Is an electronic signature legally valid under ESIGN?

Yes. Under the federal ESIGN Act (15 U.S.C. §7001) and state UETA statutes, most electronic signatures are legally binding when intent, consent, attribution, and record retention are satisfied. Exceptions include wills, certain court filings, and some real estate conveyances.

When is notarization required for the document?

Notarization depends on state law and document purpose. Deeds, some affidavits, and certain power-of-attorney forms typically require notarization. Remote online notarization is permitted in many states but requirements vary; verify with the applicable state notary authority.

How long must I retain the QMS document?

Retention depends on document nature and applicable laws. Maintain active QMS copies for the agreement term plus at least three years; keep quality records longer where industry rules apply (IRS: IRC §6501(a); HIPAA: 45 CFR §164.530(j)).

Can the QMS document be signed electronically?

Yes. Internal quality documents are generally eligible for electronic signatures under ESIGN (15 U.S.C. ch. 96) and UETA. Ensure the signature meets intent, consent, attribution, and retention tests; obtain additional authentication for high-risk approvals.

What common mistakes should I avoid when preparing it?

Common errors include vague scope descriptions, absent process owners, inconsistent document titles, incomplete revision history, and missing signatures or approval records. These issues lead to audit findings, delayed corrective actions, and potential nonconformities during supplier or regulatory reviews.

Who must sign the Quality Management System Document?

Signatures typically include the designated management representative, applicable process owners, and the document control officer. Signatures confirm approval and authority to implement changes; record name, title, and date to establish accountability and an audit trail for compliance purposes.

Electronic Signature
Templates
Miscellaneous
Quality Management System Document

Quality Management System Document

This template is fully customizable. Edit the text, fill out the fields, and send it for signature. Give it a try!

QUALITY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM DOCUMENT

This Quality Management System Document (the "QMS Document") is made and entered into on by and between:

Organization Name:

Document Owner / Responsible Party:

WHEREAS

WHEREAS, the Organization seeks to establish, implement and maintain a documented Quality Management System (QMS) to ensure consistent delivery of products and services that meet customer, regulatory, and statutory requirements; and

WHEREAS, the Document Owner is designated to develop, control and review quality documentation, assign responsibilities, and ensure that quality objectives are defined, monitored, and met; and

WHEREAS, the parties intend this QMS Document to define scope, responsibilities, performance measures, document control, and procedures for nonconformance, corrective action and continual improvement.

PURPOSE

The purpose of this QMS Document is to set forth the documented framework for quality planning, control, assurance and improvement applicable to the Organization's operations and applicable projects, including assignment of responsibilities and measures for compliance.

SCOPE

This QMS Document applies to the following organizational activities, products and services:

QUALITY OBJECTIVES

Quality objectives shall be measurable, aligned with the Organization's strategic direction, and periodically reviewed. Primary objectives include:

RESPONSIBILITIES

Management is responsible for provision of resources, appointing competent personnel, and ensuring the QMS is implemented and maintained. Specific responsibilities include:

SCOPE OF WORK

The Document Owner shall ensure procedures, work instructions and records are established and maintained to achieve the quality objectives. The specific tasks and deliverables are set forth below and shall be performed in accordance with this QMS Document.

DOCUMENT CONTROL

All controlled documents shall be identified, approved, reviewed at defined intervals, and made available at points of use. Document control responsibilities include maintaining the current document list and ensuring obsolete documents are promptly removed from circulation.

Document Identifier

NONCONFORMANCE AND CORRECTIVE ACTION

Nonconforming products, processes or records shall be identified, segregated where practicable, and dispositioned. Root cause analysis is required for significant nonconformance and corrective actions shall be implemented, documented and verified for effectiveness.

AUDIT AND MANAGEMENT REVIEW

Internal and external audits shall be conducted to verify compliance and effectiveness. Management shall review QMS performance at a minimum frequency specified below and take action to address deficiencies and opportunities for improvement.

Audit Frequency

CHANGE CONTROL

Proposed changes that affect processes, products, services, or the QMS shall be evaluated for quality and compliance impact prior to implementation. Change records shall include the rationale, approval and verification steps.

PAYMENT TERMS

Where applicable, payment for services or deliverables governed by this QMS Document shall be as follows.

Total Contract Amount Payment Schedule / Milestones Payment Due (days after invoice) Late Payment Fee

TERM AND TERMINATION

This QMS Document is effective as of and shall continue until unless earlier terminated in accordance with this section.

Either party may terminate this QMS Document for material breach if the breach is not cured within days after written notice. Either party may terminate for convenience upon days' prior written notice. Termination shall not relieve either party of obligations incurred prior to the termination date.

CONFIDENTIALITY

Each party shall maintain in confidence all confidential information disclosed in connection with this QMS Document and shall not disclose such information to third parties except to persons having a need to know and who are bound by obligations of confidentiality at least as protective as those set forth herein.

Confidentiality Period (years)

Confidential information does not include information which is public through no fault of the receiving party, received from a third party without restriction, independently developed without use of the other party's confidential information, or required by law to be disclosed (provided the disclosing party is given prior notice where permitted).

RECORDS AND RETENTION

Records created under this QMS Document shall be maintained, protected and retrievable for the period specified below and disposed of in accordance with applicable law and the Organization's record retention procedures.

Records Retention Period

GOVERNING LAW

This QMS Document shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the jurisdiction specified below, without regard to its conflict of law principles.

Governing Law (State or Jurisdiction)

ENTIRE AGREEMENT

This QMS Document, together with any attachments and referenced procedures incorporated herein, constitutes the entire agreement between the parties with respect to the subject matter and supersedes all prior and contemporaneous agreements, representations and understandings.

SEVERABILITY; SURVIVAL

If any provision of this QMS Document is held invalid or unenforceable, the remainder of the QMS Document shall remain in full force and effect. Provisions which by their nature should survive termination or expiration shall survive.

COMPLIANCE WITH LAWS AND STANDARDS

The parties shall comply with all applicable laws, regulations and recognized quality standards to the extent they apply to the Organization's operations and deliverables. Compliance obligations include statutory safety, environmental and labor requirements where applicable.

Applicable Standards / Frameworks

ACKNOWLEDGMENT

The undersigned certify that they are authorized representatives of their respective parties, have read and understand this QMS Document, and agree to be bound by its terms.

Party A (Organization) — Print Name:

By:

Date:

Party B (Document Owner / Provider) — Print Name:

By:

Date:

What the Quality Management System Document Is

A Quality Management System Document defines an organization's policies, processes, and responsibilities that direct and control quality objectives and outcomes. Typically it consolidates scope, quality policy, organizational roles, process maps, performance metrics, corrective action procedures, and document-control rules into a single reference package. Organizations use the document to align operations with internal goals and external standards such as ISO 9001, regulatory obligations, and customer requirements. For auditors and managers it serves as the authoritative record of how quality is managed, measured, and improved across departments and projects.

Why a Centralized QMS Document Matters

Maintaining a Quality Management System Document improves consistency, reduces rework, and clarifies responsibilities for staff and suppliers. It supports compliance with regulatory requirements and provides documented evidence for audits, supplier assessments, and continuous improvement initiatives.

Who Relies on a Quality Management System Document

Quality, operations, compliance, and supplier-management teams use this document to standardize procedures and track quality performance consistently across the organization.

Quality managers responsible for process control, audit readiness, corrective action, and metric reporting.
Operations leaders who implement procedures, monitor KPIs, and approve process changes.
Suppliers and contractors contracted to meet quality obligations, submit records, and support inspections.

Smaller firms and startups often adapt the document scale to match resources while retaining core quality controls and traceability.

Core Sections Included in a Professional QMS Document

A complete Quality Management System Document groups policy, scope, roles, procedures, controls, and metrics into a single controlled package to support governance and audits.

Quality Policy

A concise statement of quality objectives and management commitment. It must reference measurable targets, customer focus, compliance expectations, and top-management endorsement to guide continuous improvement and align daily operations.

Scope & Applicability

Defines processes, business units, products, and sites covered by the QMS Document. A clearly bounded scope prevents misapplication and helps auditors determine which activities and records must comply.

Process Maps

Visual or textual workflows that map inputs, outputs, controls, and interfaces. Process maps enable risk identification, handoff clarity between teams, and the basis for procedure-level work instructions.

Roles & Responsibilities

Lists owners, reviewers, approvers, and their authorities. Specify decision limits, escalation paths, and training expectations so responsibilities are enforceable and measurable during audits.

Document Control

Describes versioning, controlled-copy distribution, access permissions, retention, and disposal procedures. It must state how updates are authorized and how superseded versions are archived for traceability.

Performance Metrics

Defines KPIs, measurement frequency, sampling methods, data owners, and reporting cadence. Link metrics to objectives and corrective action processes to demonstrate measurable improvement over time.

Step-by-Step: From Draft to Controlled Release

Follow these steps to complete, approve, and maintain a Quality Management System Document from draft to controlled release.

01

Draft: Assemble content, assign authors, and gather supporting records.
02

Review: Peer and cross-functional review for accuracy and compliance.
03

Approval: Authorized approver signs and records effective date.
04

Release: Publish controlled copy, update document control register.

Setting Up a Digital Workflow for the QMS Document

Configure digital workflows to manage drafting, approvals, and version control for the Quality Management System Document.

Primary Workflow Field and Configuration Header	Setting \| Configuration
Authoring and Contributors Configuration Settings	Primary authors \| Add full names and emails
Approval Routing and Signoff Settings	Approval workflow \| Single approver or routing order
Versioning Retention and Archive Policy	Version control \| Use semantic versioning and dates
Distribution and Controlled Copy Rules	Controlled copies \| Publish PDF; record recipients

Typical Workflow for Preparing and Signing the QMS Document

Typical workflow for preparing, approving, and distributing a QMS document across teams and systems securely.

Prepare: Draft content and attach references
Approve: Authorized approver signs and records
Publish: Issue controlled copy to stakeholders
Monitor: Collect KPIs and trigger corrective actions

Technical Requirements for Document Creation and eSubmission

Confirm platform capabilities needed to prepare, sign, and store the Quality Management System Document securely and audibly.

Formats Supported: PDF, DOCX, and editable templates
Integration Ecosystem: Salesforce, NetSuite, Microsoft 365
Authentication Options: Email, SMS code, or SSO options

Security and Compliance Considerations

Encryption Standards: AES-256 at rest; TLS 1.2/1.3 in transit

Certifications & Audits: ISO 27001; SOC 2 Type II; PCI DSS

Regulatory Compliance: ESIGN, UETA, HIPAA (BAA available)

Accessibility Standards: WCAG 2.0 Level AA support

Audit Trail Detail: Detailed timestamps, IP, and event logs

Digital Records Support: 21 CFR Part 11 and eIDAS SES support

Common Preparation Challenges to Watch For

Vague scope or mismatched titles cause multiple controlled copies to circulate, creating confusion about the authoritative version and leading to inconsistent process execution.
Missing or outdated revision history prevents auditors from tracing changes, undermines corrective action records, and can result in findings during supplier or regulatory inspections.
Insufficient assignment of process ownership delays decisions, obstructs root-cause analysis, and causes recurring nonconformities because no single party is accountable for corrections.
Overly complex control procedures without clear training increase human error, reduce adherence, and make continuous improvement initiatives harder to implement and sustain.

Risks and Consequences of Poor Documentation

Audit Findings: Incomplete controls invite nonconformities

Regulatory Penalties: Fines where statutory requirements ignored

Contract Risk: Supplier disputes from unclear specs

Operational Downtime: Process failures cause delays

Data Loss: Missing retention harms investigations

Tax/Reporting Exposure: Incorrect records may trigger penalties

Key Dates and Recurring Deadlines

Key dates and recurring deadlines to schedule review, approval, and audit activities for the Quality Management System Document.

Effective Date:

Date the document becomes effective; use MM/DD/YYYY.

Scheduled Review:

Annual documented management review; set a recurring calendar reminder.

Internal Audit:

Conduct internal audits at least annually or per risk-based schedule.

Corrective Actions:

Close CAPA items within defined target days, depending on severity.

Document Revision:

Update revision history and republish controlled copy after approval.

Milestones: Drafting Through Release

Sequential milestones from drafting through controlled release, implementation, and monitoring of the QMS document.

01

Drafting

Compile inputs, references, and initial process descriptions.

02

Review Cycle

Cross-functional review and incorporation of feedback.

03

Approval Signoff

Senior management signs and records effective date.

04

Controlled Release

Publish versioned copies and notify stakeholders.

eSignature Vendor Comparison for QMS Document Workflows

Comparison of common e-signature vendors and feature availability relevant to Quality Management System Document workflows.

	signNow	DocuSign	Adobe Sign	PandaDoc	HelloSign
Starting Monthly Price	$8/user/mo	$15/user/mo	$14/user/mo	$19/user/mo	$15/user/mo
Free Trial Availability	7-day trial	Varies	Varies	Varies	Varies
Bulk Send Capability	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	No
Audit Trail Presence	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes
HIPAA Compliance Status	Yes	Yes	Yes	No	No

FAQs: Signing, Retention, and Compliance Questions

Answers to frequent questions about preparing, signing, and retaining a Quality Management System Document practically.

Need help? Contact support

Is an electronic signature legally valid under ESIGN?
Yes. Under the federal ESIGN Act (15 U.S.C. §7001) and state UETA statutes, most electronic signatures are legally binding when intent, consent, attribution, and record retention are satisfied. Exceptions include wills, certain court filings, and some real estate conveyances.
When is notarization required for the document?
Notarization depends on state law and document purpose. Deeds, some affidavits, and certain power-of-attorney forms typically require notarization. Remote online notarization is permitted in many states but requirements vary; verify with the applicable state notary authority.
How long must I retain the QMS document?
Retention depends on document nature and applicable laws. Maintain active QMS copies for the agreement term plus at least three years; keep quality records longer where industry rules apply (IRS: IRC §6501(a); HIPAA: 45 CFR §164.530(j)).
Can the QMS document be signed electronically?
Yes. Internal quality documents are generally eligible for electronic signatures under ESIGN (15 U.S.C. ch. 96) and UETA. Ensure the signature meets intent, consent, attribution, and retention tests; obtain additional authentication for high-risk approvals.
What common mistakes should I avoid when preparing it?
Common errors include vague scope descriptions, absent process owners, inconsistent document titles, incomplete revision history, and missing signatures or approval records. These issues lead to audit findings, delayed corrective actions, and potential nonconformities during supplier or regulatory reviews.
Who must sign the Quality Management System Document?
Signatures typically include the designated management representative, applicable process owners, and the document control officer. Signatures confirm approval and authority to implement changes; record name, title, and date to establish accountability and an audit trail for compliance purposes.

be ready to get more

Join over 28 million airSlate SignNow users

Sign Now