Establishing secure connection…Loading editor…Preparing document…

Project Management Testing Document

This template is fully customizable. Edit the text, fill out the fields, and send it for signature. Give it a try!

PROJECT MANAGEMENT TESTING DOCUMENT

Project Identification

Project Title:

Project ID:    Client Name:

Scope of Testing

Overview: The Service Provider shall perform all activities necessary to plan, design, execute and report testing activities set forth in this document. The testing scope below defines included and expressly excluded items.

Objectives and Acceptance Criteria

Primary Objectives: Validate functional compliance, ensure no critical defects remain open at acceptance, and verify performance targets where specified.

Deliverables and Acceptance

The following deliverables will be produced and delivered to Client for review and acceptance.

Test Plan (includes scope, approach, schedule)

Test Cases and Traceability Matrix

Test Execution Reports (daily/weekly) and Final Test Report

Test Environment & Resources

Test Types & Approach

Select applicable test types:

Functional    Integration    Regression

Performance    Security    Usability

Timeline & Milestones

Project Start Date:    Projected End Date:

Milestone 1: Date:

Milestone 2: Date:

Milestone 3: Date:

Defect Management

Defects will be logged and tracked in the agreed defect tracking system. Severity definitions and response times are as follows:

Budget, Fees & Payment

Total Fixed Fee: $

Confidentiality

Each party shall treat as confidential all information disclosed in connection with this engagement marked or reasonably understood to be confidential. Confidential information shall not be disclosed except to those employees or subcontractors who have a need to know and are bound to confidentiality obligations at least as protective as those herein. Confidential information does not include information that is or becomes publicly known without breach of this document or that is rightfully received from a third party without obligation of confidentiality.

Liability; Indemnity; Termination

The Service Provider's liability for direct damages arising out of performance under this document shall be limited to the fees paid by Client for the testing activities contemplated herein. Neither party shall be liable for consequential, incidental or punitive damages. Each party shall indemnify the other for third-party claims arising from its negligent acts or willful misconduct. Either party may terminate this engagement for material breach if the other party fails to cure within the notice period specified below.

Notice to Cure Period (days):

Governing Law; Dispute Resolution

This document shall be governed by the laws of the state identified below without regard to conflict of law principles. Parties shall attempt in good faith to resolve disputes by negotiation and, if unsuccessful, by binding arbitration as set forth below.

Governing State:

Acknowledgement

By signing below, the undersigned representatives certify that they are authorized to bind their respective parties to the terms of this Project Management Testing Document and that the terms set forth herein constitute the entire agreement for the testing services described.

Client:

By:

Date:

Service Provider:

By:

Date:

Enter text✕

What the Project Management Testing Document Is

The Project Management Testing Document is a structured record used to plan, execute, and verify testing activities for a project deliverable. It consolidates objectives, scope, test cases, success criteria, schedules, assigned resources, traceability to requirements, and formal sign-off fields so stakeholders can confirm completion and acceptance. The document provides an auditable trail of decisions, results, and approvals that supports project governance, quality assurance, and dispute resolution. It is suitable for software releases, system integrations, and complex deliverables where documented testing evidence is required for compliance or contractual acceptance.

Why a Formal Testing Document Matters

A formal Project Management Testing Document reduces ambiguity, records acceptance criteria, and creates a single source of truth for test scope and outcomes. It helps teams coordinate testing tasks, measure pass/fail results, and document approvals that justify release decisions or invoice milestones.

Why a Formal Testing Document Matters

Who Typically Prepares and Signs This Document

In many organizations multiple parties review and sign the document; roles and reviewer order should be defined in the document's sign-off section.

  • Project managers and release managers coordinating schedules and approvals across teams.
  • QA leads and test engineers documenting test cases, results, and defect disposition.
  • Legal, procurement, or client stakeholders who must confirm acceptance or milestone completion.

Key Roles Who Sign or Review

Project Manager

Responsible for completing the scheduling, scope, and resource sections; coordinates cross-functional reviewers and verifies that acceptance criteria in the document match contractual or stakeholder requirements.

QA Lead

Documents test cases, maps them to requirements, logs pass/fail status and defects, and provides the technical sign-off confirming test coverage and unresolved risk items with remediation plans.

Core Components of an Effective Testing Document

A professional Project Management Testing Document groups related information so reviewers can quickly validate scope, coverage, and approval status.

Test Scope

Define in-scope and out-of-scope features, system boundaries, and any environmental constraints so reviewers understand what was and was not tested.

Test Cases

List individual test cases with IDs, preconditions, steps, expected results, and actual outcomes to provide traceable evidence of what was executed.

Acceptance Criteria

Specify objective pass/fail rules and thresholds (e.g., zero critical defects, <2% regression rate) that determine whether the deliverable is accepted.

Schedule & Resources

Include test windows, assigned personnel, environment details, and dependencies so signers can assess readiness and timing impact on milestones.

Defect Summary

Provide a concise defect log or summary of open defects, severity, and mitigation plans so approvers can weigh residual risk.

Sign-off and Traceability

Add signature blocks, approval order, and links to requirements or change requests to ensure decisions are auditable and attributable.

Step-by-Step: Filling Out the Testing Document

Follow these sequential steps to complete the document and route it for approval without delays.

  • 01
    Prepare Document: Populate scope, test cases, schedule, and resources before review.
  • 02
    Attach Evidence: Include logs, screenshots, and defect IDs that support test outcomes.
  • 03
    Assign Reviewers: Set signer order and contact details for each approver.
  • 04
    Collect Signatures: Obtain dated signatures and preserve the audit trail for records.

Recommended Digital Workflow Settings

Configure the e-submission workflow to match your approval chain and evidence requirements.

Field Configuration
Authentication Email plus optional SMS code for signer verification
Signer Order Sequential or parallel routing per stakeholder list
Expiration Set expiration (e.g., 30 days) to avoid stale approvals
Audit Trail Enable full logging of IP, timestamps, and actions

Typical Submission and Approval Flow

This flow outlines how the document moves from draft to archival after approvals.

  • Draft and Review: Author completes fields and attaches test evidence.
  • Route to Approvers: System sends secure signing requests to listed reviewers.
  • Signer Authentication: Signers authenticate and apply electronic signatures.
  • Archive: Signed document and audit trail are stored for retention.

Technical Considerations for eSubmission

Match platform settings to your compliance needs (access controls, retention, and evidence capture) and document the configuration for audits.

  • Authentication Options: Email, SMS, KBA or SSO
  • File Formats: PDF, DOCX, and exported audit log
  • Integrations: CRM, cloud storage, and project tools

Downloads, Exports, and Supporting Files

Maintain clear records by exporting signed documents and related artifacts in standardized formats.

Export Options

Save the final document as a PDF/A and include the audit certificate to preserve signature metadata and timestamps for legal review.

Attached Evidence

Bundle logs, test run outputs, and defect reports as appendices so reviewers can validate results without searching separate systems.

Signed Copy

Deliver a single signed PDF with an embedded certificate of completion showing signer identity, IP address, and timestamps.

Version History

Keep a change log for each revision showing who changed what and when to support dispute resolution or audits.

eSignature Pricing and Feature Snapshot

Compare common pricing and feature dimensions relevant to routing and signing project testing documents; signNow is listed first per vendor comparison conventions.

signNow DocuSign Adobe Sign PandaDoc HelloSign
Starting Price $8/user/mo $15/user/mo $14/user/mo $19/user/mo $15/user/mo
Free Trial 7-day free trial Varies by vendor Varies by vendor Varies by vendor Varies by vendor
Bulk Send Yes (Business Premium) Yes Yes Yes No
Audit Trail Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
HIPAA Compliant Yes (BAA available) Yes Yes No No
Envelope Cap No cap 100 envelopes/user/year Varies Varies Varies

Security and Compliance Features to Verify

Encryption: TLS 1.2/1.3, AES-256
Certifications: SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001
Privacy Standards: GDPR, CCPA compliance
Healthcare: HIPAA compliant (BAA required)
Regulated Records: 21 CFR Part 11 support
Accessibility: WCAG 2.0 Level AA

Consequences of an Incorrect or Incomplete Document

Unenforceable Signatures: Missing intent or consent
Project Delays: Approval gaps slow releases
Contract Disputes: Ambiguous acceptance criteria
Regulatory Exposure: Privacy rule violations
Financial Penalty: Costly remediation
Audit Findings: Insufficient retention or trail

Common Preparation Mistakes to Avoid

  • Leaving acceptance criteria vague, which creates subjective approval decisions and raises the risk of post-delivery disputes.
  • Failing to attach test evidence or logs, forcing reviewers to request additional data and delaying sign-off cycles.
  • Not defining signer order or required authority levels, causing parallel approvals to conflict or become invalid.
  • Using inconsistent naming or ID schemes so traceability between requirements, test cases, and defects is lost.

Practical Tips for Accurate Completion

Adopt consistent templates and version control to reduce manual errors and speed approvals.

Standardize Test Case IDs and Names
Use a uniform convention for test identifiers and include requirement links; this prevents mismatches and makes automated reporting reliable across tools.
Collect Evidence at Time of Test
Capture screenshots, logs, and timestamps immediately during execution to ensure evidence is contemporaneous and admissible for audits or dispute resolution.
Define Clear Acceptance Criteria
Specify measurable pass/fail rules and thresholds rather than subjective terms; include acceptable workarounds and severity thresholds for defects.
Document Signer Authority and Order
List signers with titles and define sequential or parallel signing rules so electronic routing enforces required approvals automatically.

Real-World Examples of Use

These snapshots show how different organizations applied a formal testing document to streamline releases and approvals.

Optica Ventures

The interface is simple and easy-to-use for our team; more importantly, it is just as easy for our customers.

  • Test artifacts were attached to each release for immediate validation.
  • This reduced back-and-forth with stakeholders and created a clear audit trail for future reference.

Martin Properties

I can process and execute all of these documents online with 100% compliance and built-in security.

  • Signed approval enabled timely contract milestones for property handoffs.
  • The documented test results and approvals reduced disputes and accelerated project closeouts.

Frequently Asked Questions

Answers to common questions about legal validity, digital signing, and practical issues when preparing the Project Management Testing Document.


Need help? Contact support

be ready to get more
Join over 28 million airSlate SignNow users