Can the specification be signed electronically?

Yes. Electronic signatures are legally enforceable when they meet intent, consent, attribution, and retention requirements under the ESIGN Act (15 U.S.C. §7001) and applicable state UETA law. Ensure you document consent and retain a reproducible record.

When is notarization or witnesses required?

Most technical specifications do not require notarization. If the specification will be incorporated into a contract with statutory notarization or witness rules, follow state notary law or RON requirements and confirm witness counts per jurisdiction.

How do I handle HIPAA or sensitive data?

If the specification references protected health data, include HIPAA privacy and security controls and execute a Business Associate Agreement; retain records per 45 CFR §164.530(j). Limit access and specify encryption and audit logging in requirements.

What if a signer’s name doesn't match records?

Mismatched signatory names can undermine enforceability. Require legal names in the signature block and, where needed, supplemental identification or higher assurance authentication.

How to manage post‑approval changes?

Use formal change control with versioned amendments, impact analysis, and signoff from the original approvers or designated authority to preserve traceability.

How long must we retain the signed specification?

Retain the signed document for the contract term plus recommended retention (commonly 3–7 years); follow federal and industry retention rules such as IRC §6501(a) and 45 CFR §164.530(j) where applicable.

Electronic Signature
Templates
Miscellaneous
Technical Project System Requirements Specification

Technical Project System Requirements Specification

This template is fully customizable. Edit the text, fill out the fields, and send it for signature. Give it a try!

TECHNICAL PROJECT SYSTEM REQUIREMENTS SPECIFICATION

This Technical Project System Requirements Specification (the "Specification") is entered into by the parties identified below and establishes the technical, functional, non‑functional, security, acceptance, and administrative requirements for the System described herein.

Parties

Client Name:

Contractor Name:

WHEREAS

WHEREAS, Client requires development, configuration, integration, testing, and delivery of a technical system to meet the business objectives and performance criteria set forth in this Specification.

WHEREAS, Contractor represents that it possesses the technical expertise, personnel, tools, and experience necessary to implement and deliver the System in accordance with this Specification and the associated Scope of Work.

WHEREAS, the parties intend for this Specification to form the technical requirements attachment to the underlying agreement governing scope, payment, schedule, acceptance, confidentiality, and governing law.

Project Identification

Project Title Project Number / Reference Effective Date

Purpose

The purpose of this Specification is to define the complete set of technical and operational requirements for the System, to enable design, development, verification, validation, and acceptance by the parties. This Specification shall be used by Project stakeholders and implementation teams as the authoritative technical baseline.

Scope of Work

The Contractor shall perform the tasks described below and deliver the System and related deliverables in accordance with the acceptance criteria and schedule set forth in this Specification.

Scope of Work (detailed)

System Overview

Definitions

Key Terms and Definitions

Functional Requirements

The functional requirements below describe the capabilities the System must provide. Each requirement shall be verifiable through testing, demonstration, inspection, or analysis.

Requirement 1 Requirement 2 Requirement 3

Non‑Functional Requirements

Performance Availability and Reliability Scalability

Interface Requirements

User Interface API and Integration Interfaces

Data Requirements

Data Model and Storage Data Migration and Conversion

Security and Confidentiality

The Contractor shall implement controls, policies, and practices to protect Confidential Information and to satisfy applicable regulatory and contractual security obligations. Security measures shall include least privilege, encryption in transit and at rest where applicable, secure development practices, logging and monitoring, and incident response procedures.

Required Security Controls

Acceptance Criteria and Testing

Deliverables shall be accepted only after successful completion of the acceptance tests defined below. Acceptance testing will verify compliance with functional and non‑functional requirements, performance targets, and security controls.

Acceptance Criteria

Change Control and Versioning

Change Control Process

Assumptions and Constraints

Assumptions & Constraints

Payment Terms

Compensation for the work described in this Specification shall be governed by the following payment terms. All monetary amounts are in the currency specified by the parties.

Total Contract Amount Payment Schedule / Milestones Late Payment Fee

Term and Termination

The term of the obligations governed by this Specification and the parties' rights are set forth below. Termination provisions define how either party may end the engagement and the consequences for deliverables and payments.

Start Date End Date Notice Period for Termination (days) Termination Conditions and Effects

Confidentiality

Each party shall maintain the confidentiality of Confidential Information disclosed by the other party. Confidential Information shall be used solely for the performance of obligations under this Specification. Disclosure is permitted only to employees, contractors, or agents with a need to know and subject to confidentiality obligations at least as protective as those in this Specification.

Additional Confidentiality Requirements

Governing Law

This Specification and any dispute arising out of or relating to it shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the jurisdiction specified below without regard to conflict of law principles.

Governing State / Jurisdiction

Entire Agreement

This Specification, together with the underlying agreement between the parties referenced herein, constitutes the entire agreement between the parties with respect to the subject matter of this Specification and supersedes all prior proposals, understandings, and agreements, whether written or oral, relating to such subject matter.

Modifications

Any modification to this Specification must be made in writing and signed by authorized representatives of both parties. Changes to technical scope shall follow the Change Control Process specified above.

Signatures

Client - Printed Name:

Contractor - Printed Name:

Client - By:

Contractor - By:

Date:

What the Technical Project System Requirements Specification Is

A Technical Project System Requirements Specification is a formal document that captures the complete set of system-level requirements for a software or systems engineering project. It describes functional requirements, non-functional constraints (performance, security, availability), interfaces, data flows, external dependencies, acceptance criteria, and traceability to high-level business objectives. The specification serves as the authoritative reference for design, development, testing, procurement, and validation, and it records stakeholder roles, version history, and signoffs required for project progression and contract fulfillment.

Why a Clear Requirements Specification Matters

A concise, well-structured specification reduces ambiguity, shortens development cycles, and provides an objective basis for testing and acceptance. It supports procurement, risk management, and compliance with contractual and regulatory obligations.

Primary Users and Contributors

The specification is a collaborative artifact used across technical, product, and compliance teams during project planning and delivery.

Project managers and product owners who define scope and approve requirements.
Systems engineers and architects who translate requirements into design constraints and interfaces.
Compliance, security, and procurement representatives who validate regulatory and contractual items.

Final ownership and sign-off practices vary by organization; identify approvers before circulation to avoid delays.

Core Sections Every Professional Specification Should Include

Organize the specification into consistent, traceable sections so requirements map to tests, stakeholders, and change control procedures.

Executive Summary

Concise project overview, objectives, scope boundaries, key stakeholders, and success criteria so readers quickly grasp purpose and constraints.

Functional Req's

Detailed, testable descriptions of system behavior, inputs, outputs, workflows, and user roles so developers can implement and QA can validate.

Non‑Functional Req's

Performance, scalability, availability, security, maintainability, and localization constraints quantified where possible to drive design tradeoffs.

Interfaces

APIs, data formats, messaging, and integration contracts with external systems, including authentication and error-handling expectations.

Acceptance Criteria

Pass/fail conditions, test cases, and traceability matrix entries linking each requirement to validation and sign-off steps.

Change Control

Versioning, amendment process, approval authorities, and impact assessment procedures to manage requirement updates during delivery.

Step-by-Step: Drafting, Reviewing, and Finalizing the Specification

Follow an orderly sequence to draft, validate, and lock requirements before passing to development and procurement teams.

01

Draft: Compile sections and reference materials; assign draft owner.
02

Internal Review: Technical teams review for completeness and feasibility.
03

Compliance Review: Security, legal, and procurement validate regulatory items.
04

Signoff: Authorized stakeholders sign and date the approved version.

Recommended Digital Workflow Settings for Online Completion

Configure an e-delivery workflow that enforces fields, captures audit data, and routes approvers in order to maintain traceability.

Field	Configuration
Required Fields	Make Effective Date, System Owner, Signatures mandatory.
Routing Order	Set review then approval sequence with escalation rules.
Authentication	Use email+SMS or stronger KBA for approvers when needed.
Audit Capture	Enable timestamp, IP, and change history retention.

Where to Send Completed Specifications and How Routing Works

Decide destinations and routing rules up front so signed documents integrate with procurement, development, and contract repositories.

Contracts Office: Primary recipient for contractual approval and procurement filing.
Project Repository: Store final PDF and traceability matrix in project SCM or document management.
Development Team: Provide approved spec to engineering and QA for implementation.
Compliance Archive: Retain signed copy for audits and regulatory review.

Technical Requirements for Digital Completion and Exchange

Ensure the chosen platform supports required formats, integrations, and authentication to preserve evidentiary value.

File Formats: PDF, DOCX, and structured Word exports for traceability.
Integrations: Salesforce, NetSuite, Microsoft 365, Google Workspace supported.
Authentication: Email, SMS, KBA, SSO options; retention of audit trail.

Confirm exports preserve metadata and attach an audit trail; ensure the platform meets any applicable compliance requirements.

Typical eSignature Vendor Pricing and Feature Overview

Compare common pricing and capability dimensions for eSignature vendors when selecting a platform to execute and store your specification. Pricing models and feature tiers vary by vendor and plan.

	signNow	DocuSign	Adobe Sign	PandaDoc	HelloSign
Starting Price	$8/user/mo	$15/user/mo	$14/user/mo	$19/user/mo	$15/user/mo
Free Trial	7‑day free trial	Varies by plan	Varies by plan	Varies by plan	Varies by plan
Bulk Send	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	No
Audit Trail	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes
HIPAA Compliant	Yes	Yes	Yes	No	No

Security and Compliance Features to Require

Encryption: TLS 1.2/1.3 in transit; AES‑256 at rest

Certifications: SOC 2 Type II and ISO 27001 available

HIPAA: HIPAA-compliant with BAA option

21 CFR Part 11: Controls for audit trails and signatures

Data Privacy: GDPR and CCPA compliance frameworks

Accessibility: WCAG 2.0 Level AA support

Key Risks and Potential Consequences of Errors

Scope Misalignment: Leads to change orders and schedule slips

Missing Acceptance Criteria: Causes disputes at delivery and withheld payments

Non‑Compliance: Triggers audit findings and remediation costs

Invalid Signatures: Can render approvals unenforceable

Insufficient Traceability: Complicates defect resolution and impact analysis

Data Exposure: May lead to regulatory fines and reputational harm

Common Preparation Mistakes to Avoid

Writing requirements in vague, non-testable language that prevents objective verification and increases rework during QA and acceptance testing.
Failing to map requirements to specific stakeholders and signatories so review cycles stall and ownership disputes arise during implementation.
Omitting non-functional constraints such as performance or security which later force costly architecture changes under delivery pressure.
Not preserving an immutable audit trail or signed copy, which weakens evidentiary support during disputes or compliance reviews.

Key Milestones and Approval Stages

Track milestones as numbered stages from draft through maintenance so teams meet review, validation, and deployment checkpoints.

01

Requirements Drafting

Compile baseline requirements and initial stakeholder inputs for review.

02

Stakeholder Review

Technical, compliance, and business reviews iterate until consensus is reached.

03

Formal Approval

Authorized signatories execute the final document and record audit evidence.

04

Change Management

All post‑approval changes follow documented impact analysis and signoff.

Suggested Review and Delivery Deadlines

Adopt a conservative schedule with clear windows for review, remediation, and final approval to avoid downstream delays.

Initial Draft Due:

Two to three weeks from project kickoff depending on scope

Stakeholder Review Window:

Five business days per stakeholder group for comments

Validation Testing Start:

Begin within one month of final signoff

Final Signoff Deadline:

Set a fixed date to lock requirements prior to development

Periodic Update Cycle:

Quarterly reviews or as contractually required

Real-World Examples of Specification Use

Organizations use structured specifications to accelerate approvals, integrate with ERP/CRM, and support regulatory audits.

Tim Martin, Martin Properties

A property management firm standardized system requirements for tenant portals to reduce onboarding time.

Executive signoff improved coordination across leasing and IT teams.
The standardized specification enabled remote approvals and compliance with security controls, reducing time to deploy new tenant features and improving accountability during vendor integrations.

Kodi‑Marie Evans, Xerox

An enterprise operations leader used integrated specs to link NetSuite workflows to delivery milestones.

Clear acceptance criteria aligned finance and engineering.
Tying the specification to existing ERP and eSignature workflows simplified audits and ensured traceable approvals across multi‑department rollouts.

Frequently Asked Questions and Troubleshooting

Answers to common questions about execution, eSignature validity, notarization, and recordkeeping for the specification.

Need help? Contact support

Can the specification be signed electronically?
Yes. Electronic signatures are legally enforceable when they meet intent, consent, attribution, and retention requirements under the ESIGN Act (15 U.S.C. §7001) and applicable state UETA law. Ensure you document consent and retain a reproducible record.
When is notarization or witnesses required?
Most technical specifications do not require notarization. If the specification will be incorporated into a contract with statutory notarization or witness rules, follow state notary law or RON requirements and confirm witness counts per jurisdiction.
How do I handle HIPAA or sensitive data?
If the specification references protected health data, include HIPAA privacy and security controls and execute a Business Associate Agreement; retain records per 45 CFR §164.530(j). Limit access and specify encryption and audit logging in requirements.
What if a signer’s name doesn't match records?
Mismatched signatory names can undermine enforceability. Require legal names in the signature block and, where needed, supplemental identification or higher assurance authentication.
How to manage post‑approval changes?
Use formal change control with versioned amendments, impact analysis, and signoff from the original approvers or designated authority to preserve traceability.
How long must we retain the signed specification?
Retain the signed document for the contract term plus recommended retention (commonly 3–7 years); follow federal and industry retention rules such as IRC §6501(a) and 45 CFR §164.530(j) where applicable.

be ready to get more

Join over 28 million airSlate SignNow users

Sign Now