Establishing secure connection…Loading editor…Preparing document…

Project Management UAT Document

This template is fully customizable. Edit the text, fill out the fields, and send it for signature. Give it a try!

Project Management UAT Document

Project Identification

Scope of UAT

This User Acceptance Testing (UAT) Document defines the scope, acceptance criteria, test schedule, and sign-off conditions under which the Client will validate that the delivered system satisfies the agreed requirements.

In-Scope / Out-of-Scope

Deliverables and Acceptance Criteria

Each deliverable listed below must meet the stated acceptance criteria. Acceptance requires written sign-off by the Client as set forth in the Sign-off section.

Test Cases and Acceptance Metrics

The Service Provider will execute the test cases and record results. The Client will validate test outcomes against the acceptance metrics below.

Timeline and Milestones

The schedule below identifies the UAT window and milestones. Dates are target dates and subject to change through the Change Order Process.

Test Environment & Tools

Defect Management

All defects discovered during UAT will be logged, triaged, and tracked in the agreed defect tracking system. Severity definitions and SLA for remediation are set forth below.

Change Order Process

Any scope or schedule changes arising during UAT shall follow the formal Change Order Process. Change Orders must describe the change, impact to timeline, and financial impact, and require written approval by authorized representatives of both parties prior to implementation.

Budget, Costs & Payment Schedule

Confidentiality

Each party shall treat all information exchanged during UAT as confidential and shall not disclose such information except to its personnel with a need to know or as required by law. Confidential information shall be used solely for test execution and validation under this Document.

Governing Law

This Document and any dispute arising out of it shall be governed by the laws of the state indicated below, without regard to choice-of-law principles.

Sign-off Criteria

UAT is considered complete and acceptable when: (a) all critical defects are resolved or have an agreed remediation plan; (b) the pass percentage meets or exceeds the Pass Threshold above; and (c) the Client provides written acceptance pursuant to the signature block below.

UAT Result: Passed Failed

Certification

By signing below, the undersigned represent and warrant that they are authorized representatives of their respective parties, have reviewed the foregoing UAT results and attachments, and agree that the outcomes reflect the state of the tested deliverables. Signatures below constitute formal acceptance or rejection as indicated and authorize any subsequent actions required by the Change Order Process.

Client

Printed Name:

By:

Date:

Service Provider

Printed Name:

By:

Date:

Enter text✕

What the Project Management UAT Document Is

The Project Management UAT Document is the formal record that defines user acceptance testing scope, test cases, execution steps, results, and stakeholder sign-offs for a project release. It consolidates test case identifiers, test data, environment details, expected results, actual outcomes, and defect records to support go/no-go decisions. The document provides traceability between requirements and results, evidences remediation and retest cycles, and documents final acceptance by customer or sponsor. When signed electronically, ensure the signature meets ESIGN (15 U.S.C. ch. 96) and applicable state electronic signature law (UETA or state ESRA).

Why a Structured UAT Document Matters

A clear UAT document reduces release risk by making acceptance criteria explicit, capturing objective test results, and creating an auditable record of stakeholder approval. It shortens dispute resolution, improves accountability, and documents remediation history for compliance and post-release analysis.

Why a Structured UAT Document Matters

Who Prepares and Reviews the UAT Document

Typical participants include project managers, QA leads, business analysts, product owners, client representatives, and release managers who each play distinct roles in creating, executing, and approving UAT artifacts.

  • Project Manager: coordinates schedule, resources, and final acceptance criteria across stakeholders.
  • QA Lead: authors test cases, supervises execution, and ensures defect lifecycle management.
  • Product Owner / Client Rep: validates acceptance criteria, reviews results, and provides final acceptance or rejection.

Assign clear ownership for sections such as test design, execution logs, defect tracking, and final sign-off to avoid ambiguity during acceptance and handoff.

Step-by-Step: How to Complete the UAT Document

Follow these sequential steps to prepare, execute, and finalize UAT so acceptance decisions are auditable and reproducible.

  • 01
    Prepare the UAT Plan: Define scope, entry/exit criteria, roles, and schedule.
  • 02
    Design Test Cases: Map test cases to requirements and create clear steps.
  • 03
    Execute Tests: Run cases, record actual results, and capture evidence.
  • 04
    Record Defects and Sign-Off: Log issues, verify fixes, and obtain stakeholder signatures.

How to Configure the UAT Document Workflow Online

Set up a repeatable digital workflow so test artifacts route automatically and sign-offs are captured with an audit trail.

Field Configuration
Document Format Use PDF or DOCX to preserve layout and enable field placement.
Field Mapping Map test-case IDs, tester names, and dates to structured fields for export.
Signer Roles Define signer order: Tester → QA Lead → Product Owner.
Notifications Enable email/SMS reminders and attach evidence uploads to notifications.

Where to Send and Submit the Completed UAT Document

Use a consistent submission flow so stakeholders receive notification, can review evidence, and sign in order.

  • Upload Document: Place the final UAT record into your document-management system.
  • Assign Signers: Specify tester, QA lead, and approver in correct order.
  • Authenticate Signers: Use email, SMS code, or stronger auth as project controls require.
  • Archive Signed Copy: Store the completed file and audit trail in retention storage.

Technical and Integration Checklist for Digital UAT

Confirm platform capabilities before you digitize the UAT Document to ensure security, integrations, and exportability.

  • File Formats: PDF, DOCX, and export to Excel supported.
  • Integrations: CRM and ERP connectors like Salesforce and NetSuite.
  • Authentication: Email, SMS, KBA, or advanced signer authentication.

Choose a platform that provides an auditable completion certificate, retention controls, and integrations with your ticketing or test-management systems.

Typical Deadlines and Timelines in a UAT Cycle

Plan realistic windows and SLAs for test design, execution, defect remediation, and final approval to avoid release slips.

Test Design Completion:

Complete at least 2 weeks before execution window.

Execution Window:

Typically 1–4 weeks depending on scope and resources.

Defect Fix SLA:

Priority fixes: 24–72 hours; lower priority per schedule.

Regression Testing:

Allow a 3–7 day window after fixes are applied.

Final Sign-Off:

Target within 48 hours after regression passes.

Key Milestones from Plan to Final Acceptance

Track these numbered milestones as discrete checkpoints in your UAT timeline to measure readiness and reduce release risk.

01

Plan Approval

Sponsor approves scope and criteria before test design begins.

02

Test Case Readiness

All test cases reviewed and mapped to requirements.

03

Execution Start

QA team begins running test cases and capturing results.

04

Final Acceptance

Stakeholder signs UAT document and authorizes release.

Common Mistakes to Avoid When Preparing the UAT Document

  • Missing or vague expected results that prevent objective pass/fail classification and complicate defect triage.
  • Using inconsistent test-case identifiers that break traceability to requirements and automated test reports.
  • Not capturing environment and data details, leading to unreproducible failures during regression cycles.
  • Delaying stakeholder reviews until after execution, causing late rework and release postponement.

Risks from an Incomplete or Incorrect UAT Document

Release Delays: Extended timelines and higher costs.
Failed Acceptance: Customer rejection or scope rollback.
Increased Remediation Cost: Higher defect resolution effort.
Compliance Exposure: Regulatory audit gaps for regulated data.
Contractual Penalties: Service-level or milestone penalties may apply.
Reputation Impact: Loss of stakeholder confidence.

Required Security and Record Elements

Encryption: TLS 1.2/1.3 in transit; AES-256 at rest.
Access Controls: Role-based access and least-privilege policies.
Audit Trail: Timestamp, IP, action log, and change history.
HIPAA Controls: BAA required if PHI is present.
Retention Controls: Immutable export and legal-hold capabilities.
Data Backups: Regular backups and disaster recovery plans.

eSignature Vendor Comparison for UAT Document Workflows

Compare starting prices and core capabilities across vendors when choosing an e-sign solution for UAT document routing and acceptance. Feature availability and plan details vary by vendor and plan.

signNow DocuSign Adobe Sign PandaDoc HelloSign
Starting Price $8/user/mo $15/user/mo $14/user/mo $19/user/mo $15/user/mo
Free Trial 7-day free trial Varies by vendor Varies by vendor Varies by vendor Varies by vendor
Bulk Send Yes (premium plan) Yes Yes Yes No
Audit Trail Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
HIPAA Compliant Yes Yes Yes No No

FAQs and Troubleshooting for the UAT Document

Answers to common questions about contents, digital execution, signatory roles, and retention to reduce friction during acceptance.


Need help? Contact support

be ready to get more
Join over 28 million airSlate SignNow users