Can a Risk Management Review be signed electronically?

Yes. Electronic signatures are legally enforceable for most commercial and internal records under the ESIGN Act (15 U.S.C. ch. 96) and UETA where adopted; ensure consent and retention requirements are met.

When is notarization required?

Notarization is typically not required for internal reviews, but specific attestations or legally binding affidavits may need a notary depending on state rules and document purpose.

How long must I retain a signed review?

Retention depends on context: financial records follow IRC §6501(a) minimums, HIPAA records follow 45 CFR §164.530(j), and industry rules may extend these periods.

What if the signer’s name is incorrect?

Incorrect signer names can impair enforceability; correct via a signed amendment or corrective attestation that is dated and retained with the original record.

Who is authorized to sign the review?

Signatory authority is set by corporate policy; typically the head of risk, compliance officer, or an authorized executive should sign and attest to accuracy.

Can a signed review be revoked or amended?

Yes — use a formal amendment or revocation statement signed by the same authorized parties. Keep both the original and the amendment for audit trails.

Electronic Signature
Templates
Miscellaneous
Risk Management Review

Risk Management Review

This template is fully customizable. Edit the text, fill out the fields, and send it for signature. Give it a try!

Risk Management Review

Parties and Recitals

This Risk Management Review Agreement (the "Agreement") is entered into by and between:

Reviewer (Service Provider) Reviewer Address Client Client Address

WHEREAS, Reviewer is experienced in identifying, evaluating and recommending controls for operational, financial and information security risks; and

WHEREAS, Client desires to engage Reviewer to perform a structured risk management review of Client's business operations, systems and controls under the terms set forth herein; and

WHEREAS, the parties intend for the findings and recommendations delivered under this Agreement to form the basis for remediation and governance decisions by Client.

Scope of Work

Reviewer shall perform the risk management review services described below. The scope may include but is not limited to: identification of material risks, control effectiveness testing, risk rating, gap analysis, prioritised remediation recommendations and a final report.

Detailed Scope (Describe in detail)

Risk Assessment Summary

Select the risk domains to be included in this review:

Operational Risk
Financial Risk
Compliance / Regulatory Risk
Reputational Risk
Cybersecurity / Information Security
Physical Security / Business Continuity

Overall Risk Rating Key Findings

Recommendations & Action Plan

Reviewer will provide prioritized recommendations and an action plan identifying responsible parties and target completion dates.

Recommended Remediation Summary Action Plan (Itemize tasks) Responsible Party Target Completion Date

Payment Terms

In consideration for the services described herein, Client agrees to pay Reviewer in accordance with the terms below.

Total Fee Payment Schedule / Milestones Late Payment Fee

All invoices are payable within the days specified in the payment schedule. Client acknowledges that undisputed late payments authorize Reviewer to suspend services until payment is brought current.

Term and Termination

This Agreement commences on the date set forth below and continues until the services are completed unless earlier terminated in accordance with this Section.

Agreement Start Date Anticipated End Date Termination Notice Period (days)

Either party may terminate for material breach if the breaching party fails to cure within the notice period following written notice. Termination shall not relieve Client of its obligation to pay for services performed through the effective date of termination.

Confidentiality

Reviewer and Client acknowledge that each may receive Confidential Information from the other. "Confidential Information" means non-public business, technical, financial and operational information disclosed in any form. Each party shall: (i) use Confidential Information solely to perform under this Agreement; (ii) restrict disclosure to employees, contractors or advisors with a need to know and subject to confidentiality obligations at least as protective as those herein; and (iii) take reasonable measures to protect Confidential Information from unauthorized use or disclosure. Confidential Information does not include information that is already lawfully known by the receiving party, independently developed, or becomes publicly known through no breach of this Agreement.

Upon termination or at Client's written request, Reviewer will return or destroy Client Confidential Information, subject to retention of copies required by law or Reviewer policies for audit and professional records; retained copies shall remain subject to confidentiality obligations.

Limitation of Liability

To the maximum extent permitted by law, Reviewer’s liability arising out of or relating to this Agreement shall be limited to direct damages not to exceed fees paid by Client under this Agreement. Neither party shall be liable for consequential, incidental, indirect, punitive or special damages.

Governing Law

This Agreement shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the jurisdiction selected by the parties below, without regard to conflict of law principles.

Governing Law Jurisdiction

Entire Agreement

This Agreement, including any appendices and agreed statements of work executed by the parties, constitutes the entire agreement between the parties with respect to the subject matter and supersedes all prior and contemporaneous agreements, proposals and communications, whether oral or written. Any amendment must be in writing and signed by authorized representatives of both parties.

Acknowledgements

Client acknowledges that Reviewer’s opinions and recommendations are advisory. Implementation of controls is the responsibility of Client. Reviewer does not warrant that implementation of recommendations will prevent loss or regulatory action.

Additional Notes

Reviewer: Printed Name

By: Signature

Date

Client: Printed Name

By: Signature

Date

What a Risk Management Review Is and When It’s Used

A Risk Management Review is a structured assessment that identifies, evaluates, and documents risks to an organization’s operations, assets, people, and compliance posture. It typically inventories hazards, rates likelihood and impact, evaluates existing controls, and recommends remediation priorities. The review creates a dated record for internal governance, third‑party assessments, insurance negotiations, and regulatory audits. Organizations use it as a recurring checklist or an event-driven report after incidents, material changes, or quarterly/annual risk planning cycles to support decision-making and demonstrate due diligence.

Why a Risk Management Review Matters

A concise, documented review reduces uncertainty by clarifying risk exposure, control gaps, and remediation priorities while producing evidence for boards, auditors, insurers, and regulators.

Who Typically Completes a Risk Management Review

Reviews are often compiled by risk or compliance teams and routed to executive leadership for acknowledgment and sign-off.

Risk managers and GRC teams: Coordinate the inventory, scoring methodology, and consolidation of evidence for senior management.
Compliance officers and legal counsel: Assess regulatory exposure, record retention obligations, and attest to controls for auditors.
Business unit leaders and process owners: Provide factual inputs on control effectiveness and implement remediation tasks.

Core Components of a Professional Risk Management Review

A complete review blends a factual inventory with analytical scoring, control assessments, and a clear remediation plan tied to ownership and deadlines.

Executive Summary

One‑page synopsis of top risks, residual exposure, and recommended executive actions with high‑level cost or timeline estimates for remediation.

Risk Inventory

Catalog of identified risks with titles, descriptions, affected assets or processes, and source or trigger for inclusion.

Assessment Matrix

Standardized likelihood and impact ratings with combined risk scores and a clear definition of rating scales used by reviewers.

Control Evaluation

Status of existing controls, testing results, control owner, and evidence references demonstrating proof of operation or gaps.

Remediation Plan

Prioritized actions, owners, target dates, and estimated resources required, including interim compensating controls when applicable.

Sign-off & Attestations

Designated approvers sign and date the review to confirm accuracy, completeness, and acceptance of the remediation timeline.

Essential Data Elements to Capture

Document ID: Unique identifier

Reviewer Name: Full legal name

Review Date: MM/DD/YYYY

Risk Severity: Low/Medium/High

Control Status: Implemented/Tested/Planned

Attachments: Evidence references

Step-by-Step: Completing a Risk Management Review

Follow these sequential steps to create a defensible, auditable risk review that can be completed electronically and retained for compliance purposes.

01

Collect inputs: Gather inventories, incident logs, contracts, and control test results.
02

Populate the form: Enter risks, scores, controls, owners, and evidence references.
03

Review and validate: Have control owners and legal verify accuracy and completeness.
04

Approve and sign: Obtain formal sign-off and store the signed record securely.

Configuring an Online Review Workflow

Set workflow fields to enforce required inputs, routing, and authentication before signatures are allowed.

Field	Configuration
Authentication	Email link with optional SMS code for stronger ID
Routing	Sequential approvers with conditional branching
Reminders	Automated email reminders every 7 days
Retention	Auto-archive to secure storage after sign-off

Where to Send or File the Completed Review

Decide final destinations for signed reviews to meet governance, legal, and audit needs.

GRC Repository: Store master copy in governance, risk, and compliance system.
Compliance Team: Send a signed PDF to compliance for audit trails.
Business Owner: Email a copy to process owners for remediation action.
Secure Cloud Storage: Archive in encrypted cloud storage with restricted access.

Technical and Platform Considerations for Digital Reviews

Ensure the chosen platform supports required authentication methods, retains audit trails, and aligns with your compliance needs without changing local retention policies.

File formats: PDF and Word DOCX are widely supported
Integrations: Salesforce, Microsoft 365, NetSuite, Box, and Google Workspace
Security: TLS in transit; AES-256 at rest

Typical Timelines and Processing Expectations

Set clear deadlines for each phase to ensure timely remediation and to produce auditable records for regulators and auditors.

Initial Review Window:

Complete initial assessment within 30 days of assignment.

Remediation Deadline:

Target remediation within 90 days unless extended by risk owner.

Quarterly Updates:

Update high risks at least quarterly to track progress.

Annual Reassessment:

Conduct full review annually as part of enterprise risk plan.

Audit Access:

Provide signed records within auditor-requested timeframe, typically 10–30 days.

Consequences of an Incomplete or Incorrect Review

Regulatory Fines: Civil penalties possible

Data Breach Costs: Notification and remediation expenses

Contractual Liability: Breach of contractual obligations

Operational Impact: Service interruptions and downtime

Reputational Damage: Loss of trust and market impact

Insurance Denial: Coverage refusal for inadequate risk controls

Common Mistakes to Avoid

Failing to define consistent scoring criteria leads to incomparable results and weak prioritization across business units.
Keeping informal evidence or emails instead of attaching verifiable test results undermines auditability and increases remediation time.
Not assigning a named owner with a deadline creates orphaned remediation items and accountability gaps during follow-up.
Using unsigned or non‑timestamped approvals makes attribution unclear and can complicate legal or regulatory inquiries.

Real-World Examples of Completed Reviews

These brief case arcs show how organizations document findings, assign ownership, and record approvals in completed reviews.

Optica Ventures (COO)

The team standardized a single review template to capture project risks and controls.

They reduced review variance across portfolios.
As a result, Optica consolidated evidence, shortened board reporting cycles, and improved follow-up tracking by assigning clear owners and deadlines tied to each risk item.

Fertility Centers of Illinois (Founder)

Clinical operations implemented a review for patient-data access risks.

The review included control tests and attestations.
The documented process provided auditors and partners with readable evidence, ensured HIPAA-related controls were validated, and formalized remediation responsibilities across clinical and IT teams.

Who Signs and What Authority They Hold

Risk Manager

Typically responsible for compiling the review, validating controls, and presenting findings to the executive team; can certify factual accuracy but may not have final legal authority.

Chief Compliance Officer

Usually holds the attestation authority to sign and accept residual risks on behalf of the organization and to represent the record to auditors and regulators.

eSignature Vendor Pricing and Feature Comparison

Compare basic pricing and essential capabilities relevant to signing and storing a Risk Management Review; signNow appears first for parity with other solutions.

	signNow	DocuSign	Adobe Sign	PandaDoc	HelloSign
Starting Price	$8/user/mo	$15/user/mo	$14/user/mo	$19/user/mo	$15/user/mo
Free Trial	7-day free trial	Varies by plan	Varies by plan	Yes, limited	Yes, limited
Bulk Send	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	No
Audit Trail	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes
HIPAA Compliant	Yes	Yes	Yes	No	No
Envelope Cap	No envelope cap	100 envelopes/user/year	Varies by plan	Varies by plan	Varies by plan

Frequently Asked Questions and Troubleshooting

Answers to common questions about legality, signatures, retention, and correcting records after signing.

Need help? Contact support

Can a Risk Management Review be signed electronically?
Yes. Electronic signatures are legally enforceable for most commercial and internal records under the ESIGN Act (15 U.S.C. ch. 96) and UETA where adopted; ensure consent and retention requirements are met.
When is notarization required?
Notarization is typically not required for internal reviews, but specific attestations or legally binding affidavits may need a notary depending on state rules and document purpose.
How long must I retain a signed review?
Retention depends on context: financial records follow IRC §6501(a) minimums, HIPAA records follow 45 CFR §164.530(j), and industry rules may extend these periods.
What if the signer’s name is incorrect?
Incorrect signer names can impair enforceability; correct via a signed amendment or corrective attestation that is dated and retained with the original record.
Who is authorized to sign the review?
Signatory authority is set by corporate policy; typically the head of risk, compliance officer, or an authorized executive should sign and attest to accuracy.
Can a signed review be revoked or amended?
Yes — use a formal amendment or revocation statement signed by the same authorized parties. Keep both the original and the amendment for audit trails.

be ready to get more

Join over 28 million airSlate SignNow users

Sign Now