Can a FAT Extension be signed electronically?

Yes. Electronic signatures are legally enforceable under the ESIGN Act (15 U.S.C. ch. 96) and UETA where adopted, provided intent, consent, attribution, and record retention requirements are met.

Is notarization required for every extension?

Not usually. Notarization is only needed if the extension alters a document that itself requires notarization under state law or contract terms. Check state rules and contract language before notarizing.

What happens if approvers are unavailable?

Designate alternates in the approval matrix or include escalation rules in the workflow. Lack of timely approvals can expose teams to liquidated damages or work-stoppage risks.

How should evidence be attached?

Attach scanned PDFs, test logs, delivery receipts, and photos with clear file names and brief captions. Well-organized evidence reduces reviewer questions and speeds approval.

When is a contract amendment required instead?

If the change affects price, scope, or other core contractual terms, execute a formal contract amendment rather than a simple extension. Consult contract counsel when in doubt.

How long must extension records be kept?

Retain completed extension records for the contract term plus at least three years; industry rules may require longer retention (e.g., HIPAA six years, IRS three years).

Electronic Signature
Templates
Project Management
Project Management FAT Extensions

Project Management FAT Extensions

This template is fully customizable. Edit the text, fill out the fields, and send it for signature. Give it a try!

Project Management FAT Extensions

Project Identification

Project Title Project ID Client Name Service Provider Project Manager (Provider) Contract Reference

Effective Date:

Recitals

This FAT Extensions Agreement (the "Agreement") documents the mutually agreed extension of scheduled Factory Acceptance Test (FAT) activities originally defined in the Contract Reference above. Client Name: and Service Provider: acknowledge that the parties have complied with the change request procedures required by their underlying agreement and now record the adjustments set forth below.

Scope of Extension

Scope Description Out-of-Scope Items

Reason for extension (operational, supplier delay, design changes, etc.):

Deliverables and Acceptance Criteria

Deliverable 1 Title:

Deliverable 1 Acceptance Criteria

Deliverable 2 Title:

Deliverable 2 Acceptance Criteria

Do any acceptance criteria change as a result of this extension? Yes

Timeline and Milestones

Original FAT Start Date: Original FAT End Date:

Requested Extension Period (days):

New FAT Start Date: New FAT End Date:

Milestone Schedule (list each revised milestone)

Budget and Payment

Does this extension affect contract price? Yes No

If yes, Total Additional Cost Payment Schedule or Adjustment

Change Order Processing Fee (if applicable):

Change Control and Approvals

Change Request Number:

Attachments (drawings, test plans, updated schedules)

Authorized approver for Client (print name and title):

Authorized approver for Provider (print name and title):

Confidentiality

All information exchanged in connection with this extension shall be treated as Confidential Information under the terms of the parties' existing confidentiality provisions. Neither party shall disclose the other's confidential information except as required by law, and any such disclosure shall be subject to prior notice to the disclosing party where permitted.

Governing Law; Dispute Resolution

This Agreement shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws selected under the original contract. The parties shall attempt to resolve any dispute arising out of this extension in accordance with the dispute resolution procedures set forth in the underlying agreement. Absent such procedure, the parties agree to submit disputes to good-faith negotiation prior to initiating formal proceedings.

Warranties; No Waiver

Except as expressly modified by this Agreement, all warranties, terms, and conditions of the underlying contract remain in full force and effect. No failure or delay by either party in exercising any right will constitute a waiver of that right unless set forth in a signed writing.

Authorization and Certification

The undersigned certify that they are authorized representatives of their respective organizations with authority to amend the schedule, scope, and cost as set forth herein and that execution of this Agreement constitutes a binding amendment to the underlying contract to the extent provided herein.

Client - Printed Name:

Service Provider - Printed Name:

By:

Date:

What the Project Management FAT Extensions document is

A Project Management FAT Extensions form documents a formal request to extend a Final Acceptance Test (FAT) or analogous project milestone when circumstances prevent timely completion. It records the reason for delay, proposed new milestone dates, expected impact to schedule and budget, and required approvals. The document creates an auditable trail for project records, aligns stakeholder expectations, and becomes the basis for schedule adjustments, contract amendments, or claims management procedures where applicable across construction, software delivery, and professional services.

Why using a standardized FAT Extensions form matters

A consistent extension form reduces ambiguity by capturing the cause, scope, and approvals in one place, supporting contract compliance and auditability. It helps avoid informal email promises that are difficult to validate and provides a clear record for schedule recovery, invoicing, and dispute resolution.

Which project roles typically complete or approve a FAT Extensions form

Completed forms serve as an enforceable record for progress reporting, change control, and invoice or liquidated-damages calculations when properly countersigned.

Project managers and PMO teams who assess schedule impact and propose new test dates, preparing supporting documentation and risk analysis.
Contractors and subcontractors who document the justification for delay and provide revised resource or scope estimates for the FAT.
Owners, client representatives, or QA leads who review, accept, or reject the extension request and record conditional approvals.

Typical signatories and their perspectives

Senior Project Manager

The Senior Project Manager prepares the extension request, assesses schedule and budget impact, and submits supporting evidence. Their narrative should explain root causes, mitigation steps, and an achievable revised FAT date to enable informed approvals and minimize downstream claims.

Contractor Representative

The Contractor Representative provides factual support for the delay—resource constraints, delivery delays, or technical blockers—and supplies revised delivery timelines, cost estimates if applicable, and acceptance of any conditional requirements set by the client.

Step-by-step: completing a FAT Extensions request

Follow these steps to prepare a clear, approvable extension request and reduce back-and-forth with stakeholders.

01

1. Gather facts: Collect incident dates, test logs, and supplier notices.
02

2. Assess impact: Estimate schedule, cost, and quality consequences.
03

3. Propose dates: Select new FAT and contingency dates.
04

4. Submit for approval: Include attachments and route to all approvers.

Core components to include in a professional extension request

A complete FAT Extensions document should present facts, impact assessment, and approvals so stakeholders can decide quickly and maintain an auditable record.

Request Header

Include project name, contract number, request date, and requestor contact information so the form can be indexed and routed without additional clarification.

Justification

Describe root causes with specific dates and vendor references. Include any corrective actions already taken and the likelihood of recurrence to inform risk decisions.

Impact Analysis

Quantify schedule shifts, cost implications, affected deliverables, and resource changes. Use concise tables when multiple milestones are affected to aid review.

Proposed Schedule

Provide the requested FAT date, intermediate checkpoints, and contingency plan including resource commitments and testing windows to support acceptance.

Approvals

List required approvers and their role (owner, QA lead, contract manager). Include signature blocks and date fields to capture formal acceptance.

Supporting Evidence

Attach logs, vendor notices, test reports, and photos where relevant. Well-labeled evidence shortens review time and reduces follow-up questions.

Configuring an online extension workflow

Set up an electronic workflow to route the request, collect signatures, and capture an audit trail for future reference.

Field	Configuration
Upload Document	PDF or DOCX accepted
Assign Signers	Role-based order
Authentication	Email or SMS code
Notifications	Automated reminders enabled

Typical digital route for a FAT Extensions request

A standard e-submission flow ensures each party sees the same records and the platform captures identity and timestamps.

Prepare Form: Complete fields, attach evidence.
Route to Approvers: Order by role, not by email.
Signer Authentication: Use email/SMS or stronger methods.
Audit Trail: System logs timestamps and IPs.

Technical and compatibility considerations for eSubmission

Confirm recipients can open attachments and receive authentication codes; ensure your eSignature provider captures an auditable certificate of completion.

File Formats: PDF, DOCX, XLSX supported
Integrations: Salesforce, NetSuite, Microsoft 365
Authentication: Email, SMS code, or SSO

Security and compliance controls to look for

Encryption: TLS 1.2/1.3; AES-256 at rest

Audit Trails: Detailed event logs

HIPAA: BAA available

21 CFR Part 11: Compliance option

SOC 2: Type II available

Accessibility: WCAG 2.0 AA support

Common timing expectations and internal deadlines

Define internal cutoffs and expected turnaround times to prevent unauthorized work during pending approvals.

Submission Deadline:

Submit before original FAT date

Acknowledgment Window:

Approver acknowledges within 5 business days

Decision Period:

Approval or denial within 10 business days

Effective Date:

New FAT date becomes effective on approval

Stakeholder Notice:

Notify affected parties within 2 business days

Key milestones in the extension request lifecycle

The following staged milestones show the typical sequential flow from request to implementation.

01

Request Submitted

Requestor files form with attachments and evidence.

02

Technical Review

Project and QA teams assess feasibility and impacts.

03

Approval Decision

Owner or contract manager approves, rejects, or conditions extension.

04

Implementation

Schedule updated and stakeholders informed; execute mitigation plan.

Common errors that slow or invalidate extension requests

Missing or incomplete evidence such as vendor delivery receipts or test logs, which forces repeated requests for documentation and delays approval.
Vague impact statements that do not quantify schedule, cost, or deliverable changes, causing reviewers to request supplemental risk assessments.
Incorrect project identifiers or mismatched contract numbers that prevent automated routing and lead to lost paperwork or misfiled records.
Failing to include required approvers or signature blocks which results in non-binding requests and potential disputes over authority.

Key liabilities and risks from poorly documented extensions

Liquidated Damages: Contractual financial exposure

Schedule Slippage: Cascade delays to dependent work

Payment Withholding: Owner may suspend payments

Claims Risk: Disputed responsibilities increase

Regulatory Risk: Noncompliance penalties possible

Reputation: Stakeholder confidence may erode

How a FAT Extension differs from a contract amendment

Compare purpose, formality, and timing to decide whether a full contract amendment is required or a limited extension form will suffice.

Criteria	FAT Extension	Contract Amendment
Purpose	schedule relief	contract terms change
Formality	lower formality	higher formality
Signatures	approvers only	parties and counsel
When used	short delays	material contractual changes

Typical eSignature vendor pricing and capabilities relevant to FAT Extensions

Compare basic pricing and feature presence for common eSignature vendors. signNow is listed first per vendor-comparison conventions used here.

	signNow	DocuSign	Adobe Sign	PandaDoc	HelloSign
Starting Price	$8/user/mo	$15/user/mo	$14/user/mo	$19/user/mo	$15/user/mo
Free Trial	7-day trial	Varies	Varies	Varies	Varies
Bulk Send	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	No
Audit Trail	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes
HIPAA Compliant	Yes	Yes	Yes	No	No
Envelope Cap	No cap	100 envelopes/user/year	Varies	Varies	Varies

Real examples showing how teams use extension forms

These concise examples illustrate practical applications and outcomes when extension requests are handled formally.

Optica Ventures LLC

A small developer documented a failed third-party delivery affecting FAT timelines

Provided delivery notices and revised test windows
The client accepted a conditional new date after reviewing logs, reducing dispute time and preserving the overall project budget.

Tech Data

An enterprise operations team used a templated extension to manage vendor delays

Routed multi-level approvals automatically
This standardized approach shortened review cycles and ensured clear audit records for later contractual reconciliation.

Frequently asked questions and troubleshooting tips

Answers to common questions when preparing, routing, or storing Project Management FAT Extensions.

Need help? Contact support

Can a FAT Extension be signed electronically?
Yes. Electronic signatures are legally enforceable under the ESIGN Act (15 U.S.C. ch. 96) and UETA where adopted, provided intent, consent, attribution, and record retention requirements are met.
Is notarization required for every extension?
Not usually. Notarization is only needed if the extension alters a document that itself requires notarization under state law or contract terms. Check state rules and contract language before notarizing.
What happens if approvers are unavailable?
Designate alternates in the approval matrix or include escalation rules in the workflow. Lack of timely approvals can expose teams to liquidated damages or work-stoppage risks.
How should evidence be attached?
Attach scanned PDFs, test logs, delivery receipts, and photos with clear file names and brief captions. Well-organized evidence reduces reviewer questions and speeds approval.
When is a contract amendment required instead?
If the change affects price, scope, or other core contractual terms, execute a formal contract amendment rather than a simple extension. Consult contract counsel when in doubt.
How long must extension records be kept?
Retain completed extension records for the contract term plus at least three years; industry rules may require longer retention (e.g., HIPAA six years, IRS three years).

be ready to get more

Join over 28 million airSlate SignNow users

Sign Now