Can evaluations be signed electronically?

Yes. Electronic signatures satisfy intent and consent requirements under the federal ESIGN Act (15 U.S.C. ch. 96) and state UETA statutes when intent, attribution, and retention are preserved.

Do employees need to consent to e-delivery?

If the evaluation is consumer-facing under ESIGN disclosure rules, obtain consent to receive records electronically and confirm access; otherwise follow internal HR policy for consent.

What if a signature is missing?

Return the form for completion or capture a dated electronic acknowledgement; document attempts to obtain signatures to preserve defensibility.

How do I correct an error after signing?

Issue a corrected evaluation with a new signature and an explanation of the change; retain both versions per retention policy for audit trail purposes.

Are notarization or witnesses required?

Not routinely. Notarization is uncommon for evaluations unless required by contract or state-specific rules; check jurisdictional requirements before notarizing.

How long must HR retain evaluations?

Retain per company policy and applicable law: generally at least 3 years, longer for PHI (45 CFR §164.530(j)) or tax‑related records (IRC §6501(a)).

Electronic Signature
Templates
Other
Employee Performance Evaluation

Employee Performance Evaluation

This template is fully customizable. Edit the text, fill out the fields, and send it for signature. Give it a try!

Employee Performance Review

Name:

Job Title:

Name of Department:

Name of Supervisor:

Date Hired:

Last Review Date:

This Review Date:

The following definitions apply to each factor rated below:

Level 6—Far Exceeds Job Requirements
Performance at this level far exceeds the requirements for this position. Duties and responsibilities are exceptionally met and consistently exceeded.

Level 5—Consistently Exceeds Job Requirements
Performance at this level is always beyond the requirements for this position. Duties and responsibilities are not only met excellently, but exceeded consistently.

Level 4—Meets and Usually Exceeds Job Requirements
Performance at this level is above the requirements for this position. Duties and responsibilities are met well and usually exceeded.

Level 3—Consistently Meets Job Requirements
Performance at this level is up to the requirements for this position. Duties and responsibilities are met consistently and in a satisfactory and acceptable manner.

Level 2—Inconsistent in Meeting Job Requirements
Performance at this level is at the minimum acceptable requirements for this position. Duties and responsibilities are met marginally.

Level 1—Does Not Meet Job Requirements
Performance at this level is below the minimum acceptable requirements for the position. Duties and responsibilities are not met in an acceptable manner.

Circle appropriate number.

Quantity of Work Level 1 2 3 4 5 6

Volume of work regularly produced, speed and consistency of output.

Quality of Work Level 1 2 3 4 5 6

Extent to which employee completes assignments.

Job Cooperation Level 1 2 3 4 5 6

Amount of interest and enthusiasm shown in work.

Ability to Work with Others Level 1 2 3 4 5 6

Extent to which employee interacts effectively with others in doing his/her job.

Adaptability Level 1 2 3 4 5 6

Extent to which employee is able to perform various assignments within the scope of his/her job duties.

Communications Level 1 2 3 4 5 6

Extent to which employee communicates effectively with others in doing his/her job.

Job Knowledge Level 1 2 3 4 5 6

Extent of job information and understanding possessed by employee.

Initiative Level 1 2 3 4 5 6

Extent to which employee is a self-starter in attaining objectives of his/her job.

Overall Evaluation of Employee Performance Level 1 2 3 4 5 6

Attendance: Problem No Problem

I. Employee’s Career Development

A. Strengths:

B. Development Needs:

C. Development Plan (including long range):

II. Employee Comments (optional)

General comment about the evaluation of your performance:

Read and acknowledged by:

Employee

Date

III. Approvals

Supervisor

Date

Department Manager

Date

Human Resources

Date

President

Date

What an Employee Performance Evaluation Is and When It’s Used

An Employee Performance Evaluation is a formal record documenting an employee’s job performance over a defined review period. It typically includes objective metrics, manager comments, a rating or scoring system, goal-setting for the next period, and signatures from the employee and reviewer. Organizations use evaluations for merit increases, promotion decisions, development planning, disciplinary actions, and compliance with internal HR policies. Properly completed evaluations create an auditable personnel record that supports fair employment actions and helps manage talent across teams.

Why a Structured Evaluation Matters

A consistent Employee Performance Evaluation improves fairness, documents decisions, and supports HR compliance with recordkeeping requirements and internal policies.

Who completes and reviews these evaluations

Accurate completion by all parties ensures the evaluation is defensible, useful for career development, and ready for secure storage.

Employee self-assessment: Completes self-review sections, provides examples of accomplishments and development needs.
Direct manager: Scores performance, adds narrative feedback, and proposes goals or corrective actions.
HR or People Ops: Reviews for consistency, ensures retention, and records outcomes for compensation or personnel actions.

Step-by-step: complete an Employee Performance Evaluation

Follow these four practical steps to complete a clear, consistent evaluation that HR can retain and rely on.

01

Prepare: Gather job description, prior goals, and performance data.
02

Assess: Rate each competency and add factual examples.
03

Discuss: Hold a review meeting to align on feedback and goals.
04

Finalize: Employee and manager sign; HR files the record.

Core components every professional evaluation should include

A comprehensive evaluation balances objective metrics with qualitative feedback and clear next steps to support development and HR decisions.

Employee Information

Basic identifiers: full legal name, employee ID, job title, department, manager name, and review period to ensure accurate personnel linkage.

Performance Metrics

Objective measures tied to the role: sales quota attainment, project delivery, quality scores, or other quantifiable KPIs used to justify ratings.

Manager Comments

Narrative describing strengths, areas for improvement, specific examples, and context supporting numerical ratings or disciplinary actions.

Development Plan

Clear, measurable goals, required training, resources, and timelines for the next review period to track progress and accountability.

Rating Scale

A standardized scale (numeric or descriptive) with definitions so ratings remain consistent across teams and reviewers.

Signatures & Acknowledgment

Employee and manager signatures with dates and optional HR acknowledgement to confirm the review occurred and was recorded.

Essential fields and quick data checklist

Employee ID: Unique payroll identifier

Review Dates: Start and end dates

Rating Summary: Final score or level

Manager Name: Reviewer identity

Action Items: Agreed next steps

Signature Status: Signed / Pending

Common mistakes to avoid when completing evaluations

Using vague language: generic praise or criticism without specific examples undermines performance decisions and future coaching.
Inconsistent rating scales: applying different standards across teams creates perception of bias and weakens HR defensibility.
Missing signatures or dates: unsigned evaluations may be rejected by payroll or HR and complicate disciplinary processes.
Ignoring documentation: failing to retain prior goals, warnings, or evidence can expose the organization to employment disputes.

Risks and downstream consequences of incorrect evaluations

Disparate Impact: Can lead to discrimination claims

Payroll Errors: Incorrect pay decisions

Record Gaps: Impairs audits and appeals

Disciplinary Risk: Weak termination justification

HIPAA Exposure: Patient-related staff evaluations risk PHI

Retention Failure: Violates document retention policies

How electronic completion and routing typically works

A digital evaluation workflow speeds review, provides an audit trail, and centralizes storage while preserving legal validity under U.S. e-signature law.

Upload: HR uploads the template and fields.
Assign: System routes to manager and employee.
Authenticate: Signers verify identity (email, SMS, or stronger).
Complete: Signatures and timestamps are recorded.

Key workflow settings for online evaluations

Configure these settings to ensure secure routing, required authentication, and consistent field behavior across reviews.

Field	Configuration
Routing Order	Sequential manager → employee → HR
Authentication	Email link with optional SMS code
Reminders	Automated nudges at 3 and 7 days
Templates	Lock core fields to maintain consistency

eSignature vendor pricing and capability snapshot for evaluation workflows

Compare starting prices and key capabilities relevant to Employee Performance Evaluation processes across common eSignature vendors; signNow is listed first per the table structure.

	signNow	DocuSign	Adobe Sign	PandaDoc	HelloSign
Starting Price	$8/user/mo	$15/user/mo	$14/user/mo	$19/user/mo	$15/user/mo
Free Trial	7-day trial	Varies	Varies	Varies	Varies
Bulk Send	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Varies
Audit Trail	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes
HIPAA Compliant	Yes	Yes	Yes	No	No
Envelope Cap	No cap	100 envelopes/user/yr	Varies	Varies	Varies

Common timelines and internal deadlines for evaluation cycles

Set clear internal deadlines to keep reviews on schedule and to meet payroll, promotion, and compensation planning needs.

Annual Cycle:

Complete year-end reviews within 30 days of period close.

Probation Review:

Conduct at 30, 60, or 90 days per policy.

Goal Setting:

Agree on new goals within 14 days post-review meeting.

Appeal Window:

Allow employees 14 days to submit comments or dispute.

HR Filing:

Submit final signed evaluation to HR within 7 business days.

Frequently asked questions about Employee Performance Evaluations

Answers to common questions about e-signatures, legal validity, storage, and correction workflows for performance evaluations.

Need help? Contact support

Can evaluations be signed electronically?
Yes. Electronic signatures satisfy intent and consent requirements under the federal ESIGN Act (15 U.S.C. ch. 96) and state UETA statutes when intent, attribution, and retention are preserved.
Do employees need to consent to e-delivery?
If the evaluation is consumer-facing under ESIGN disclosure rules, obtain consent to receive records electronically and confirm access; otherwise follow internal HR policy for consent.
What if a signature is missing?
Return the form for completion or capture a dated electronic acknowledgement; document attempts to obtain signatures to preserve defensibility.
How do I correct an error after signing?
Issue a corrected evaluation with a new signature and an explanation of the change; retain both versions per retention policy for audit trail purposes.
Are notarization or witnesses required?
Not routinely. Notarization is uncommon for evaluations unless required by contract or state-specific rules; check jurisdictional requirements before notarizing.
How long must HR retain evaluations?
Retain per company policy and applicable law: generally at least 3 years, longer for PHI (45 CFR §164.530(j)) or tax‑related records (IRC §6501(a)).

Explore Templates

Bad Faith Breach of Implied Obligation Insurance Defenses to Intentional Torts Module 3 Iowa Civil Jury Instructions Bolton Et Al v. Golden Business Inc Daily Report Premises Liability Lease Agreement Guide to Contract Interpretation

be ready to get more

Join over 28 million airSlate SignNow users

Sign Now