Where can I find the official opinion?

Request the certified opinion and docket entry from the issuing court’s clerk or consult an official reporter. Unofficial transcriptions should be verified against the clerk’s copy before filing.

How should I cite the decision in court papers?

Use the case name, court, date, and reporter citation if available. Follow your jurisdiction’s citation manual and include the docket number when helpful for clerk retrieval.

Can I rely on this opinion outside Louisiana?

Out-of-state courts may treat it as persuasive but not binding. Cite it as persuasive authority and explain factual and statutory differences when arguing outside the issuing jurisdiction.

Is an electronic copy admissible as evidence?

Electronic copies with verifiable provenance and an intact audit trail are generally admissible; preserve metadata and be prepared to authenticate under applicable rules of evidence.

Does ESIGN/UETA affect court filing validity?

Electronic signatures meet federal ESIGN requirements (15 U.S.C. ch. 96) and state UETA rules where adopted, but follow the court’s local eFiling and signature rules.

What if I cannot locate a reporter citation?

Indicate that the opinion is unpublished or provide a docket citation and a certified copy from the clerk to ensure the court can verify the source.

Electronic Signature
Templates
Other
State of Louisiana vs. Nicholas Revish (2019)

State of Louisiana vs. Nicholas Revish (2019)

This template is fully customizable. Edit the text, fill out the fields, and send it for signature. Give it a try!

Criminal Action No.

JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT IN AND FOR THE

PARISH OF , LOUISIANA

STATE OF LOUISIANA

VS

***

ASSIGNMENT OF ERRORS

The Defendant, , through counsel and pursuant to Louisiana Code of Criminal Procedure, Article 844, assigns the following as errors to be considered on appeal:

1.

The trial court erred by failing to take into consideration any mitigating factors pursuant to the sentencing guidelines and sentenced your Defendant to a term of imprisonment far exceeding the term as listed in the sentencing guidelines.

2.

The trial court erred in sentencing the Defendant to a term of imprisonment of years at hard labor, as such was an excessive sentence which is cruel and unusual pursuant to the U.S. and Louisiana Constitutions.

Respectfully Submitted,

Parish I.D. Board

LA

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I HEREBY CERTIFY that a copy of the above and foregoing Assignment of Errors has this date been served upon the Office of the District Attorney for the Parish of , Louisiana, by hand delivering a copy of the same.

Louisiana, this day of , 20

What State of Louisiana vs. Nicholas Revish (2019) refers to

State of Louisiana vs. Nicholas Revish (2019) refers to a criminal-case docket listed under that caption in Louisiana courts from 2019. This page serves as a neutral reference to help legal professionals and researchers locate court records, identify the procedural posture, and use the case citation consistently in filings and legal memoranda. It does not substitute for reading the full opinion or official docket entries; practitioners should verify facts with the court clerk or the official reporter before relying on the case in argument.

Why this case citation matters for practitioners

Citing State of Louisiana vs. Nicholas Revish (2019) can clarify procedural history or illuminate a point of law within Louisiana jurisdiction. Lawyers, judges, and researchers rely on accurate citation to show precedent, compare holdings, and support procedural positions in motions or appeals.

Core elements to review in the opinion and docket

When you read the case file, look for the procedural posture, controlling issues, factual summary, legal holdings, the court’s reasoning, and the final disposition. Each element shapes how the case can be cited and relied upon in subsequent briefs.

Procedural Posture

Identify the stage of litigation (trial, appeal, post-conviction) and which court decided the matter to determine precedential weight.

Material Facts

Summarize the essential facts the court considered; distinguish facts from dicta when applying the holding to new matters.

Legal Issues

Note the specific legal questions presented and the statutory or constitutional provisions the court interpreted.

Holding

Extract the narrow holding — the rule the court applied to the material facts that binds lower courts within the jurisdiction.

Reasoning

Capture the court’s rationale and any policy or precedent it relied upon; separate primary reasoning from persuasive commentary.

Disposition

Record the final outcome (affirmed, reversed, remanded) and any instructions for further proceedings or sentencing modifications.

Step-by-step: how to use the case in a brief

Follow a concise workflow when incorporating this case into pleadings or memoranda to ensure accuracy and persuasive clarity.

01

Locate Opinion: Obtain the official opinion and docket from the clerk or a certified reporter before quoting or citing.
02

Confirm Posture: Verify whether the opinion is final, pending appeal, or subject to rehearing to understand its precedential effect.
03

Extract Holding: Summarize the narrow holding and its factual limits; avoid overstating breadth when arguing analogies.
04

Cite Properly: Use the correct case name, court, reporter citation, and date in the jurisdiction's required citation format.

How to set up a citation workflow for this case

Design a repeatable workflow for storage, retrieval, and eFiling that keeps citations accurate and documents organized.

Field	Configuration
Document Upload	PDF preferred; include scanned docket stamp for authenticity in court filings.
Signer Roles	Define roles such as 'Attorney of Record' and 'Filing Counsel' for signature routing.
Authentication	Use email or SMS code for signer verification when eSigning affidavits or cover letters.
Retention	Keep original opinion and filings in the case file for at least seven years, subject to local rules.

Where to file or submit documents that reference the case

Route filings and references through the appropriate court office or electronic filing service while preserving required signatures and certificates of service.

Court Clerk: File original pleadings and certified copies with the clerk of the issuing court or appellate clerk.
eFiling System: Use the court’s authorized eFile portal when available, following local formatting and filing rules.
Opposing Counsel: Serve opposing counsel per local rules and include the precise citation and docket references.
Record Retention: Place signed filings in the matter's official record and backup in secure document storage.

Risks and consequences of incorrect use or citation

Mis-citation: May lead to brief rejection.

Unverified Facts: Invites opposing challenge.

Overbroad Reliance: Misstates scope of holding.

Procedural Error: Can cause filing defects.

Missing Docket: Hinders court retrieval.

Unauthenticated Filing: May be administratively refused.

Common drafting pitfalls to avoid

Quoting dicta as controlling law instead of identifying the paper’s narrow holding leads to overstated arguments and possible credibility loss in court.
Failing to confirm that the opinion remains good law can result in reliance on overturned or superseded authority.
Using an unofficial or unverified opinion text risks transcription errors; always compare against the official reporter or clerk’s copy.
Omitting the correct docket number, decision date, or court name increases the chance opposing counsel or the court cannot locate the cited record.

eSignature vendor comparison for handling filings and exhibits

The table compares common vendor starting prices and feature signals relevant to secure signing of legal filings and exhibits; signNow is listed first per comparison protocol.

	signNow	DocuSign	Adobe Sign	PandaDoc	HelloSign
Starting Price	$8/user/mo	$15/user/mo	$14/user/mo	$19/user/mo	$15/user/mo
Free Trial	7-day free trial	Varies	Varies	Varies	Varies
Bulk Send	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	No
Audit Trail	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes
HIPAA Compliant	Yes	Yes	Yes	No	No

Technical considerations for electronic filings and evidence

Courts and opposing parties expect clear, accessible file formats, reliable authentication, and archived audit trails when documents are submitted electronically.

File Format: PDF/A or searchable PDF preferred
Integrations: Salesforce, NetSuite, Google Workspace supported
Authentication: Email, SMS code, or KBA per court rule

Practical tips for accurate, court-ready citation and use

Follow these best practices to avoid clerical or procedural defects when relying on State of Louisiana vs. Nicholas Revish (2019) in filings.

Verify Opinion Source

Always cross-check the text against the official reporter or clerk’s certified copy to prevent transcription errors that could be fatal to an argument.

Limit the Holding

Frame the case by its narrow holding and material facts rather than treating broader language as controlling precedent.

Follow Local Citation Rules

Format the citation per the jurisdiction’s rules for briefs and ensure docket numbers and dates are correct for clerk retrieval.

Preserve Audit Trail

When eSigning or submitting, retain the audit trail (timestamps, IP, signer identity) to demonstrate authenticity if challenged.

How attorneys commonly apply this case in practice

These short scenarios show typical uses of a state appellate or trial opinion in motions, briefs, and evidentiary memoranda.

Trial Motion Example

A defense attorney cites the decision to support a suppression motion where factual parallels exist

Key parallel: search incident similarities that constrain warrantless searches
The motion frames the case’s holding narrowly, asks the court to apply the same reasoning, and attaches the official opinion for judicial convenience.

Appellate Brief Example

Appellate counsel references the opinion to demonstrate an inconsistent lower-court approach

Point: highlight the court’s statutory interpretation that favors reversal
The brief contrasts factual records, argues for alignment with the cited holding, and provides pinpoint citations to the published opinion and docket entries.

Who typically consults or cites this case

Several professional groups commonly look up or rely on State of Louisiana vs. Nicholas Revish (2019) for legal work.

Criminal defense attorneys researching suppression, sentencing, or appellate strategy.
Prosecutors preparing responses, distinguishing factual scenarios and preserving prosecutorial positions.
Legal researchers and clerks compiling precedent and verifying procedural histories for briefs.

Each user should verify the official opinion and local court rules before incorporating the case into filings or legal advice.

Frequently asked questions about using this case

Answers to common practical questions about locating, citing, authenticating, and relying on State of Louisiana vs. Nicholas Revish (2019).

Need help? Contact support

Where can I find the official opinion?
Request the certified opinion and docket entry from the issuing court’s clerk or consult an official reporter. Unofficial transcriptions should be verified against the clerk’s copy before filing.
How should I cite the decision in court papers?
Use the case name, court, date, and reporter citation if available. Follow your jurisdiction’s citation manual and include the docket number when helpful for clerk retrieval.
Can I rely on this opinion outside Louisiana?
Out-of-state courts may treat it as persuasive but not binding. Cite it as persuasive authority and explain factual and statutory differences when arguing outside the issuing jurisdiction.
Is an electronic copy admissible as evidence?
Electronic copies with verifiable provenance and an intact audit trail are generally admissible; preserve metadata and be prepared to authenticate under applicable rules of evidence.
Does ESIGN/UETA affect court filing validity?
Electronic signatures meet federal ESIGN requirements (15 U.S.C. ch. 96) and state UETA rules where adopted, but follow the court’s local eFiling and signature rules.
What if I cannot locate a reporter citation?
Indicate that the opinion is unpublished or provide a docket citation and a certified copy from the clerk to ensure the court can verify the source.

Explore Templates

Affidavit of Loss Release of Interest Proof of Delivery or Mail of Superior Court Maricopa County Notice of Pendency of Action 3 Day Notice to Pay Rent Deed of Trust Form Missouri Permissive Cross Complaint

be ready to get more

Join over 28 million airSlate SignNow users

Sign Now