What if a signer lacks authority?

If a signer lacks authority, obtain a properly authorized signature or a delegation letter before accepting the response. Acceptance without proper authority can void certification and expose the requesting organization to contract disputes; document any remedial approvals.

Can the request be signed electronically?

Yes, in most cases; electronic signatures are enforceable under the ESIGN Act (15 U.S.C. ch. 96) and UETA where adopted. Exceptions include some court filings and testamentary documents; verify whether notarization or witnesses are required.

Are notarization or witnesses required?

Not usually for routine performance requests, but certain attachments like affidavits, sworn certifications, or jurisdictional documents may require notarization or witnesses. Confirm state law and contract terms before accepting uncertified attachments.

How should confidential or PHI data be handled?

Limit PHI in responses and use secure channels or redaction. If PHI is necessary, ensure HIPAA compliance, obtain a signed BAA with your vendor, and retain records per 45 CFR §164.530(j).

What if required fields are incomplete?

Return the submission specifying missing fields and a deadline for correction. Track re-submissions, preserve original timestamps, and note that persistent incomplete fields may trigger audit findings or payment holds.

How long must these signed records be retained?

Retain signed requests for the project lifecycle plus statutory periods—minimum three years for tax-related records (IRC §6501(a)), six years for HIPAA-related records (45 CFR §164.530(j)), and longer where contracts or state law require.

Electronic Signature
Templates
Project Management
Project Management Performance Request

Project Management Performance Request

This template is fully customizable. Edit the text, fill out the fields, and send it for signature. Give it a try!

PROJECT MANAGEMENT PERFORMANCE REQUEST

Project Identification

Project Title Project ID

Client Name: Service Provider:

Project Manager (Client): Project Manager (Provider):

Request Date: Request Reference No.:

Summary of Request

This Project Management Performance Request is issued by the Client to the Service Provider to request specific performance actions, corrective measures, or verification of completed work under the Project Agreement referenced above. The Service Provider shall respond in accordance with the timeline and procedures set forth below.

Summary of requested performance or corrective action

Scope of Work

The Service Provider shall perform the following scope to satisfy this request. Items not expressly included are presumed out of scope unless changed through the change order process described below.

Detailed scope of work Out-of-scope items

Deliverables and Acceptance

Each deliverable must include acceptance criteria. The Client will perform acceptance testing within the period specified below; failure to provide written rejection within the acceptance period constitutes acceptance.

Deliverable 1 — Description Deliverable 1 — Acceptance criteria

Due Date:

Deliverable 2 — Description Deliverable 2 — Acceptance criteria

Due Date:

Timeline and Milestones

Start Date: End Date:

Milestone 1

Due Date: Responsible Party:

Milestone 2

Due Date: Responsible Party:

Budget and Payment

Total Budget/Cost: $

Payment schedule and terms

Payment milestone 1 (% or amount): Payment milestone 1 due:

Change Order Process

All modifications to scope, schedule or budget must be processed through a written change order signed by authorized representatives of both parties. Emergency or critical path deviations shall be documented and followed by a formal change order no later than five business days after occurrence.

Change order contact (Client) Change order contact (Provider)

Confidentiality and Data Handling

Each party will treat as Confidential Information all non-public information disclosed in connection with this request. Confidential Information shall be used solely to effect performance under this request and shall not be disclosed except to those employees, subcontractors or agents with a need-to-know who are bound to confidentiality obligations no less protective than those herein. This clause survives termination of this request for a period of three years.

Liability, Remedies and Termination

The Service Provider shall correct defective or nonconforming work upon notice within the timeframes specified in this request. The Client's sole remedies for failure to meet acceptance criteria shall include re-performance, price adjustment, or, where permitted by the Master Agreement, termination for cause. Neither party will be liable for consequential damages except in cases of willful misconduct or gross negligence.

Governing Law and Dispute Resolution

This request shall be governed by the laws of the state of without regard to its conflicts of law principles. Disputes will be resolved in accordance with the dispute resolution provisions of the applicable Project Agreement.

Certifications and Acknowledgements

By signing below, each signatory represents and warrants that they are authorized to bind the party for which they sign, that the information in this request is true and accurate to the best of their knowledge, and that the party will perform in accordance with the terms set forth herein and any applicable Master Agreement.

Client acknowledges receipt of this request: Service Provider acknowledges receipt:

Attachments and Supporting Information

List attachments or reference documents

Client:

By:

Date:

Service Provider:

By:

Date:

What the Project Management Performance Request Is

A Project Management Performance Request is a formal, written request used to gather documented evidence about a project’s execution, including deliverables, schedules, budgets, quality metrics, change orders, and compliance with contract terms. Organizations use the request for milestone acceptance, audits, vendor performance reviews, or project closeout. Typical content includes a scope definition, required exhibits, specific performance metrics, submission instructions, and signature blocks; responses become part of the project record and support payment decisions, dispute resolution, and regulatory reviews.

Why Standardizing This Request Matters

A standardized Project Management Performance Request creates a consistent record for evaluating schedule, budget, scope, and quality. It reduces ambiguity, speeds review, and strengthens auditability so contract and compliance teams can verify performance and resolve disputes with documented evidence.

Typical Senders and Responders

Project managers, procurement officers, contract administrators, and internal audit teams use the Project Management Performance Request to collect standardized performance data and evidence across projects.

Project managers seeking documented evidence for milestone acceptance and closeout.
Procurement and vendor managers assessing contractor compliance with scope, schedule, and payment terms.
Internal auditors, compliance teams, and executive sponsors reviewing performance for audits and renewals.

Responses typically come from prime contractors, subcontractors, or internal project teams that supply attested records, metrics, and supporting exhibits for validation.

Who Issues and Who Responds

Requesting Official

Person or office authorized to issue the request, such as a contract officer or project director. Responsible for defining the scope of requested information, setting deadlines, and certifying that collected responses meet contractual and audit requirements before acceptance.

Responding Party

Entity or individual receiving the request—typically a prime contractor, subcontractor, or internal project team. Must provide accurate performance data, supporting documents, and an authorized signature or attestation within the stated timeframe to ensure compliance and avoid penalties.

Security and Compliance Considerations

Encryption: TLS 1.2/1.3 in transit; AES-256 at rest

Certifications: SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001, PCI DSS

Legal Frameworks: ESIGN, UETA, HIPAA (BAA available)

Audit Trail: Detailed timestamp, IP, and action log

Authentication: Email, SMS, SSO options; 2FA supported

Data Privacy: EU-U.S. Data Privacy Framework available

Consequences of Incomplete or Incorrect Responses

Payment Withholding: Payments delayed or withheld

Contract Termination: Risk of termination for default

Audit Findings: Cost disallowance or recovery

Regulatory Fines: Violations can trigger penalties

Reputational Harm: Damaged vendor relationships

False Claims Risk: Civil liability for misstatements

Common Preparation and Submission Pitfalls

Incomplete supporting documents cause delays and may trigger follow-up requests or audit exceptions; include certificates, test results, change orders, and approvals to reduce processing time.
Ambiguous dates or inconsistent milestone definitions lead to disputes; use MM/DD/YYYY format and cross-reference contract schedules to ensure clarity and comparability.
Mismatched names or missing signatures can invalidate responses; require full legal names and authorized signatories with role and date on each page.
Submitting unredacted confidential data may breach privacy obligations; redact unrelated personal health or financial data and follow HIPAA or contractual privacy rules.

Step-by-Step: Prepare, Issue, and Collect

Use this step-by-step workflow to prepare, authorize, send, and collect a Project Management Performance Request and its supporting documents in a compliant and auditable manner.

01

Prepare Request: Define scope, metrics, and required attachments
02

Authorize: Obtain issuing official signature and authority
03

Distribute: Send to named recipients with deadline
04

Collect & Review: Receive responses, verify documents, and record findings

How the Request Flows Through Your Organization

This overview shows how a Project Management Performance Request moves from issuance to final record, including routing, signer actions, and audit capture.

Upload Document: Attach template and supporting exhibits
Assign Recipients: Define signer roles and response owners
Authenticate Signer: Use email, SMS, or stronger methods
Finalize Record: Capture signatures and save audit trail

Configuring a Digital Workflow for Online Completion

Configure a digital workflow so the Project Management Performance Request collects structured responses, enforces required fields, and produces an auditable signed record.

Field	Configuration
Required Fields	Full legal name, effective date, milestones, deliverables
Authentication Settings	Email link with optional SMS code or KBA
Routing Rules	Sequential or parallel signer order; reminders enabled
Storage & Retention	Encrypted storage, export as PDF and XML

eSignature Vendor Pricing and Feature Snapshot

Compare eSignature vendor pricing and common features relevant to issuing and signing a Project Management Performance Request.

	signNow	DocuSign	Adobe Sign	PandaDoc	HelloSign
Starting Price	$8/user/mo	$15/user/mo	$14/user/mo	$19/user/mo	$15/user/mo
Free Trial	7-day free trial	Varies by plan and contract	Varies by plan and contract	Varies by plan and contract	Varies by plan and contract
Bulk Send	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Varies by plan and contract
Audit Trail	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes
HIPAA Compliant	Yes (BAA available)	Varies by plan and contract	Varies by plan and contract	Varies by plan and contract	Varies by plan and contract
Envelope Cap	No envelope cap	100 envelopes/user/year	Varies by plan	Varies by plan	Varies by plan

Typical Deadlines and SLAs for Requests

Typical deadlines for issuing and returning a Project Management Performance Request vary by contract; define internal SLAs to avoid missed milestones and payment delays.

Issuance at milestone or audit trigger:

Send immediately after milestone acceptance or audit initiation

Standard response deadline window for recipients:

Typically 14 to 30 calendar days from receipt

Reminder and follow-up schedule before due date:

Automated reminder seven days before the due date

Escalation and compliance actions for late responses:

Escalate to contract officer after missed deadline

Final acceptance and record closure procedures:

Document acceptance, archive signed records, and notify stakeholders

Practical Tips to Improve Accuracy and Speed

Adopt consistent templates, clear metrics, and digital workflows to reduce errors and speed verification of Project Management Performance Requests.

Use a standardized template with defined metrics and exhibits

Standardize field names, required attachments, and measurement units across projects. Predefine milestone acceptance criteria, deliverable formats, and evidence types to reduce back-and-forth and simplify automated validation during review.

Require authorized signatory and role identification on submissions

Specify the authorized signatory by name and title and require a dated signature or digital attestation. Maintain a delegation list so reviewers can confirm authority and avoid later disputes about who could bind the contractor or vendor.

Attach supporting documents and cross-reference contract exhibits

Include referenced documents—change orders, test results, inspection reports—as numbered exhibits and cite contract exhibit numbers. Cross-referencing ensures the reviewer can reconcile performance claims with contractual obligations without requesting repetitive clarifications.

Use secure eSignature and role-based access controls

Require an eSignature solution that preserves an audit trail, provides signer attribution, and enforces access controls for sensitive attachments. Use HIPAA-compliant workflows when health information is present and retain logs consistent with regulatory requirements.

Essential Sections to Include in the Template

Include these core sections in a Project Management Performance Request so responses are consistent, verifiable, and suitable for audit or contract compliance reviews.

Header

Identify requesting organization, project name, contract number, and reference to the governing agreement. Include a unique request ID and issue date to support version control and traceability.

Scope

Define the exact scope of performance being assessed, including milestones, deliverables, geographic limits, and excluded items. Clear scope prevents misinterpretation and reduces disputes during validation.

Required Deliverables

List documents to attach (test reports, change orders, certificates) and specify acceptable formats, page limits, and exhibit numbering conventions to enable efficient review and automated parsing.

Performance Metrics

Specify measurable indicators (schedule variance, cost variance, defect counts, percent complete) with calculation methods and thresholds for acceptance to remove ambiguity in evaluation.

Signatures

Include signature blocks for authorized signatory, title, date, and contact details. State whether initials on each page are required and whether digital signatures are acceptable.

Submission Instructions

Provide delivery method, recipient contact, deadline, acceptable file formats, and retention instructions for both the responder and requesting office to ensure compliance and secure handling.

Frequently Asked Questions and Troubleshooting

Answers to frequent questions about completing, signing, and storing a Project Management Performance Request efficiently.

Need help? Contact support

What if a signer lacks authority?
If a signer lacks authority, obtain a properly authorized signature or a delegation letter before accepting the response. Acceptance without proper authority can void certification and expose the requesting organization to contract disputes; document any remedial approvals.
Can the request be signed electronically?
Yes, in most cases; electronic signatures are enforceable under the ESIGN Act (15 U.S.C. ch. 96) and UETA where adopted. Exceptions include some court filings and testamentary documents; verify whether notarization or witnesses are required.
Are notarization or witnesses required?
Not usually for routine performance requests, but certain attachments like affidavits, sworn certifications, or jurisdictional documents may require notarization or witnesses. Confirm state law and contract terms before accepting uncertified attachments.
How should confidential or PHI data be handled?
Limit PHI in responses and use secure channels or redaction. If PHI is necessary, ensure HIPAA compliance, obtain a signed BAA with your vendor, and retain records per 45 CFR §164.530(j).
What if required fields are incomplete?
Return the submission specifying missing fields and a deadline for correction. Track re-submissions, preserve original timestamps, and note that persistent incomplete fields may trigger audit findings or payment holds.
How long must these signed records be retained?
Retain signed requests for the project lifecycle plus statutory periods—minimum three years for tax-related records (IRC §6501(a)), six years for HIPAA-related records (45 CFR §164.530(j)), and longer where contracts or state law require.

be ready to get more

Join over 28 million airSlate SignNow users

Sign Now