDoc	HelloSign
Starting Price	$8/user/mo	$15/user/mo	$14/user/mo	$19/user/mo	$15/user/mo
Free Trial	7-day free trial	Yes, limited	Yes, limited	Yes, limited	Yes, limited
Bulk Send	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	No
Audit Trail	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes
HIPAA Compliant	Yes	Yes	Yes	No	No
Envelope Cap	No cap	100 envelopes/user/year	Varies	Varies	Varies

Frequently Asked Questions

Answers to common questions about completing, authenticating, and storing the Project Management Evaluation Procedure.

Need help? Contact support

Can this be signed electronically?
Yes. Under the ESIGN Act (15 U.S.C. §7001) and UETA, electronic signatures are valid if intent, consent, attribution, and retention requirements are met.
When is a notarization required?
Notarization is typically required only when a document must be acknowledged for recording or legal formality; check state rules if the evaluation will be used as formal evidence.
How do we prove signer identity?
Use email verification, SMS codes, knowledge-based authentication, or stronger methods; retain audit logs showing IP, timestamp, and authentication method.
What if an approver's name differs?
Correct mismatched names before signing; provide evidence of identity and approval to avoid challenges to the document's validity.
How long must we retain completed evaluations?
Retain per internal policy that meets federal minimums—e.g., IRS three-year standard—and any industry-specific rules such as HIPAA six-year retention.
How to correct a signed evaluation?
If changes are material, create a new version or amendment and route it for approval; do not alter the original signed file to preserve the audit trail.

be ready to get more

Join over 28 million airSlate SignNow users

Sign Now