Can the method be e-signed?

Yes. Under the ESIGN Act (15 U.S.C. ch. 96) and UETA (adopted by most states), electronic signatures are legally valid for commercial agreements unless a statutory exception applies.

When is notarization required?

Notarization is document- and state-dependent. For most commercial implementation methods notarization is optional; if a contract requires notarization follow the state notary rules or RON requirements.

What authentication level should we use?

Use email or SMS for routine approvals. For regulated data or high-value contracts, choose stronger methods such as KBA or multi-factor authentication to meet compliance needs.

How do we store signed records?

Store signed PDFs with audit trails in a secure repository that supports retention policies and exportable audit logs to meet IRS, HIPAA, or corporate recordkeeping rules.

Who can sign on behalf of an organization?

The designated authorized signer per procurement or corporate resolution should sign. Verify signatory authority before acceptance to avoid contract disputes.

How to handle version control?

Use templates with version numbering, require approvals for changes, and archive superseded versions with metadata and a change log for auditability.

Electronic Signature
Templates
Project Management
Project Management Implementation Method

Project Management Implementation Method

This template is fully customizable. Edit the text, fill out the fields, and send it for signature. Give it a try!

PROJECT MANAGEMENT IMPLEMENTATION METHOD

Project Identification

Project Name Project ID Client Name Client Address Service Provider Name Project Manager (Provider) Client Project Sponsor

Purpose and Overview

This Project Management Implementation Method (the Method) defines the agreed approach by which the Service Provider will plan, execute, monitor and close the project identified above. It documents responsibilities, deliverables, acceptance criteria, timeline, budget controls, change control and governance mechanisms. The Method supplements the Master Services Agreement between the parties and governs project-specific execution unless expressly superseded in writing.

Scope of Work

Scope Description Out of Scope

Deliverables and Acceptance

The Service Provider shall deliver the items set out below. Each deliverable must satisfy its acceptance criteria and pass the acceptance tests defined by the Client prior to final acceptance and release of final payment.

Deliverable 1 — Title Deliverable 1 — Description and Acceptance Criteria Deliverable 2 — Title Deliverable 2 — Description and Acceptance Criteria Additional Deliverables (summary)

Timeline and Milestones

Planned Start Date Planned End Date Milestone 1 — Title

Milestone 1 — Target Date:

Milestone 1 — Acceptance Criteria Milestone 2 — Title

Milestone 2 — Target Date:

Milestone 2 — Acceptance Criteria

Budget and Payment

Total Project Cost Payment Schedule Invoicing and Payment Terms

Change Order Process

All changes to scope, deliverables, schedule or price shall be processed through a written change order. No change shall be effective or incur cost to the Client unless signed by authorized representatives of both parties prior to implementation.

Change Order Approval Threshold Change Order Process Summary

Confidentiality and Data Protection

The parties acknowledge and agree that confidential information exchanged in connection with the project is subject to confidentiality obligations. The Service Provider shall (a) use confidential information solely for project purposes, (b) limit access to personnel with a need to know, and (c) implement reasonable administrative, physical and technical safeguards to protect such information. Confidential information does not include information that is publicly known through no fault of the receiving party or is rightfully obtained from a third party without restriction.

Intellectual Property and Deliverables

Unless otherwise agreed in writing, the Client shall retain ownership of Client-provided materials and of final deliverables upon full payment. The Service Provider grants the Client a perpetual, non-exclusive, worldwide license to use deliverables for Client operations. The Service Provider retains rights to underlying tools, methodologies and pre-existing materials but grants a license to the Client to the extent necessary to use the deliverables.

Acceptance Testing and Remedies

Acceptance testing shall be conducted in accordance with the acceptance criteria set for each deliverable. The Client shall provide documented acceptance or rejection within the agreed review period. For rejected deliverables, the Service Provider shall correct defects at no additional charge and resubmit for acceptance. If the Service Provider fails to cure material defects within a commercially reasonable period, the Client may withhold payment attributable to the rejected deliverable or pursue other remedies under the agreement.

Liability, Insurance, and Force Majeure

Each party's liability arising from this Method shall be subject to the limits set forth in the governing agreement. The Service Provider shall maintain insurance customary for the services provided. Neither party shall be liable for failure or delay to perform to the extent caused by circumstances beyond its reasonable control, provided the affected party gives prompt notice and uses commercially reasonable efforts to resume performance.

Termination

This Method may be terminated in accordance with the termination provisions of the governing agreement. Upon termination, the Service Provider shall deliver work in progress and submit final invoices for all work performed through the termination date in accordance with the payment terms.

Governing Law and Dispute Resolution

This Method shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the jurisdiction specified below. The parties shall first attempt to resolve any dispute through good faith negotiations; if unresolved, disputes shall be resolved in the manner provided in the governing agreement.

Governing Law (State or Jurisdiction)

Project Governance and Reporting

Regular governance meetings shall be held at intervals set out below. The Service Provider shall deliver progress reports including status of milestones, risks, issues and expenditures. Escalation points and decision authorities are identified below.

Meeting Cadence Reporting Deliverables

Change History and Approvals

Any amendment to this Method must be in writing and signed by authorized representatives of both parties. The table below records formal amendments and approvals related to this project.

Recent Amendment or Note

Signatures

Client — Printed Name:

Client — By:

Date:

Service Provider — Printed Name:

Service Provider — By:

Date:

What the Project Management Implementation Method Is

The Project Management Implementation Method is a structured template and process for launching, tracking, and closing a discrete implementation effort such as a software deployment, organizational change, or operational rollout. It defines roles, deliverables, timelines, acceptance criteria, risks, and communication channels so teams and stakeholders share a single source of truth. The method is neutral to industry and scalable from small projects to enterprise programs; it is intended to support clear accountability, consistent documentation, and measurable outcomes throughout the project lifecycle.

Why a Formal Implementation Method Matters

A documented method reduces ambiguity, aligns stakeholders, and preserves institutional knowledge. Using a consistent approach improves schedule predictability, helps manage risks proactively, and makes approvals and handoffs auditable for compliance or procurement reviews.

Who Typically Uses This Implementation Method

Project managers and implementation leads use the method to coordinate cross-functional workstreams and maintain a single authoritative record for approvals and milestones.

Project Managers and PMOs responsible for schedule, scope, and resource allocation.
IT and technical leads who track deployment activities and configuration baselines.
Business sponsors and stakeholders who approve milestones and acceptance criteria.

Sponsors, procurement teams, and operations staff review the method’s outputs to confirm contractual deliverables, acceptance criteria, and post-implementation support obligations.

Core Components of a Professional Implementation Method

A complete implementation method combines governance, planning, execution, risk controls, communications, and acceptance criteria so teams can manage delivery consistently and defensibly.

Governance

Defines decision authority, escalation paths, roles and RACI assignments so approvals and exceptions are traceable and auditable across the project life cycle.

Scope

Documents in-scope deliverables, explicit exclusions, and acceptance criteria to reduce scope creep and provide objective measures for sign-off and payments.

Schedule

Includes baseline timelines, critical-path milestones, and change control rules so deviations are visible and managed through a formal process.

Resources

Specifies staffing, vendor responsibilities, equipment and procurement needs to ensure capacity planning and cost tracking are aligned with deliverables.

Risk Management

Lists identified risks, mitigation actions, owners, and triggers for escalation so responses are timely and documented for audits.

Communications

Defines stakeholder reports, frequency, channels, and decision records so information flows consistently and approvals are retained for compliance.

Step-by-Step Implementation Checklist

Follow these sequential steps to move from initiation through acceptance while preserving auditability and change control.

01

Initiation: Define scope, sponsor, and business objectives.
02

Planning: Create baseline schedule, resource plan, and risk register.
03

Execution: Track deliverables, run tests, and manage scope changes.
04

Closeout: Obtain acceptance, archive records, and capture lessons.

Typical Digital Workflow Settings for eSubmission

Configure workflow fields and authentication to match your internal approval and security requirements when sending the method for review or signature.

Field	Configuration
Signing Order	Set sequential or parallel as required by governance
Authentication	Email or SMS code; use KBA for higher assurance
Template Reuse	Enable template library for consistent reuse and versioning
Reminders	Set automatic reminders and escalation notifications

Technical Considerations for Digital Completion

Choose a platform that supports secure eSignatures, audit trails, and the authentication level your organization requires.

File Formats: PDF, DOCX supported
Integrations: Salesforce, NetSuite, Google Workspace available
Authentication: Email, SMS, or advanced options

Typical Online Submission Flow

A standard eSubmission moves documents from upload to signature capture and finally to storage with a complete audit trail for each action.

Upload: Add the method document to the signing platform
Assign Fields: Place signature, date, and approval fields
Send: Deliver to signers via email or secure link
Archive: Store signed copy and audit report in repository

Common Timeline Events and Typical Deadlines

Use the schedule below as a baseline; adjust durations to reflect resource availability and contractual obligations.

Kickoff Meeting:

Within 1–2 weeks of contract execution for alignment

Baseline Schedule:

Delivered within 2–4 weeks after kickoff for stakeholder approval

Major Deliverable:

Milestone dates per the project schedule and SOW

Stakeholder Review:

Typically 5–10 business days per review cycle

Final Acceptance:

Formal sign-off after successful testing and remediation

Common Mistakes to Avoid

Vague scope leading to disputes and change orders.
Missing authorized signatory; approvals rejected in procurement.
Insufficient authentication for regulatory paperwork.
No archived audit trail for post-project reviews.

Risks and Consequences of Errors

Contractual Delay: Damages or liquidated sums

Tax Penalties: Reporting errors may trigger IRS fines

Regulatory Exposure: HIPAA or industry sanctions

Procurement Rejection: Noncompliant signatures voiding approvals

Operational Disruption: Missed go-live windows

Reputational Harm: Client trust diminished

eSignature Pricing Snapshot for Implementation Workflows

Compare starting price, trial availability, bulk send, audit trail, HIPAA support, and envelope caps across vendors to match platform risk and volume needs.

	signNow	DocuSign	Adobe Sign	PandaDoc	HelloSign
Starting Price	$8/user/mo	$15/user/mo	$14/user/mo	$19/user/mo	$15/user/mo
Free Trial	7-day free trial, no credit card	Varies by vendor	Varies by vendor	Varies by vendor	Varies by vendor
Bulk Send	Yes (Business Premium+)	Varies by plan	Varies by plan	Varies by plan	Varies by plan
Audit Trail	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes
HIPAA Compliant	Yes	Yes	Yes	No	No
Envelope Cap	No cap	100 envelopes/user/year	Varies	Varies	Varies

Real-World Examples of the Method in Use

Several organizations have adapted a formal implementation method to accelerate approvals and reduce onsite dependencies during rollouts.

Martin Properties — Tim Martin, Founder

The interface lets us process and execute documents online with full compliance on mobile or offline devices.

Reduced turnaround time for lease rollouts.
The method eliminated in-person bottlenecks, preserved audit trails, and allowed the team to meet tight occupancy deadlines while keeping records organized for future audits and tenant disputes.

Optica Ventures — Brian Fitzgibbons, COO

The interface is simple and easy for both our team and customers to use.

Improved external sign-off rates.
Standardizing the implementation method helped reduce review cycles, improved clarity on deliverables, and sped client onboarding while maintaining a clear record for compliance teams.

Frequently Asked Questions and Troubleshooting

Answers to common questions about completing, signing, and storing the Project Management Implementation Method are listed below.

Need help? Contact support

Can the method be e-signed?
Yes. Under the ESIGN Act (15 U.S.C. ch. 96) and UETA (adopted by most states), electronic signatures are legally valid for commercial agreements unless a statutory exception applies.
When is notarization required?
Notarization is document- and state-dependent. For most commercial implementation methods notarization is optional; if a contract requires notarization follow the state notary rules or RON requirements.
What authentication level should we use?
Use email or SMS for routine approvals. For regulated data or high-value contracts, choose stronger methods such as KBA or multi-factor authentication to meet compliance needs.
How do we store signed records?
Store signed PDFs with audit trails in a secure repository that supports retention policies and exportable audit logs to meet IRS, HIPAA, or corporate recordkeeping rules.
Who can sign on behalf of an organization?
The designated authorized signer per procurement or corporate resolution should sign. Verify signatory authority before acceptance to avoid contract disputes.
How to handle version control?
Use templates with version numbering, require approvals for changes, and archive superseded versions with metadata and a change log for auditability.

be ready to get more

Join over 28 million airSlate SignNow users

Sign Now