Can this form be signed electronically?

Yes. Electronic signatures meet federal standards under the ESIGN Act (15 U.S.C. §7001) and state UETA laws where adopted. Ensure the signer consents to electronic records and that the platform captures attribution and retention metadata.

Who should sign the completed form?

At minimum the analyst who performed the test and the reviewing legal or compliance officer should sign. If remediation is approved, include senior HR leadership for final acceptance to show organizational responsibility.

Is notarization required for this form?

Not typically. Internal compliance reports do not normally need notarization, but use-case specifics or local policies may require additional authentication for external submissions or litigation exhibits.

How long should we retain the signed form?

Retain per your records policy; a common practice is at least 3 years after the decision, longer if litigation risk exists. If PHI is present, follow HIPAA retention of 6 years (45 CFR §164.530(j)).

What if test results conflict with business necessity?

Document any business necessity analysis and explore reasonable alternatives. Legal should evaluate risk and approve any decisions to continue practices shown to have adverse impact.

How do we demonstrate chain of custody for data?

Keep original data extracts, query scripts, and versioned test outputs. Use an eSignature platform that records timestamps, signer identity, and an audit trail to establish provenance.

Electronic Signature
Templates
HR
HR Discrimination Testing Form

HR Discrimination Testing Form

This template is fully customizable. Edit the text, fill out the fields, and send it for signature. Give it a try!

HR Discrimination Testing Form

Purpose: This form documents the planning, conduct, findings, and recommended corrective actions arising from internal discrimination testing exercises. All information provided will be maintained as confidential investigative records and used only for compliance, corrective action, training, and reporting required by company policy or applicable law.

Personal Information

Full Legal Name Employee / Applicant ID Address

Phone:

Email:

Position Information

Current Job Title Department

Reporting Manager:

Start Date:

Current Salary / Rate

Employment History (Most Recent)

Employer 1 — Company Name

Title:

Dates Employed: From To

Primary Responsibilities Reason for Leaving

Employment History (Previous)

Employer 2 — Company Name

Title:

Dates Employed: From To

Primary Responsibilities Reason for Leaving

Education

Highest Degree Institution Graduation Date

References (Professional)

Reference 1

Phone:

Email:

Relationship Reference 2

Phone:

Email:

Relationship Reference 3

Phone:

Email:

Relationship

Discrimination Test Details

Requested By

Type of Test (select all applicable) Hiring/audit screening Promotion/process audit Compensation/equity analysis Harassment/behavioral audit Service delivery/accessibility Other:

Method(s) Employed Resume/CV audit Call or inquiry test Interview audit / role-play Statistical analysis / cohort comparison Other:

Test Date(s):

Locations / Platforms:

Test Scenario Summary Controlled Variables and Differentiators Test Participants / Profiles Evidence Collected

Findings and Results

Was a disparate outcome observed? Yes No

Quantitative Results (if applicable) Qualitative Observations and Examples Conclusion and Determination

Recommendations & Remediation

Recommended Corrective Actions Training or Policy Changes Required

Legal Disclosures & Authorizations

At-Will Employment: Nothing in this form alters the at-will employment relationship between the company and any employee, except by a written agreement signed by an authorized company officer.

Equal Opportunity Statement: The company is committed to maintaining a workplace free from unlawful discrimination and retaliation. This testing is conducted to identify and remediate disparities in employment and service practices consistent with company policy and applicable law.

Authorization to Contact Previous Employers and Conduct Background Checks I authorize the company to contact previous employers and to obtain background or employment verification information as necessary for investigation and validation of test findings.

Certification

I certify that the information provided in this form is true and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that intentionally providing false information during an investigation or testing process may result in disciplinary action up to and including termination.

I certify the above statement.

Investigator / Reporting Information

Investigator Name Investigator Title / Department Investigator Summary

Confidentiality & Retention

All materials and records generated in the course of discrimination testing are confidential investigative records. Access is limited to individuals with a legitimate business need. Records will be retained consistent with company policy and applicable legal obligations.

Reporting Party:

Signature:

Date:

What the HR Discrimination Testing Form Is and When It’s Used

The HR Discrimination Testing Form documents statistical and procedural reviews used to detect disparate impact or other discriminatory effects from hiring, promotion, compensation, or classification policies. It records test method, sample population, comparator groups, statistical results, decision thresholds, and recommended remediation. The form supports internal compliance with Title VII and related federal or state anti-discrimination obligations, provides an audit trail for in-house counsel or regulators, and standardizes how HR teams capture evidence and approvals for adverse-impact analyses.

Why a Standardized Testing Form Matters

A consistent form ensures repeatable methodology, clear documentation for legal review, and defensible decisions if regulators or plaintiffs challenge hiring or pay practices.

Who Typically Completes and Reviews This Form

The HR Discrimination Testing Form is completed by HR analysts or people analytics teams and reviewed by legal or compliance prior to action.

HR Analyst — Prepares the dataset, documents variables, and runs statistical tests for disparate impact.
People Analytics — Validates methodology, advises on sample selection, and confirms statistical significance.
Legal / Compliance — Reviews findings, assesses regulatory risk, and approves remedial actions if required.

Final sign-off often involves HR leadership and legal counsel when remediation is recommended or when results could affect candidate or employee status.

Core Sections You Should Include on the Form

A professional form groups data collection, statistical details, interpretation, approvals, and remediation steps so reviewers can assess both method and outcome quickly.

Header

Record form title, department, author, and effective date to create a clear record for audit and retrieval.

Scope

Define population, job titles, date range, and exclusions so results are reproducible and limitations are explicit for reviewers.

Methodology

Specify tests used (e.g., 4/5ths rule, logistic regression, chi-square), software, and thresholds for significance or disparate impact.

Results

Present raw counts, rates, test statistics, p-values, and effect-size metrics so legal and HR teams can interpret findings.

Interpretation

Summarize whether impact appears and whether business necessity or job-relatedness was assessed as part of the analysis.

Action

Document recommended remediation, responsible party, timeline, and approvals required for implementation and monitoring.

Step-by-Step: Complete the Form Correctly

Follow these steps in order to ensure the analysis is consistent, documented, and ready for legal review.

01

Assemble data: Gather personnel, job, and selection outcome records.
02

Define scope: Set job codes, date range, and inclusion criteria.
03

Run tests: Apply selected statistical methods and record outputs.
04

Document and sign: Attach findings, interpret results, and obtain required approvals.

How to Configure the Digital Workflow

Design the online workflow so the right people receive fields in order and signatures are auditable.

Field Mapping	Map each form field to HRIS or source system fields.
Authentication Method	Use email plus optional SMS code for reviewer authentication.
Routing Order	Route to Analyst → People Analytics → Legal → HR Director.
Approval Conditions	Require legal sign-off when impact exceeds threshold.
Storage Location	Save final PDF to encrypted HR records repository.

Typical Submission and Review Flow

A clear review path reduces delays and preserves the audit trail for every decision.

Prepare form: Author completes fields and attaches data export.
Send to reviewers: Automatic routing to analytics and legal.
Review and sign: Reviewers annotate and eSign the results.
Archive: Store signed copy and audit log securely.

Technology Considerations for eSubmission

Choose a platform that supports secure upload, audit trails, and the integrations your HR stack requires.

Integrations: Salesforce, NetSuite, Google Workspace supported
File formats: PDF, DOCX, XLSX accepted
Authentication: Email, SMS, or advanced methods

Key Security and Compliance Considerations

Encryption: TLS 1.2/1.3 in transit

Data at rest: AES-256 encryption

Privacy standards: HIPAA BAA available

Audit trails: Detailed timestamp and IP logs

Certifications: SOC 2 Type II and ISO 27001

FDA / FDA-like: 21 CFR Part 11 support

Legal Risks from Inadequate Testing or Documentation

Disparate impact claims: 42 U.S.C. §2000e-2 exposure

OFCCP review: Contractor audits can require remediation

Litigation costs: Potential damages and legal fees

Regulatory findings: Administrative orders and monitoring

Reputational harm: Public disclosures and brand impact

Invalid decisions: Hiring or pay actions may be rescinded

Common Pitfalls to Avoid

Incomplete or inconsistent source data that mixes job titles, codes, or locations can produce misleading rates and invalidate test results.
Selecting an inappropriate comparator group or failing to document why a reference group was chosen undermines the defensibility of any adverse-impact finding.
Relying on small sample sizes without noting statistical power can lead to false positives or negatives and poor remediation decisions.
Failing to capture and retain audit metadata, including who ran the test and which dataset version was used, weakens the evidentiary value of the report.

Practical Tips for Reliable, Defensible Results

Adopt consistent procedures, document assumptions, and involve legal and analytics teams before finalizing actions based on test results.

Use a documented standard method

Choose and record a statistical approach in advance to avoid ad hoc choices that can be challenged in litigation or audits.

Keep raw data snapshots

Archive the exact dataset, including extraction time and query, so results can be reproduced during review or discovery.

Involve legal early

Engage counsel before remediation to evaluate business necessity, reasonable alternatives, and mitigation plans.

Monitor remediation

Track outcomes and re-test at defined intervals to confirm that corrective actions address the identified impact.

Realistic Use Cases

Two short examples show how the form supports both routine audits and complaint-driven reviews.

Internal Audit Example

A people analytics team ran annual adverse-impact testing across sales roles

found a significant disparity using logistic regression
they documented methodology, notified legal, implemented targeted outreach and re-tested after six months, keeping all signed approvals.

Complaint-Driven Review

An employee complaint triggered a targeted promotion analysis

HR extracted promotion rates by cohort and applied chi-square testing
legal reviewed the report and HR implemented a revised promotion rubric with monitoring and documented approvals.

Timing and Internal Deadlines to Adopt

Set internal deadlines for testing, review, and retention to ensure timely response to complaints and periodic compliance checks.

Annual Review:

Conduct enterprise-wide testing at least once per year for major job families.

Complaint Response:

Begin targeted analysis within 30 days of a formal complaint.

Pre-implementation:

Test new selection tools or changes before deployment.

Post-remediation Check:

Reassess affected groups within 3–6 months after changes.

Record Retention Trigger:

Retention periods begin on the effective date of the decision documented on the form.

Selected eSignature Pricing and Feature Snapshot

Common eSignature vendors and starting prices for annual billing are shown; select a plan that meets authentication, audit trail, and compliance needs without assuming feature parity.

	signNow	DocuSign	Adobe Sign	PandaDoc	HelloSign
Starting Price	$8/user/mo	$15/user/mo	$14/user/mo	$19/user/mo	$15/user/mo
Free Trial	7-day free trial	Varies by plan	Varies by plan	Varies by plan	Varies by plan
Bulk Send	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	No
Audit Trail	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes
HIPAA Compliant	Yes	Yes	Yes	No	No

Frequently Asked Questions and Troubleshooting

Answers to common questions about completing, signing, and storing the HR Discrimination Testing Form, including legal validity and evidence preservation.

Need help? Contact support

Can this form be signed electronically?
Yes. Electronic signatures meet federal standards under the ESIGN Act (15 U.S.C. §7001) and state UETA laws where adopted. Ensure the signer consents to electronic records and that the platform captures attribution and retention metadata.
Who should sign the completed form?
At minimum the analyst who performed the test and the reviewing legal or compliance officer should sign. If remediation is approved, include senior HR leadership for final acceptance to show organizational responsibility.
Is notarization required for this form?
Not typically. Internal compliance reports do not normally need notarization, but use-case specifics or local policies may require additional authentication for external submissions or litigation exhibits.
How long should we retain the signed form?
Retain per your records policy; a common practice is at least 3 years after the decision, longer if litigation risk exists. If PHI is present, follow HIPAA retention of 6 years (45 CFR §164.530(j)).
What if test results conflict with business necessity?
Document any business necessity analysis and explore reasonable alternatives. Legal should evaluate risk and approve any decisions to continue practices shown to have adverse impact.
How do we demonstrate chain of custody for data?
Keep original data extracts, query scripts, and versioned test outputs. Use an eSignature platform that records timestamps, signer identity, and an audit trail to establish provenance.

be ready to get more

Join over 28 million airSlate SignNow users

Sign Now