Establishing secure connection…Loading editor…Preparing document…

Project Management Request for As-Built

This template is fully customizable. Edit the text, fill out the fields, and send it for signature. Give it a try!

Project Management Request for As-Built

Project Identification

Client Name:    Client Contact:

Client Email:    Client Phone:

Service Provider:    Project Manager:

Provider Email:    Provider Phone:

Request Date:

Scope of Work

The Service Provider is requested to prepare As-Built deliverables that document the final constructed conditions for the Project. The Work shall include field verification, incorporation of approved change orders, and preparation of record documents in the formats and standards specified in this request. The scope shall be limited to the items expressly listed below unless otherwise agreed in a written change order signed by both parties.

Deliverables and Acceptance Criteria

Select required deliverable types and specify standards for each selected item. All deliverables must reference the project ID and revision numbering.

  As-Built Drawings (CAD)       PDF Record Drawings       BIM Model (Revit)

  Point Cloud / Laser Scan Data       Field Survey Data (CSV/GIS)       P&IDs / Equipment Lists

Timeline and Milestones

Project Start Date:    Target Completion Date:

Milestone 1:    Date:

Milestone 2:    Date:

Milestone 3:    Date:

Budget and Payment

Standard Change Order Administration Fee (%):

Quality, Standards and Deliverable Format

The Service Provider warrants that all As-Built deliverables will be prepared under the supervision of qualified personnel, will reflect field-verified conditions to the degree of accuracy specified, and will conform to the project drafting, CAD layering, and BIM standards agreed below.

Acceptance, Review and Revisions

Deliverables will be submitted for Client review. Client shall have a period of 10 business days to review and provide consolidated comments. The Service Provider will have up to 10 business days to submit revised deliverables addressing Client comments. Additional revisions requested beyond two review cycles are considered change requests and will be handled per the change order process.

Confidentiality and Data Retention

Each party shall hold confidential all non-public information provided under this request. The Service Provider shall store project data securely and retain final deliverables for a period of not less than one year following final acceptance unless otherwise agreed in writing. Confidentiality obligations survive termination of this request.

Liability and Warranties

The Service Provider warrants the accuracy of the As-Built deliverables prepared under this request to the extent of accepted industry standards. Except for willful misconduct or gross negligence, each party's liability for direct damages arising from this request is limited to the total fees paid for the As-Built work. Neither party will be liable for consequential, incidental, or special damages.

Governing Law and Dispute Resolution

This Request shall be governed by the laws of the jurisdiction noted below. The parties agree to first attempt to resolve disputes through good faith negotiation; unresolved disputes may proceed to mediation or other dispute resolution as mutually agreed.

Attachments and References

Administrative Notices

This Request for As-Built constitutes a written instruction under the underlying contract when signed by both parties. Any amendment to the scope, schedule, or fees shall be executed in a written change order signed by authorized representatives of both parties.

Client

Party Label:

By:

Date:

Service Provider

Party Label:

By:

Date:

Enter text✕

What the Project Management Request for As-Built Is

A Project Management Request for As-Built is a formal document that requests final, post-construction drawings, annotations, or verification of installed systems and site conditions. It typically identifies the project, scope, deliverables, responsible parties, and delivery format for as-built drawings, and it records expectations for turnarounds, certification, and acceptance criteria. This request serves as the handover mechanism from contractors or subcontractors to the project manager, enabling accurate recordkeeping, future maintenance, warranty validation, and compliance with contract closeout requirements.

Why a Clear Request for As-Built Matters

A clear Project Management Request for As-Built reduces rework, shortens closeout timelines, and preserves a consistent record of the finished facility for operations and compliance.

Why a Clear Request for As-Built Matters

Who Typically Prepares and Responds to This Request

Project managers and contract administrators usually issue the request to contractors or architects during punch list and closeout phases.

  • General Contractor — Submits consolidated as-built package and coordinates discipline inputs, final QA/QC, and delivery format.
  • Subcontractor / Trade Contractor — Provides discipline-specific redlines, measured conditions, and stamped trade drawings as required by contract.
  • Architect / Engineer — Reviews as-built submissions for compliance with design intent and issues final signoffs or required corrections.

The requester should specify acceptance criteria, formats, reference baselines, and a single delivery contact to avoid fragmented submissions.

Step-by-Step: Issuing and Closing an As-Built Request

Follow a simple sequence to issue the request, collect submissions, verify contents, and accept the as-built package.

  • 01
    Prepare Request: Draft scope and file-format requirements; attach templates.
  • 02
    Send to Contractors: Distribute to responsible trades with routing instructions.
  • 03
    Collect Submissions: Receive files, check naming and formats.
  • 04
    Verify & Accept: Perform QA/QC and issue acceptance or corrective actions.

Typical Digital Workflow for As-Built Requests

Digital workflows streamline delivery, version control, and auditability for as-built submissions.

  • Upload Request: Upload the request document and templates to the platform.
  • Configure Fields: Add delivery contact, due date, and attachments.
  • Distribute: Email or send direct signing links to responsible parties.
  • Track Completion: Monitor submissions, receive certificates of completion.

Suggested Digital Workflow Settings

Use consistent workflow settings to reduce signer confusion and to preserve a complete audit trail.

Field Configuration
Routing Order Sequential or parallel based on dependency
Authentication Email link or SMS code for contractor signers
Attachments Require named attachments and format validation
Notifications Reminders at 3, 7, and 14 days before due date

Technical Requirements and Integrations

Choose a platform that supports the file formats and integrations used by the project team.

  • File Types: PDF, DWG, DOCX, Revit
  • Integrations: Procore, Box, Google Workspace
  • Authentication: Email, SMS, SSO

Ensure the platform captures an audit trail, supports large attachments, and meets any required compliance frameworks.

Security and Compliance Essentials for Delivery Platforms

Encryption: TLS 1.2/1.3 in transit; AES-256 at rest
Certifications: SOC 2 Type II and ISO 27001 available
HIPAA: BAA required for PHI handling
21 CFR Part 11: Supports compliant audit and controls
ESIGN / UETA: Meets electronic signature legal frameworks
Accessibility: WCAG 2.0 Level AA conformance

Common Risks and Potential Consequences

Late Delivery: May trigger liquidated damages or retainage withholding
Wrong Signer: Invalid signatures can delay acceptance and payment
Missing Attachments: Incomplete packages require resubmission and extra costs
Notarization Failure: May void an affidavit or recorded exhibit
PHI Exposure: HIPAA violations can result in penalties and audits
Data Loss: Poor retention increases litigation and maintenance risks

Real-World Examples of As-Built Requests

Actual customer experiences show practical outcomes when as-built requests are clearly specified and digitally managed.

Martin Properties

Tim Martin processed closeout documents online to speed approvals.

  • The team used consolidated digital packages for all trades.
  • As a result, Martin Properties reduced turnaround time, improved file consistency, and completed final invoicing faster while preserving an auditable acceptance trail.

Optica Ventures

Brian Fitzgibbons emphasized simplicity in submissions.

  • He required one formatted deliverable per trade.
  • That requirement improved contractor compliance, reduced conversion and QA effort, and provided a single source of truth for facility management teams.

Best Practices to Improve Accuracy and Speed

Adopt consistent conventions and verification steps to minimize disputes and rework during closeout.

Standardize File Naming
Define a project-wide naming convention before submissions begin. Require discipline prefixes, revision numbers, and dates to avoid version conflicts and to simplify automated ingestion into asset management systems.
Require Consolidated Packages
Ask for a single, consolidated as-built package per contractor containing all trade files, redlines, and certifications. Consolidation reduces review overhead and clarifies accountability for missing components.
Specify Accepted Formats
List acceptable formats (DWG, PDF/A, IFC, Revit) and minimum file requirements. Require PDF/A for long-term archival to prevent future rendering or compatibility issues.
Use Audit Trails
Capture timestamps, signer identity, and delivery confirmations for every submission. An auditable record reduces disputes and supports warranty and liability reviews when questions arise.

Frequent Errors to Avoid

  • Submitting files in inconsistent formats that require conversion, causing delays and potential data loss when layers or metadata are stripped.
  • Providing incomplete drawings without revision histories or redline annotations, which forces additional site visits or measurements to confirm conditions.
  • Not designating a single delivery contact, leading to fragmented submissions, duplicate files, and unclear responsibility for corrections or updates.
  • Failing to state acceptance criteria or QA standards, resulting in rejections and extended closeout timelines due to subjective reviewer expectations.

Typical Signatory Roles

Project Manager

The issuer responsible for defining scope, acceptance criteria, and final acceptance. The project manager coordinates reviewers and holds final authority to accept the as-built package for record retention and payment release.

Contractor Representative

An authorized contractor signatory who confirms that submitted as-built documents accurately represent installed conditions and that required QA/QC checks have been completed.

eSignature Pricing and Capability Snapshot for As-Built Workflows

Compare typical vendor starting prices and core capabilities relevant to handling as-built submissions and large-file workflows; signNow is listed first for comparison consistency.

signNow DocuSign Adobe Sign PandaDoc HelloSign
Starting Price $8/user/mo $15/user/mo $14/user/mo $19/user/mo $15/user/mo
Free Trial 7-day trial Varies by plan Varies by plan Varies by plan Varies by plan
Bulk Send Yes (Business Premium) Yes Yes Yes No
Audit Trail Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
HIPAA Compliant Yes Yes Yes No No
Envelope Cap No cap 100 envelopes/user/year Varies by plan Varies by plan Varies by plan

Frequently Asked Questions About As-Built Requests

Answers to common questions about e-signatures, notarization, retention, and submission quality for as-built packages.


Need help? Contact support

be ready to get more
Join over 28 million airSlate SignNow users