Overview
Summarize aims, primary hypotheses, and high-level rationale. Include measurable objectives, expected outcomes, and how the study advances scientific or programmatic goals. State target population and scope.
Use the Research Developmental Study to document study scope, reduce regulatory risk, and provide an audit-ready record for institutional review boards and sponsors. Clear documentation helps align teams, support funding requests, and demonstrate compliance with policy and oversight requirements.
Principal investigators, research coordinators, and institutional review board staff commonly prepare or review the Research Developmental Study to confirm feasibility and compliance before full protocol submission.
Other contributors often include biostatisticians, data managers, sponsors, and grant administrators during review and budgeting.
Summarize aims, primary hypotheses, and high-level rationale. Include measurable objectives, expected outcomes, and how the study advances scientific or programmatic goals. State target population and scope.
Describe study type, control groups, randomization, blinding, sample size justification, and statistical approach. Reference power calculations and inclusion/exclusion criteria with citations to methodology standards and expected variability estimates.
Define eligibility, recruitment methods, consent procedures, anticipated enrollment timeline, retention strategies, and any vulnerable population safeguards required by IRB and regulatory policy.
Detail data elements, collection instruments, storage location, de-identification plan, access controls, and retention period. Specify formats and metadata standards and data sharing or transfer conditions.
List personnel, facilities, equipment, software, estimated budget, funding sources, and contingency plans. Include procurement timelines and vendor contacts where relevant.
Identify required approvals (IRB, privacy office, data use agreements, conflict-of-interest disclosures) and estimated review timelines, and list sponsor or institutional compliance checkpoints with contact and escalation paths.
| Field | Configuration |
|---|---|
| Preferred signer authentication verification method | Email, SMS code, or ID check |
| Signature fields and required attachments | Signature, initials, date, and file upload |
| Conditional routing and workflow triggers | Route based on role, approval, or form values |
| Audit trail and document retention settings | Enable full audit logs, timestamps, and export |
Digital submission requires a platform that supports secure e-signatures, audit trails, and file attachments for IRB and sponsor review.
Set internal deadline two to four weeks before IRB submission
Allow 2–6 weeks for administrative review prior to full board
Budget and compliance checks may require 1–4 weeks
Secure approval before participant recruitment; timeline varies by board
Submit amendments or safety reports within IRB-specified timelines
Final IRB-approved consent templates that match study procedures, include risks, benefits, withdrawal rights, and HIPAA authorization where applicable; use clear version numbering for control.
Detailed budget showing personnel, equipment, indirect costs, contingency lines, and funder restrictions. Provide cost justifications and any matched or conditional funding commitments.
Current CVs for PI and key personnel highlighting relevant experience, publications, and prior human subjects research to demonstrate qualifications and oversight capability.
Signed data use agreements or DUAs specifying permitted uses, transfer protections, retention obligations, and responsibilities for secondary use or sharing.