Establishing secure connection…Loading editor…Preparing document…

Soc Serv Law 358 A4 Form 358 A 2 Order Directing

This template is fully customizable. Edit the text, fill out the fields, and send it for signature. Give it a try!

Order Directing or Dispensing with Service of Notice

Soc. Serv. Law §358-a(4)

Form 358-a-2

Order Directing

or Dispensing with

Service of Notice

8/2010

At a term of the Family Court of the

State of New York, held in and for the

County of New York,

at

on

PRESENT:

Hon.

Judge

Docket No.

ORDER

DIRECTING

DISPENSING WITH

SERVICE OF NOTICE

In the Matter of the Application for Approval

of an Instrument Concerning

CIN #

Pursuant to Section 358-a of the Social

Services Law.

The petition of an authorized official of the Department of Social Services,

County, New York City Administration for Children's Services), dated :

having been filed with this Court requesting approval of an instrument transferring custody and care of

the child to the agency;

[Check box, if applicable]: And the above-mentioned instrument executed by ,

the parent(s) guardian(s) containing consents to the jurisdiction of the Family

Court over this proceeding and waivers of service of the petition and notice of proceeding,

NOW THEREFORE, it is hereby [check applicable box(es)]:

ORDERED that service of a notice of the proceeding and a copy of the petition shall be

made upon

in the following manner

Form 358-a(2)

Page 2

ORDERED that service of a notice of this proceeding and a copy of the petition upon the

above-named consenting parent(s) guardian(s), shall be dispensed with.

ENTER

Judge of the Family Court

Dated:

PURSUANT TO SECTION 1113 OF THE FAMILY COURT ACT,
AN APPEAL FROM THIS ORDER MUST BE TAKEN WITHIN
30 DAYS OR RECEIPT OF THE ORDER BY APPELLANT IN COURT,
35 DAYS FROM THE DATE OF MAILING OF THE ORDER TO
APPELLANT BY THE CLERK OF COURT, OR 30 DAYS AFTER
SERVICE BY A PARTY OR THE ATTORNEY FOR THE CHILD UPON
THE APPELLANT, WHICHEVER IS EARLIEST.

Check applicable box:

Order mailed on

Order received in court on

Enter text

What the Soc Serv Law 358 A4 Form 358 A 2 Order Directing is

The Soc Serv Law 358 A4 Form 358 A 2 Order Directing is a New York State statutory order used by courts or authorized agencies to direct action under Social Services Law section 358. It records a court or administrative directive that affects eligibility, benefits, or agency duties and creates an official, enforceable instruction. The document sets the scope of the order, parties affected, effective date, and any conditions. Accurate completion ensures the order can be implemented by agencies, employers, or benefits administrators without procedural delay or challenge.

Why a correct Order Directing matters

A complete, well-prepared Order Directing clarifies responsibilities, avoids implementation delays, and reduces the risk of administrative appeals or misinterpretation by agencies or third parties.

Why a correct Order Directing matters

Typical users and signers

Ensure each role completes the sections assigned to them and that signatures match authority on file.

  • Court staff and judges issuing the directive for agency action
  • Agency caseworkers and benefits administrators who implement the order
  • Attorneys and authorized representatives filing or serving the order

Step-by-step: filling and issuing the order

Follow these steps in sequence to prepare, authenticate, and distribute the Order Directing.

  • 01
    Prepare: Complete case identifiers, parties, and directive text accurately.
  • 02
    Authorize: Obtain signature from judge or authorized official and required attestations.
  • 03
    Authenticate: Notarize or apply electronic authentication where required by statute or court rule.
  • 04
    Distribute: File with the clerk and serve designated agencies and parties per local rules.

How the Order Directing moves from court to agency

A standard process moves the order from issuance to implementation; each step creates a record for compliance and audit.

  • Issuance: Judge or authorized official signs and dates the order.
  • Clerk Filing: Order is filed with the court clerk and docketed.
  • Service: Designated agencies and parties are formally served with the order.
  • Agency Action: Agency updates records and implements the directive as written.

Configuring an online workflow for this order

Map document fields to your e-signature workflow and set authentication and routing rules for accurate processing.

Field Configuration
Case Number Field Required; map to system case ID for automated indexing
Signature Field Set signer role and authentication level (email or 2FA)
Service Dates Auto-fill date fields after service events for audit accuracy
Recipient Routing Conditional routing to clerk, agency inbox, and counsel

Technical requirements for electronic completion and submission

Ensure chosen platform meets any statutory notarization or agency-specific e-filing requirements before using electronic submission.

  • Authentication: Email, SMS code, or stronger multi-factor
  • Audit Trail: Timestamps, IP address, and action logs
  • Integrations: CRM, case management, and cloud storage

Typical eSignature vendor pricing and capabilities for filing and serving orders

Compare starting prices and core capabilities among common eSignature vendors; signNow appears first per platform guidance.

signNow DocuSign Adobe Sign PandaDoc HelloSign
Starting Price $8/user/mo $15/user/mo $14/user/mo $19/user/mo $15/user/mo
Free Trial 7-day free trial Varies by vendor Varies by vendor Varies by vendor Varies by vendor
Bulk Send Yes (Premium tier) Yes Yes Yes Yes
Audit Trail Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
HIPAA Compliant Yes Yes Yes No No

Security and compliance points to confirm

Encryption: TLS 1.2/1.3 in transit
Data at Rest: AES-256 encryption
Certifications: SOC 2 Type II and ISO 27001
HIPAA: BAA available for protected health information
ESIGN/UETA: Meets ESIGN and UETA legal requirements
Audit Trail: Timestamped events and signer attribution

Consequences of incomplete or inaccurate orders

Implementation Delay: Agency may delay or refuse action
Administrative Appeal: Affected parties can file challenges or appeals
Invalid Order: Court may quash or require reissuance
Service Failure: Improper service may void enforcement
Data Breach Risk: Poor security can expose confidential records
Legal Exposure: Noncompliance may lead to sanctions or liability

Common preparation errors to avoid

  • Using informal or abbreviated party names that do not match court filings, causing rejection or misrouting.
  • Omitting key identifiers such as the docket or case number, which prevents clerks and agencies from indexing the order.
  • Failing to specify precise actions, deadlines, or responsible units, leaving agencies uncertain how to comply.
  • Neglecting required notarization or witness attestation where state or court rules mandate it, which can invalidate the order.

Real-world examples and how they applied electronic workflows

These customer examples show how electronic signatures and structured workflows supported administrative orders and reduced turnaround.

Optica Ventures (Brian Fitzgibbons, COO)

Client moved to online orders to speed processing

  • Reduced signer friction across mobile and desktop
  • The interface was easy for staff and customers, enabling faster acknowledgment and clearer routing of court-directed agency actions.

Fertility Centers of Illinois (John Butler, Founder)

Healthcare provider adopted secure e-signing for administrative orders

  • Implemented HIPAA controls and audit trails
  • The platform supported BAA execution and provided documented chain-of-custody for sensitive orders and patient-related administrative directives.

Essential elements a professional Order Directing should include

A clear structure and all required elements reduce processing risk and ensure enforceability.

Header

Court name, tribunal, and docket information clearly displayed

Parties

Full legal names and contact information for all affected parties

Directive

Clear, actionable instructions specifying duties, timelines, and responsible units

Effective Date

Date field in MM/DD/YYYY format indicating when the order takes effect

Authentication

Judge or official signature, with notarization or electronic authentication as required

Service Block

Designated recipients, method of service, and certificate of service entry

How the Order Directing differs from related court documents

Compare this order to similar instruments so you choose the correct form and routing procedure.

Criteria Order Directing Administrative Directive
Purpose court-enforced instruction agency internal instruction
Signature Source judge or authorized official agency head or designee
Filing Requirement filed with court clerk may be filed internal only
Typical Use enforce benefits or duties internal policy or program change

Time-sensitive dates to track when issuing the order

Track effective dates, service deadlines, and appeal periods to preserve rights and meet agency obligations.

Effective Date:

Enter MM/DD/YYYY; determines when obligations begin

Service Deadline:

Complete service per local rule to trigger agency duties

Filing Date:

Date filed with clerk; used for docketing and appeals

Appeal Window:

Track statutory appeal timelines as specified in the order

Record Retention Start:

Retention begins from creation or filing date

Key milestones from issuance to final implementation

A sequential milestone view clarifies timing expectations and responsible parties.

01

Issuance

Judge signs and dates the order to begin the process

02

Clerk Docketing

Clerk files and dockets the order for official record

03

Service Completed

Order served on agencies and parties, triggering agency duties

04

Agency Implementation

Agency updates records and performs directed actions

Common questions and practical answers

Answers to frequent questions about completing, authenticating, and submitting the Order Directing.


Need help? Contact support

be ready to get more
Join over 28 million airSlate SignNow users