Can a UAT be signed electronically?

Yes. Electronic signatures satisfy U.S. law when parties demonstrate intent, consent to electronic records, attribution, and retention capability. Use an audit trail and chosen authentication to document signer identity and intent when storing the signed record.

Who has authority to sign acceptance?

The signers should be pre-authorized decision-makers such as the project sponsor or delegated approver. Identify signer authority in the contract or governance matrix to prevent later disputes about acceptance validity.

When is notarization required?

Notarization is rarely needed for internal UATs; it may be required when acceptance triggers a legal transfer or is attached to documents that state law requires notarization. Check applicable state rules before adding notary steps.

What if a signer’s name differs from their ID?

Use the legal name matching government ID in the signature block; mismatched names can complicate attribution and increase the risk of challenge. Record the authentication method used at signing.

How should outstanding defects be handled in sign-off?

Document conditional acceptance with clear remediation timelines and success criteria. Avoid ambiguous language; specify whether acceptance is conditional, which defects are exceptioned, and who owns remediation and retest.

How long should signed UATs be retained?

Retain signed UATs according to relevant standards: minimum three years for financial records, six years for HIPAA-related materials, and longer where state law or contract requires extended retention.

Electronic Signature
Templates
Project Management
Project Management User Acceptance Test

Project Management User Acceptance Test

This template is fully customizable. Edit the text, fill out the fields, and send it for signature. Give it a try!

Project Management User Acceptance Test

Project Identification

Project Title:

Project ID Client Name and Primary Contact Service Provider and Project Manager

Scope of Work for UAT

This User Acceptance Test (UAT) covers the functional and business-process validation of the deliverables listed below as they relate to the Project Scope. The UAT will verify that the system satisfies acceptance criteria as defined for each deliverable.

In-Scope Items (describe) Out-of-Scope Items (describe)

Test Objectives and Acceptance Criteria

Primary Test Objectives Acceptance Criteria (measurable, verifiable)

Test Environment and Setup

Environment Type: Development Test Staging Production (if applicable)

Environment Configuration and Access Requirements

Deliverables and Acceptance Criteria by Item

Deliverable 1 - Title Acceptance Criteria Deliverable 2 - Title Acceptance Criteria

Test Cases (Representative Samples)

Complete test case records below for each executed test. Attach additional records as required and reference them in the Test Results section.

Test Case ID: Title:

Preconditions Test Steps

Expected Result:

Actual Result:

Pass: Defect Logged:

Tester Name: Date:

Test Case ID: Title:

Preconditions Test Steps

Expected Result:

Actual Result:

Pass: Defect Logged:

Tester Name: Date:

Defect Triage and Change Order Process

All defects discovered during UAT will be logged with severity and reproducibility. Critical defects that materially prevent acceptance must be remediated prior to final acceptance. Changes to accepted scope, schedule, or budget discovered during UAT must follow the Change Order Process below.

Defect Escalation and Severity Definitions Change Order Procedure

Schedule and Milestones

UAT Start Date: UAT End Date (planned):

Milestone 1

Target Date:

Milestone 2

Target Date:

Milestone 3

Target Date:

Budget, Payments & Fees

Total UAT Budget Payment Schedule

Confidentiality

All test data, results, and documentation produced under this UAT are confidential and constitute Confidential Information of the Client and Service Provider as set forth in the underlying agreement. Neither party will disclose Confidential Information to third parties except as required by law or with prior written consent of the other party. Confidential Information must be handled in accordance with the security and data protection requirements of the Project Agreement.

Governing Law and Dispute Resolution

This UAT Statement shall be governed by the laws of the state of without regard to conflict of law principles. Any dispute arising out of this UAT shall be resolved in accordance with the dispute resolution provisions of the Project Agreement; absent such provisions, the parties agree to negotiate in good faith and pursue mediation prior to litigation.

Final Acceptance Statement

By signing below, the Client certifies that it has performed the UAT in accordance with the procedures described herein, and that the deliverables accepted meet the agreed acceptance criteria except for any defects explicitly listed below. Acceptance is conditional upon remediation of Critical defects as defined in the Defect Escalation section.

Exceptions or Known Defects at Time of Acceptance

Client Printed Name:

By:

Date:

Title/Role:

Service Provider Printed Name:

By:

Date:

Title/Role:

What the Project Management User Acceptance Test Is

The Project Management User Acceptance Test (UAT) is a formal document and process used to confirm that a project deliverable meets defined acceptance criteria and is ready for production or client handover. It records test cases, expected results, actual outcomes, defect logs, and acceptance decisions from business stakeholders. UAT captures sign-off authority, conditions for conditional acceptance, and any outstanding issues requiring remediation. It can be executed as a paper document or an electronically signed record under U.S. e-signature laws when parties provide required consent and record retention.

Why a Project Management UAT Matters

A clear UAT document reduces release risk by documenting acceptance criteria, testing scope, and stakeholder approval. It creates an auditable record for decisions, limits scope disputes, and clarifies remediation responsibilities before production deployment.

Who Typically Completes and Signs a UAT

UATs are collaborative: multiple roles supply evidence, test results, and final acceptance. Roles and responsibilities should be recorded within the document before testing begins.

Project Managers: Coordinate test schedule, consolidate results, and ensure sign-off alignment across stakeholders.
Business Stakeholders: Validate that functionality meets business requirements and provide formal acceptance or conditional approval.
QA/Test Engineers: Execute test cases, log defects, and confirm retests against acceptance criteria.

The documented signer list should identify signatory authority for contractually binding acceptance and list alternates to avoid delays in approvals.

How to Complete the UAT: Step-by-Step

Follow a consistent sequence to collect evidence, log defects, and secure formal acceptance to avoid rework and disputes.

01

Prepare Test Pack: Assemble test cases, data, environment details, and success criteria.
02

Execute Cases: Run tests, record outcomes and any deviation from expected results.
03

Log Defects: Document defects with severity, steps to reproduce, and screenshots.
04

Sign-Off: Stakeholders review evidence and sign acceptance or issue conditional approval.

Core Components of a Professional UAT Document

A complete UAT packages evidence, responsibilities, and sign-off language so reviewers can make informed acceptance decisions with an auditable record.

Test Summary

Concise overview of scope, environment, and objectives so reviewers quickly understand what was validated and why it matters.

Scope & Exclusions

Defines included features and explicit exclusions to prevent scope creep and to document agreed boundaries for acceptance.

Test Cases

Detailed steps, input data, and expected results for each scenario that demonstrates compliance with acceptance criteria.

Results & Evidence

Pass/fail status, logs, screenshots, and links to artifacts that support each test case outcome for auditability.

Defect Register

Tracked issues with severity, assignment, remediation steps, and retest status to show outstanding work at sign-off.

Acceptance Statement

Clear sign-off language that specifies whether acceptance is unconditional, conditional, or rejected, including remediation obligations.

Configure the UAT Workflow Online

Set up roles, routing order, and authentication before sending the UAT for signature to ensure a smooth e-submission process.

Field	Configuration
Authentication	Email link, SMS code, or advanced verification
Template	Reusable UAT template with locked header fields
Routing Order	Sequential or parallel signer order
Notifications	Reminders and completion receipts enabled

Where to Send and How Submissions Flow

Routing should mirror decision authority: send UAT to the business sponsor, then to technical leads, then to QA for closure and archival.

Upload Document: Attach final UAT PDF or template to the signing platform.
Assign Signers: List stakeholder emails and role-based signing order.
Authenticate Signers: Choose email, SMS, or stronger verification as required.
Store Copies: Distribute signed copy to project repository and stakeholders.

Technical and Platform Considerations

Choose a signing platform that supports audit trails, secure storage, and the authentication strength needed for your project.

Integrations: Salesforce, NetSuite, Microsoft 365, Google Workspace
File Formats: PDF, DOCX, HTML, Excel supported
Authentication: Email link, SMS OTP, KBA, or SSO

Ensure the chosen platform stores a complete audit trail (timestamps, IP addresses, signer attribution) and supports export to your records management system for retention and compliance.

Typical Timelines and Deadlines for UAT

Define and communicate deadlines up front; tie defect SLAs to the sign-off schedule to avoid last-minute disputes.

Test Execution Window:

Schedule 1–3 weeks depending on scope and integration complexity

Defect Fix SLA:

Critical defects: 48–72 hours; major: 3–7 days; minor: negotiated

Retest Period:

Allow 3–10 business days for verification after fixes

Final Sign-Off Deadline:

Set a firm date for acceptance to lock release schedules

Archive Date:

Export signed UAT to records system within 7 days of sign-off

Key Milestones from Test Plan to Final Sign-Off

Map milestones to owners and dates so stakeholders understand dependencies and acceptance gating.

01

Test Plan Approval

Project sponsor signs off on the test scope and schedule.

02

Execution Complete

All planned test cases have been executed and documented.

03

Defect Resolution

Critical defects resolved and retested to status 'closed'.

04

Formal Acceptance

Authorized signers complete the acceptance statement and date it.

Common Mistakes Teams Make When Preparing UATs

Undefined acceptance criteria lead to subjective decisions and project delays when stakeholders disagree on 'done'.
Using inconsistent version identifiers makes it hard to match test results to the deployed build for post-release triage.
Not recording evidence (logs, screenshots) reduces trust in test outcomes and increases the chance of reopening issues later.
Late involvement of business signers creates compressed review windows and can force rushed or conditional acceptances.

Risks and Consequences of an Incorrect or Incomplete UAT

Operational Downtime: Unplanned outages post-release

Contractual Disputes: Client disputes over acceptance status

Regulatory Exposure: Noncompliance in regulated industries

Increased Costs: Remediation and rollback expenses

Loss of Trust: Stakeholder confidence erosion

Delayed Releases: Missed market or contractual deadlines

Security and Compliance Considerations

Encryption: TLS 1.2/1.3; AES-256 at rest

Audit Trail: Timestamps, IPs, and action logs

HIPAA Support: BAA available for healthcare workflows

21 CFR Part 11: Support for FDA-regulated records

Access Controls: Role-based permissions and SSO

Certifications: SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001

Electronic vs Digital Signatures: Key Differences

Choose the signature type that matches legal and technical needs; both forms can be valid but offer different levels of cryptographic assurance.

Aspect	Electronic Signature	Digital Signature
Definition	any electronic sign	pki-based cryptographic sign
Non-repudiation	audit trail evidence	certificate-based proof
Legal Acceptance	esign/ueta valid	esign/ueta valid
Typical Use	contracts, approvals	high-assurance regulated records

eSignature Vendor Pricing Snapshot

Below are commonly compared entry-level pricing and capability indicators for eSignature platforms; signNow is listed first per platform comparison conventions.

	signNow	DocuSign	Adobe Sign	PandaDoc	HelloSign
Starting Price	$8/user/mo	$15/user/mo	$14/user/mo	$19/user/mo	$15/user/mo
Free Trial	7-day trial	Varies	Varies	Varies	Varies
Bulk Send	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	No
Audit Trail	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes
HIPAA Compliant	Yes	Yes	Yes	No	No

Practical UAT Examples from Common Projects

Examples show how UATs are applied across deployments to document acceptance and speed project closure.

ERP Rollout

Mid-market company ran UAT across finance modules using scripted scenarios

120 critical cases executed over two weeks
The signed UAT limited post-release defects and provided a single source of truth for go-live decisions and warranty obligations.

Patient Portal Launch

Hospital system validated PHI-handling and consent flows

testers exercised audit logging and role separation
Formal acceptance documented remediation items and ensured HIPAA-aligned retention before production launch.

Frequently Asked Questions About UATs and Electronic Acceptance

Answers address common uncertainties about e-signing, authority, and recordkeeping for UAT documents.

Need help? Contact support

Can a UAT be signed electronically?
Yes. Electronic signatures satisfy U.S. law when parties demonstrate intent, consent to electronic records, attribution, and retention capability. Use an audit trail and chosen authentication to document signer identity and intent when storing the signed record.
Who has authority to sign acceptance?
The signers should be pre-authorized decision-makers such as the project sponsor or delegated approver. Identify signer authority in the contract or governance matrix to prevent later disputes about acceptance validity.
When is notarization required?
Notarization is rarely needed for internal UATs; it may be required when acceptance triggers a legal transfer or is attached to documents that state law requires notarization. Check applicable state rules before adding notary steps.
What if a signer’s name differs from their ID?
Use the legal name matching government ID in the signature block; mismatched names can complicate attribution and increase the risk of challenge. Record the authentication method used at signing.
How should outstanding defects be handled in sign-off?
Document conditional acceptance with clear remediation timelines and success criteria. Avoid ambiguous language; specify whether acceptance is conditional, which defects are exceptioned, and who owns remediation and retest.
How long should signed UATs be retained?
Retain signed UATs according to relevant standards: minimum three years for financial records, six years for HIPAA-related materials, and longer where state law or contract requires extended retention.

be ready to get more

Join over 28 million airSlate SignNow users

Sign Now