Are electronic signatures valid on this plan?

Yes. Electronic signatures are legally valid under the federal ESIGN Act (15 U.S.C. ch. 96) and state UETA laws where adopted. Ensure the signing method documents intent, consent, attribution, and retention to meet legal-validity tests.

When is notarization required?

Most internal QA plans do not require notarization. Notarization is only needed if a third party or filing authority requires an acknowledged signature; verify the specific agency or contract clause before notarizing.

Can I use remote notarization (RON)?

Many states permit RON, but rules vary. Confirm state RON status and technology requirements before relying on remote notarization for legally sensitive approvals.

How do I update an approved plan?

Create a new version with a revision date, summary of changes, and updated approvals. Preserve prior signed versions for audit and retention purposes according to your retention schedule.

Who must sign the plan?

Typically the QA lead, product owner, and release manager must sign. For regulated contexts, include compliance or security officer signatures as required by internal policy.

What if a plan contains errors after signing?

Document the error, create an amended plan version, and obtain signatures on the correction. Keep the original signed version and the amendment for audit traceability.

QA Automation Plan

This template is fully customizable. Edit the text, fill out the fields, and send it for signature. Give it a try!

QA AUTOMATION PLAN

Parties and Effective Date

Client Name: Service Provider Name:

Effective Date:

Recitals

WHEREAS, Client Name: requires a documented QA automation strategy to increase test coverage, reduce regression risk, and accelerate release cadence; and

WHEREAS, Service Provider Name: represents that it has the professional expertise, personnel, tools, and facilities necessary to design, implement, and maintain the QA automation solution described in this Plan; and

WHEREAS, the parties desire to set forth the objectives, scope, deliverables, payment, confidentiality, and other terms governing the QA automation engagement.

Objective

The objective of this QA Automation Plan is to define a repeatable, maintainable automated testing capability that validates critical functionality, enables continuous integration and delivery, and provides measurable quality metrics to the Client.

Scope of Work

Scope Description Specific Deliverables

1. Test Automation Framework: Design and deliver a modular automation framework, including base libraries, reporting, and utility modules.

2. Automated Test Suites: Implement automated suites covering functional, regression, and smoke tests as agreed in the acceptance criteria.

3. CI/CD Integration and Pipelines: Integrate automation execution into Client continuous integration pipelines and provide configuration scripts.

Tools, Frameworks, and Environments

Select Proposed Tools

Selenium WebDriver Cypress Playwright

Appium JUnit/TestNG Cucumber / BDD

Other Tools (specify) Supported Environments

Acceptance Criteria & Test Coverage Targets

Acceptance Criteria Coverage Targets

CI/CD Integration & Reporting

Pipeline Integration Notes Reporting Cadence

Payment Terms

Total Contract Amount Payment Schedule Late Payment Fee / Interest

All invoices are due as stated in the Payment Schedule. Overdue amounts shall accrue interest and may be offset by the Client against future payments only in accordance with the dispute procedures set forth in this Plan.

Term and Termination

Term Start: Term End:

Notice Period for Termination Termination Conditions

Confidentiality

Each party shall maintain in strict confidence all Confidential Information received from the other party. "Confidential Information" includes nonpublic technical and business information, test data, test plans, proprietary scripts, and any information designated as confidential. Confidential Information does not include information which: (a) is or becomes generally available to the public through no fault of the receiving party; (b) was in the receiving party's possession prior to receipt from the disclosing party as demonstrable by written records; or (c) is independently developed by the receiving party without use of the disclosing party's Confidential Information.

The receiving party shall use Confidential Information solely for the performance of this Plan and shall not disclose it to any third party except to employees or contractors with a need to know and subject to confidentiality obligations no less protective than those herein. Confidentiality obligations survive termination of this Plan for a period of .

Warranties & Liability

The Service Provider warrants that services will be performed in a professional and workmanlike manner consistent with industry standards. Except for intentional misconduct or gross negligence, neither party shall be liable to the other for consequential, incidental, or punitive damages. The Service Provider's aggregate liability for direct damages under this Plan shall not exceed the total amount paid by the Client under this Plan.

Governing Law

This Plan shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of , without regard to conflict of laws principles.

Entire Agreement

This Plan, including all exhibits and attachments expressly incorporated herein, constitutes the entire agreement between the parties with respect to the subject matter and supersedes all prior and contemporaneous agreements, proposals, and communications, whether oral or written. Any amendment or modification must be in writing signed by authorized representatives of both parties.

Risk & Mitigation

Known Risks and Mitigation Strategies

Maintenance & Support

Ongoing Maintenance Services

Acceptance and Signatures

The undersigned authorized representatives of the parties acknowledge and accept the terms of this QA Automation Plan and agree to perform their respective obligations in accordance with its provisions.

Client Printed Name:

By:

Date:

Service Provider Printed Name:

By:

Date:

What the QA Automation Plan Is and When It Applies

A QA Automation Plan documents the strategy, scope, tools, and responsibilities for automating software quality assurance tasks. It specifies test coverage, environments, schedules, entry/exit criteria, and required approvals so teams can run repeatable automated test cycles, integrate with CI/CD, and produce auditable results for stakeholders and regulators.

Why a Formal QA Automation Plan Matters

A written plan reduces ambiguity, shortens release cycles by standardizing automation work, and provides an auditable trail for compliance and post-release analysis.

Who Typically Prepares and Uses This Plan

The QA Automation Plan is prepared by QA leads and automation engineers and read by product owners, release managers, and auditors.

QA leads: define scope, map test cases to automation, and set pass/fail criteria for builds.
Automation engineers: author scripts, manage CI integration, and maintain test environments and data.
Product owners and release managers: review coverage, accept risk, and approve go/no-go decisions.

Keep the plan accessible to development, operations, and compliance teams so automation work remains aligned with release and audit requirements.

Step-by-Step: Create and Activate the QA Automation Plan

Follow these sequential steps to prepare, validate, and operationalize the plan across teams.

01

Gather Requirements: Collect product acceptance criteria, compliance needs, and release schedule.
02

Define Scope: Map features to risk categories and select automation targets.
03

Select Tools: Choose frameworks, runners, and reporting tools compatible with CI/CD.
04

Approve and Publish: Secure stakeholder sign-off and commit the plan to version control.

Configure Your Online Automation Workflow

Set up the digital workflow so test artifacts, approvals, and audit records flow automatically between systems.

Field	Configuration
Repository Link	URL to test scripts repository and branch naming convention
CI Trigger	Branch merge or scheduled cron triggering test suites
Notification Hook	Slack/Teams channel and email distribution list
Report Destination	Artifact storage path and access permissions

How Automated Tests Move from Plan to Production

This flow shows the typical handoffs when a plan drives automated testing in a CI/CD pipeline.

Author Plan: Document scope, cases, and schedules in the plan repository.
Implement Scripts: Develop automation aligned to mapped test cases.
Run in CI: Execute suites on merge or schedule with environment provisioning.
Publish Results: Store artifacts and share pass/fail reports with stakeholders.

Platform and File Requirements for eSubmission

Use a platform that supports PDF and DOCX, audit trails, and integrations with your CI/CD and document stores.

File formats: PDF, DOCX, and Excel supported for plan documents and test matrices.
Integrations: Salesforce, NetSuite, Google Workspace, Microsoft 365, and Procore are common integration targets.
Security: Platform must provide TLS in transit and AES-256 at rest.

Confirm the platform supports audit logs, signer authentication, and retention policies required by your compliance team before publishing.

Essential Sections to Include in a Professional Plan

A complete QA Automation Plan groups technical and governance details so reviewers can find test scope, acceptance criteria, and traceability quickly.

Executive Summary

High-level objectives, release alignment, and risk assessment for non-technical stakeholders to review.

Scope & Exclusions

Explicit module list, excluded features, and rationale for what will not be automated.

Test Strategy

Frameworks, test types (unit, API, UI), data needs, and environment requirements.

Schedule & SLAs

Planned execution cadence, maximum acceptable test duration, and result SLAs for reporting.

Roles & Responsibilities

Owners for creation, maintenance, approval, and incident response to failed tests.

Compliance & Audit Trail

Retention, signature, and evidence requirements to support regulatory review and audits.

Security and Compliance Controls to Document

Encryption: TLS 1.2/1.3; AES-256 at rest

Audit Trail: Immutable timestamps and action logs

Access Control: Role-based permissions, SSO/SAML

HIPAA: BAA available where required

21 CFR Part 11: Support for FDA-regulated records

Certifications: SOC 2 Type II and ISO 27001

Common Pitfalls to Avoid When Writing the Plan

Vague scope statements that leave teams unclear which components require automation and which do not, causing wasted effort and gaps.
Underestimating environment parity—tests run in different environments than production frequently produce false positives or negatives during release.
Missing approval metadata and version history, which increases audit friction and makes it difficult to determine which plan version applied to a release.
Ignoring data handling rules for sensitive test data, which can create HIPAA or privacy exposures during automated runs.

Consequences of an Incomplete or Incorrect QA Automation Plan

Release Failures: Increased production incidents and rollback frequency

Regulatory Risk: Noncompliance with HIPAA or sector rules

Audit Findings: Insufficient evidence for change control and approvals

Operational Delay: Longer release cycles and emergency fixes

Financial Impact: Higher remediation costs and potential fines

Reputational Harm: Customer trust and contract risks

Typical Timelines and Scheduling Expectations

Set realistic dates for design, development, execution, and review so automation tasks align to the release cadence.

Plan Draft Due:

2–4 weeks before planned automation start to allow stakeholder review

Script Development:

Parallel to sprint cycles; typical sprint-aligned delivery cadence

CI Integration:

Integrate with CI within 1 sprint of script readiness

Regression Window:

Schedule nightly or pre-release regression runs per SLA

Sign-off:

Final approval at least 48 hours before release

Key Milestones from Plan Draft to Production

Track milestones sequentially to show progress and dependencies from planning through deployment.

01

Draft Plan Complete

Plan version created with scope and initial signatories.

02

Automation Build

Scripts and fixtures implemented and code-reviewed.

03

Staging Validation

Full suite executed in staging with pass/fail metrics.

04

Release Approval

Stakeholder sign-off recorded and archived before deployment.

How QA Automation Plans Differ from Related Documents

Compare the QA Automation Plan to adjacent artifacts so teams know when to use each document.

Document Type	Primary Purpose	Typical Audience
Test Plan	detailed test design	qa team
Release Plan	deployment steps	release managers
Automation Plan	automation strategy	automation engineers
Traceability Matrix	requirement mapping	qa and product

Entry-Level eSignature Pricing and Core Feature Comparison

Basic pricing and feature availability for common eSignature vendors; signNow is listed first for direct comparison.

	signNow	DocuSign	Adobe Sign	PandaDoc	HelloSign
Starting Price	$8/user/mo	$15/user/mo	$14/user/mo	$19/user/mo	$15/user/mo
Free Trial	7-day free trial	Varies by vendor	Varies by vendor	Varies by vendor	Varies by vendor
Bulk Send	Yes (Business Premium)	Yes	Yes	Yes	No
Audit Trail	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes
HIPAA Compliant	Yes	Yes	Yes	No	No
Envelope Cap	No cap	100 envelopes/user/year	Varies	Varies	Varies

Real-World Examples of Automation Plans in Use

These short case arcs show how organizations applied a formal automation plan to improve delivery and compliance.

Optica Ventures — COO

Optica formalized automation across releases to reduce misconfiguration risk

The plan mapped test cases to environments and CI triggers
As a result, the team improved traceability and simplified stakeholder review while maintaining consistent delivery schedules.

Martin Properties — Founder

A property management firm automated lease validation and release smoke tests

They integrated results into their release dashboard
This reduced manual verification, created a reliable audit trail for signed leases, and accelerated tenant onboarding.

FAQs and Troubleshooting for the QA Automation Plan

Answers to frequent questions about validity, signatures, notarization, and updating the plan for compliance and audit readiness.

Need help? Contact support

Are electronic signatures valid on this plan?
Yes. Electronic signatures are legally valid under the federal ESIGN Act (15 U.S.C. ch. 96) and state UETA laws where adopted. Ensure the signing method documents intent, consent, attribution, and retention to meet legal-validity tests.
When is notarization required?
Most internal QA plans do not require notarization. Notarization is only needed if a third party or filing authority requires an acknowledged signature; verify the specific agency or contract clause before notarizing.
Can I use remote notarization (RON)?
Many states permit RON, but rules vary. Confirm state RON status and technology requirements before relying on remote notarization for legally sensitive approvals.
How do I update an approved plan?
Create a new version with a revision date, summary of changes, and updated approvals. Preserve prior signed versions for audit and retention purposes according to your retention schedule.
Who must sign the plan?
Typically the QA lead, product owner, and release manager must sign. For regulated contexts, include compliance or security officer signatures as required by internal policy.
What if a plan contains errors after signing?
Document the error, create an amended plan version, and obtain signatures on the correction. Keep the original signed version and the amendment for audit traceability.

be ready to get more

Join over 28 million airSlate SignNow users

Sign Now