Establishing secure connection…Loading editor…Preparing document…

Order Re: Adequate Cause (Washington)

This template is fully customizable. Edit the text, fill out the fields, and send it for signature. Give it a try!

Temporary Custody Order (Nonparental Custody)

Superior Court of Washington

County of

In re the Custody of:

Child(ren),

Petitioner(s),

and

Respondent(s).

No.

Temporary Custody Order

(Nonparental Custody)

(TCO/TMO/TMRO)

I. Judgment/Order Summaries

1.1 Restraining Order Summary:

Name of person(s) restrained:

Name of person(s) protected:

See paragraph 3.2.

Violation of a Restraining Order in Paragraph 3.2 Below With Actual Notice of its Terms Is a Criminal Offense Under Chapter 26.50 RCW and Will Subject the Violator to Arrest. RCW 26.10.115.

1.2 Money Judgment Summary:

A. Judgment creditor

B. Judgment debtor

C. Principal judgment amount (back child support) $

From (date) to (date)

D. Interest to date of judgment $

E. Attorney fees $

F. Costs $

G. Other recovery amount $

H. Principal judgment shall bear interest at % per annum

I. Attorney fees, costs and other recovery amounts shall bear interest at % per annum

II. Basis

A motion for a temporary nonparental custody order was presented to this court and the court finds reasonable cause to enter this order. The court has consulted the judicial information system, if available, to determine the existence of any information and proceedings that are relevant to the placement of the child(ren).

Indian Child Welfare Act

Indian child status:

Jurisdiction:

III. Order

3.1 Temporary Relief

Respondent (name) : Visitation shall be

Respondent (name) : Visitation shall be

3.2 Restraining Order

Previous Order

The prior restraining order dated :

This order shall be filed forthwith in the clerk’s office and entered of record. The clerk of the court shall forward a copy of this order on or before the next judicial day to , which shall forthwith enter this order into any computer-based criminal intelligence system available in this state used by law enforcement agencies to list outstanding warrants.

(A law enforcement information sheet must be completed by the party or the party’s attorney and provided with this order before this order will be entered into the law enforcement computer system.)

Violation of a Restraining Order in Paragraph 3.2 With Actual Notice of its Terms Is a Criminal Offense Under Chapter 26.50 RCW and Will Subject the Violator to Arrest. RCW 26.10.115.

Service

The requesting party must arrange for service of this order on the restrained party. File the original Return of Service with the clerk and provide a copy to the law enforcement agency listed above.

Expiration Date

This restraining order will expire in 12 months and shall be removed from any computer-based criminal intelligence system available in this state used by law enforcement agencies to list outstanding warrants, unless a new order is issued, or unless the court sets forth another expiration date here: (month/day/year)

3.3 Other Restraining Order

3.4 Bond or Security

3.5 Other

3.6 Summary of RCW 26.09.430 - .480, Regarding Relocation of a Child

This is a summary only. For the full text, please see RCW 26.09.430 through 26.09.480.

If the person with whom the child resides a majority of the time plans to move, that person shall give notice to every person entitled to court ordered time with the child.

If the move is outside the child’s school district, the relocating person must give notice by personal service or by mail requiring a return receipt. This notice must be at least 60 days before the intended move. If the relocating person could not have known about the move in time to give 60 days’ notice, that person must give notice within five days after learning of the move. The notice must contain the information required in RCW 26.09.440. See also form DRPSCU 07.0500 (Notice of Intended Relocation of a Child).

If the move is within the same school district, the relocating person must provide actual notice by any reasonable means. A person entitled to time with the child may not object to the move but may ask for modification under RCW 26.09.260.

Notice may be delayed for 21 days if the relocating person is entering a domestic violence shelter or is moving to avoid a clear, immediate and unreasonable risk to health and safety.

If information is protected under a court order or the address confidentiality program, it may be withheld from the notice.

A relocating person may ask the court to waive any notice requirements that may put the health and safety of a person or a child at risk.

Failure to give the required notice may be grounds for sanctions, including contempt.

If no objection is filed within 30 days after service of the notice of intended relocation, the relocation will be permitted and the proposed revised residential schedule may be confirmed.

A person entitled to time with a child under a court order can file an objection to the child’s relocation whether or not he or she received proper notice.

An objection may be filed by using the mandatory pattern form WPF DRPSCU 07.0700 (Objection to Relocation/Petition for Modification of Custody Decree/Parenting Plan/Residential Schedule). The objection must be served on all persons entitled to time with the child.

The relocating person shall not move the child during the time for objection unless: (a) the delayed notice provisions apply; or (b) a court order allows the move.

If the objecting person schedules a hearing for a date within 15 days of timely service of the objection, the relocating person shall not move the child before the hearing unless there is a clear, immediate and unreasonable risk to the health or safety of a person or a child.

Warning: Violation of residential provisions of this order with actual knowledge of its terms is punishable by contempt of court and may be a criminal offense under RCW 9A.40.060(2) or RCW 9A.40.070(2). Violation of this order may subject a violator to arrest.

Dated: Judge/Commissioner

Petitioner or petitioner’s attorney:

A signature below is actual notice of this order.

Signature of Petitioner or Lawyer/WSBA No.

Print or Type Name Date

Respondent or respondent’s attorney:

A signature below is actual notice of this order.

Signature of Respondent or Lawyer/WSBA No.

Print or Type Name Date

Petitioner or petitioner’s attorney:

A signature below is actual notice of this order.

Signature of Petitioner or Lawyer/WSBA No.

Print or Type Name Date

Respondent or respondent’s attorney:

A signature below is actual notice of this order.

Signature of Respondent or Lawyer/WSBA No.

Print or Type Name Date

Signature of Guardian ad Litem or Lawyer/WSBA No.

Print or Type Name Date

Enter text✕

What the Order Re: Adequate Cause (Washington) Is and When It Applies

An Order Re: Adequate Cause (Washington) is a written court determination that adequate cause exists to grant, defer, or modify a procedural or substantive relief request in a Washington case. Typical contexts include motions to seal records, temporary restraining orders, expedited discovery, or requests to proceed out of time. The order records the court’s factual findings and legal basis, identifies affected parties, and sets deadlines or conditions. Parties use the order as the operative instruction for clerk processing, service, enforcement, and any subsequent appeal or compliance steps.

Why a Clear Order Re: Adequate Cause Matters

A precise and properly executed order ensures enforceability, clear timelines, and predictable clerk processing while reducing disputes about scope or intent.

Why a Clear Order Re: Adequate Cause Matters

Who Prepares, Signs, and Relies on This Order

The document is drafted by litigants or their counsel, entered by a judge, and administered by court clerks; parties and service agents depend on it for next steps.

  • Judges and chambers staff who prepare or sign the order for docket entry and enforcement.
  • Attorneys who draft proposed orders or who must serve and comply with court-mandated conditions.
  • Court clerks and process servers who file, index, and serve the order according to local rules.

Accuracy at drafting and proper filing reduce the risk of administrative rejection, misservice, or avoidable appeals.

Typical Signatory Roles

Judge

The presiding judge signs or stamps the order after findings of adequate cause are made on the record. The judge’s signature and date establish the order’s effective authority and commencement of any deadlines.

Attorney

An attorney for a movant often prepares a proposed order for the judge’s signature; counsel must ensure the text matches the oral findings and local clerk requirements before submission.

Core Elements to Include in a Professional Order Re: Adequate Cause

A professional order clearly identifies parties, the case number, the court, factual findings supporting adequate cause, the precise relief granted or denied, timelines, and signature blocks for the judicial officer.

Caption

Court name, case number, and party names placed exactly as on the original complaint or docket.

Findings

Concise factual and legal findings explaining why the court determined adequate cause exists for the requested relief.

Relief Granted

Precise order language describing the remedy, limitations, and any conditions for compliance.

Deadlines

Clear dates for compliance, service, or further hearings; identify whether dates exclude weekends or holidays.

Service Instructions

How parties must be served, acceptable methods, and who bears service cost or responsibility.

Signature Block

Judge’s printed name, signature line, and signature date; include clerk entry line if required by local form.

Step-by-Step: From Draft to Filed Order

Follow a consistent workflow to draft, present, sign, and file the order so processing is predictable and timely.

  • 01
    Draft: Prepare proposed order matching oral findings.
  • 02
    Review: Confirm accuracy with judge’s chambers and opposing counsel if required.
  • 03
    Sign: Judge signs physically or via authorized e-signature.
  • 04
    File: Clerk stamps/enters the order and provides certified copy if requested.

Typical Processing Flow After the Order Is Signed

Understanding the downstream steps helps parties meet service and compliance obligations without delay.

  • Clerk Entry: Clerk enters the signed order into the docket and assigns a filing stamp.
  • Service: Order must be served on affected parties per local rule and any court direction.
  • Compliance: Parties comply with ordered actions or seek clarification via motion when needed.
  • Appeal Window: Clock for appeals or post-order motions begins as specified in the order or local statute.

Digital Workflow Settings for Preparing and Submitting the Order

Configure e-filing and signing options to match court requirements and signer authentication expectations.

Field Configuration
Authentication Method Email link | SMS code | KBA where allowed
Signing Order Sequential signing for judge signature then clerk
Attachments Include supporting exhibits and certificate of service
Audit Trail Enable time-stamped logs and IP capture

Technical and Format Requirements for eFiling and eSigning

Verify the court’s electronic filing and signature policies before submitting electronic orders.

  • File Formats: PDF/A preferred; PDF or DOCX accepted depending on court e-file portal.
  • Signer Authentication: Use the level of authentication the court permits for judicial signatures.
  • Integrations: Connectors (e.g., court e-file systems, document management) improve consistency and auditability.

When the court accepts electronic orders, preserve audit records and any proof-of-service to support enforcement or appeal.

Common Timeframes and Deadlines to Track

Orders trigger procedural clocks; list and track each deadline to avoid forfeiture or delayed enforcement.

Immediate Filing:

File proposed order promptly after signature to start official entry.

Service Deadline:

Serve parties within the period the order or local rule requires.

Effective Date:

The order’s effective date may be immediate or a future set date.

Appeal Period:

Check local rules; many appeal windows run 30 days from entry.

Record Retention:

Keep copies per retention rules for potential review or appeal.

Key Processing Milestones from Entry to Potential Appeal

Map the typical milestone sequence so teams can coordinate service, compliance, and post-order actions.

01

Draft Submission

Movant files or delivers proposed order to chambers for review.

02

Judge Entry

Judge signs and the clerk formally enters the order on the docket.

03

Service Completed

Designated parties receive the order by permitted service methods.

04

Appeal or Motion

Parties file any post-order motions or notices of appeal within the prescribed period.

Common Preparation Errors to Avoid

  • Using nonstandard caption formatting that causes clerk rejection and indexing delays.
  • Omitting precise relief language, leaving enforcement and compliance open to dispute.
  • Failing to include an effective date or incorrectly formatting the date for local rules.
  • Neglecting to confirm the court’s e-filing or e-signature policies before electronic submission.

Consequences of an Incorrect or Incomplete Order

Filing Rejection: Clerk may reject or return the order for correction.
Enforcement Delay: Incorrect orders can postpone relief or enforcement actions.
Sanctions: Court may impose sanctions if errors cause undue litigation costs.
Appeal Complications: Ambiguities increase the risk of successful appeals or remands.
Fee Exposure: Re-filing or correction can create additional filing or service costs.
Evidence Exclusion: Procedural defects can jeopardize admissibility of related submissions.

Security and Compliance Considerations for Electronic Orders

Encryption: TLS 1.2/1.3 in transit; AES-256 at rest
Audit Trail: Time-stamped logs capturing signer, IP, and actions
HIPAA: BAA required where PHI is present
Certifications: SOC 2 Type II and ISO 27001 available
Access Controls: Role-based access and SSO options
Retention: Secure archival to preserve integrity and chain of custody

How signNow Compares on Price and Core Features

Cost and core capabilities vary across providers; the table below summarizes starting price and select feature availability to inform platform selection.

signNow DocuSign Adobe Sign PandaDoc HelloSign
Starting Price $8/user/mo $15/user/mo $14/user/mo $19/user/mo $15/user/mo
Free Trial 7-day trial Varies Varies Varies Varies
Bulk Send Yes Yes Yes Yes No
Audit Trail Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
HIPAA Compliant Yes Yes Yes No No

Practical Examples of When an Order Re: Adequate Cause Is Used

Below are two concise example scenarios illustrating common contexts for this order type.

Eviction Proceeding

A landlord files an emergency motion to expedite possession based on tenant abandonment

  • Court finds adequate cause on the evidentiary record
  • The signed order shortens the notice period and sets a 7-day compliance deadline with service instructions for the tenant and county clerk.

Sealing Sensitive Records

A party requests sealing of documents containing personal identifiers

  • The court reviews affidavits and determines adequate cause exists
  • The order directs redaction procedures, who may access sealed files, and a timeline for eventual review or unsealing.

Frequently Asked Questions About Orders Re: Adequate Cause (Washington)

Answers to common questions about drafting, signing, filing, and electronic submission to help avoid processing errors and delays.


Need help? Contact support

be ready to get more
Join over 28 million airSlate SignNow users