Can an electronic signature validate this Policy?

Yes. Electronic signatures meet the ESIGN Act (15 U.S.C. ch. 96) and UETA where adopted, provided the signing process demonstrates intent, consent, attribution, and record retention capabilities.

Do consumer-facing disclosures apply?

If the Policy affects consumer transactions or records, ESIGN requires disclosure and consent procedures. Consult legal counsel when consumer rights or financial records are implicated.

Is notarization required for the Policy?

Not usually. Notarization is seldom necessary for internal Policies, but specific state or contractual provisions may require notarized acknowledgements; verify per contract or state rule.

How should version control be handled?

Maintain a signed, dated archive of each Policy version, record the effective date, and preserve audit trails showing who signed and when for future audits.

What authentication level is recommended?

Use email plus optional SMS or higher-level verification for critical approvals; stronger authentication improves evidentiary weight for compliance purposes.

How long must signed Policies be retained?

Follow applicable retention rules: IRS minimums (IRC §6501(a)), HIPAA six-year rule (45 CFR §164.530(j)), and any industry-specific retention requirements.

Electronic Signature
Templates
Miscellaneous
Quality Assurance Policy

Quality Assurance Policy

This template is fully customizable. Edit the text, fill out the fields, and send it for signature. Give it a try!

QUALITY ASSURANCE POLICY

Client Name: Provider Name:

Effective Date:

Whereas

WHEREAS, Client Name: engages Provider Name: to perform services requiring a formal quality assurance policy;

WHEREAS, the parties desire to set forth standards, procedures, responsibilities, and remedies with respect to quality control, corrective action, and audit rights to ensure products and services conform to agreed specifications and applicable regulatory or contractual requirements;

WHEREAS, this Policy establishes the quality assurance framework that governs inspection, testing, recordkeeping, and dispute resolution relating to the services performed under the parties' agreement.

Policy Statement

It is the policy of the parties that all deliverables, processes, and services provided under this relationship shall meet or exceed the quality criteria set forth in this document and in any referenced specifications. The Provider shall implement and maintain controls, inspection routines, and corrective action procedures sufficient to ensure continued conformance to contract requirements and to reduce nonconformities to the greatest extent practicable.

Scope of Work

Description of Covered Activities

Quality Objectives

The Provider shall achieve and maintain the following measurable objectives: timely delivery in accordance with agreed milestones, a defect rate not to exceed the agreed threshold, and documented corrective actions for all nonconformances. Specific target metrics:

Target Defect Rate

Roles and Responsibilities

Quality Manager (Provider) Quality Manager Contact

Quality Control Procedures

The Provider shall establish documented procedures for inspection, sampling, testing, and acceptance criteria. Inspections shall be performed at stages sufficient to detect nonconformance before release.

Inspection Frequency: Sample Size:

Inspection and Testing Procedures (summary)

Corrective Action & Nonconformance

Upon identification of a nonconformance, the Provider shall: (a) quarantine affected items or suspend affected services as appropriate, (b) notify Client within the time specified in this Policy, (c) perform root cause analysis, and (d) implement documented corrective and preventive actions with timelines and verification of effectiveness. Records of all nonconformance reports and corrective actions shall be maintained as set forth below.

Notification Timeframe for Nonconformance

Recordkeeping

The Provider shall retain records of inspections, test results, nonconformance reports, corrective actions, and releases for a minimum period specified below, and shall make such records available to the Client upon request for audit and verification.

Record Retention Period

Audit and Review

Client reserves the right to audit Provider's quality system and records during normal business hours upon reasonable notice. The parties shall cooperate in scheduled reviews of quality performance and shall agree actions for improvement where metrics fall below agreed thresholds.

Audit Frequency

Payment Terms

Compensation for work performed under this Policy shall be as follows:

Payment Amount Payment Schedule Late Payment Fee

Term and Termination

This Policy shall commence on Start Date and continue through the End Date unless earlier terminated in accordance with this section.

Start Date: End Date:

Required Notice for Termination (number of days)

Either party may terminate this Policy for cause if the other party fails to cure a material breach within the notice_period specified above following written notice. Termination for convenience may be exercised upon provision of the notice_period, subject to settlement of outstanding obligations.

Confidentiality

Each party shall keep confidential all non-public information obtained from the other party in connection with this Policy and shall not disclose such information except to the extent required by law or as necessary to perform obligations hereunder. Confidential information shall be used solely for the purposes contemplated by this Policy. The obligations of confidentiality shall survive termination of this Policy for a period equivalent to the record_retention_period specified above or as otherwise required by applicable law.

Governing Law

This Policy shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the state specified below without regard to its conflict of laws principles.

Governing State

Entire Agreement

This Policy, together with any referenced statements of work, specifications, and incorporated documents, constitutes the entire agreement between the parties regarding quality assurance matters and supersedes all prior representations, understandings, and agreements with respect thereto. No amendment shall be effective unless in writing and signed by authorized representatives of both parties.

Miscellaneous Provisions

If any provision of this Policy is held invalid or unenforceable, the remaining provisions shall remain in full force and effect. The parties agree to negotiate in good faith to replace any invalid provision with a valid provision that achieves, to the extent possible, the original economic, legal and commercial objectives.

Applicability to Subcontractors

The Provider shall flow down the obligations of this Policy to any subcontractor performing work under this Policy where applicable.

Client:

By:

Date:

Provider:

By:

Date:

What a Quality Assurance Policy Is and Why It Matters

A Quality Assurance Policy documents an organization's formal approach to planning, executing, and verifying quality standards for products, services, and processes. It sets roles, responsibilities, metrics, and acceptance criteria, and describes audit and corrective-action procedures. The Policy provides consistent expectations for employees, suppliers, and partners, supports regulatory compliance where applicable, and creates a record of controls and approvals that can be used in internal audits and external reviews. Drafting a clear Policy reduces ambiguity during inspections and supports repeatable quality outcomes across teams and sites.

Key Advantages of Having a Written Quality Assurance Policy

A formal Policy clarifies responsibilities, reduces process variation, documents compliance controls, and preserves institutional knowledge. It supports auditability for regulators and customers, reduces rework by specifying acceptance criteria, and creates a consistent basis for training, continuous improvement, and supplier oversight.

Who Typically Maintains and Follows a Quality Assurance Policy

Implementation requires cooperation across functions: operations, procurement, legal, HR, and IT must align to keep the Policy current and enforced.

Quality managers and QA teams who design test plans, audits, and corrective actions for products or services.
Compliance, legal, and regulatory teams who ensure controls meet HIPAA, FDA, OSHA, or industry-specific rules.
Operational leaders and supervisors who enforce procedures and confirm work meets documented acceptance criteria.

Primary Signers and Responsible Roles

QA Manager

Accountable for drafting and maintaining the Policy, scheduling audits, approving corrective actions, and reporting quality metrics to senior management.

Compliance Officer

Verifies alignment with regulatory requirements (e.g., HIPAA, FDA), reviews changes for legal risk, and retains signed Policy versions for audit readiness.

Security and Compliance Controls to Reference

Data Encryption: TLS 1.2/1.3 in transit

At-Rest Protection: AES-256 encryption

Auditability: Detailed audit trails retained

Regulatory Standards: SOC 2 Type II available

Healthcare Controls: HIPAA compliant (BAA required)

FDA Records: 21 CFR Part 11 support

Step-by-Step: Create and Approve Your Quality Assurance Policy

Follow a structured sequence to draft, review, and finalize the Policy so approvals and versioning are auditable.

01

Draft: Define scope, metrics, responsibilities, and acceptance criteria.
02

Review: Circulate to legal, compliance, and operations for feedback.
03

Approve: Obtain required signatures and record effective date.
04

Distribute: Share final Policy and enforce version control.

How to Configure an Electronic Approval Workflow

Set up a clear digital workflow so routing, authentication, and archival happen automatically for each Policy version.

Field	Configuration
Signing Order	Sequential routing: QA → Legal → Compliance → Executive
Authentication	Email link plus optional SMS or ID verification
Template Reuse	Create a master template with conditional fields
Notifications	Set reminders at 3 and 7 days past due

Digital Signing and Submission Considerations

Ensure the chosen platform can store signed copies, produce tamper-evident audit records, and meet regulatory encryption standards.

File Formats: PDF, DOCX supported
Integrations: Connects to Google Workspace and Microsoft 365
Authentication: Email, SMS, or stronger methods

Typical Routing for a Quality Assurance Policy

A clear sequence reduces delays and preserves a complete audit trail for each sign-off step.

Author: Uploads draft and places signature fields
Reviewers: Comment and request edits as needed
Approvers: Sign in established order with authentication
Archive: Store signed Policy with audit log

Typical Timelines and Review Deadlines

Establish recurring milestones so the Policy remains current and auditable across reporting cycles.

Initial Review Cycle:

30–60 days for first draft review and stakeholder alignment

Annual Review:

At least annually or when regulations change

Immediate Updates:

Within 30 days for critical compliance changes

Audit Preparation:

Complete documentation 14 days before scheduled audits

Version Publication:

Publish and date new Policy versions on effective date

Key Milestones from Draft to Archival

Track discrete stages to create a single auditable path from drafting through retention.

01

Draft Completion

Final internal draft prepared and ready for review

02

Stakeholder Review

Legal and compliance complete comments and approve edits

03

Executive Signoff

Authorized signers apply signatures and record dates

04

Archival

Signed Policy stored in secure repository with audit trail

Common Preparation Errors to Avoid

Using ambiguous acceptance criteria that leave test results open to interpretation during audits.
Failing to assign role-based approvers, leading to unsigned or improperly authorized Policy versions.
Neglecting to record effective dates and version numbers, which complicates incident investigations and audits.
Relying on handwritten approvals without digital audit logs that capture signer identity and timestamp.

Risks If the Policy Is Incorrect or Missing

Regulatory Exposure: Fines, notices, or corrective orders

Product Nonconformance: Customer claims or recalls

Contract Breach: Penalties under agreements

Audit Findings: Adverse audit reports

Operational Delays: Rework and production stoppages

Reputational Harm: Loss of customer trust

How a Quality Assurance Policy Differs from a Standard Operational Procedure

Compare scope and intent to determine when a document is a Policy versus an SOP.

Criteria	Quality Assurance Policy	Standard Operating Procedure
Purpose	high-level controls	step-by-step tasks
Audience	organizational leadership	operational staff
Revision Frequency	annual or regulatory	as-processes-change
Enforceability	audit and compliance focus	training and execution focus

Typical eSignature Vendor Pricing and Feature Snapshot

Common capability and pricing dimensions help select an e-signature platform for distributing and signing Quality Assurance Policies.

	signNow	DocuSign	Adobe Sign	PandaDoc	HelloSign
Starting Price	$8/user/mo	$15/user/mo	$14/user/mo	$19/user/mo	$15/user/mo
Free Trial	7-day free trial	Varies by plan	Varies by plan	Varies by plan	Varies by plan
Bulk Send	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	No
Audit Trail	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes
HIPAA Compliant	Yes	Yes	Yes	No	No

Example Use Cases for a Quality Assurance Policy

Practical scenarios show how a Policy supports consistent outcomes and audit readiness across functions.

Manufacturing QA Rollout

A mid-size manufacturer standardized inspection criteria across three plants to reduce variability and improve traceability.

Paper processes replaced by templated digital records to ensure consistent data capture.
The new Policy centralized acceptance criteria, clarified corrective-action steps, and created an auditable trail for internal audits and supplier reviews.

Clinical Process Controls

A clinic documented device calibration and test procedures to meet regulatory expectations.

Clinical staff followed the same signed checklist for each device maintenance event.
The formal Policy recorded roles, verification steps, and retention practices so clinical leadership could demonstrate controls during compliance reviews.

Frequently Asked Questions About Implementing a Quality Assurance Policy

Answers to common questions about drafting, approving, signing, and retaining a Quality Assurance Policy in U.S. organizations.

Need help? Contact support

Can an electronic signature validate this Policy?
Yes. Electronic signatures meet the ESIGN Act (15 U.S.C. ch. 96) and UETA where adopted, provided the signing process demonstrates intent, consent, attribution, and record retention capabilities.
Do consumer-facing disclosures apply?
If the Policy affects consumer transactions or records, ESIGN requires disclosure and consent procedures. Consult legal counsel when consumer rights or financial records are implicated.
Is notarization required for the Policy?
Not usually. Notarization is seldom necessary for internal Policies, but specific state or contractual provisions may require notarized acknowledgements; verify per contract or state rule.
How should version control be handled?
Maintain a signed, dated archive of each Policy version, record the effective date, and preserve audit trails showing who signed and when for future audits.
What authentication level is recommended?
Use email plus optional SMS or higher-level verification for critical approvals; stronger authentication improves evidentiary weight for compliance purposes.
How long must signed Policies be retained?
Follow applicable retention rules: IRS minimums (IRC §6501(a)), HIPAA six-year rule (45 CFR §164.530(j)), and any industry-specific retention requirements.

be ready to get more

Join over 28 million airSlate SignNow users

Sign Now