Do I need to notarize the letter?

Not typically. Most programs accept unsigned or signed letters without notarization unless the admissions instructions explicitly request a notarized signature. Check program-specific directions before seeking notarization to avoid unnecessary fees.

Can I submit an electronic signature?

Yes if the program or portal accepts e-signatures. Electronic signatures that produce an audit trail with signer attribution are generally acceptable under federal e-signature laws for most admissions processes.

What if the applicant asks to waive rights?

Applicants can waive or retain access to recommendation letters depending on institutional policy. Waiving access may increase confidentiality; follow the applicant's preference and institutional guidance.

How should I correct an error after submitting?

Contact the admissions office or portal support immediately to request a replacement or addendum. Provide a corrected, signed version and any explanation the institution requests to replace the prior submission.

Are handwritten signatures acceptable?

Handwritten signatures on scanned PDFs are normally accepted when submitted according to program rules. Ensure the scanned file is clear and includes the date and recommender contact details for verification.

How long does processing typically take?

Processing depends on the admissions cycle and submission method; electronic portal submissions are usually processed faster than mailed copies, but timelines vary by program and volume.

Electronic Signature
Templates
Legal
Embry Riddle Letter of Recommendation Form

Embry Riddle Letter of Recommendation Form

This template is fully customizable. Edit the text, fill out the fields, and send it for signature. Give it a try!

What the Embry Riddle Letter of Recommendation Form Is

The Embry Riddle Letter of Recommendation Form is a standardized document used by applicants to request written assessments from instructors, employers, or supervisors for academic admission, scholarships, or program placement. It collects the recommender's contact and affiliation details, the candidate's identifying information, a structured appraisal of skills and qualifications, and the recommender's signature and date. Many admissions offices expect a consistent format so evaluators can compare submissions. While often optional, a well-completed form speeds review, reduces follow-up requests, and helps ensure the statement is attributable and verifiable.

Why a Clear, Complete Recommendation Form Matters

A properly completed Embry Riddle Letter of Recommendation Form gives reviewers consistent data points to evaluate applicants objectively, shortens processing time, and reduces administrative follow-up. Accurate forms preserve applicant confidentiality choices and support compliance with institutional disclosure policies.

Who Typically Completes or Submits This Form

Submissions may be sent by the recommender directly, uploaded by the applicant, or submitted through an official admissions portal depending on program instructions.

Faculty members providing academic evaluations and course-based context
Supervisors or managers assessing professional performance and responsibilities
Advisors, internship mentors, or research leads detailing project contributions

Representative Recommender Profiles

Professor — Faculty Recommender

A tenured or adjunct faculty member who can attest to academic ability, coursework, research potential, and classroom engagement. Their recommendation typically carries weight for admissions committees evaluating curriculum fit and academic preparedness.

Employer — Supervising Manager

A direct supervisor or internship manager who can describe workplace performance, teamwork, technical skills, and leadership potential. Employer letters are especially relevant for professional master's programs and positions requiring applied experience.

Key Parts of the Embry Riddle Letter of Recommendation Form

A complete form includes identifying details, relationship context, assessment sections, signature, and any applicant waiver of rights. The items below outline components that reviewers expect to see for a thorough evaluation.

Recommender Details

Full name, title, institutional affiliation, official email and phone number to permit verification and follow-up when necessary.

Applicant Identification

Candidate full legal name, application ID or date of birth where requested, and program to which the applicant seeks admission.

Relationship Context

How you know the applicant, capacity (e.g., course instructor, supervisor), and length of relationship in months or years.

Qualitative Evaluation

Narrative assessment of strengths, areas for development, examples of notable work, and comparison to peers when applicable.

Ratings or Scales

Structured rating fields (if present) for intellect, communication, teamwork, initiative, and technical skills with brief supporting examples.

Signature and Date

Signed name, date, and printed name; include institutional letterhead or contact details for increased credibility.

Required Information: Essential Fields at a Glance

Recommender Name: Full legal name

Title / Affiliation: Job title and employer

Applicant Name: Full legal name

Relationship Details: Role and duration

Signature and Date: Signed name and MM/DD/YYYY

Contact Email: Institutional email preferred

Step-by-Step: Completing and Submitting the Recommendation

Follow these four core steps to complete and deliver the Embry Riddle Letter of Recommendation Form correctly and on time.

01

Receive Request: Confirm instructions and deadline from the applicant or portal.
02

Complete Form: Enter required fields, provide ratings, and write concise examples.
03

Sign: Apply handwritten or permitted e-signature and date the form.
04

Submit: Send via the specified admissions portal, email, or upload method.

How to Customize and Complete the Form Online

If completing the form in an online admissions portal or eSignature tool, use these configuration suggestions to ensure proper routing and validation.

Field	Configuration
Recommender Email	Set as required and validate format
Signature Field	Enable e-sign or upload image option
Date Field	Enforce MM/DD/YYYY input mask
Attachment Option	Allow resume or letterhead upload

Where to Send the Completed Embry Riddle Form

Choose the submission path specified by the program: direct portal upload, email to admissions, or return to the applicant for inclusion in their file.

Admissions Portal: Upload using the applicant's portal link when provided
Direct Email: Send to the admissions office email address if allowed
Return to Applicant: Provide signed form back to the student when permitted
Mail: Use official letterhead and mail if the program requires physical copies

Digital Submission and eSignature Considerations

When submitting electronically, confirm which authentication methods and file formats the institution accepts to ensure acceptance.

Accepted Formats: PDF preferred; Word DOCX often accepted
Authentication: Email link, SMS code, or institutional SSO
Integrations: Portal integrations with common systems supported

Keep a copy of the signed file and audit trail showing signer email, timestamp, and any authentication used to support attribution and reproduce the record if needed.

Comparing eSignature Options for Submitting Recommendation Forms

Select an eSignature provider that meets institutional requirements for authentication, audit trails, and any privacy compliance obligations; signNow appears first in the vendor list for feature reference.

	signNow	DocuSign	Adobe Sign	PandaDoc	HelloSign
Starting Price	$8/user/mo	$15/user/mo	$14/user/mo	$19/user/mo	$15/user/mo
Bulk Send	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	No
Audit Trail	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes
HIPAA Compliant	Yes	Yes	Yes	No	No
Envelope Cap	No cap	100 env/user/yr	Varies	Varies	Varies

Common Mistakes to Avoid

Using a personal email instead of institutional email address
Leaving signature or date fields blank
Entering applicant nickname rather than legal name
Submitting outside the specified portal or wrong recipient

Risks of Incomplete or Incorrect Recommendation Forms

Processing Delay: Application review postponed

Rejection Risk: Missing identity details can cause rejection

Verification Failure: unverifiable recommender contact

Privacy Concern: FERPA issues if student record disclosed

Invalid Signature: Unsigned forms may be unacceptable

Lost Audit Trail: No proof of signing event

Practical Tips for Accurate and Efficient Completion

Implement these practices to increase the clarity, reliability, and acceptance rate of recommendation submissions.

Confirm Submission Method in Advance

Verify whether the program requires portal upload, direct email, or a mailed paper copy and follow their specified method to avoid processing delays and ensure your recommendation is matched to the correct applicant file.

Use Institutional Contact Information

Provide your official institutional email and phone number rather than a personal address; institutions often use official contact details to validate authorship and reduce the need for manual checks that slow admission decisions.

Provide Specific Examples

Support any ratings with concrete examples of the applicant's work, leadership, or technical accomplishments; concise, evidence-based comments are more persuasive than generic praise and help committees compare candidates.

Keep a Signed Copy

Retain a dated copy of the signed form and any associated audit trail or delivery confirmation so you can respond quickly to verification requests or resolve disputes about the submission date.

Real-World Examples of Recommendation Submissions

These brief examples illustrate practical scenarios and the outcomes institutions reported after receiving well-prepared recommendations.

Optica Ventures — COO Example

A COO requested recommendations for internship finalists to confirm work readiness and communication skills.

The letters included specific project metrics and timelines.
Admissions reported faster decision cycles and fewer clarification requests when recommenders used structured examples tied to applicant responsibilities.

Xerox — NetSuite Director Example

A director provided form-based recommendations for applicants to a professional program to document systems experience.

The submission included role, duration, and measurable achievements.
Reviewers noted improved comparability across candidates and reduced back-and-forth verification, speeding final selection.

Frequently Asked Questions About the Embry Riddle Recommendation Form

Answers to common questions about completion, signing, submission, and verification for recommenders and applicants.

Need help? Contact support

Do I need to notarize the letter?
Not typically. Most programs accept unsigned or signed letters without notarization unless the admissions instructions explicitly request a notarized signature. Check program-specific directions before seeking notarization to avoid unnecessary fees.
Can I submit an electronic signature?
Yes if the program or portal accepts e-signatures. Electronic signatures that produce an audit trail with signer attribution are generally acceptable under federal e-signature laws for most admissions processes.
What if the applicant asks to waive rights?
Applicants can waive or retain access to recommendation letters depending on institutional policy. Waiving access may increase confidentiality; follow the applicant's preference and institutional guidance.
How should I correct an error after submitting?
Contact the admissions office or portal support immediately to request a replacement or addendum. Provide a corrected, signed version and any explanation the institution requests to replace the prior submission.
Are handwritten signatures acceptable?
Handwritten signatures on scanned PDFs are normally accepted when submitted according to program rules. Ensure the scanned file is clear and includes the date and recommender contact details for verification.
How long does processing typically take?
Processing depends on the admissions cycle and submission method; electronic portal submissions are usually processed faster than mailed copies, but timelines vary by program and volume.

Explore Templates

State of Alaska v. Hazelwood Certificate of Service by Certified Mail Affirmation of Completion of Mandatory Education Requirement Petition for Review of Guardianship Notice of Change of Address CIV-693 Instructions for Child's Change of Name

be ready to get more

Join over 28 million airSlate SignNow users

Sign Now