Establishing secure connection…Loading editor…Preparing document…

Psychiatric Review Technique

This template is fully customizable. Edit the text, fill out the fields, and send it for signature. Give it a try!

PSYCHIATRIC REVIEW TECHNIQUE

Form Approved
OMB No. 0960-0413

Name     SSN

NH (If different from above)     SSN

I. MEDICAL SUMMARY

A. Assessment is from: to

B. Medical Disposition(s):

1. No Medically Determinable Impairment

2. Impairment(s) Not Severe

3. Impairment(s) Severe But Not Expected to Last 12 Months

4. Meets Listing (Cite Listing)

5. Equals Listing (Cite Listing)

6. RFC Assessment Necessary

7. Coexisting Nonmental Impairment(s) that Requires Referral to Another Medical Specialty

8. Insufficient Evidence

C. Category(ies) Upon Which the Medical Disposition is Based:

1. 12.02 Organic Mental Disorders

2. 12.03 Schizophrenic, Paranoid and Other Psychotic Disorders

3. 12.04 Affective Disorders

4. 12.05 Mental Retardation

5. 12.06 Anxiety-Related Disorders

6. 12.07 Somatoform Disorders

7. 12.08 Personality Disorders

8. 12.09 Substance Addiction Disorders

9. 12.10 Autism and Other Pervasive Developmental Disorders

These findings complete the medical portion of the disability determination.

MC/PC’s Signature

Date

MC/PC’s Printed Name

Code


II. DOCUMENTATION OF FACTORS THAT EVIDENCE THE DISORDER

A. 12.02 Organic Mental Disorders

Psychological or behavioral abnormalities associated with a dysfunction of the brain…as evidenced by at least one of the following:

1. Disorientation to time and place

2. Memory impairment

3. Perceptual or thinking disturbances

4. Change in personality

5. Disturbance in mood

6. Emotional lability and impairment in impulse control

7. Loss of measured intellectual ability...

A medically determinable impairment is present that does not precisely satisfy the diagnostic criteria above.

Disorder

Pertinent symptoms, signs, and laboratory findings that substantiate the presence of the impairment:

Insufficient evidence to substantiate the presence of the disorder (explain in Part IV, Consultant’s Notes).

B. 12.03 Schizophrenic, Paranoid and Other Psychotic Disorders

Psychotic features and deterioration that are persistent (continuous or intermittent), as evidenced by at least one of the following:

1. Delusions or hallucinations

2. Catatonic or other grossly disorganized behavior

3. Incoherence, loosening of associations, illogical thinking, or poverty of content of speech

a. Blunt affect, or

b. Flat affect, or

c. Inappropriate affect

4. Emotional withdrawal and/or isolation

A medically determinable impairment is present that does not precisely satisfy the diagnostic criteria above.

Disorder

Pertinent symptoms, signs, and laboratory findings that substantiate the presence of this impairment:

Insufficient evidence to substantiate the presence of the disorder (explain in Part IV, Consultant’s Notes).

C. 12.04 Affective Disorders

Disturbance of mood, accompanied by a full or partial manic or depressive syndrome, as evidenced by at least one of the following:

1. Depressive syndrome characterized by at least four of the following:

a. Anhedonia or pervasive loss of interest in almost all activities, or

b. Appetite disturbance with change in weight, or

c. Sleep disturbance, or

d. Psychomotor agitation or retardation, or

e. Decreased energy, or

f. Feelings of guilt or worthlessness, or

g. Difficulty concentrating or thinking, or

h. Thoughts of suicide, or

i. Hallucinations, delusions or paranoid thinking

2. Manic syndrome characterized by at least three of the following:

a. Hyperactivity, or

b. Pressures of speech, or

c. Flight of ideas, or

d. Inflated self-esteem, or

e. Decreased need for sleep, or

f. Easy distractibility, or

g. Involvement in activities that have a high probability of painful consequences which are not recognized, or

h. Hallucinations, delusions or paranoid thinking

3. Bipolar syndrome with a history of episodic periods manifested by the full symptomatic picture of both manic and depressive syndromes (and currently characterized by either or both syndromes)

A medically determinable impairment is present that does not precisely satisfy the diagnostic criteria above

Disorder

Pertinent symptoms, signs, and laboratory findings that substantiate the presence of this impairment (explain in Part IV, Consultant’s Notes, if necessary):

Insufficient evidence to substantiate the presence of the disorder (explain in Part IV, Consultant’s Notes).

D. 12.05 Mental Retardation

Significantly subaverage general intellectual functioning with deficits in adaptive functioning initially manifested during the developmental period; i.e., the evidence demonstrates or supports onset of the impairment before age 22, with one of the following:

1. Mental incapacity evidenced by dependence upon others for personal needs and inability to follow instructions such that the use of standardized measures of intellectual functioning is precluded

2. A valid verbal, performance, or full scale IQ of 59 or less

3. A valid verbal, performance, or full scale IQ of 60 through 70 and a physical or other mental impairment imposing an additional and significant work-related limitation of function

4. A valid verbal, performance, or full scale IQ of 60 through 70

A medically determinable impairment is present that does not precisely satisfy the diagnostic criteria above.

Disorder

Pertinent symptoms, signs, and laboratory findings that substantiate the presence of this impairment.

Insufficient evidence to substantiate the presence of the disorder (explain in Part IV, Consultant’s Notes).

E. 12.06 Anxiety-Related Disorders

Anxiety as the predominant disturbance or anxiety experienced in the attempt to master symptoms, as evidenced by at least one of the following:

1. Generalized persistent anxiety accompanied by three of the following:

a. Motor tension, or

b. Autonomic hyperactivity, or

c. Apprehensive expectation, or

d. Vigilance and scanning

2. A persistent irrational fear of a specific object, activity or situation which results in a compelling desire to avoid the dreaded object, activity, or situation

3. Recurrent severe panic attacks manifested by a sudden unpredictable onset of intense apprehension, fear, terror, and sense of impending doom occurring on the average of at least once a week

4. Recurrent obsessions or compulsions which are a source of marked distress

5. Recurrent and intrusive recollections of a traumatic experience, which are a source of marked distress

A medically determinable impairment is present that does not precisely satisfy the diagnostic criteria above.

Disorder

Pertinent symptoms, signs, and laboratory findings that substantiate the presence of this impairment:

Insufficient evidence to substantiate the presence of the disorder (explain in Part IV, Consultant’s Notes).

F. 12.07 Somatoform Disorders

Physical symptoms for which there are no demonstrable organic findings or known physiological mechanisms, as evidenced by at least one of the following:

1. A history of multiple physical symptoms of several years duration beginning before age 30, that have caused the individual to take medicine frequently, see a physician often and alter life patterns significantly

2. Persistent nonorganic disturbance of one of the following:

a. Vision, or

b. Speech, or

c. Hearing, or

d. Use of a limb, or

e. Movement and its control (e.g., coordination disturbances, psychogenic seizures, akinesia, dyskinesia), or

f. Sensation (e.g., diminished or heightened)

3. Unrealistic interpretation of physical signs or sensations associated with the preoccupation or belief that one has a serious disease or injury

A medically determinable impairment is present that does not precisely satisfy the diagnostic criteria above.

Disorder

Pertinent symptoms, signs, and laboratory findings that substantiate the presence of this impairment:

Insufficient evidence to substantiate the presence of the disorder (explain in Part IV, Consultant’s Notes).

G. 12.08 Personality Disorders

Inflexible and maladaptive personality traits which cause either significant impairment in social or occupational functioning or subjective distress, as evidenced by at least one of the following:

1. Seclusiveness or autistic thinking

2. Pathologically inappropriate suspiciousness or hostility

3. Oddities of thought, perception, speech and behavior

4. Persistent disturbances of mood or affect

5. Pathological dependence, passivity, or aggressivity

6. Intense and unstable interpersonal relationships and impulsive and damaging behavior

A medically determinable impairment is present that does not precisely satisfy the diagnostic criteria above.

Disorder

Pertinent symptoms, signs, and laboratory findings that substantiate the presence of this impairment:

Insufficient evidence to substantiate the presence of the disorder (explain in Part IV, Consultant’s Notes).

H. 12.09 Substance Addiction Disorders

Behavioral changes or physical changes associated with the regular use of substances that affect the central nervous system.

If present, evaluate under one or more of the most closely applicable listings:

1. Listing 12.02—Organic mental disorders

2. Listing 12.04—Affective disorders

3. Listing 12.06—Anxiety-related disorders

4. Listing 12.08—Personality disorders

5. Listing 11.14—Peripheral neuropathies

6. Listing 5.05—Liver damage

7. Listing 5.04—Gastritis

8. Listing 5.08—Pancreatitis

9. Listing 11.02 or 11.03—Seizures

A medically determinable impairment is present that does not precisely satisfy the diagnostic criteria above.

Disorder

Pertinent symptoms, signs, and laboratory findings that substantiate the presence of this impairment:

Insufficient evidence to substantiate the presence of the disorder (explain in Part IV, Consultant’s Notes).

I. 12.10 Autistic Disorder and Other Pervasive Developmental Disorders

Qualitative deficits in the development of reciprocal social interaction, in the development of verbal and nonverbal communication skills, and in imaginative activity. Often there is a markedly restricted repertoire of activities and interests, which frequently are stereotyped and repetitive.

1. Autistic disorder, with medically documented findings of all of the following:

a. Qualitative deficits in reciprocal social interaction

b. Qualitative deficits in verbal and nonverbal communication and in imaginative activity

c. Markedly restricted repertoire of activities and interests

2. Other pervasive developmental disorders, with medically documented findings of both of the following:

a. Qualitative deficits in reciprocal social interaction

b. Qualitative deficits in verbal and nonverbal communication and in imaginative activity

A medically determinable impairment is present that does not precisely satisfy the diagnostic criteria above.

Disorder

Pertinent symptoms, signs, and laboratory findings that substantiate the presence of this impairment:

Insufficient evidence to substantiate the presence of the disorder (explain in Part IV, Consultant’s Notes).

III. RATING OF FUNCTIONAL LIMITATIONS

A. “B” Criteria of the Listings

Specify the listing(s) (i.e., 12.02 through 12.10) under which the items below are being rated

FUNCTIONAL LIMITATION DEGREE OF LIMITATION Insufficient Evidence
1. Restriction of Activities of Daily Living None Mild Moderate Marked* Extreme*
2. Difficulties in Maintaining Social Functioning None Mild Moderate Marked* Extreme*
3. Difficulties in Maintaining Concentration, Persistence, or Pace None Mild Moderate Marked* Extreme*
4. Repeated Episodes of Decompensation, Each of Extended Duration None One or Two Three* Four* or More

B. “C” Criteria of the Listings

1. Complete this section if 12.02, 12.03, or 12.04 applies and the paragraph B requirements are not satisfied.

Medically documented history of a chronic organic mental, schizophrenic, etc., or affective disorder of at least 2 years’ duration...

1. Repeated episodes of decompensation, each of extended duration

2. A residual disease process that has resulted in such marginal adjustment...

3. Current history of 1 or more years’ inability to function outside a highly supportive living arrangement...

Evidence does not establish the presence of the “C” criteria

Insufficient evidence to establish the presence of the “C” criteria (explain in Part IV, Consultant’s Notes).

2. Complete this section if 12.06 applies and the paragraph B requirements are not satisfied.

Complete inability to function independently outside the area of one’s home

Evidence does not establish the presence of the “C” criteria

Insufficient evidence to establish the presence of the “C” criterion (explain in Part IV, Consultant’s Notes).

IV. CONSULTANT’S NOTES

Section 223 and section 1633 of the Social Security Act authorize the information requested on this form... Paperwork Reduction Act statement text continues here.

Enter text✕

What the Psychiatric Review Technique (PRT) Is

Psychiatric Review Technique (PRT) is a standardized assessment form used by medical reviewers and clinicians to document psychiatric diagnoses, symptom severity, treatment history, and functional limitations when preparing evidence for disability determinations. The PRT organizes findings across core domains—activities of daily living, social functioning, concentration, persistence, and pace—records objective exam results and testing, and captures medical source statements. Its structured format supports consistent reviewer conclusions for adjudicators and provides a clear, auditable summary useful for initial decisions and any subsequent appeals.

Why a Standardized PRT Matters

A standardized Psychiatric Review Technique improves clarity and consistency in psychiatric evidence by aligning clinical findings with functional impact, streamlining reviewer comparisons across cases, and providing a clear written rationale for eligibility decisions.

Why a Standardized PRT Matters

Who Completes and Uses the PRT

Typical users include medical consultants, treating psychiatrists, disability examiners, and attorneys preparing or reviewing psychiatric evidence.

  • Medical consultants: summarize clinical findings, apply diagnostic criteria, and rate functional limitations.
  • Treating psychiatrists: provide source statements, describe treatment response, and document prognosis.
  • Disability examiners and lawyers: use PRT to assess claim sufficiency and plan next steps.

Organizations processing high volumes of claims—such as state disability determination services—rely on standardized PRTs to maintain quality and reproducibility across reviewers.

Core Sections to Include in Every PRT

A professional Psychiatric Review Technique captures diagnosis, functional domain ratings, evidence summary, treatment history, clinical observations, and the provider's final medical opinion in a structured format.

Diagnosis

List primary and secondary psychiatric diagnoses with ICD-10 codes when available, brief onset history, and supporting signs or test results to substantiate the diagnostic conclusions for adjudicators.

Functional Domains

Rate limitations across activities of daily living, social functioning, concentration, persistence, and pace; include examples showing how symptoms affect work-related tasks and daily routines and context.

Evidence Summary

Summarize objective findings, structured mental status exam results, psychological testing, lab data, and consistency between reported symptoms and observable behaviors; cite dates and providers with source notes.

Treatment History

Detail current and prior psychotropic medications, psychotherapy, hospitalizations, adherence, side effects, and documented response over time to establish treatment-resistant features or improvement.

Clinical Findings

Include mental status exam observations—appearance, behavior, speech, mood, affect, thought process, cognition—and specific examples of functional impairment in workplace-relevant contexts with timestamps, provider notes, and any standardized rating scales.

Medical Opinion

Provide clear conclusions on capacity to perform sustained work activities, recommended restrictions, reasonable accommodations, expected duration, and probability of improvement including citation to treating source statements and summary rationale.

Step-by-Step: Completing a PRT

Follow a clear sequence when completing a PRT to ensure evidence alignment, timeliness, and auditability for disability adjudication.

  • 01
    Gather Evidence: Collect treatment records, MSEs, and test reports
  • 02
    Complete PRT: Enter diagnoses, domain ratings, and examples
  • 03
    Validate Entries: Confirm dates, provider names, and signatures
  • 04
    Submit & Archive: Route to adjudicator and store signed PDF

Typical Workflow for Using a PRT

Typical workflow moves from evidence collection to reviewer assessment, PRT completion, electronic routing to adjudicator, and record retention.

  • Collect Records: Gather treatment notes, MSEs, and psych testing
  • Assess Function: Evaluate ADLs, social, concentration, persistence, pace
  • Document Findings: Complete PRT fields with dates and examples
  • Route Report: Send to adjudicator and upload to record system

Configuring an Electronic PRT Workflow

Configure an electronic PRT workflow to collect signer data, enforce required fields, and create an auditable trail for adjudication.

Field Configuration
Authentication Email, SMS code, or ID verification
Required Fields Make diagnosis and functional ratings mandatory
Conditional Logic Show treatment history when psychotropic medication listed
Notifications Alert reviewers and adjudicators on completion

Technical Requirements for Digital Submission

Ensure the platform supports secure upload, eSign, audit trails, and configurable fields to meet evidentiary and privacy requirements.

  • File Formats: Accept PDF, DOCX, and scanned images
  • Integrations: Connect to EHR, case management, and storage
  • Security: TLS 1.2/1.3 in transit; AES-256 at rest

Essential Data Elements to Include

Patient Identifiers: Name, DOB, SSN, contact
Diagnoses: Primary and secondary ICD-10 codes
Treatment Records: Medication lists, therapy notes, hospitalizations
Mental Status Exam: Appearance, mood, cognition, thought content
Functional Ratings: ADLs, social, concentration, persistence, pace
Provider Info: Name, credentials, signature, date

Common Pitfalls to Avoid

  • Missing objective evidence reduces persuasive weight; reviewers should attach mental status exam details, test results, and contemporaneous treatment notes to support subjective reports.
  • Vague functional descriptions (e.g., 'limited') without concrete examples of task difficulty or frequency hinder accurate ratings and adjudication.
  • Omitting dates, provider names, or medication timelines makes it difficult to assess course and treatment response over time.
  • Failing to document reliability, patient effort, or corroborating third-party observations can weaken the evaluation's evidentiary value.

Risks When the PRT Is Incomplete or Incorrect

Claim Denial: Insufficient evidence may lead to denial
Appeals Delay: Incomplete PRTs extend processing time
Medical Record Errors: Mismatched data can undermine credibility
HIPAA Exposure: Unauthorized disclosure risks fines
Professional Liability: Inaccurate opinions risk malpractice claims
Statutory Noncompliance: Failure to retain records violates rules

eSignature Vendor Feature Comparison for PRT Workflows

Comparison of common eSignature vendor features relevant to completing and distributing Psychiatric Review Technique forms, with signNow listed first.

signNow DocuSign Adobe Sign PandaDoc HelloSign
Starting Price $8/user/mo $15/user/mo $14/user/mo $19/user/mo $15/user/mo
Free Trial 7-day trial No No Yes, limited Yes, limited
Bulk Send Yes Yes Yes Yes No
Audit Trail Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
HIPAA Compliant Yes Yes Yes No No

Practical Use Cases for the PRT

Real-world scenarios illustrate how PRTs streamline psychiatric evidence collection and support adjudication in disability cases.

State Disability Review

A state disability determination service used a standardized PRT to consolidate multiple psychiatric records into a single evaluative summary.

  • Reduced reviewer turnaround time and clarified limitations.
  • The structured summary allowed adjudicators to focus on medical rationale and expedited initial decisions, while also producing a clear basis for appeals when additional evidence was required, improving documentation quality across reviews.

Clinical Consultation

A treating psychiatrist completed a PRT to support a patient's Social Security claim, detailing medication response and functional impact.

  • Provided objective domain ratings linked to work tasks.
  • This documentation assisted the patient's representative in preparing a concise medical summary for the hearing, aligning clinical observations with vocational considerations and reducing ambiguity about day-to-day limitations and ensuring evidence was admissible and well-indexed.

Frequently Asked Questions and Troubleshooting

Common questions about using and submitting Psychiatric Review Techniques, including evidence sufficiency, electronic signatures, retention, and state-specific notarization rules.


Need help? Contact support

be ready to get more
Join over 28 million airSlate SignNow users