Establishing secure connection…Loading editor…Preparing document…

Project Management Plans and Elevations

This template is fully customizable. Edit the text, fill out the fields, and send it for signature. Give it a try!

PROJECT MANAGEMENT PLANS AND ELEVATIONS

Project Identification

Client Name:    Client Contact:

Service Provider:    Provider PM:

Scope of Work

This document defines the Project Management Plans and Elevations deliverables, including the production, review, revision control, and acceptance of architectural elevation drawings and associated project management documentation for the project titled:

Deliverables and Acceptance Criteria

Deliverable 1 (Plans Package):    Due:

Deliverable 2 (Elevations):    Due:

Client Acceptance Period (days):    Acceptance occurs when deliverable meets criteria or punchlist is issued; final acceptance upon satisfactory remediation.

Drawings, Elevations and Revision Control

Drawing Sheet Reference(s):

Revision Control Procedure: Revisions shall be recorded with revision number, date, and author. Latest revision must be clearly indicated on each sheet. Revision Number:

Timeline and Milestones

Project Start Date:    Estimated Completion Date:

Milestone 1 Date:

Milestone 2 Date:

Budget and Payment

Total Fixed Fee (if applicable): $

Invoices submitted in accordance with the payment schedule are due for payment within calendar days of invoice receipt unless disputed in writing.

Change Order and Variations

All changes to scope, drawings, elevations, or schedule shall be effected only by a written Change Order signed by both Client and Service Provider. Change Orders shall state the change, cost impact, schedule impact, and authorized signatories.

Quality Assurance, Reviews and Inspections

The Service Provider shall maintain QA/QC procedures for drawing preparation and elevation production, including internal peer review, dimension checks, and coordinate verification. Design review sessions shall be scheduled at milestones and recorded in meeting minutes. Field verification responsibilities are described below.

Communication and Meetings

Primary Communication Method:    Regular Meeting Cadence:

Confidentiality

Each party agrees that all design documents, elevations, cost information, and project management records exchanged under this agreement are Confidential Information. Confidential Information shall not be disclosed to third parties without prior written consent, except as required by law. Confidential obligations survive termination of this agreement for a period of three (3) years.

Liability and Indemnification

The Service Provider shall perform services with the professional skill and care ordinarily provided by architects and project managers practicing in the same locality under the same or similar circumstances. To the fullest extent permitted by law, each party agrees to indemnify and hold harmless the other party from claims arising from the indemnifying party's negligence or willful misconduct, subject to any limits set forth in a separate master agreement.

Governing Law and Dispute Resolution

This agreement shall be governed by the laws of: . Claims or disputes shall be referred to the designated project representatives for good-faith negotiation prior to the commencement of formal dispute resolution.

Attachments and Deliverable List

Attachments included with this Plan (check as applicable):
        

Final Certifications

By signing below, each party certifies that it has authority to enter this agreement, that the information provided is true and correct to the best of its knowledge, and that it shall comply with the obligations set forth herein. The persons signing bind their respective parties to all terms and conditions of this document.

Client

Party Label:

Print Name:

By:

Title:

Date:

Service Provider

Party Label:

Print Name:

By:

Title:

Date:

Enter text✕

What Project Management Plans and Elevations Are

Project Management Plans and Elevations combine the project management plan (scope, schedule, roles, risk mitigation) with architectural elevation drawings to create a single coordinated package for design, permitting, and construction. These documents include cover information, drawing sets with labeled elevations, material callouts, a milestone schedule, and an approval matrix. Owners, architects, contractors, and permitting authorities use the package to review compliance, coordinate trades, and establish the baseline for change orders. Electronic versions preserve version history and audit trails for regulatory and contract purposes.

Why a Combined Plan and Elevations Matter

A unified package reduces ambiguity between management and design teams, accelerates permit review, and creates a single source of truth for schedules, material selections, and approval status. This lowers rework risk and clarifies responsibilities across stakeholders.

Why a Combined Plan and Elevations Matter

Who Typically Prepares and Uses These Documents

Multiple stakeholders use Project Management Plans and Elevations at different stages; each role relies on specific sections to act quickly and accurately.

  • Project managers — Use the schedule, milestone tracking, resource assignments, and risk register to coordinate contractors and monitor progress.
  • Architects/engineers — Provide and revise elevation drawings, material callouts, code notes, and design clarifications for permit approvals and contractor bidding.
  • General contractors — Use drawings and the approval matrix for bid preparation, sequencing, submittals, inspections, and issuing change orders.

Version control, clear signatory authority, and accessible electronic copies keep these stakeholders aligned through permitting, procurement, and construction.

Core Components of a Professional Package

A complete Project Management Plans and Elevations package blends administrative, design, and approval artifacts so every reviewer can find the information needed for permitting, bidding, and construction.

Cover Sheet

Project title, client, contact list, revision table, and scope summary. Acts as an index and primary version-control reference for all parties and reviewers.

Site Plan

Scaled site plan showing property lines, setbacks, utilities, access, grading notes, and any easements needed for permitting and civil coordination.

Elevations

Orthogonal building faces with dimensions, material callouts, finished floor heights, and annotations that demonstrate code compliance and design intent.

Schedule

Master schedule with key milestones, critical path items, and inspection dates linked to permit conditions and contractor sequencing.

Specifications

Material and workmanship specifications, product standards, and testing requirements that inform procurement, quality control, and contractor obligations.

Approval Matrix

Signatory blocks, approver roles, submission timelines, and permit authority contacts to clarify who must review and when approvals are required.

Step-by-Step: Assemble and Authorize the Package

Follow these sequential actions to prepare, review, and distribute a Project Management Plans and Elevations package for permitting and site use.

  • 01
    Prepare package: Compile drawings, specs, schedule, and cover sheet.
  • 02
    Internal review: Circulate to architects, PM, and contractor for comments.
  • 03
    Submit for approval: Send to permitting authority and stakeholders.
  • 04
    Record and distribute: Archive signed set and share controlled copies with trades.

How to Configure an Electronic Review and Approval Workflow

Set up routing and field controls to automate approvals, preserve audit trails, and reduce manual handoffs during plan review.

Field Configuration
Signature Order Sequential routing by role with optional parallel reviewer groups
Authentication Email link with SMS code; KBA or RON where required
Conditional Fields Show contractor-only fields after contractor selection
Archiving Save PDF/A with audit trail and version metadata

Typical Submission and Routing Flow

Use an ordered flow to collect signatures, record approvals, and distribute both working and archival copies to stakeholders and permitting authorities.

  • Upload files: Add PDF drawings, specs, and cover documentation.
  • Place fields: Add signature, initial, and date fields to the package.
  • Send to reviewers: Route to designers, PM, contractor, and permitting authority.
  • Finalize: Capture completed PDF and preserve audit trail.

Sharing, Signing, and File Requirements

Choose a platform that supports common construction workflows, integrates with project tools, and preserves tamper-evident audit trails.

  • Integrations: Procore, NetSuite, Microsoft 365, Salesforce
  • File formats: PDF, PDF/A, DOCX, DWG
  • Authentication: Email link, SMS code, KBA, optional RON

Common Timelines and Expected Review Windows

Typical timing varies by jurisdiction and project complexity; use these ranges to plan submissions and anticipate review cycles.

Permit submission window:

Submit prior to construction mobilization; local review 2–8 weeks typical.

Plan review cycles:

Expect 1–3 review iterations depending on code and completeness.

Contractor bid period:

Allow 2–4 weeks for accurate subcontractor pricing and clarifications.

Inspection scheduling:

Book inspections ahead; municipal slots can be 1–4 weeks out.

Closeout documentation:

Complete final as-built and approvals before warranty start.

Key Project Milestones From Planning to Closeout

Track these numbered milestones to coordinate approvals, mobilization, and final acceptance across stakeholders.

01

Concept Approval

Obtain preliminary signoff on scope and general elevations from owner and design team.

02

Permit Submission

Submit complete package to authority having jurisdiction and respond to review comments.

03

Construction Mobilization

Start on-site work once permits and key approvals are in place.

04

Project Closeout

Deliver as-built drawings, final approvals, and archived signed package for records.

Common Mistakes to Avoid

  • Incomplete elevations or missing material callouts that trigger review comments and require re-submission, delaying permits and start dates.
  • Inconsistent revision control where older drawings circulate alongside new revisions, causing contractor confusion and rework on site.
  • Missing approval signatures or incorrect signatory authority that lead to rejected submissions or legal disputes over acceptance.
  • Failing to include required supporting documents such as energy compliance forms or structural calculations, which causes administrative holds.

Penalties and Practical Risks of Errors

Permit Denial: Construction cannot commence
Schedule Delays: Costs increase and milestones shift
Change Orders: Additional expense and negotiation
Warranty Issues: Liability for defective work
Safety Risk: Noncompliance can endanger occupants
Legal Disputes: Contract claims and potential litigation

eSignature Provider Comparison for Document Workflows

Compare core pricing and capability dimensions when selecting an eSignature provider for plan submission and approvals. Brand ordering places signNow first per vendor comparison guidance.

signNow DocuSign Adobe Sign PandaDoc HelloSign
Starting Price $8/user/mo $15/user/mo $14/user/mo $19/user/mo $15/user/mo
Free Trial 7-day free trial, no credit card Varies by vendor Varies by vendor Varies by vendor Varies by vendor
Bulk Send Yes Yes Yes Yes Limited
Audit Trail Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
HIPAA Compliant Yes Yes Yes No No

Required Identification and Document Metadata

Project Title: Exact project name
Owner Name: Legal entity or individual
Site Address: Full street and ZIP
Drawing List: Indexed filenames and revisions
Revision Number: Sequential code/date
Approvals: Signatures and dates

Real-World Examples of Digital Plan Execution

These short case arcs show how organizations use electronic workflows to manage plans, approvals, and integrations with enterprise systems.

Martin Properties

Tim Martin, Founder, moved plan approvals online to reduce in-person dependencies and speed closeouts.

  • Faster review cycles and consistent compliance.
  • He reports executing documents online with full compliance and security, enabling necessary approvals without on-site signings and reducing administrative overhead across projects.

Xerox

Kodi-Marie Evans, Director of NetSuite Operations, integrated signature workflows into their ERP to standardize approvals.

  • NetSuite integration simplified formats.
  • The approach provided flexibility to capture signatures in required formats, improved control over document versions, and reduced time spent reconciling approvals across systems.

Frequently Asked Questions and Troubleshooting

Answers to common questions about preparing, submitting, and e-signing Project Management Plans and Elevations, including electronic validity and storage best practices.


Need help? Contact support

be ready to get more
Join over 28 million airSlate SignNow users