How do I confirm this case is still good law?

Run the citation through an authoritative citator or case law database to check for subsequent reversals, limitations, or negative treatment; cite the citator result in your research notes.

What is the correct Bluebook citation format?

Cite the case as 'State v. Moriarty, 361 S.W.2d 133 (Court Year).' Adjust parenthetical to match the issuing court and year per Bluebook rules.

Can I quote the opinion in a filing?

Yes, but include an accurate pinpoint citation and confirm there are no confidential materials or sealed exhibits in the published opinion before quoting.

Is a reporter citation mandatory in briefs?

Most courts require a standard citation format; using a reporter citation like 361 S.W.2d 133 is conventional and preferred for printed authorities.

Where can I obtain the full official opinion text?

Official opinions are available from the issuing court’s website, commercial databases, or the printed reporter; cite the source you used for accuracy.

Does e-filing affect citation practice?

E-filing does not change citation format but check local rules for PDF exhibits, redaction obligations, and allowed file types when attaching opinions.

Electronic Signature
Templates
Other
State v. Moriarty 361 S.W.2d 133

State v. Moriarty 361 S.W.2d 133

This template is fully customizable. Edit the text, fill out the fields, and send it for signature. Give it a try!

Jury Instructions

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF MISSISSIPPI

VS.

NO.

JURY INSTRUCTION NO.

You are instructed that just compensation is a decision to be made by the jury. Your discretion as to the measure of damages is wide, but not unlimited, and you may not act arbitrarily. Exercise your discretion as to the amount of damages reasonably, intelligently and in harmony with the evidence of the case and the Court's instructions. The damages for personal injury cannot be assessed by any fixed rule, but you are the sole judges as to the measure of damages in this case. Should your verdict be for the Plaintiff in this case, you may consider the following factors to determine the amount of damages to award as may be shown by a preponderance of the evidence:

The amount of severe emotional distress inflicted on the Plaintiff, if any.
Past, present and future physical pain and suffering and resulting mental anguish and anxiety, if any.
Reasonable and necessary medical expenses already incurred and those which are reasonably probable to be incurred in the future, if any.
Any future disability or impairment that is reasonably probable to occur, its duration and its effect, if any, on Plaintiff's future earning capacity. In arriving at the amount of your award, if any, for any loss of future earning capacity, you should consider what the Plaintiff's health, physical ability, age and earning power were before the injury and the effect of the Plaintiff's injuries, if any, upon them.
Past loss of wages.
Any loss of enjoyment of life.

What State v. Moriarty 361 S.W.2d 133 Represents

State v. Moriarty, cited as 361 S.W.2d 133, is a reported opinion published in the Southwestern Reporter, Second Series. The citation identifies a state appellate decision summarized at volume 361, page 133. Reported opinions like this record the court’s factual background, procedural posture, reasoning, and disposition. Legal researchers use the reporter citation to locate the full text, verify binding authority within the issuing jurisdiction, and check subsequent history before relying on the case in briefs, memoranda, or court filings.

Why this citation matters for legal research

A published reporter citation identifies precedent, aids pinpoint referencing, and signals the opinion’s availability in legal research databases. Confirm jurisdictional weight and subsequent treatment to determine whether State v. Moriarty is binding, persuasive, or overruled.

Who typically consults this reported opinion

Different legal professionals consult appellate citations for research, filings, and teaching.

Attorneys researching precedent for briefs, motions, and appellate strategy.
Paralegals and legal assistants preparing citations, pinpoints, and case summaries.
Law students and academics analyzing doctrinal development and case law trends.

Confirm the opinion’s jurisdictional authority and any later appellate treatment before relying on it in practice.

Step-by-step: Using the citation in court documents

Follow these steps to locate, verify, and cite State v. Moriarty correctly in legal work.

01

Locate: Search official reporter or court database using 361 S.W.2d 133.
02

Verify: Check subsequent history and treatment in citators.
03

Pinpoint: Use the page number (133) for exact quotations and citations.
04

Cite: Format citation per Bluebook and local court rules.

Frequently asked questions about using the citation

Common questions about locating, citing, and relying on State v. Moriarty 361 S.W.2d 133 with concise answers to avoid common research mistakes.

Need help? Contact support

How do I confirm this case is still good law?
Run the citation through an authoritative citator or case law database to check for subsequent reversals, limitations, or negative treatment; cite the citator result in your research notes.
What is the correct Bluebook citation format?
Cite the case as 'State v. Moriarty, 361 S.W.2d 133 (Court Year).' Adjust parenthetical to match the issuing court and year per Bluebook rules.
Can I quote the opinion in a filing?
Yes, but include an accurate pinpoint citation and confirm there are no confidential materials or sealed exhibits in the published opinion before quoting.
Is a reporter citation mandatory in briefs?
Most courts require a standard citation format; using a reporter citation like 361 S.W.2d 133 is conventional and preferred for printed authorities.
Where can I obtain the full official opinion text?
Official opinions are available from the issuing court’s website, commercial databases, or the printed reporter; cite the source you used for accuracy.
Does e-filing affect citation practice?
E-filing does not change citation format but check local rules for PDF exhibits, redaction obligations, and allowed file types when attaching opinions.

eSignature platform pricing snapshot for document workflows

Comparing signNow with major eSignature vendors on basic cost and common enterprise features relevant to legal workflows and court filing preparation.

	signNow	DocuSign	Adobe Sign	PandaDoc	HelloSign
Starting Price	$8/user/mo	$15/user/mo	$14/user/mo	$19/user/mo	$15/user/mo
Free Trial	7-day free trial	Varies	Varies	Varies	Varies
Bulk Send	Yes (Business Premium)	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes
Audit Trail	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes
HIPAA Compliant	Yes	Yes	Yes	No	No

Security and compliance highlights relevant to case documents

In-transit encryption: TLS 1.2/1.3

At-rest encryption: AES-256

Certifications: ISO 27001; SOC 2 Type II

Regulatory compliance: ESIGN, UETA, CCPA

Healthcare standard: HIPAA (BAA required)

FDA / audit: 21 CFR Part 11 support

Key risks when relying on a reported opinion

Superseded precedent: Risk of relying on overruled law

Incorrect citation: May mislead court or opposing counsel

Jurisdictional mismatch: Non-binding in other states

Quoting excerpts: Context omission may distort meaning

Sealed materials: Use of sealed exhibits can violate rules

Late filings: Procedural sanctions or denial risk

Common research pitfalls to avoid

Failing to check subsequent appellate treatment before relying on an older opinion can result in citing obsolete law and weaken legal arguments.
Using an unofficial or excerpted copy without verifying with the reporter text increases the chance of transcription errors or missing context.
Relying on persuasive out-of-state authority without explaining why it applies to the forum state can confuse judges and opposing counsel.
Neglecting local citation rules and pinpoints may lead to formatting rejections or reduced credibility with the court.

Setting up a review workflow for the opinion

Configure a repeatable workflow for locating, annotating, and storing the opinion across your team or case file.

Field	Configuration
Source	Official reporter or court database
Access Method	Library subscription or court website
Citation Format	Bluebook or local court rules
Storage	PDF archival with metadata

Technical considerations for e-submitting case materials

Confirm acceptable file formats, authentication, and integration needs before e-submitting opinions or exhibits.

Supported formats: PDF, DOCX, HTML, XLSX
Integrations: Salesforce, Microsoft 365, NetSuite
Authentication: Email, SMS, SSO, OAuth

Timing and procedural deadlines to verify

Court-related deadlines vary by state and case type; confirm with the issuing court’s local rules before filing or citing an opinion.

Appeal period:

Varies by jurisdiction; commonly 10–30 days from judgment.

Motion timing:

Local rules set time for motions and responses; check court schedule.

E-filing windows:

Some courts restrict filing to business hours or specific platforms.

Citation updates:

Run citators close to filing to capture any intervening history.

Record retention:

Maintain copies per court rules and institutional policies.

Explore Templates

Request for Arbitration of a Fee Dispute Police Services Act RSO 1990 c P15 Multi-Member LLC Operating Agreement Juvenile Delinquency Order FCA 3205 Form 3-11A Juvenile Delinquency FCA 3206 Form 3 Juvenile Delinquency Order

be ready to get more

Join over 28 million airSlate SignNow users

Sign Now