Performance Issues
Describe specific, objective examples of unacceptable performance or behavior with dates and measurable metrics to avoid ambiguity.
A well-drafted PIP reduces legal risk, sets objective expectations, and creates a transparent path to improved performance for the employee. It also documents the employer’s good-faith efforts to address issues before more severe action.
Human resources teams, direct supervisors, and the employee named in the plan are the primary participants in preparing and executing a PIP.
Some organizations also involve legal counsel or union representatives for review when the situation is high-risk or the employee is covered by a collective bargaining agreement.
HR leads finalize the PIP template, confirm policy alignment, and maintain the official file. They ensure documentation meets internal and regulatory retention obligations.
The employee’s manager completes the performance specifics, coaching steps, and progress checkpoints. Managers are responsible for monitoring and documenting follow-up.
Describe specific, objective examples of unacceptable performance or behavior with dates and measurable metrics to avoid ambiguity.
List precise, measurable performance targets or behavioral changes so the employee knows exactly what success looks like.
Define the start date, duration, and intermediate checkpoints for the improvement period; include final review date and any extension criteria.
Document training, coaching, modified duties, or tools the employer will provide to help the employee meet expectations.
Explain how progress will be measured (metrics, reports, observations) and who will collect or verify the data.
State clear outcomes if expectations are not met, ranging from continued monitoring to reassignment, demotion, or termination.
| Field | Configuration |
|---|---|
| Routing Order | Manager then HR then employee |
| Signer Authentication | Email + optional SMS code |
| Audit Trail | Enable IP, timestamp, and action logs |
| Retention Tagging | Apply HR retention policy metadata |
Choose a platform that provides secure signatures, reliable audit trails, and integration with HR systems to avoid manual rework.
Enable long-term storage with access controls and export capabilities to standard formats; verify the platform supports relevant integrations such as HRIS and cloud storage to maintain single-source records.
Date when monitoring begins
Weekly or biweekly review dates
End date for the improvement period
Criteria and maximum extension length
Timeline to raise disputes per policy
| signNow | DocuSign | Adobe Sign | PandaDoc | HelloSign | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | $8/user/mo | $15/user/mo | $14/user/mo | $19/user/mo | $15/user/mo |
| Free Trial | 7-day free trial | Varies | Varies | Varies | Varies |
| Bulk Send | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Varies |
| Audit Trail | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| HIPAA Compliant | Yes | Yes | Yes | No | No |
| Envelope Cap | No cap | 100 envelopes/user/year | Varies | Varies | Varies |
A manager documents missed sprint commitments and sets concrete sprint delivery metrics
A clinician’s charting errors are identified with dates and examples