Gate Criteria
Clear pass/fail conditions such as scope completeness, risk mitigation, quality gates, and regulatory checks for objective decisions.
A consistent template improves decision quality, reduces rework, and provides an auditable trail of approvals and assumptions.
The template is used by cross-functional stakeholders to align on scope, budget, and risk before each phase.
Use the template to reduce subjective approvals and ensure each gate decision references the same baseline information.
| Field | Configuration |
|---|---|
| Routing Order | Sequential approvals with parallel reviewer option |
| Authentication | Email link or SMS code; optional KBA for high-risk gates |
| Conditional Fields | Show remediation steps when decision = Conditional |
| Archive Location | Secure cloud repository with versioning |
Confirm platform capabilities before moving templates online to preserve signatures, audit trails, and access controls.
Ensure the chosen platform supports audit trails, retention policies, and role-based access to meet governance and compliance needs.
Clear pass/fail conditions such as scope completeness, risk mitigation, quality gates, and regulatory checks for objective decisions.
A concise list of required documents and evidence for the gate, with owner and status for each item to avoid missing items at review.
Current budget, requested funding, variance analysis, and forecast to inform capital allocation and funding decisions.
Top project risks, mitigation plans, residual risk assessment, and critical dependencies that affect the gate decision.
Formal decision field, conditional approvals, required actions, and a sign-off area capturing name, title, and date.
Version history and a short rationale for major changes to ensure traceability for audits and postmortem reviews.
List critical assumptions that informed estimates, timelines, and risk assessments, and identify owner for each assumption.
Call out upstream and downstream dependencies, third-party deliverables, and schedule sensitivity to external inputs.
Flag any legal, regulatory, or contractual obligations (HIPAA, export controls) that affect scope or resourcing.
Attach only decision-relevant artifacts—business case, technical assessment, cost breakdown, and test reports.
Gate package submitted at least 7 business days before the scheduled review.
Cross-functional pre-review completed within 3 business days of submission.
Approvers respond with questions or decision within 5 business days of meeting.
Action items from conditional approvals must be closed within the timeframe specified by approvers.
Signed decision and archived package completed within 2 business days of approval.
Initial concept review and alignment on strategic fit.
Feasibility assessment and preliminary budget authorization.
Approve development funding and detailed planning.
Confirm readiness via testing and compliance checks.
| Criteria | Stage Gate Template | Roadmap |
|---|---|---|
| Purpose | decision control | strategic sequencing |
| Cadence | milestone-driven | continuous |
| Decision Record | formal approvals captured | informal status updates |
| Detail Level | high for gate evidence | broad for planning |
| signNow | DocuSign | Adobe Sign | PandaDoc | HelloSign | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | $8/user/mo | $15/user/mo | $14/user/mo | $19/user/mo | $15/user/mo |
| Free Trial | 7-day free trial | Varies by plan | Varies by plan | Varies by plan | Varies by plan |
| Bulk Send | Yes (Business Premium+) | Yes | Yes | Yes | Varies |
| Audit Trail | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| HIPAA Compliant | Yes (BAA available) | Yes | Yes | No | No |
Martin Properties used a stage gate template for project approvals
Xerox integrated gate approvals with NetSuite for automatic budget checks