What if a signer cannot access the file?

Confirm the recipient email, check spam filters, and provide an alternate secure link. If access issues persist, consider a different authentication method or resend the invitation using a verified email address.

Is an electronic signature legally binding?

Yes. In the United States, electronic signatures have legal effect under the ESIGN Act (15 U.S.C. §7001) and are supported by UETA in most states, provided intent, consent, attribution, and record retention are satisfied.

Do planning reviews require notarization?

Typically no, unless the document being approved is a notarizable instrument under state law. Check state requirements and add notarization or witness steps when legal instruments or deeds are part of the package.

How should we store signed reviews?

Store the signed record in a secure document management system with an audit trail. Retain records per applicable federal or industry retention rules and any longer state or internal retention periods.

What authentication level is recommended?

Use email or SMS for routine approvals; require stronger authentication such as multi-factor or ID verification for high-risk approvals or regulated projects involving PHI or financial controls.

How do we correct an error after signoff?

If minor, prepare an amendment or addendum and route for signatures. For material changes, execute a formal change request and obtain fresh approvals to maintain an auditable approval trail.

Electronic Signature
Templates
Project Management
Project Management Planning Review Template

Project Management Planning Review Template

This template is fully customizable. Edit the text, fill out the fields, and send it for signature. Give it a try!

Project Management Planning Review Template

Project Identification

Project Title Project ID Client Name Client Contact (Name, Title, Phone/Email) Service Provider Project Manager (Provider)

Review Date: Review Period Start: Review Period End:

Scope of Work

The Service Provider shall perform the work described below in accordance with the project plan and acceptance criteria. The scope shall be limited to the deliverables and tasks expressly identified; any additions shall require the Change Order Process described herein.

Detailed Scope Description Out-of-Scope Items

Deliverables and Acceptance Criteria

Each deliverable must include objective acceptance criteria. Acceptance requires written confirmation by the Client or its authorized representative per the Sign-Off Procedure below.

Deliverable 1 — Description Deliverable 1 — Acceptance Criteria Deliverable 2 — Description Deliverable 2 — Acceptance Criteria

Timeline and Milestones

Anticipated schedule and key milestones. Dates below represent target dates and are subject to the Change Order Process where material schedule changes occur.

Project Start Date Project End Date (Estimated) Milestone 1 — Name

Target Date:

Milestone 2 — Name

Target Date:

Budget and Payment

Financial terms, invoicing cadence, and payment milestones. All fees are exclusive of taxes unless otherwise stated. Client obligations to pay shall follow acceptance of deliverables or milestones as specified below.

Total Budget / Contract Value Payment Schedule Late Payment Terms

Change Order Process

Any change to scope, schedule, or price will be documented by a written change order. No change shall be effective unless signed by authorized representatives of both parties. Emergency changes required to meet critical dates must be confirmed in writing within five business days following verbal authorization.

Change Order Approval Threshold Change Order Procedure Notes

Risk, Assumptions, and Constraints

Key Risks and Mitigation Assumptions and Constraints

Acceptance and Sign-Off Procedure

Acceptance of deliverables requires submission of deliverable documentation and completion of acceptance tests where applicable. The Client shall provide written acceptance or a written list of deficiencies within ten business days of delivery; absence of such response shall not constitute deemed acceptance unless otherwise agreed in writing.

Acceptance Procedure / Criteria

Confidentiality

Both parties acknowledge that in performance of the Services each may receive Confidential Information of the other. "Confidential Information" means non-public business, technical or financial information disclosed in connection with the Project. Each party shall (a) use Confidential Information only for performance under this document, (b) restrict disclosure to employees, agents, or subcontractors who have a need to know and who are bound to protect it, and (c) promptly return or destroy Confidential Information upon written request. Confidentiality obligations shall survive termination of the engagement for a period of three years.

Governing Law

This Planning Review and any disputes arising out of or relating to it shall be governed by the laws of the jurisdiction identified below, without regard to conflict of law provisions.

Governing Law (State/Country)

Review Checklist

Confirm items below to indicate readiness of the planning package for execution.

Scope documented and approved

Schedule validated against resource availability

Budget authorized or funding confirmed

Key risks identified and mitigation assigned

Required resources and staffing assigned

Notes and Action Items

Action Items Resulting from Review

Client:

By:

Date:

Service Provider:

By:

Date:

What the Project Management Planning Review Template Is

The Project Management Planning Review Template is a structured document used to evaluate and approve a project's initial plan, scope, schedule, resources, risks, and governance before execution. It consolidates key deliverables, stakeholder signoffs, milestones, acceptance criteria, and compliance checkpoints into a single review package. Organizations use the template to standardize intake, reduce approval delays, document decisions, and create a consistent record that supports change control, audits, and post-project retrospectives across functional teams and external stakeholders.

Why Use this Review Template for Project Planning

Using a standardized planning review reduces ambiguity in scope and responsibilities, improves stakeholder alignment, and provides a documented baseline for monitoring. It helps reveal schedule conflicts and resource gaps early, reducing rework and budget overruns while creating an auditable record of approvals.

Who Typically Completes a Planning Review

Final signoff often involves the project sponsor and a designated approver from governance or finance to authorize execution.

Project Managers and PMO leads coordinating scope, schedule, risk, and resource commitments across teams.
Functional Managers and subject-matter experts validating resourcing, dependencies, and technical feasibility for their areas.
Sponsors and governance committees providing strategic approval and budget authorization for the project plan.

Essential Sections to Include in the Template

A complete planning review template groups matching information so reviewers can quickly evaluate scope, risks, timeline, costs, and approvals.

Project Summary

One-page overview of objectives, outcomes, business justification, and succinct success criteria to orient reviewers quickly.

Scope & Deliverables

Clear list of in-scope and out-of-scope items, acceptance criteria, and any deliverable owners to reduce later disputes.

Schedule & Milestones

High-level timeline with key milestones, critical path items, and date-based checkpoints for governance and stakeholder alignment.

Resources & Budget

Staffing plan, cost estimates, and resource constraints with contingency assumptions and funding source identified.

Risk & Issues

Top project risks, mitigation plans, residual risk impact, and escalation points for decisions needing sponsor attention.

Approvals

Designated approvers, signature blocks, and required artifacts for final signoff and audit trail retention.

Step-by-Step: Completing the Planning Review

Follow these steps in sequence to prepare, circulate, and finalize the planning review for formal approval.

01

Prepare draft: Populate all template fields and attach required exhibits.
02

Internal review: Share with SMEs for technical and budget verification.
03

Stakeholder circulation: Route to approvers in role-based order for comments.
04

Final signoff: Collect approvals and archive the signed record.

Configuring the Online Review Workflow

Configure routing, authentication, and fields to match your organization's approval model before sending the review.

Field	Configuration
Signers	Add approvers in signing order and assign roles or parallel approvals as needed.
Authentication	Choose email, SMS code, or stronger authentication for sensitive approvals.
Conditional fields	Use conditional visibility for sections that apply only to certain project types.
Notifications	Set reminder cadence and escalation notifications for overdue approvals.

Where to Send and Where the Final Record Lives

Decide distribution and storage locations before routing so recipients and archives are consistent and auditable.

Approvers: Email or secure link to designated approvers for signature.
Project Repository: Store the signed package in the project document management system.
Governance Archive: Upload final record to PMO or governance records for audits.
Requester: Send a final copy to the project sponsor and originator.

Technical Requirements for Digital Completion

Ensure the chosen tool provides an audit trail and encrypted storage to meet internal recordkeeping and compliance requirements.

File formats: PDF and DOCX supported.
Authentication: Email, SMS, or stronger MFA options.
Integrations: Connectors for cloud storage and PM tools.

Key Milestones in the Planning Review Sequence

A sequential milestone list clarifies approval windows and prevents process bottlenecks during the planning review.

01

Draft Completion

Finalize draft deliverables and exhibits for review.

02

Stakeholder Review

SMEs and functional managers provide feedback.

03

Executive Approval

Sponsor authorizes scope and budget.

04

Document Archival

Store signed review and version history in repository.

Typical Timeframes and Deadlines to Expect

Establish reasonable deadlines for each review step and communicate them clearly to participants.

Draft preparation window:

7–14 calendar days to assemble materials and initial estimates.

SME review period:

3–7 calendar days for technical and budget reviews.

Approver response time:

3–5 business days recommended to avoid schedule slip.

Escalation timeframe:

Initiate sponsor escalation after 5 business days of delay.

Archival deadline:

Archive signed package within 3 business days after approval.

Common Mistakes to Avoid When Preparing the Review

Submitting incomplete scope or missing acceptance criteria, which creates scope ambiguity and increases dispute risk during execution.
Not assigning clear owners for deliverables and tasks, producing confusion about accountability and delaying downstream work.
Using inconsistent date formats or ambiguous milestone definitions, which causes misinterpretation and scheduling conflicts across teams.
Failing to attach supporting exhibits (budget detail, risk logs, resource spreadsheets), forcing reviewers to chase information and delaying approval.

Consequences of an Incomplete or Incorrect Review

Schedule delays: Project start or milestones slip.

Budget overruns: Unidentified costs exceed estimates.

Contract disputes: Deliverable disagreements require mediation.

Regulatory exposure: Noncompliance risks for regulated projects.

Audit findings: Lack of approvals triggers audit exceptions.

Invalid signatures: Improper execution can challenge enforceability.

Security and Compliance Essentials to Note

Encryption: TLS 1.2/1.3 in transit; AES-256 at rest.

Audit Trail: Tamper-evident logs with timestamps and IPs.

Authentication: Support for MFA and access controls.

HIPAA: BAA required for protected health information.

ESIGN / UETA: Electronic signatures legally recognized in U.S.

SOC 2 / ISO: Independent certification and controls reporting.

eSignature Vendor Pricing Snapshot for Review Workflows

Compare basic pricing and key capabilities for common eSignature platforms used to execute planning reviews; signNow appears first per vendor listing requirements.

	signNow	DocuSign	Adobe Sign	PandaDoc	HelloSign
Starting Price	$8/user/mo	$15/user/mo	$14/user/mo	$19/user/mo	$15/user/mo
Free Trial	7-day free trial, no card	Verify vendor	Verify vendor	Verify vendor	Verify vendor
Bulk Send	Yes (Business Premium)	Yes	Yes	Yes	Verify vendor
Audit Trail	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes
HIPAA Compliant	Yes (BAA required)	Yes	Yes	Verify vendor	Verify vendor

Practical Examples of Planning Review Use

Two common scenarios illustrate how the template reduces review cycle time and clarifies approvals.

Enterprise PMO Review

A PMO consolidates a cross-functional plan for a large IT rollout, highlighting scope, dependencies, and budget

Review focuses on integration points and resource conflicts
The template provided a single source of truth, shortened review cycles, and created an audit-ready record for governance and post-implementation lessons learned.

Construction Project Kickoff

A general contractor submits a planning review for a mid-size build, including schedule, permits, and safety plan

Review center evaluates permitting timelines and subcontractor commitments
Using the template ensured permit owners and safety officers signed timely approvals and reduced mobilization delays on site.

Practical Tips for Accurate, Efficient Completion

Apply these practical practices to reduce rework and speed approvals for planning reviews.

Standardize naming conventions

Use consistent project titles, version numbering, and metadata so reviewers find the correct file quickly and avoid duplicate reviews or mismatched approvals across systems.

Pre-fill reusable data

Populate recurring fields such as organization name, sponsor, and template legal clauses ahead of time to reduce manual entry errors and accelerate review cycles.

Use conditional fields

Make sections appear only when relevant (for example, regulatory approvals for regulated projects) to simplify reviewer experience and avoid unnecessary review items.

Keep attachments concise

Attach only essential exhibits and reference longer documents by link or index to keep the review package focused and reduce reviewer fatigue.

FAQs and Troubleshooting for the Planning Review

Common questions about execution, signatures, storage, and validity are addressed below to help avoid delays.

Need help? Contact support

What if a signer cannot access the file?
Confirm the recipient email, check spam filters, and provide an alternate secure link. If access issues persist, consider a different authentication method or resend the invitation using a verified email address.
Is an electronic signature legally binding?
Yes. In the United States, electronic signatures have legal effect under the ESIGN Act (15 U.S.C. §7001) and are supported by UETA in most states, provided intent, consent, attribution, and record retention are satisfied.
Do planning reviews require notarization?
Typically no, unless the document being approved is a notarizable instrument under state law. Check state requirements and add notarization or witness steps when legal instruments or deeds are part of the package.
How should we store signed reviews?
Store the signed record in a secure document management system with an audit trail. Retain records per applicable federal or industry retention rules and any longer state or internal retention periods.
What authentication level is recommended?
Use email or SMS for routine approvals; require stronger authentication such as multi-factor or ID verification for high-risk approvals or regulated projects involving PHI or financial controls.
How do we correct an error after signoff?
If minor, prepare an amendment or addendum and route for signatures. For material changes, execute a formal change request and obtain fresh approvals to maintain an auditable approval trail.

be ready to get more

Join over 28 million airSlate SignNow users

Sign Now