Can the form be signed electronically?

Yes, electronic signatures are legally valid under ESIGN (15 U.S.C. §7001) and UETA where adopted, provided the institution accepts them and signer identity can be attributed and retained.

Is IRB approval always required?

Not always. Minimal-risk or certain educational activities may qualify for exemption, but you must submit a determination request to the IRB rather than assume exemption.

How long does review typically take?

Turnaround depends on risk level and meeting schedules; expedited reviews often finish in 2–4 weeks, while full-board reviews commonly take 4–8 weeks.

What if the protocol changes after approval?

Submit an amendment describing the change; significant changes require IRB approval before implementation and may affect consent documents.

Where should signed forms be stored?

Store final signed approval letters and consent forms in the institutional records system and project file, retaining audit logs and access history for audits.

Who signs for minors or incapacitated participants?

A parent or legally authorized representative typically provides consent; assent from minors should be documented as required by the IRB.

Electronic Signature
Templates
Miscellaneous
Research Ethical Clearance Form

Research Ethical Clearance Form

This template is fully customizable. Edit the text, fill out the fields, and send it for signature. Give it a try!

RESEARCH ETHICAL CLEARANCE FORM

Application No.: Date of Submission:

Applicant Information

Principal Investigator Department / Unit Institution Contact (email / phone) Co-Investigators

Recitals

WHEREAS the Research Ethics Committee of has the mandate to review and authorize human-subjects research conducted under the auspices of the institution; and

WHEREAS the Principal Investigator named above seeks ethical clearance for the research project entitled "" to be conducted at the stated institution and affiliated sites; and

WHEREAS the Committee requires submission of protocol details, consent instruments, and supporting documentation to assess risks, benefits and protections for research participants;

Scope of Work / Study Description

Summary of Study Objectives and Rationale Methodology (Design, Procedures, Instruments)

Participants and Recruitment

Estimated Number of Participants Inclusion Criteria Exclusion Criteria

Does the study involve vulnerable populations? Children/Minors Prisoners Cognitively impaired Other

Informed Consent Procedures

Consent Type: Written consent Oral consent Assent (for minors) Waiver of consent requested

If a waiver is requested, provide justification

Risks, Benefits and Mitigation

Foreseeable Risks and Discomforts Risk Mitigation Measures Potential Benefits

Data Management and Confidentiality

Confidentiality Measures

Will identifiable data be shared with third parties? Yes No

Data Retention Period

Funding, Compensation and Payment Terms

Source of Funding Total Budget (if applicable) Participant Compensation (amount and schedule)

Policy on delayed reimbursements:

Term and Termination of Clearance

Proposed Start Date: Proposed End Date:

Notice Period for Suspension or Termination of Approval

Confidentiality and Certification

Confidentiality Clause: The Principal Investigator and all research personnel shall maintain the confidentiality of participant data, implement the confidentiality measures described in this application, and comply with applicable laws and institutional policies governing data protection. Any disclosure of identifiable information shall occur only with participant consent or where required by law, and only after notification to the Research Ethics Committee where practicable.

Certification: By signing below the Principal Investigator certifies that the information supplied in this application and accompanying documents is complete and accurate; that the research will be conducted in accordance with the protocol and approved consent procedures; that all study personnel will receive appropriate training in the protection of human subjects; and that any significant amendments or unanticipated problems will be reported to the Research Ethics Committee in a timely manner.

Governing Law and Entire Agreement

Governing Law: This clearance and any determinations made by the Research Ethics Committee are governed by the laws and institutional policies applicable to research involving human participants at the institution named in this form.

Entire Agreement: This form together with the submitted protocol, consent forms, and supporting documents constitutes the complete submission to the Committee. Any approval granted is conditioned upon compliance with the submitted materials and any conditions specified by the Committee.

Attachments Checklist (tick items submitted)

Research protocol
Informed consent/assent documents
Questionnaires / data collection instruments
CVs of key personnel
Funding/contract documents
Site permission letters

Committee Use Only

Date reviewed:

Decision: Approved Approved with conditions Rejected

Conditions or Committee Comments

Clearance Number (if approved): Validity Period (months):

Principal Investigator:

By:

Date:

Chair, Research Ethics Committee:

By:

Date:

What the Research Ethical Clearance Form Is and When It’s Used

A Research Ethical Clearance Form documents an institutional review board (IRB) or ethics committee assessment that research involving human participants meets ethical and regulatory standards. The form summarizes study purpose, methods, participant protections, consent processes, and data handling so reviewers can evaluate risk, benefit, and compliance with federal and institutional rules such as the Common Rule (45 CFR Part 46). Institutions use it to approve, require changes to, or exempt studies before recruitment or data collection begins.

Why Completing This Form Correctly Matters

Accurate clearance forms protect participants, reduce institutional liability, and enable lawful data collection and publication. Proper documentation documents informed consent, risk mitigation, and IRB decision-making, which funders and journals commonly require.

Who Prepares and Who Reviews the Form

Clear, complete submissions accelerate review cycles and reduce iterative revision requests.

Principal investigators and study coordinators complete protocol details and attach consent templates.
IRB administrators and ethics committee members review risk, consent, and data safeguards.
Sponsors, departmental chairs, or funding reviewers request documented clearance before release of funds.

Core Components Every Professional Clearance Form Should Include

A professional clearance form organizes all elements reviewers need to assess safety, consent, and data protection so decisions are consistent and auditable.

Project Title

Concise title that matches protocol and all attachments; helps cross-reference registrations and publications.

Objectives

Clear study aims and hypotheses; explains primary endpoints, sample size rationale, and any secondary analyses.

Methods

Study design, recruitment, inclusion/exclusion criteria, data collection methods, and timelines for participant contact.

Risks & Benefits

Summary of foreseeable risks, mitigation strategies, and expected benefits to participants or knowledge.

Consent

Consent process description, copy of consent form, assent procedures for minors, and withdrawal procedures.

Data Security

Storage, access controls, de-identification, retention periods, and plans for data sharing or destruction.

Step-by-Step: Submitting a Clearance Form

Follow these sequential steps to prepare, verify, and submit the form for IRB review.

01

Prepare Materials: Gather protocol, consent, recruitment, and data security documents.
02

Complete Form: Fill every required field and attach supporting files.
03

Verify Signatures: Confirm authorized signers and authentication method.
04

Submit to IRB: Send via institutional portal or designated office for review.

Configuring an Online Submission Workflow

Set up routing and validation so each submission follows your institution’s review path and captures required metadata.

Field	Configuration
Required Fields	Make PI name, protocol title, consent attached mandatory.
Attachments	Accept PDF/DOCX; require signed consent templates and recruitment text.
Reviewer Routing	Auto-route to IRB admin, primary reviewer, and chair in sequence.
Reminders	Enable email reminders for pending reviewer actions and signer prompts.

Where to File and How Submissions Flow

Understand the typical destinations for an approved clearance form and how copies are distributed.

IRB Office: Primary repository for review records and final approval letters.
Departmental Records: Department retains protocol copy for internal oversight.
Sponsor: Share approval documents with funders per award terms.
Study File: Store signed forms with study documentation for audits.

Digital Signing and Distribution: Platform Requirements

Validate vendor security certifications and compatibility with institutional IT policies before enabling eSubmission workflows.

File Formats: Accept PDF and DOCX; preserve original text and attachments.
Authentication: Use email + SMS or stronger methods for signer identity confirmation.
Integrations: Platform should support integrations with institutional systems and cloud storage.

eSignature Vendor Comparison for Research Forms

Basic pricing and capability snapshot to help institutions evaluate eSignature vendors for clearance-form workflows. signNow is shown first per vendor ordering rules.

	signNow	DocuSign	Adobe Sign	PandaDoc	HelloSign
Starting Price	$8/user/mo	$15/user/mo	$14/user/mo	$19/user/mo	$15/user/mo
Free Trial	7-day trial	Varies	Varies	Varies	Varies
Bulk Send	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	No
Audit Trail	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes
HIPAA Compliant	Yes	Yes	Yes	No	No
Envelope Cap	No cap	100 envelopes/user/yr	Varies	Varies	Varies

Required Information Fields at a Glance

Project Title: Short title

Principal Investigator: Name and contact

Study Population: Participant description

Risk Summary: Key risks listed

Consent Process: How consent is obtained

Data Security Plan: Storage and access

Consequences of Incomplete or Incorrect Clearance

Unapproved Research: Study halted; enrollment prohibited

Participant Harm: Ethical violations and liability

Funding Loss: Sponsor may suspend or withdraw funds

IRB Sanctions: Suspension or corrective action

Data Breach Fines: Regulatory penalties and remediation costs

Legal Liability: Civil suits and institutional exposure

Common Mistakes That Delay Clearance

Incomplete consent templates or missing signature lines that require resubmission and delay review.
Mismatched names, affiliations, or dates between attachments and the main form causing verification issues.
Failure to describe data security and de-identification sufficiently for reviewer assessment.
Submitting amended protocols without clearly labeled change summaries or tracked revisions for reviewers.

Practical Tips for Accurate and Efficient Completion

Following a short checklist improves completeness and shortens review cycles; combine this with strong records management.

Use a Pre-Submission Checklist

Confirm all required attachments, signatures, and protocol identifiers are present to reduce iterative review requests.

Verify Signer Authority

Ensure listed signers have delegated authority and that institutional signatures follow internal policy.

Apply Consistent Dates

Use MM/DD/YYYY across all documents; inconsistent dates can create audit questions and delay approval.

Preserve an Audit Trail

Retain signing timestamps, IP addresses, and submission logs to support compliance with ESIGN and institutional audit needs.

How to Save, Share, and Archive the Clearance Form

Manage copies and formats so reviewers, sponsors, and auditors can access signed records in accepted file types.

Download Formats

Save final signed copies as PDF/A and retain an original editable DOCX for institutional records.

Supporting Documents

Attach consent forms, recruitment materials, and data management plans as separate labeled files.

Version Control

Maintain versioned filenames and a change log when amendments are submitted.

Access Logs

Record who accessed or downloaded approval letters for audit purposes.

Example Use Cases: How Institutions Apply Clearance Forms

These scenarios illustrate typical institutional workflows and outcomes when the form is used correctly.

University Social Science Study

A faculty PI submits a minimal-risk survey protocol with consent text

IRB assigns expedited review and requests minor consent edits
After revision the study is approved, recruitment begins, and documentation is archived for 7 years.

Clinical Observational Research

A hospital team submits a patient data review request involving PHI

The IRB requires HIPAA authorization language and data access controls
Once controls are documented and signed, the IRB issues approval with HIPAA retention instructions.

Typical Timelines and Processing Expectations

Review timelines depend on risk level, IRB meeting schedules, and completeness of the submission; plan accordingly.

Expedited Review:

Often completed within 2–4 weeks for minimal-risk proposals.

Full Board Review:

Requires calendar scheduling; expect 4–8 weeks depending on meeting cadence.

Amendments:

Turnaround varies; simple administrative changes may be days, substantive amendments weeks.

Continuing Review:

Annual reports or as-required intervals to maintain active approval status.

Emergency Approvals:

Some institutions provide rapid review pathways for time-sensitive public health research.

FAQs and Troubleshooting for the Clearance Form

Answers to common questions about eSigning, approvals, amendments, and recordkeeping for research ethical clearance.

Need help? Contact support

Can the form be signed electronically?
Yes, electronic signatures are legally valid under ESIGN (15 U.S.C. §7001) and UETA where adopted, provided the institution accepts them and signer identity can be attributed and retained.
Is IRB approval always required?
Not always. Minimal-risk or certain educational activities may qualify for exemption, but you must submit a determination request to the IRB rather than assume exemption.
How long does review typically take?
Turnaround depends on risk level and meeting schedules; expedited reviews often finish in 2–4 weeks, while full-board reviews commonly take 4–8 weeks.
What if the protocol changes after approval?
Submit an amendment describing the change; significant changes require IRB approval before implementation and may affect consent documents.
Where should signed forms be stored?
Store final signed approval letters and consent forms in the institutional records system and project file, retaining audit logs and access history for audits.
Who signs for minors or incapacitated participants?
A parent or legally authorized representative typically provides consent; assent from minors should be documented as required by the IRB.

be ready to get more

Join over 28 million airSlate SignNow users

Sign Now