Can the SOP be signed electronically?

Yes. Electronic signatures are legally valid for most transactions under the ESIGN Act (15 U.S.C. ch. 96) and UETA (1999) where adopted. Ensure intent, consent, attribution, and retention to meet the four-prong e‑signature test.

When is a wet signature or notary required?

Some documents and attestations remain excluded from e-signature laws (wills, certain court orders, and some real property filings). Where notary acknowledgment is required, follow state notary rules or use Remote Online Notarization if the state permits.

How should we authenticate signers for sensitive SOP approvals?

Use stronger authentication for high-risk approvals: two-factor, SSO, or knowledge-based identity proofing. For regulated records, align authentication with applicable rules such as 21 CFR Part 11 where relevant.

What retention obligations apply to signed SOPs?

Follow federal minimums (e.g., IRS: 3 years under IRC §6501(a)) and industry rules such as HIPAA (45 CFR §164.530(j) — six years). Maintain an immutable signed copy and associated audit trail.

How do we handle version control disputes?

Keep an auditable change log with effective dates, approver identities, and archived prior versions. The authoritative version is the one with documented approval and an effective date.

What if a signer later disputes their signature?

Preserve the audit trail (timestamps, IP, authentication method). Electronic evidence that demonstrates intent and attribution commonly satisfies admissibility tests, but severe disputes may require legal review.

Electronic Signature
Templates
Miscellaneous
Standard Operating Procedure for Audit

Standard Operating Procedure for Audit

This template is fully customizable. Edit the text, fill out the fields, and send it for signature. Give it a try!

STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE FOR AUDIT

This Standard Operating Procedure for Audit (the "SOP") is entered into by and between the parties identified below for the purpose of establishing standardized processes, responsibilities, controls, and reporting requirements related to audits conducted under this SOP.

Client Name: Service Provider Name:

WHEREAS

WHEREAS, Client requires systematic, documented audit procedures to verify compliance with contractual obligations, internal policies, and applicable regulatory requirements; and

WHEREAS, Service Provider maintains the personnel, procedures, and controls necessary to plan and perform audits in accordance with professional standards and the terms set forth in this SOP; and

WHEREAS, the Parties desire to set forth the scope, responsibilities, scheduling, documentation, confidentiality, compensation, and governance applicable to audits performed under this SOP.

SCOPE OF WORK

Describe scope and objectives Audit type(s)

Financial audit Operational audit Compliance audit IT/general controls audit

AUDIT PROCEDURES

1. Planning and Notification: The Service Provider shall prepare an audit plan that identifies objectives, scope, criteria, sampling methodologies, estimated timeline, and required client resources. The audit plan shall be delivered to Client no fewer than prior to fieldwork.

2. Fieldwork and Testing: Fieldwork shall be conducted in accordance with the approved audit plan. Auditors shall document testing procedures, sample selections, exceptions noted, and evidence collected in audit workpapers retained in accordance with this SOP.

3. Reporting: Upon completion of fieldwork, Service Provider shall issue a draft audit report within days. Client shall provide written comments within days of receipt. The final report shall address material findings, recommendations, and agreed corrective actions.

RESPONSIBILITIES

Client responsibilities Service Provider responsibilities

DOCUMENTATION & RECORDS

All audit workpapers, evidence, and final reports shall be retained for a period of from the date of the final report. Storage location or method:

QUALITY CONTROL & TRAINING

Service Provider shall maintain a documented quality control program for audits, including peer review of significant findings and supervisor sign-off on final reports. Auditors assigned to this engagement must have completed required training and maintain competency records.

Training and competency notes

PAYMENT TERMS

Total agreed fee Payment schedule Late payment fee

Late payments shall accrue interest at a rate of on outstanding amounts, and Client is responsible for reasonable collection costs.

TERM AND TERMINATION

This SOP shall commence on Start Date: and shall continue until End Date: unless earlier terminated as provided herein.

Either Party may terminate this SOP for convenience upon providing days' prior written notice to the other Party. Termination for cause may be effected immediately where a material breach is not cured within days after written notice.

CONFIDENTIALITY

Each Party shall maintain in confidence all non-public information obtained in connection with an audit and shall not disclose such information except to those of its employees, agents, or advisors who have a need to know and who are bound by confidentiality obligations at least as protective as those set forth herein. Confidential information shall not include information that is or becomes publicly available through no fault of the receiving Party, is rightfully received from a third party without obligation of confidentiality, or is independently developed by the receiving Party.

Upon termination or expiration of this SOP, each Party shall promptly return or destroy Confidential Information as requested by the disclosing Party, except to the extent retention is required by law or professional standards, in which case retained copies shall remain subject to the confidentiality obligations of this SOP.

GOVERNING LAW

This SOP shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of , without regard to conflict of law principles. The Parties submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts located within that state for disputes arising under this SOP.

ENTIRE AGREEMENT

This SOP, together with any executed schedules or attachments expressly incorporated herein, constitutes the entire agreement between the Parties with respect to the subject matter hereof and supersedes all prior and contemporaneous agreements, understandings, and communications, whether written or oral. Any amendment or modification must be in writing and signed by authorized representatives of both Parties.

CHANGE CONTROL & REVIEW

This SOP shall be reviewed at a minimum every months or upon material change to applicable laws, standards, or business processes. Proposed changes shall be documented and approved in writing by authorized representatives of both Parties prior to implementation.

MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS

Neither Party may assign or transfer its rights or obligations under this SOP without the prior written consent of the other Party, except to a successor entity in connection with a merger or sale of substantially all assets. If any provision of this SOP is found invalid or unenforceable, the remaining provisions shall remain in full force and effect.

Client:

By:

Date:

Service Provider:

By:

Date:

What a Standard Operating Procedure for Audit Covers

A Standard Operating Procedure for Audit is a formal, written protocol that describes how an organization plans, conducts, documents, and closes audits for financial, operational, compliance, or technical areas. The SOP defines scope, audit objectives, risk criteria, sampling methods, required evidence, roles and responsibilities, reporting formats, escalation paths for findings, and version control. It serves as the canonical reference for internal and external auditors to ensure consistent execution, defensible conclusions, and an auditable trail that regulators or stakeholders can review during inspections or formal reviews.

Why a Standard Operating Procedure for Audit Is Important

An SOP for audit reduces variability across engagements, preserves institutional knowledge, and improves evidence traceability. It helps demonstrate consistent controls to regulators, supports repeatable testing, and shortens review cycles by standardizing documentation, approvals, and escalation.

Who Prepares and Who Uses the Audit SOP

Typical preparers and users include internal teams, compliance officers, and outside auditors who rely on a single reference for audit procedures.

Internal audit teams responsible for planning, testing, and reporting audit results across business units.
Compliance and risk officers who set control objectives, monitor remediation, and track corrective actions.
External auditors and third-party assessors who reference the SOP for sampling, procedures, and evidence standards.

The SOP facilitates collaboration among stakeholders, clarifies responsibilities, and streamlines audit execution and follow-up across the organization.

Core Elements to Include in a Professional Audit SOP

A complete SOP balances process, evidence standards, authorization, and continuous improvement so audits are consistent, reproducible, and defensible for internal and external review.

Scope

Define covered processes, business units, systems, and control objectives. Clear scope prevents scope creep and focuses evidence collection on material areas.

Roles & Responsibilities

List duties for audit owners, reviewers, approvers, and business contacts. Include escalation contacts and decision authorities for findings and remediation.

Audit Methodology

Describe sampling approach, testing techniques, testing frequency, and acceptance criteria so procedures are repeatable and comparable across engagements.

Evidence Management

Specify evidence types, naming conventions, secure storage locations, chain-of-custody practices, and retention rules for audit artifacts.

Reporting Templates

Provide report formats, required disclosures, severity rating scales, and remediation tracking fields to standardize results and timelines.

Version Control

Document change history, approval signatures, effective dates, and distribution lists so users know which SOP version is authoritative.

Step-by-Step: From Draft to Published SOP

Follow these steps to draft, approve, and publish the SOP so auditors and stakeholders use one controlled version.

01

Draft: Develop text, scope, and templates; include evidence requirements.
02

Review: Circulate to subject-matter experts for control and factual validation.
03

Approve: Obtain documented sign-off from process owners and compliance leadership.
04

Distribute: Publish the approved SOP, notify stakeholders, and archive prior versions.

How SOP Routing and Sign-Off Typically Works

A clear routing flow reduces delays: authoring, sequential approvals, signature capture, and final archival should be defined and automated where possible.

Upload Template: Store master copy in a controlled repository.
Assign Reviewers: Set approval order for stakeholders and subject-matter experts.
Collect Signatures: Capture sign-off electronically or in writing with audit trail.
Archive: Record final version and retain prior revisions per retention rules.

Key Digital Workflow Settings to Configure

Configure routing order, authentication strength, field types, and retention before sending the SOP for approval.

Field	Configuration
Template Name	SOP Audit Template v1 — versioned
Routing Order	Sequential approvers — author, manager, compliance
Authentication	Email + optional SMS code or SSO
Retention	Retain signed copy per records policy

Platform Capabilities to Support SOP Execution

Select a platform that provides secure signatures, a tamper-evident audit trail, and exportable records for long‑term retention.

Integrations: Salesforce NetSuite Google Workspace Microsoft 365
Formats Supported: PDF DOCX Excel
Authentication: Email SMS SSO

Penalties and Risks from Incorrect or Incomplete SOPs

1099 Filing Penalties: $60–$330 per form

I-9 Paperwork Violations: $281–$2,789 per violation

HIPAA Noncompliance: Civil penalties vary

Invalid Signature: Document may be unenforceable

Audit Findings: Remediation costs and reputational harm

Retention Failures: Regulatory fines or evidence loss

Common Mistakes to Avoid When Preparing an SOP

Unclear scope and objectives that force auditors to guess what controls or processes are in scope and increase rework during testing.
Missing or inconsistent evidence naming and storage locations, which lengthens retrieval time and undermines chain of custody.
Lack of documented approval authorities or outdated signatory lists, causing signed versions to be legally ambiguous or invalid.
No versioning or change log, so teams may use superseded procedures and fail to demonstrate compliance during inspection.

Security and Compliance Considerations for SOP Records

Encryption: TLS 1.2/1.3 in transit; AES-256 at rest

Authentication: Email, SMS, SSO, optional KBA

Audit Trail: Time, IP, action log retained

HIPAA BAA: BAA required for PHI workflows

Certifications: SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001

Access Controls: Role-based permissions and SSO

Practical Examples of SOP Use in Organizations

The following real-world examples show how organizations apply a formal SOP to streamline audits and evidence collection.

Optica Ventures (COO)

Optica standardized its audit checklist and templates to reduce reviewer questions.

"The interface is simple and easy-to-use for our team; more importantly, it is just as easy for our customers."
Standardization reduced turnaround time and improved customer clarity when auditors requested documentation, enabling faster closure of routine findings and fewer rework cycles.

Martin Properties (Founder)

Martin Properties moved SOP approvals online to support remote closings.

"I can process and execute all of these documents online with 100% compliance and built-in security."
Digital execution reduced in-person meetings, shortened execution timelines, and improved the landlord and tenant experience while preserving an auditable evidence trail for inspections.

Comparing eSignature Cost and Capabilities for SOP Execution

Select an eSignature provider based on pricing, compliance, and features needed to execute and retain signed SOPs; signNow is listed first for comparison.

	signNow	DocuSign	Adobe Sign	PandaDoc	HelloSign
Starting Price	$8/user/mo	$15/user/mo	$14/user/mo	$19/user/mo	$15/user/mo
Free Trial	7-day free trial	Varies	Varies	Varies	Varies
Bulk Send	Available (Business Premium)	Varies	Varies	Varies	Varies
Audit Trail	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes
HIPAA Compliant	Yes (BAA available)	Varies	Varies	Varies	Varies

Frequently Asked Questions and Troubleshooting

Answers to common questions about legal validity, signatures, notarization, and recordkeeping for SOPs used in audits.

Need help? Contact support

Can the SOP be signed electronically?
Yes. Electronic signatures are legally valid for most transactions under the ESIGN Act (15 U.S.C. ch. 96) and UETA (1999) where adopted. Ensure intent, consent, attribution, and retention to meet the four-prong e‑signature test.
When is a wet signature or notary required?
Some documents and attestations remain excluded from e-signature laws (wills, certain court orders, and some real property filings). Where notary acknowledgment is required, follow state notary rules or use Remote Online Notarization if the state permits.
How should we authenticate signers for sensitive SOP approvals?
Use stronger authentication for high-risk approvals: two-factor, SSO, or knowledge-based identity proofing. For regulated records, align authentication with applicable rules such as 21 CFR Part 11 where relevant.
What retention obligations apply to signed SOPs?
Follow federal minimums (e.g., IRS: 3 years under IRC §6501(a)) and industry rules such as HIPAA (45 CFR §164.530(j) — six years). Maintain an immutable signed copy and associated audit trail.
How do we handle version control disputes?
Keep an auditable change log with effective dates, approver identities, and archived prior versions. The authoritative version is the one with documented approval and an effective date.
What if a signer later disputes their signature?
Preserve the audit trail (timestamps, IP, authentication method). Electronic evidence that demonstrates intent and attribution commonly satisfies admissibility tests, but severe disputes may require legal review.

be ready to get more

Join over 28 million airSlate SignNow users

Sign Now