What if a signer name differs?

If the signer's name does not match identification, document the discrepancy in the form and obtain a corrected entry or notarized affirmation. Mismatched names can affect attribution and may require re-signing to ensure enforceability under ESIGN and UETA.

Can the Revised QAR be e-signed?

Yes. Under the ESIGN Act (15 U.S.C. ch. 96) and UETA in almost all states, electronic signatures are legally valid when intent, consent, signer attribution, and reliable record retention are documented. Exceptions such as wills and some court filings remain ineligible for e-signature.

Is notarization required?

Not generally for internal QAR records, but notarization or remote online notarization may be required for documents that affect legal title, deeds, or formal affidavits. Check state notary rules and RON statutes before relying on electronic acknowledgements.

How long should I retain QARs?

Retention depends on record type and industry: follow IRS guidance (IRC §6501(a)) for tax records (three years) and HIPAA (45 CFR §164.530(j)) for protected health records (six years). Consult state rules for longer retention.

What formatting prevents rejections?

Use MM/DD/YYYY dates, full legal names, consistent state abbreviations, and searchable attachment filenames. Avoid scanned handwriting for critical data fields; use searchable PDFs to support audit retrieval and electronic indexing.

How do I correct an executed QAR?

Do not alter an executed document; prepare an addendum or corrective amendment that references the original, explains the change, and is signed by the same parties. Preserve both originals and amendment for audit trails and legal clarity.

Revised QAR Document

This template is fully customizable. Edit the text, fill out the fields, and send it for signature. Give it a try!

REVISED QAR DOCUMENT

This Revised Quality Assurance Review Document (Revision No.: ) is made effective as of by and between Client Name: and Contractor Name: (collectively, the Parties).

WHEREAS

WHEREAS, the Parties previously executed a Quality Assurance Review (Original QAR Date: ) describing deliverables, acceptance criteria, and remediation procedures; and

WHEREAS, the Parties have completed a subsequent review and agreed to adopt the revisions summarized in this Revised QAR Document to refine acceptance criteria, update corrective actions, and amend the schedule and payment terms where specified herein; and

WHEREAS, the Parties desire to set forth the revised scope, responsibilities, payment and termination terms applicable to the revised review and related deliverables.

SCOPE OF WORK

Revised Scope of Work Summary of Revisions Incorporated

Deliverables under this Revised QAR Document shall adhere to the updated acceptance criteria set forth in the Scope of Work above. All deliverables shall be submitted in the format and within the timelines described herein. Any failure to meet acceptance criteria shall trigger the corrective action process described in the Scope of Work, subject to the limitations and remedies specified in this Document.

PAYMENT TERMS

Total Amount Payable Payment Schedule Late Payment Fee

All invoices shall be supported by documentation demonstrating completion of the applicable milestone. Payments are due within the period specified in the Payment Schedule following receipt of an invoice. Any undisputed amount not paid when due shall accrue interest at the Late Payment Fee set forth above. Disputes to invoiced amounts must be notified in writing within ten (10) days of receipt; undisputed portions remain payable as scheduled.

TERM AND TERMINATION

Term Start Date: . Term End Date: .

Notice Period for Termination (days)

Either Party may terminate this Revised QAR Document for convenience upon providing the other Party the Notice Period specified above. Either Party may terminate immediately for material breach by the other Party that remains uncured thirty (30) days after written notice specifying the breach. Termination shall not relieve either Party of obligations incurred prior to termination, including payment for conforming work and obligations to complete corrective actions initiated prior to termination.

CONFIDENTIALITY

Each Party shall treat as Confidential Information all non-public information disclosed by the other Party in connection with the Revised QAR Document, including technical data, business plans, software, trade secrets, and deliverables. Confidential Information shall be held in strict confidence and not disclosed to third parties except to employees, agents or subcontractors who have a need to know and who are bound by confidentiality obligations at least as protective as those set forth herein. Confidentiality obligations shall survive termination for a period of , except to the extent a longer period is required by applicable law. The confidentiality obligations do not apply to information that is: (a) already known without obligation of confidentiality; (b) becomes publicly known through no fault of the receiving Party; or (c) is required to be disclosed by law, provided the disclosing Party is given prior notice to seek protective relief.

GOVERNING LAW

This Revised QAR Document shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of , without regard to choice-of-law principles. The Parties submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the state and federal courts located within that state for any dispute arising under this Document.

ENTIRE AGREEMENT

This Revised QAR Document, together with any attachments and referenced schedules signed by the Parties, constitutes the entire agreement between the Parties with respect to the subject matter hereof and supersedes all prior and contemporaneous agreements, proposals, and communications, whether written or oral. Any amendment or modification must be in writing and executed by authorized representatives of both Parties.

ADDITIONAL PROVISIONS

Remedies: The Parties acknowledge that a breach of the confidentiality provisions or failure to comply with acceptance procedures may cause irreparable harm for which monetary damages may be inadequate; accordingly, the non-breaching Party shall be entitled to equitable relief in addition to other remedies available at law. Limitation of Liability: Except for willful misconduct or gross negligence, neither Party shall be liable for consequential damages arising from actions under this Revised QAR Document.

Attachments Included

Revised Acceptance Criteria Checklist
Updated Project Schedule
Change Log / Revision History

CERTIFICATION AND ACKNOWLEDGMENT

By signing below, each Party certifies that the individual signing has the authority to bind the Party, that the Party has read and understands this Revised QAR Document, and that the Party agrees to be bound by its terms.

Client:

By:

Date:

Contractor:

By:

Date:

What the Revised QAR Document Is

The Revised QAR Document is a standardized quality-assurance review report used to document findings, corrective actions, and verification steps following process or product inspections. It records scope, inspection criteria, test results, deviations, root-cause analysis, disposition decisions, and responsible parties, and includes signatures, dates, and approval status. The revised version reflects updated templates, field definitions, and audit-trail requirements to support regulatory compliance and internal quality governance. It is designed for repeatable use across projects and departments to provide a clear, auditable record of quality-review activities.

Why Use a Revised QAR Document

A Revised QAR Document centralizes inspection outcomes and corrective measures, reducing ambiguity in follow-up actions. It improves traceability for audits, supports regulatory compliance under applicable standards, and helps teams monitor closure of nonconformities and verify effectiveness of corrective actions.

Who Completes and Reviews This Document

Common users include quality managers, compliance officers, project leads, and external auditors across regulated industries.

Quality managers tracking inspection metrics and corrective action closure status.
Compliance officers assessing regulatory impact and documentation completeness for audits.
Project leads coordinating remediation tasks and scheduling re-inspections to verify compliance.

Other participants include contract administrators, suppliers, and legal counsel when nonconformities affect contractual obligations or regulatory risk.

Core Sections to Include in a Professional Revised QAR Document

Core sections structure the Revised QAR Document to ensure consistent reporting, clear responsibility, and an auditable trail for inspections and corrective actions.

Header

Includes document title, revision number, effective date, authoring organization, and distribution list so recipients can identify and retrieve the current template for audit and control purposes.

Scope

Defines inspection boundaries, product or process identifiers, sampling methods, acceptance criteria, and statistical rationale for sampling where applicable to avoid misinterpretation during reviews.

Findings

Records observed nonconformities, measurements, evidence references, severity levels, and immediate containment actions taken at the time of inspection including photographs, test reports, and inspector notes to support resolution.

Root Cause

Provides structured analysis (five whys, fishbone, or FMEA), identifies contributing factors, and links corrective actions to prevent recurrence with assigned owners and target completion dates.

Corrective Action

Specifies action steps, responsible parties, resources required, verification methods, and acceptance criteria to confirm the action resolves the identified issue and specifies follow-up audit timing and evidence to close the item.

Signatures

Contains signatory blocks for inspectors, approvers, and reviewers with printed names, titles, dates, and electronic signature metadata including audit-trail timestamps and IP addresses when available to support traceability and legal validity.

Step-by-Step: From Inspection to Closure

Follow this stepwise process to complete and route the Revised QAR Document from inspection through closure.

01

Prepare Form: Complete header and scope fields.
02

Record Findings: Document evidence, severity, and photos.
03

Assign Actions: Allocate owners, resources, and due dates.
04

Verify Closure: Confirm resolution and sign off.

Typical Electronic Workflow for QAR Distribution

Typical electronic workflow for distributing, signing, and archiving the Revised QAR Document across teams and compliance systems.

Upload Document: Sender uploads final QAR PDF or DOCX.
Place Fields: Add signature, date, and verification fields.
Send to Signers: Email or secure link routes to assigned signers.
Archive Record: Store signed PDF with audit trail metadata.

Recommended eSubmission Settings

Recommended configuration settings for electronic routing and field validation when using an e-signature platform to minimize errors.

Field Name and Purpose for Routing	Field \| Configuration
Signature Field Placement and Validation	Signature \| Require signer name, email verification, timestamp
Date and Effective Date Handling	Date \| Use MM/DD/YYYY and auto-fill current date
Conditional Fields and Dependencies in Workflow	Conditional \| Show corrective action fields only when nonconformity = Yes
Attachment and Evidence Requirements for Verification	Attachments \| Allow PDF, JPG; require verifier note for each file

Technical and Integration Considerations

Minimum technical and integration requirements for e-submission and secure distribution of the Revised QAR Document.

File Formats: PDF/A, PDF, DOCX supported.
Integrations: Salesforce, NetSuite, Google Workspace
Authentication: Email, SMS code, SSO options

Penalties and Risks of Incorrect or Incomplete QARs

Regulatory Noncompliance: Potential fines or enforcement actions

Contract Breach: Damages or withheld payment

Tax Reporting Issues: Affects records tied to IRS audits (IRC §6501(a))

I-9 Documentation: Incomplete I-9s risk fines (8 CFR §274a.2)

HIPAA Exposure: Improper handling can breach HIPAA; BAA required

Operational Delay: Unclosed actions impede production or delivery

Common Preparation Mistakes to Avoid

Incomplete evidence attachments that lack timestamps or unique identifiers, making it difficult to verify when and where an issue occurred and who validated corrective work.
Using inconsistent terminology for findings and severity levels causes confusion across teams and impedes automated reporting or trend analysis in quality dashboards.
Missing signatory metadata or unsigned approval blocks undermine legal enforceability and create audit exceptions that may trigger repeat inspections.
Failure to link corrective actions to root-cause analysis results in superficial fixes and recurring nonconformities that increase cost and risk over time.

Practical Practices to Improve Accuracy and Audit Readiness

Adopt these practices to improve accuracy, traceability, and audit readiness for Revised QAR Documents across teams.

Use a single controlled template for all reviews

Maintain one approved template with version control and change history. Ensure any updates are communicated to stakeholders, archived copies retained, and prior versions labeled to prevent use of outdated forms during inspections or audits.

Require metadata and evidence for each finding

Mandate structured metadata fields (inspector, date, location, severity) and attach supporting evidence such as photos or test reports. Enforce file naming conventions and ensure attachments are searchable for audit retrieval.

Link corrective actions to verification steps

Document clear verification procedures for each corrective action, including acceptance criteria, tester identity, and evidence to close. Schedule follow-up audits and record outcomes to demonstrate effectiveness over time.

Train staff on consistent entry and review

Provide periodic training on completing the Revised QAR Document, interpreting severity ratings, and using the e-submission platform. Track training completion and update guidance as processes or standards change.

Real-World Examples of Revised QAR Use

Examples show how Revised QAR Documents are used in practice across different settings and outcomes.

Optica Ventures

Optica Ventures used the Revised QAR Document to standardize inspection reporting across its portfolio, reducing variation between teams and clarifying corrective action assignments.

Implementation simplified customer-facing documentation and internal handoffs.
Inspectors reported fewer follow-up queries, and leadership noted faster closure of nonconformities. The structured template preserved reviewer notes and evidence enabling downstream teams to prioritize remediation and avoid repeat inspections.

Xerox

Xerox integrated the Revised QAR Document within its ERP to automatically attach inspection results to work orders, improving record linkage across systems.

Automation reduced manual uploads and mismatched records.
As a result, auditors could trace defects to originating batches and corrective actions with a clear chain of evidence; the team cited improved audit readiness and faster root-cause verification.

Estimated Entry Pricing and Common Capabilities

Pricing and plan features vary; the table below compares entry pricing and common enterprise capabilities across signNow and leading competitors.

	signNow	DocuSign	Adobe Sign	PandaDoc	HelloSign
Starting Price	$8/user/mo	$15/user/mo	$14/user/mo	$19/user/mo	$15/user/mo
Free Trial	7-day free trial	No	No	Yes, limited	Yes, limited
Bulk Send	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	No
Audit Trail	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes
HIPAA Compliant	Yes	Yes	Yes	No	No
Envelope Cap	No envelope cap	100 envelopes/user/year	Varies by plan	Varies by plan	Varies by plan

Frequently Asked Questions and Troubleshooting

Answers to frequent questions about completing, signing, and storing the Revised QAR Document, with troubleshooting tips for common issues.

Need help? Contact support

What if a signer name differs?
If the signer's name does not match identification, document the discrepancy in the form and obtain a corrected entry or notarized affirmation. Mismatched names can affect attribution and may require re-signing to ensure enforceability under ESIGN and UETA.
Can the Revised QAR be e-signed?
Yes. Under the ESIGN Act (15 U.S.C. ch. 96) and UETA in almost all states, electronic signatures are legally valid when intent, consent, signer attribution, and reliable record retention are documented. Exceptions such as wills and some court filings remain ineligible for e-signature.
Is notarization required?
Not generally for internal QAR records, but notarization or remote online notarization may be required for documents that affect legal title, deeds, or formal affidavits. Check state notary rules and RON statutes before relying on electronic acknowledgements.
How long should I retain QARs?
Retention depends on record type and industry: follow IRS guidance (IRC §6501(a)) for tax records (three years) and HIPAA (45 CFR §164.530(j)) for protected health records (six years). Consult state rules for longer retention.
What formatting prevents rejections?
Use MM/DD/YYYY dates, full legal names, consistent state abbreviations, and searchable attachment filenames. Avoid scanned handwriting for critical data fields; use searchable PDFs to support audit retrieval and electronic indexing.
How do I correct an executed QAR?
Do not alter an executed document; prepare an addendum or corrective amendment that references the original, explains the change, and is signed by the same parties. Preserve both originals and amendment for audit trails and legal clarity.

be ready to get more

Join over 28 million airSlate SignNow users

Sign Now