Study ID
Unique protocol identifier and version so every page references the same approved study document and amendment history.
A standardized Research Mask Study reduces administrative ambiguity, supports regulatory review, and documents participant consent and masking procedures in a consistent format that is auditable and reproducible across sites.
The document is used by people responsible for study conduct, compliance, and participant interaction.
Roles vary by institution; maintain role-based copies and access logs to support audits and monitoring visits.
Unique protocol identifier and version so every page references the same approved study document and amendment history.
Brief objective, design, and primary endpoints so site staff and participants can quickly confirm relevance and scope.
Detailed instructions for assigned mask type, fitting, wear time, and monitoring to ensure consistent implementation across participants.
Concise inclusion/exclusion items with checkboxes to confirm screening decisions and any required pre‑enrollment tests.
Standardized fields for demographics, baseline measures, adverse events, and visit dates to support downstream analysis and reporting.
Designated areas for participant acknowledgement, witness or proxy details, and investigator attestation with date stamps.
| Field | Configuration | Validation rule | Required |
|---|---|
| Required fields | Mark participant name, DOB, consent checkbox as required |
| Authentication | Use email link or SMS code depending on risk level |
| Save drafts | Allow staff to save in-progress records for later completion |
| Notifications | Notify PI and coordinator on completion |
Confirm platform compatibility, integrations, and supported file types before rolling out the form to sites.
Verify mobile responsiveness and offline capabilities for field staff; ensure any platform used supports required audit trails and access controls.
Obtain approval before any participant contact or enrollment
Obtain informed consent prior to study procedures or data collection
Report serious events per IRB requirements, often within 24–72 hours
Submit annual status reports as required by the approving IRB
Follow sponsor timelines for database lock and final submissions
Dr. Jane Smith, PI. Responsible for overall study conduct, final verification of eligibility and consent, and for ensuring local regulatory compliance during enrollment and follow‑up.
Alex Martinez, Coordinator. Handles day-to-day participant interactions, completes screening checklists, documents mask assignment and fitting checks, and ensures signatures and timestamps are recorded accurately.
A community clinic enrolls eligible adults using the form to document screening and masking instructions
A coordinated network uses a standardized template to harmonize data collection across sites
| Criterion | Electronic Signature | Wet Ink |
|---|---|---|
| Legal validity | ||
| Attribution evidence | audit trail | handwritten name |
| Storage | encrypted digital | physical file |
| Speed | faster | slower |
| signNow | DocuSign | Adobe Sign | PandaDoc | HelloSign | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | $8/user/mo | $15/user/mo | $14/user/mo | $19/user/mo | $15/user/mo |
| Free Trial | 7-day free trial, no credit card | No | No | Yes, limited | Yes, limited |
| Bulk Send | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | No |
| Audit Trail | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Envelope Cap | No cap | 100 envelopes/user/year | Varies by plan | Varies by plan | Varies by plan |