Scope Summary
Concise description of study goals, geographic limits, time periods, and specific intersections or corridors included, clarifying what is and is not included.
A concise Traffic Study Proposal Document reduces ambiguity, sets expectations for schedule and cost, and documents the technical approach reviewers expect. Well-structured proposals prevent scope creep, speed permitting reviews, and support transparent budgeting for clients and municipalities.
Identifying each party up front improves communication, clarifies approvals, and helps route the final report for signatures and acceptance.
The firm’s licensed traffic engineer or principal typically signs to certify scope, methodology, and professional responsibility. Their signature confirms technical oversight and that the study will meet applicable professional standards and local guidance.
An authorized client signatory (owner, developer, or project manager) signs to accept scope, fees, and schedule. Their authorization confirms consent to proceed and allocates billing responsibility.
Concise description of study goals, geographic limits, time periods, and specific intersections or corridors included, clarifying what is and is not included.
Detailed data collection methods (manual counts, pneumatic tubes, video, origin–destination), sample dates, time-of-day windows, and weather/season considerations.
Models and procedures to be used (e.g., HCM, SYNCHRO, VISSIM, capacity analyses), plus assumptions, growth factors, and any software-specific settings.
List of draft and final reports, figures, raw count tables, spreadsheets, and GIS/KML outputs, with file formats and review cycles defined.
Detailed timeline with key dates for field work, interim drafts, agency reviews, and final submission, including contingencies for delays.
Line-item cost estimate, payment schedule, change-order process, and assumptions that could trigger additional fees.
| Field | Configuration |
|---|---|
| Signer Order | Sequential or parallel signing as required |
| Authentication | Email link with optional SMS code or ID check |
| File Format | PDF preferred with attached spreadsheets |
| Retention | Automatic archiving and export to project folder |
Choose the method the receiving agency prefers and retain electronic evidence of delivery and signature events for the project record.
Usually 30–90 days from issue date
Schedule within 2–6 weeks after authorization
Typically 3–6 weeks after data collection
Allow 2–6 weeks depending on municipality
Deliver within 1–2 weeks after addressing comments
Client signs and returns the proposal; work authorization begins.
Field counts and observations conducted in the study area.
Modeling and preliminary findings prepared for internal review.
Draft report sent to client and agency for comments.
| Criteria | Proposal | Impact Study |
|---|---|---|
| Typical Purpose | scope definition | technical analysis |
| Deliverable | scope & cost | final report |
| Timing | before work | after data collection |
| Signatures | authorization only | certification of results |
A 120-unit apartment near an arterial requires peak-hour turning movement counts
A 15,000 sq ft retail conversion at an existing shopping center focuses on weekend and evening peaks
Final reports should be delivered as PDF/A for archival, with bookmarks and embedded figures for accessibility and consistent printing.
Provide count tables in CSV or Excel so agencies can verify numbers and re-run summaries if needed.
Share shapefiles or KML for study area boundaries and intersection geometries when mapping is required.
Include SYNCHRO/VISSIM project files or equivalent so reviewers can reproduce model outputs when requested.
| signNow | DocuSign | Adobe Sign | PandaDoc | HelloSign | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | $8/user/mo | $15/user/mo | $14/user/mo | $19/user/mo | $15/user/mo |
| Free Trial | 7-day free trial | No free trial | No free trial | No free trial | No free trial |
| Bulk Send | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | No |
| Audit Trail | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| HIPAA Compliant | Yes | Yes | Yes | No | No |