Can the UAT Format be signed electronically?

Yes. Under the ESIGN Act (15 U.S.C. ch. 96) and UETA where adopted, electronic signatures are legally enforceable if intent, consent, attribution, and record retention are satisfied. Include required consumer disclosures and retain the audit trail to prove authenticity.

What if signer name differs from official ID?

Mismatched names can complicate attribution and may lead to audit challenges; correct the record, obtain a signer attestation, or require identity verification. For regulated processes, use stronger authentication (KBA or RON) to substantiate signer identity.

Are witnesses or notarization required for UAT?

Generally UAT Formats do not require notarization or witnesses. If the UAT is bundled with a legally significant instrument that requires notarization under state law, follow those rules and, where remote notarization is used, ensure compliance with state RON requirements.

How long should UAT records be kept?

Retention varies: retain artifacts for the project life plus at least three years; keep tax-related records three years per IRC §6501(a); healthcare materials six years per 45 CFR §164.530(j). Check state or industry rules for longer periods.

What authentication level is recommended?

Use email plus multi-factor or knowledge-based authentication for moderate-risk signings; use advanced signer authentication or RON for high-assurance needs. Record the chosen method in the UAT Format to support later audits and dispute resolution.

How do I correct a signed UAT entry?

Do not alter a signed record in place. Create an amendment or addendum that references the original document, obtain fresh signatures from required parties, and retain both the original and the corrected version for an auditable history.

Electronic Signature
Templates
Miscellaneous
User Acceptance Testing Format

User Acceptance Testing Format

This template is fully customizable. Edit the text, fill out the fields, and send it for signature. Give it a try!

USER ACCEPTANCE TESTING FORMAT

This User Acceptance Testing Agreement ("Agreement") is entered into between Client Name: and Provider Name: . Effective Date:

WHEREAS

WHEREAS, Provider has developed or configured software, systems, or services described in this Agreement and will deliver those deliverables for Client's evaluation; and

WHEREAS, Client requires a structured User Acceptance Testing ("UAT") process to validate that the deliverables meet the mutually agreed acceptance criteria and functional requirements prior to final acceptance and final payment.

WHEREAS, the parties agree to perform UAT in accordance with the terms of this Agreement and the Test Plan appended or described below.

SCOPE OF WORK

Provider shall provide the deliverables, testing support, defect remediation, and documentation necessary for Client to perform User Acceptance Testing. The parties will follow the test cases, schedules, and procedures set forth in this section.

Detailed Scope and Deliverables

ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA

The deliverables will be deemed accepted when Client confirms, in writing, that all Critical and High defects identified during UAT have been resolved, and that the deliverables meet the documented functional requirements and the pass threshold set forth below.

Pass Threshold (e.g., % of test cases passing) Acceptance Criteria Summary

TEST PLAN

Test Summary Test Environment Test Cases / Scenarios

PAYMENT TERMS

In consideration for the services and deliverables described herein, Client will pay Provider in accordance with the terms below.

Total Contract Amount Payment Schedule Late Payment Fee

Final acceptance is a condition precedent to the final payment. Any disputed amounts shall be subject to the dispute resolution provisions in this Agreement, and undisputed amounts shall be paid in accordance with the schedule above.

TERM AND TERMINATION

This Agreement commences on Start Date: and continues until End Date: , unless earlier terminated in accordance with this section.

Notice Period for Termination (days)

Either party may terminate this Agreement for material breach by the other party if such breach is not cured within the notice period specified above. Termination shall not relieve Client of paying for services performed and accepted prior to termination.

CONFIDENTIALITY

"Confidential Information" means non-public business, technical, and financial information disclosed by one party to the other in connection with this Agreement. The receiving party shall (a) use Confidential Information solely to perform its obligations hereunder; (b) restrict access to Confidential Information to employees and contractors who have a need to know and are bound by confidentiality obligations at least as protective as those set forth herein; and (c) not disclose Confidential Information to third parties except as required by law. Confidentiality obligations shall survive termination for a period of three (3) years, except for trade secrets, which shall be protected as long as they remain trade secrets.

Client Acknowledgement of Confidentiality

I acknowledge and agree to the Confidentiality provisions above.

GOVERNING LAW

This Agreement shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the Jurisdiction specified below without regard to its conflicts of law principles.

Governing Jurisdiction

ENTIRE AGREEMENT

This Agreement, together with any exhibits and the Test Plan (as attached or described herein), constitutes the entire agreement between the parties with respect to the subject matter hereof and supersedes all prior and contemporaneous agreements, proposals, and communications, whether oral or written. No amendment shall be effective unless in writing and signed by authorized representatives of both parties.

ACCEPTANCE RESULTS

Upon completion of UAT, Client shall record acceptance results below. Final acceptance requires Client's authorized signature.

Accepted Rejected

Acceptance Summary / Notes

Acceptance Date:

Client Name:

By:

Date:

Provider Name:

By:

Date:

What the User Acceptance Testing Format Is and why it matters

User Acceptance Testing (UAT) Format is a structured template used to document final verification that a software product meets business requirements and is ready for production. The format records test scenarios, acceptance criteria, test data, environment details, pass/fail outcomes, tester identity, and sign-off fields. It standardizes validation steps to ensure repeatability and auditability, helping stakeholders confirm functionality, usability, and compliance before release. This document is commonly used by QA teams, product owners, and business users to formalize acceptance decisions and to create a traceable record for audits and future reference.

Why a standard UAT Format improves acceptance clarity

A User Acceptance Testing Format clarifies acceptance conditions, documents test evidence, and allocates accountability for go/no-go decisions. It reduces deployment risk, supports regulatory and audit requirements, and creates a reproducible sign-off trail that is especially useful where ESIGN/UETA-compliant electronic signatures are used.

Who completes and signs the UAT Format

Typical users include QA, product owners, business analysts, and compliance officers responsible for release approvals and documentation.

QA testers: execute scenarios, record results, and flag defects for remediation.
Product owners confirm acceptance criteria and authorize production deployment after review.
Compliance and audit teams preserve evidence for regulatory reviews and post-release audits.

Users collaborate to ensure test coverage matches business requirements, sign off cleanly, and maintain records for traceability and future regression testing.

Core elements to include in a professional UAT Format

A professional User Acceptance Testing Format contains standardized sections that capture criteria, test cases, results, environment, issues, and final sign-off to support repeatable acceptance decisions.

Acceptance Criteria

Define measurable conditions for success per feature or user story. Include severity thresholds, pass/fail criteria, data inputs, and any conditional acceptance rules so testers know when to mark a scenario as accepted.

Test Scenarios

List end-to-end test scenarios mapped to requirements. Provide step-by-step actions, expected outcomes, prerequisites, and reference test data to ensure consistent execution across testers.

Test Results

Record actual results, timestamps, environment identifiers, and evidence attachments. Clearly mark pass, fail, or blocked and include links or file names for screenshots and logs for auditability.

Issues & Defects

Document defects with reproduction steps, severity, owner, and resolution status. Cross-reference defect IDs to retest cases and include notes on workarounds or impacts on acceptance.

Tester Details

Capture tester name, role, contact, test date, and signature block. Include version/build number and the environment to tie results to a specific release.

Sign-off & Approval

Provide explicit sign-off fields for business and technical owners, electronic signature lines, approval dates, and a statement confirming readiness for production deployment.

Step-by-step: completing and approving the UAT Format

Follow these sequential steps to complete the User Acceptance Testing Format accurately and create an auditable acceptance record for stakeholders.

01

Prepare Document: Collect requirements, test scope, and version details before writing scenarios.
02

Add Test Cases: List steps, input data, expected results, and prerequisites for each scenario.
03

Execute Tests: Run scenarios, record actual results, attach evidence, and note deviations.
04

Sign Off: Business owners review outcomes and sign the approval fields electronically.

Where to send the completed UAT Format and how routing works

Routing the completed UAT Format ensures reviewers receive evidence and that final approval is recorded with audit metadata.

Upload: Store in document repository with version tag.
Notify Reviewers: Send notification to approvers with context.
Collect Signatures: Capture electronic signatures and audit trail.
Archive: Save signed PDF and metadata for retention.

Key deadlines to set for UAT activities

Set clear deadlines for each testing phase to align stakeholders, preserve auditability, and meet planned release milestones.

Planning & Scope Finalized:

Complete before test case creation and environment provisioning.

Testing Window:

Run tests during agreed dates; ensure adequate coverage.

Defect Fix SLA:

Define response and retest timelines per severity level.

Business Review Deadline:

Allow sufficient time for stakeholder review before deployment.

Final Sign-off Date:

Specify cut-off for approvals to trigger production release.

Security and compliance attributes to note

Encryption in transit: TLS 1.2 and TLS 1.3 protocols.

Encryption at rest: AES-256 encryption at rest.

Certifications: SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001, PCI DSS.

HIPAA Support: HIPAA-compliant with BAA available.

ESIGN & UETA: Compliant with ESIGN and UETA laws.

Accessibility: WCAG 2.0 Level AA compliant.

Common risks and consequences of an incorrect UAT Format

Failed Acceptance: Unvalidated defects released to production.

Regulatory Exposure: Noncompliance with record rules (ESIGN/UETA).

Financial Loss: Costly rework and downtime.

Audit Findings: Missing evidence triggers corrective action.

Contractual Disputes: Acceptance ambiguity leads to disputes.

Invalid Signatures: Improper consent can void acceptance.

Vendor pricing and feature comparison for eSignature platforms used with UAT

Comparison of common eSignature plan features and starting prices to help select a platform for managing UAT sign-offs and approvals.

	signNow	DocuSign	Adobe Sign	PandaDoc	HelloSign
Starting Price	$8/user/mo	$15/user/mo	$14/user/mo	$19/user/mo	$15/user/mo
Free Trial	7-day free trial	Varies by plan	Varies by plan	Varies by plan	Varies by plan
Bulk Send	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	No
Audit Trail	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes
HIPAA Compliant	Yes	Yes	Yes	No	No

Platform capabilities to check before eSubmission

Verify the eSignature platform supports required authentication, audit trails, integrations (CRM or document storage), and file formats used in your UAT workflow.

Authentication: Email, SMS, KBA, or SSO available
Integrations: Salesforce, NetSuite, Google Workspace, Box
File Formats: PDF, DOCX, HTML, Excel supported

Practical tips for accurate and efficient UAT completion

Practical practices reduce rework and streamline acceptance; incorporate version control, consistent naming, and clear sign-off roles into the UAT Format.

Maintain Version Control

Record a single authoritative document version and include a version history table in the UAT Format. Ensure that every test case references the version/build and that reviewers sign the specific version to avoid ambiguity during audits or post-release defect analysis.

Use Realistic Test Data

Populate test cases with realistic but non-production data; avoid real customer personal data when possible. For healthcare or financial systems, use synthetic datasets or masked production extracts and document data controls and permissions used during testing to meet compliance obligations.

Standardize Pass/Fail Criteria

Provide explicit pass/fail definitions for each test case and require reproductions steps for failures. Tie each criterion to a requirement ID so stakeholders can quickly determine whether a failed item blocks release or can be accepted with mitigations.

Document Evidence Thoroughly

Attach screenshots, log excerpts, and test data identifiers to each result entry. Include timestamps, environment names, and build numbers. Properly cataloged evidence expedites audits and prevents disputes over what was tested when and by whom.

How organizations apply a standard UAT Format in practice

These examples show how organizations use a standardized UAT Format to accelerate sign-off and retain compliant evidence across releases.

Optica Ventures

Optica Ventures formalized UAT acceptance using a standardized format to reduce ambiguity and accelerate customer-facing approvals.

Signatures returned more quickly and predictably.
Brian Fitzgibbons, COO, notes the interface is easy for teams and customers, improving cycle time while preserving a clear audit trail for future reviews and compliance checks.

Tech Data

Tech Data integrated UAT sign-offs into revenue workflows to align technical validation with commercial approval and shorten handoffs.

Measurable improvement in speed to revenue.
Bob Dutkowsky, CEO, reported that embedding electronic sign-offs reduced manual handoffs and provided consistent documentation across deals, enabling finance and sales to execute faster with a reliable audit record.

Frequently asked questions about completing and signing the UAT Format

Answers to frequent questions about completing, signing, and retaining the User Acceptance Testing Format accurately.

Need help? Contact support

Can the UAT Format be signed electronically?
Yes. Under the ESIGN Act (15 U.S.C. ch. 96) and UETA where adopted, electronic signatures are legally enforceable if intent, consent, attribution, and record retention are satisfied. Include required consumer disclosures and retain the audit trail to prove authenticity.
What if signer name differs from official ID?
Mismatched names can complicate attribution and may lead to audit challenges; correct the record, obtain a signer attestation, or require identity verification. For regulated processes, use stronger authentication (KBA or RON) to substantiate signer identity.
Are witnesses or notarization required for UAT?
Generally UAT Formats do not require notarization or witnesses. If the UAT is bundled with a legally significant instrument that requires notarization under state law, follow those rules and, where remote notarization is used, ensure compliance with state RON requirements.
How long should UAT records be kept?
Retention varies: retain artifacts for the project life plus at least three years; keep tax-related records three years per IRC §6501(a); healthcare materials six years per 45 CFR §164.530(j). Check state or industry rules for longer periods.
What authentication level is recommended?
Use email plus multi-factor or knowledge-based authentication for moderate-risk signings; use advanced signer authentication or RON for high-assurance needs. Record the chosen method in the UAT Format to support later audits and dispute resolution.
How do I correct a signed UAT entry?
Do not alter a signed record in place. Create an amendment or addendum that references the original document, obtain fresh signatures from required parties, and retain both the original and the corrected version for an auditable history.

be ready to get more

Join over 28 million airSlate SignNow users

Sign Now