Scope
Define the systems, user groups, modules, and limits of the specification so evaluators know what is in scope and what is excluded.
A concise Educational Technical Requirements document reduces ambiguity during procurement and implementation, protects student data, and ensures accessibility and interoperability across vendors and campus systems. It helps align IT, procurement, legal, and instructional stakeholders around measurable acceptance criteria.
The document is used by multiple campus and vendor stakeholders during procurement, deployment, and maintenance.
Clear roles reduce review cycles and simplify technical acceptance testing when each party understands responsibilities and signatory authority.
Define the systems, user groups, modules, and limits of the specification so evaluators know what is in scope and what is excluded.
List required features and workflows, user roles, data inputs/outputs, reporting, and expected user concurrency levels for accurate sizing.
Specify authentication, encryption, data segregation, breach notification, and any regulatory obligations such as FERPA or HIPAA when applicable.
State required conformance levels (for example, WCAG 2.0 Level AA) and testing methods for assistive-technology compatibility.
Document required integrations (SIS, LMS, SSO, reporting), API formats, data exchange frequency, and supported file formats.
Include acceptance criteria, test cases, performance targets, remediation timelines, and rollback or rejection conditions.
| Field | Configuration |
|---|---|
| Authentication | Email link, SMS code, or SSO depending on sensitivity |
| Accessibility checks | Automated and manual accessibility testing before approval |
| File format | Use PDF/A or DOCX for archival and redline compatibility |
| Integration | Connect to procurement and contract management systems for automatic routing |
Choose platform integrations and export formats that match institutional systems and archiving requirements.
Verify that chosen integrations preserve metadata and audit trails to support compliance, procurement records, and future audits.
Brian Fitzgibbons, COO at Optica Ventures LLC, moved routine client forms online to reduce turnaround time.
John Butler, Founder of Fertility Centers of Illinois, integrated eSignatures into clinical intake and administrative workflows.
Set vendor response window (typically 2–4 weeks)
Allow 7–14 days for clarifying questions
Plan 1–3 weeks for technical review and scoring
Allocate 2–6 weeks for pilot and remediation
Allow institutional signoff and contracting 1–3 weeks
Finalize requirements and secure stakeholder sign-off before issuing to vendors
Complete technical scoring and choose qualified vendor(s)
Execute acceptance tests and document any remedial actions
Complete migration, training, and go-live checklists
| Criteria | Educational Technical Requirements | Vendor Technical Proposal | Procurement RFP |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary Purpose | define technical standards | describe vendor capabilities | solicit bids and pricing |
| Author | institution it/procurement | vendor | institution procurement office |
| Level of Detail | prescriptive technical detail | implementation approach | commercial terms and timelines |
| Use in Evaluation | scoring for compliance | evidence of capability | basis for contract award |
| signNow | DocuSign | Adobe Sign | PandaDoc | HelloSign | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | $8/user/mo | $15/user/mo | $14/user/mo | $19/user/mo | $15/user/mo |
| Free Trial | 7-day free trial, no credit card required | Varies by plan | Varies by plan | Varies by plan | Varies by plan |
| Bulk Send | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | No |
| Audit Trail | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| HIPAA Compliant | Yes | Yes | Yes | No | No |
| Envelope Cap | No cap | 100 envelopes/user/year | Depends on plan | Depends on plan | Depends on plan |