Can a proposal be signed electronically?

Yes. Electronic signatures are legally valid under the federal ESIGN Act (15 U.S.C. ch. 96) and state UETA statutes, provided the signature shows intent, consent, attribution, and the record is retained so it can be reproduced.

Do I need IRB approval before signing?

Obtain IRB approval before initiating human-subjects research. Some institutional processes allow signature of administrative forms prior to IRB approval, but data collection must not begin without IRB clearance.

Who can sign for the institution?

Authorized institutional officials (grants officers or department chairs) sign institutional commitments. Confirm your institution’s delegation of authority for contract and budget signoff.

Is notarization required for proposals?

Most proposals do not require notarization; certain attachments or subrecipient agreements may require notarized signatures or apostilles depending on sponsor or jurisdiction.

How should confidential data be described?

Describe data use, storage, access controls, de-identification processes, and data-sharing limitations clearly in the protocol and consent documents to satisfy IRB and sponsor requirements.

How do I update a submitted proposal?

Submit amendments through the IRB and sponsor portals following their change control processes; annotate revisions, justification, and updated consent forms as required.

Electronic Signature
Templates
Miscellaneous
Research Study Proposal

Research Study Proposal

This template is fully customizable. Edit the text, fill out the fields, and send it for signature. Give it a try!

Research Study Proposal

This Research Study Proposal (the Proposal) is entered into as of Effective Date: by and between Client Name: and Research Institution: . Principal Investigator: .

RECITALS

WHEREAS, Client Name represents that it seeks to engage Research Institution to design and perform the research project titled Study Title: for the purpose of advancing scientific knowledge and producing the Deliverables described below; and

WHEREAS, Research Institution has expertise and personnel to perform the research, and is willing to provide such services under the terms and conditions set forth in this Proposal; and

WHEREAS, the parties desire to set forth the scope, schedule, payment, confidentiality, and other principal terms that will govern performance of the proposed study.

SCOPE OF WORK

Summary of Work Methodology Deliverables Proposed Timeline (high-level)

PAYMENT TERMS

Total Fee Payment Schedule / Milestones Late Payment Fee Expense Reimbursement

TERM AND TERMINATION

The term of this Proposal shall commence on Start Date: and shall continue through End Date: unless earlier terminated as provided below.

Termination Notice Period

Either party may terminate this Proposal for convenience upon written notice to the other party in accordance with the notice period above. Termination for cause shall be permitted where a party materially breaches any material obligation and fails to cure such breach within thirty (30) days of written notice thereof, or immediately for breaches involving human subject safety or unlawful conduct.

CONFIDENTIALITY AND DATA

Each party shall maintain as confidential all Confidential Information disclosed by the other party in connection with this Proposal and shall not disclose such information except to employees, contractors, or agents who have a need to know and who are bound to confidentiality obligations at least as protective as those set forth herein. Confidential Information shall not include information that is or becomes publicly known through no breach of this Proposal, is already in a receiving party's possession without restriction, or is independently developed without use of the disclosing party's Confidential Information.

Confidentiality Duration

Data resulting from the study shall be owned as follows: . Any personal data or human-subjects research will be processed in accordance with applicable laws and institutional policies, and where applicable Research Institution shall obtain required approvals from an institutional review board prior to commencing work.

Requires IRB or Equivalent Approval

Yes, IRB approval required

PUBLICATION, INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY, AND REPRESENTATIONS

Subject to any prior rights granted in writing, Research Institution may publish or present results derived from the study provided that Client Name is given reasonable prior notice and a thirty (30) day review period to comment on the confidential or proprietary aspects of the proposed publication. Ownership of inventions, patents, and copyrights arising directly from the funded research shall be allocated as follows: .

Each party represents and warrants that it has the authority to enter into this Proposal and that performance will comply with applicable laws and regulations.

GOVERNING LAW; DISPUTE RESOLUTION

Governing Law

This Proposal shall be governed by the laws of the jurisdiction specified above, without regard to choice of law rules. The parties shall attempt in good faith to resolve disputes by negotiation prior to pursuing formal remedies.

ENTIRE AGREEMENT

This Proposal, together with any attachments and referenced schedules, constitutes the entire agreement between the parties with respect to the subject matter hereof and supersedes all prior and contemporaneous agreements, proposals, and communications. Any amendment or modification must be in writing and signed by authorized representatives of both parties.

Notices under this Proposal shall be given to the addresses below. Client Contact: Contact Email: Research Contact:

Client Printed Name:

By:

Date:

Research Institution Printed Name:

By:

Date:

What a Research Study Proposal Is and when it is used

A Research Study Proposal is a formal document that outlines the objectives, methodology, timeline, resources, and ethical safeguards for a planned research project. It describes the research question, study design, participant eligibility, data handling procedures, and anticipated outcomes so sponsors, institutional review boards (IRBs), and collaborators can evaluate feasibility, compliance, and funding needs. The proposal also identifies key personnel, budget estimates, and the institutional affiliation that will manage regulatory responsibilities and recordkeeping during and after the study.

Why a clear proposal matters for approvals and funding

A well-structured Research Study Proposal clarifies scientific rationale, demonstrates regulatory compliance, and documents protections for participants. It supports timely IRB review, helps sponsors assess risk and cost, and creates an auditable record for institutional oversight and grant administration.

Typical stakeholders who prepare or review research proposals

Each role requires different sections and documentation; shared clarity speeds review and reduces revision cycles.

Principal Investigators and co-investigators preparing study design and protocol for IRB and sponsor review.
Research administrators and grants officers reviewing budgets, compliance, and institutional approvals.
IRB members and ethicists assessing participant protections, consent language, and risk minimization.

Who signs and certifies the proposal

Principal Investigator

The PI attests to scientific accuracy, responsible conduct, and compliance with protocol and institutional policies; signature establishes accountability for study execution and reporting.

Authorized Official

An institutional signing official (department chair, grants officer, or institutional official) certifies institutional commitments for resources, IRB oversight, and financial management.

Essential sections to include in a professional proposal

A complete Research Study Proposal groups content into standard sections so reviewers can quickly assess scientific merit, safety, and feasibility.

Title Page

Project title, short abstract, principal investigator name, institutional affiliation, contact information, and sponsor or funding source information.

Background

Concise literature review and rationale showing the knowledge gap the study addresses and how the study design will address it.

Objectives

Primary and secondary objectives with measurable endpoints, hypotheses, and predefined success criteria for statistical analysis.

Methods

Study design, population, inclusion/exclusion criteria, recruitment plan, interventions, data collection instruments, and analysis plan.

Ethics & Safety

Informed consent process, risk/benefit assessment, data privacy measures, adverse event reporting, and plan for IRB submission.

Budget & Timeline

Itemized budget, personnel effort, milestone schedule, deliverables, and any subcontractor or vendor arrangements.

Step-by-step: preparing and submitting the proposal

Complete these sequential steps to prepare a proposal that meets institutional and regulatory expectations.

01

Draft Protocol: Write background, objectives, methods, and safety monitoring details.
02

Assemble Attachments: Add consent forms, instruments, CVs, and budget justification.
03

Complete Administrative Fields: Fill PI, affiliation, dates, and funding details exactly.
04

Submit to IRB/Sponsor: Upload package to IRB and sponsor portal; track review comments and respond promptly.

Configuring an electronic workflow for proposal approvals

Set up a digital review and approval workflow that routes the proposal to each stakeholder in order.

Field	Configuration
Upload Document	PDF or DOCX accepted; include all attachments as a single package.
Signer Order	Set sequential routing: PI → Department Head → Grants Office → IRB liaison.
Authentication	Use email-based links or stronger MFA for institutional signers.
Audit Trail	Enable detailed timestamps, signer IPs, and completion certificates.

Digital tools and format requirements for e-submission

Use tools that create an auditable record and support secure storage to meet institutional and regulatory needs.

Supported Formats: PDF and Word DOCX are standard for submissions.
Authentication Options: Email links, SMS codes, or institution SSO are recommended.
Integrations: Connect with institutional systems like Google Workspace or Microsoft 365.

Typical electronic review flow for a research proposal

A common digital flow improves transparency and reduces routing delays across administrative and oversight offices.

Upload: Author uploads proposal package to the submission portal.
Route: System routes to required reviewers in configured order.
Sign: Authorized parties review and apply electronic signatures.
Archive: Final package and audit trail are stored in the institutional repository.

Common timelines and review expectations

Anticipate internal and external review windows to plan submission and follow-up tasks.

Internal Review:

Allow 1–4 weeks for departmental and grants office checks before formal submission.

IRB Initial Review:

Expedited reviews may take 1–2 weeks; full-board reviews commonly require 4–8 weeks.

Sponsor Response:

Funding decisions vary widely — expect 2–6 months for competitive grants.

Contract Negotiation:

Institutional contract and budget finalization commonly add 2–8 weeks.

Amendments and Renewals:

Plan ahead for continuing review submissions per IRB schedule to avoid lapses.

Key milestone sequence from draft to active study

Track these sequential milestones to move from concept to active data collection.

01

Protocol Completion

Finalize methods, endpoints, and safety monitoring before administrative review.

02

Administrative Clearance

Grants and departmental approvals must be in place for institutional submission.

03

IRB Approval

Obtain written IRB approval for the protocol and informed consent forms.

04

Study Activation

Complete site setup, training, and any sponsor requirements before recruiting participants.

Common preparation mistakes to avoid

Incomplete consent language that omits data use, storage, or sharing terms causing IRB revision requests and delays.
Mismatched names or affiliations between budgets, contracts, and the PI record that block institutional signoff.
Insufficient data management plan details, especially regarding de-identification and retention, triggering compliance queries.
Submitting late or without required attachments such as CVs, certificates, or collaborator agreements leading to administrative rejection.

Consequences of an incorrect or noncompliant proposal

Delayed Approval: Extended timelines and missed funding or enrollment windows.

Sponsor Rejection: Proposal may be declined for funding due to incomplete documentation.

IRB Noncompliance: Possible suspension of study activities until corrective action is taken.

Data Integrity Risk: Poorly defined methods can compromise study validity.

Financial Liability: Unapproved costs may not be reimbursed by sponsors.

Regulatory Exposure: Failure to meet reporting obligations could prompt audits.

Key data and compliance elements to document

Participant Privacy: Describe de-identification and access controls.

Data Storage: State storage location and encryption practices.

Access Controls: List authorized personnel and authentication methods.

Retention Policy: Specify retention periods and disposal procedures.

Adverse Events: Define reporting timelines and responsible parties.

Consent Documentation: Include signed consent form templates for IRB review.

eSignature vendor comparison for proposal signing and approvals

Compare common vendor criteria relevant to institutional proposals. signNow appears first in the table per platform conventions; verify vendor details with their published terms.

	signNow	DocuSign	Adobe Sign	PandaDoc	HelloSign
Starting Price	$8/user/mo	$15/user/mo	$14/user/mo	$19/user/mo	$15/user/mo
Free Trial	7-day trial	Varies by plan	Varies by plan	Varies by plan	Varies by plan
Bulk Send	Yes (plan-dependent)	Varies by plan	Varies by plan	Varies by plan	Varies by plan
Audit Trail	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes
HIPAA Compliant	Yes	Yes	Yes	Varies	Varies

Practical examples of proposal use in real projects

Two concise examples show how proposals align study design, approvals, and contracting in different settings.

Academic Clinical Study

A university team developed a randomized pilot study protocol to test an intervention.

The IRB required clarified consent language and data retention details.
After revision the proposal gained IRB approval and a three-year internal seed grant to support recruitment and analysis.

Government-Funded Evaluation

A public agency solicited proposals for a program evaluation with strict reporting timelines.

The applicant submitted budget and deliverable milestones aligned with agency contract terms.
The clear proposal enabled timely award negotiation and a monitored implementation schedule tied to payments.

Frequently asked questions about Research Study Proposals

Answers to common questions about signatures, approvals, and common administrative issues encountered when preparing proposals.

Need help? Contact support

Can a proposal be signed electronically?
Yes. Electronic signatures are legally valid under the federal ESIGN Act (15 U.S.C. ch. 96) and state UETA statutes, provided the signature shows intent, consent, attribution, and the record is retained so it can be reproduced.
Do I need IRB approval before signing?
Obtain IRB approval before initiating human-subjects research. Some institutional processes allow signature of administrative forms prior to IRB approval, but data collection must not begin without IRB clearance.
Who can sign for the institution?
Authorized institutional officials (grants officers or department chairs) sign institutional commitments. Confirm your institution’s delegation of authority for contract and budget signoff.
Is notarization required for proposals?
Most proposals do not require notarization; certain attachments or subrecipient agreements may require notarized signatures or apostilles depending on sponsor or jurisdiction.
How should confidential data be described?
Describe data use, storage, access controls, de-identification processes, and data-sharing limitations clearly in the protocol and consent documents to satisfy IRB and sponsor requirements.
How do I update a submitted proposal?
Submit amendments through the IRB and sponsor portals following their change control processes; annotate revisions, justification, and updated consent forms as required.

be ready to get more

Join over 28 million airSlate SignNow users

Sign Now