Establishing secure connection…Loading editor…Preparing document…

Supreme Court of Mississippi Case No. 95-CT-01199

This template is fully customizable. Edit the text, fill out the fields, and send it for signature. Give it a try!
Supreme Court of Mississippi Case No. 95-CT-01199
Prepare your document for signing right on this page
  • 01 Edit the text and complete the fields
  • 02 Click Sign Now and on the next screen add recipients and signature fields in SignNow
  • 03 Start your free trial to sign and send your doc
Sign Now

What Supreme Court of Mississippi Case No. 95-CT-01199 Represents

Supreme Court of Mississippi Case No. 95-CT-01199 identifies a specific appellate matter filed with Mississippi's highest court. This page explains the typical components of a numbered Supreme Court docket entry, how that identifier is used in legal filings and citations, and what parties, counsel, researchers, or clerks need to know when locating or referencing the record in court systems and secondary sources.

Why this case identifier matters for legal workflow

A precise case number ensures accurate retrieval of briefs, orders, and opinions; it prevents misfiling and supports compliance with appellate procedure. Counsel and courts rely on this identifier for service, docketing, and producing an authoritative official record.

Why this case identifier matters for legal workflow

Who refers to Supreme Court of Mississippi Case No. 95-CT-01199

Several roles regularly access or cite a Mississippi Supreme Court case number when preparing filings, compiling records, or researching precedent.

  • Appellate attorneys and litigators who draft petitions, briefs, and responses for submission to the court.
  • Court clerks and docketing staff who record filings, issue notices, and manage the public docket.
  • Researchers, law librarians, and reporters who cite the case for precedent or public records.

Accurate use of the case number improves retrieval, reduces delay, and helps ensure court papers are associated with the correct proceeding.

Primary users and roles

Appellate Counsel

Attorneys preparing briefs, motions, and petitions who must reference the docket number consistently; they coordinate service, file certified records, and follow Mississippi appellate rules for formatting and deadlines.

Court Clerk

Clerical officers who register filings under the case number, issue filing receipts, maintain the official record and calendar, and provide public access to docket entries.

Essential record and security details

Public docket: May be accessible
Sealed filings: Restricted access
Confidential exhibits: Redaction required
eFiling format: PDF/A preferred
Audit trail: Preserve timestamps
Retention rule: Follow court policy

Risks of incorrect citation or late filing

Missed deadline: Waiver risk
Wrong docket: Misfiled record
Failed service: Procedural dismissal
Sanctions: Court-ordered fines
Evidence loss: Record gaps
Confidential breach: Privacy exposure

Common difficulties when working with a Supreme Court case number

  • Using an incorrect case number on a filing leads to misrouting and can delay judicial consideration for days or weeks while clerks correct docket entries.
  • Failing to serve opposing counsel with the filed document under the listed case number can result in motions being treated as unopposed or procedural sanctions.
  • Submitting exhibits in an unsupported file format or without a searchable PDF/A copy increases the chance of clerks rejecting the submission or requesting resubmission.
  • Neglecting to mark or properly redact sealed materials before electronic submission can cause confidentiality breaches and administrative rejection.

Step-by-step: locating and referencing the case number

Follow these basic steps to locate the official docket entry and use the case number correctly in filings and citations.

  • 01
    Search court database: Query the Mississippi Supreme Court docket using party or case number.
  • 02
    Confirm parties: Verify caption and party names match the official record.
  • 03
    Download filings: Obtain PDF copies of briefs, orders, and opinions.
  • 04
    Cite precisely: Use the full case number in headers and certificates of service.

Recommended eFiling workflow settings for appellate submissions

Configure your electronic filing workflow to match court requirements and preserve metadata for the official record.

Field Configuration
Document format PDF/A, searchable preferred
Authentication Attorney email + bar number
Signing method Law firm e-sign or wet signature scanned
Notification Auto-notify opposing counsel

How an appellate filing is processed after submission

After you submit a filing that references the case number, the court follows a standard routing and docketing sequence.

  • Intake review: Clerk checks format, caption, and case number.
  • Docketing: Document is assigned a docket entry and timestamp.
  • Service: Opposing parties are notified per certificate of service.
  • Scheduling: Court sets briefing deadlines or argument dates.

Platform and file requirements for electronic submissions

Courts and clerks commonly specify file formats, maximum file sizes, and acceptable authentication methods for electronic filings.

  • Accepted formats: PDF, PDF/A
  • Authentication: Email + firm credentials
  • Integrations: E-file systems support common APIs

Use a platform that preserves an audit trail, supports searchable PDFs, and integrates with court eFiling systems; verify compatibility before bulk submissions.

Paper filing versus electronic filing for appellate matters

Comparing key attributes helps determine the appropriate submission method for a Supreme Court filing.

Criteria Paper Electronic
Court Acceptance
Receipt timestamp clerk-stamped auto-generated
Processing speed slower faster
Record preservation physical file digital archive

eSignature vendor pricing snapshot relevant to court document workflows

Basic plan and capability comparisons for common eSignature vendors. signNow appears first per platform comparison conventions.

signNow DocuSign Adobe Sign PandaDoc HelloSign
Starting Price $8/user/mo $15/user/mo $14/user/mo $19/user/mo $15/user/mo
Free Trial 7-day free trial Varies by vendor Varies by vendor Varies by vendor Varies by vendor
Bulk Send Yes (Business Premium) Yes Yes Yes No
Audit Trail Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
HIPAA Compliant Yes Yes Yes No No
Envelope Cap No cap 100 envelopes/user/year Varies by plan Varies by plan Varies by plan

Key components to include when preparing a professional appellate filing

A well-structured appellate submission ties the case number to a clear caption, procedural history, argument, and supporting record exhibits.

Case Caption

Complete party names, lower-court case number, and the Supreme Court of Mississippi Case No. 95-CT-01199 at the top of each filing.

Statement of Facts

Concise factual chronology with citations to the record and specific exhibit numbers retained under the case number.

Issues Presented

Numbered legal issues framed for review; link each issue to the exact record pages where evidence appears.

Argument

Legal analysis with citations to statutes and precedent; cross-reference the docket and appendices by page.

Relief Sought

Clear statement of the requested remedy, stay requests, or procedural orders tied to the case number.

Appendix / Record

Certified copies of lower-court orders and exhibits indexed and paginated under the case number.

Download formats and supporting documents to preserve the record

When saving or sharing materials tied to the case number, use stable formats and retain supporting metadata for authenticity and retrieval.

PDF/A Archive

Save final briefs and orders as PDF/A with embedded fonts and searchable text for long-term preservation.

Certified Copies

Obtain certified PDFs of clerk-stamped filings to prove filing dates and court acceptance.

Exhibit Index

Include a numbered index matching exhibits to record pages for easy cross-reference.

Audit Trail

Preserve signing metadata and system logs when using electronic signatures or eFiling platforms.

Practical tips to reduce errors when referencing a Supreme Court case number

Adopt consistent practices that clerks and opposing counsel can rely on to avoid misfiling and delays.

Validate the docket number
Before filing, confirm the case number in the court's official docket to ensure accuracy and avoid misattribution.
Use standardized captions
Maintain a template for captions that includes the full case number and party names exactly as entered on the official docket.
Preserve proof of service
Keep delivery receipts, email confirmations, or certified mail records showing the case number and date of service.
Maintain searchable archives
Store filings in indexed, searchable formats (PDF/A) so team members can retrieve materials by case number quickly.

Key procedural stages after submitting an appellate filing

Understand the sequential milestones from filing to final disposition so you can monitor compliance and next steps.

01

Filing Acceptance

Clerk verifies format and assigns a docket entry and timestamp to the submission.

02

Briefing Schedule

Court issues deadlines for opposing briefs and reply briefs per appellate rules.

03

Oral Argument

If granted, the court schedules argument and notifies counsel under the case number.

04

Opinion Issued

Court publishes opinion or order referencing the docket number and disposition.

Typical timing considerations to check with court rules

Filing and response timeframes vary by motion type and the Mississippi Rules of Appellate Procedure; confirm specific counts before filing.

Notice of Appeal Timeframe:

Deadlines depend on judgment type; consult the Rules of Appellate Procedure for exact counts.

Briefing Deadlines:

Court sets opening, response, and reply brief dates after docketing.

Motion Response Time:

Response windows vary; many motions permit 10 to 14 days for opposition.

Extension Requests:

Courts may grant extensions for cause; file requests early and reference the docket number.

Opinion Publication:

Timing to opinion varies from weeks to months depending on case complexity.

Notarization and witness steps for filings that require authentication

When a filing requires notarized affidavits or witness statements, follow a consistent sequence to preserve validity.

01

Prepare document

Ensure text is final before any signatures or notarization steps.

02

Identify signers

Confirm signers’ legal names and acceptable ID documents.

03

Arrange notary

Schedule in-person notary or confirm RON acceptance by the court.

04

Witness presence

If witnesses required, have them sign in notary presence as appropriate.

05

Record RON session

Retain audio-video recording if remote notarization was used and state requires retention.

06

Attach certificate

Include notary or witness certificate with the filing to show authentication.

07

Scan to PDF/A

Create a high-quality searchable PDF for eFiling and archival.

08

Retain originals

Keep originals per retention policy or court order.

Real-world examples of secure, compliant document workflows

These short examples show how organizations use eSignature and document management when working with legal matters and numbered dockets.

Brian Fitzgibbons — Optica Ventures LLC

Optica adopted electronic execution for complex paperwork to reduce turnaround times and maintain exact case references.

  • They used standardized templates and audit trails to track signers.
  • The result was fewer clerical errors, consistent captioning across filings, and easier retrieval of signed documents when counsel needed certified copies for appellate submissions.

Tim Martin — Martin Properties

A small law practice used eSignature for property and litigation documents to avoid in-person logistics.

  • Mobile signing allowed remote witnesses to coordinate.
  • Firms kept certified PDF archives with metadata to demonstrate filing dates and maintain the official record tied to docket numbers during appeals and title disputes.

Frequently asked questions about using the case number and filing correctly

Answers to common questions about locating, citing, and submitting documents referencing Supreme Court of Mississippi Case No. 95-CT-01199.


Need help? Contact support

Explore Templates

Assignment of Copyright to Multiple Works Sale of Copyright to Published Book Book Publishing Contract Agreement to Provide Custodial Services Sale Purchase Agreement Aircraft Agreement
be ready to get more
Join over 28 million airSlate SignNow users
Sign Now
Company
Forms
Pricing
Resources
Knowledge base
Other Products
© 2026 airSlate Inc. All rights reserved.