Identification
Project name, release or build number, environment tested, and reference to related change request or ticket IDs so reviewers can map the approval to a specific deployment package.
A consistent UAT Approval Form reduces ambiguity at release gates by recording test coverage, acceptance criteria, and signer intent. It supports traceability for audits, simplifies rollbacks or remediation planning, and documents stakeholder consent for deployment decisions under established governance.
The UAT Approval Form is completed and signed by cross-functional stakeholders who validate functional and non-functional requirements prior to production release.
Project name, release or build number, environment tested, and reference to related change request or ticket IDs so reviewers can map the approval to a specific deployment package.
Concise statement of features, modules, and explicit acceptance criteria or success metrics used to judge whether testing is complete and whether the release meets business needs.
High-level counts of test cases executed, passed, failed, blocked, and regression coverage plus links or references to detailed test reports and evidence artifacts.
List of open defects with severity, owner, and an agreed mitigation, deferral rationale, or blocking status aligned to release policy.
Role-based signature lines for required approvers with printed name, role, email, signature, and date to record intent and attribution clearly.
Deployment window, rollback criteria, monitoring checklist, post-release verification steps, and contact points for issues discovered after release.
| Field | Configuration |
|---|---|
| Approval Order | Sequential routing: QA → Product → Release. |
| Required Fields | Make signatures, defect list, and test summary mandatory. |
| Conditional Logic | Show mitigation details when defects remain open. |
| Attachments | Allow multiple file types (PDF, CSV, screenshots). |
UAT Approval Forms can be shared by secure email, document management systems, or eSignature workflows to capture approvals electronically.
Final UAT evidence must be submitted by the agreed test exit date.
Stakeholders should return signed form within the agreed SLA, commonly 48–72 hours.
Approved releases are scheduled in the next available deployment window.
Documented exceptions require additional approval cycles and may delay release.
Signed forms moved to long-term archive immediately after deployment.
Optica used an electronic approval record to consolidate sign-offs across distributed teams.
Xerox integrated approvals into ERP workflows to attach signed forms to release tickets.
| signNow | DocuSign | Adobe Sign | PandaDoc | HelloSign | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | $8/user/mo | $15/user/mo | $14/user/mo | $19/user/mo | $15/user/mo |
| Free Trial | 7-day free trial, no credit card required | Varies by plan | Varies by plan | Varies by plan | Varies by plan |
| Bulk Send | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Varies by plan |
| Audit Trail | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| HIPAA Compliant | Yes | Yes | Yes | No | No |
| Envelope Cap | No envelope cap | 100 envelopes/user/year | Varies by plan | Varies by plan | Varies by plan |