Can I use electronic signatures?

Yes. Electronic signatures are legally valid under the ESIGN Act (15 U.S.C. ch. 96) and UETA where adopted. Ensure intent, consent, attribution, and retention to meet the ESIGN four‑part validity test.

Do employees have to sign?

Signatures are recommended to acknowledge receipt and discussion. If an employee refuses, document the refusal and follow company policy; an unsigned acknowledgment may not change substantive rating but affects auditability.

What authentication should I use?

Use a level of authentication proportionate to risk: email link for routine reviews, SMS or SSO for higher assurance. Stronger authentication improves attribution and reduces dispute risk.

How do I correct an error after signing?

Create an amendment or corrected review and have all parties sign the new document. Maintain both the original and corrected version with an annotation explaining the reason for the change.

Are performance reviews covered by HIPAA or FERPA?

Reviews rarely contain health data; include HIPAA safeguards only when PHI appears. For education staff, be mindful of FERPA if student information is referenced and limit access accordingly.

How long should I keep completed reviews?

Follow your retention policy: keep active records during employment and for several years after termination. Federal guidance supports minimums such as 3 years for tax-related documentation and 6 years for HIPAA-covered records.

Electronic Signature
Templates
HR
Performance Review Template

Performance Review Template

This template is fully customizable. Edit the text, fill out the fields, and send it for signature. Give it a try!

PERFORMANCE REVIEW TEMPLATE

Employee Name: Employee ID:

Review Period: From to Review Date:

Personal Information

Full Legal Name Address Phone Email

Position Information

Job Title Department Reporting Manager

Start Date: Current Salary: Employment Status: Full-time Part-time Contractor

Performance Summary and Overall Rating

Overall Performance Rating (select one): 5 Outstanding 4 Exceeds Expectations 3 Meets Expectations 2 Needs Improvement 1 Unsatisfactory

Reviewer Summary

Goals and Achievements

Goal 1 — Objective

Achievement Rating: Comments:

Goal 2 — Objective

Achievement Rating: Comments:

Goal 3 — Objective

Achievement Rating: Comments:

Core Competencies

Communication — Rating: Comments:

Teamwork — Rating: Comments:

Problem Solving — Rating: Comments:

Strengths and Areas for Development

Key Strengths Areas for Development

Development Plan

Action Item 1

Target Completion Date:

Action Item 2

Target Completion Date:

Reviewer Comments and Employee Response

Reviewer Comments Employee Comments (optional)

Employment History (for record)

Previous Employer 1 — Company Name Title

Dates Employed: Reason for Leaving:

Previous Employer 2 — Company Name Title

Dates Employed: Reason for Leaving:

Education

Highest Degree Institution

Graduation Date:

Professional References

Reference 1 — Name

Phone: Email:

Relationship Reference 2 — Name

Phone: Email:

Relationship Reference 3 — Name

Phone: Email:

Relationship

Legal Disclosures and Certifications

At-Will Employment: I acknowledge that employment with the Company is at-will and that either the employee or the Company may terminate the employment relationship at any time, with or without cause or notice, unless otherwise provided by a written agreement signed by an authorized Company representative.

Equal Employment Opportunity: The Company does not discriminate on the basis of race, color, religion, sex, national origin, age, disability, veteran status, genetic information, or any other status protected by applicable law. Performance evaluations shall be based on job-related criteria.

Authorization: I authorize the Company to contact former employers and listed references for the purpose of verifying information contained in this record. I further acknowledge that the Company may conduct background or reference checks in accordance with Company policy and applicable law.

Employee Certification

By signing below, I certify that the information provided in this performance review is accurate to the best of my knowledge and that I have discussed the content with my reviewer. I understand that my signature indicates only that I have read and received this review, and does not necessarily indicate agreement with the contents.

Employee acknowledges authorization for contact with prior employers and consents to appropriate background checks as required for continued employment.

Employee Name:

Employee Signature:

Date:

Reviewer Name:

Reviewer Signature:

Date:

What a Performance Review Template Is and When It Helps

A Performance Review Template is a standardized document used to evaluate an employee's job performance, record ratings, set goals, and document development plans. Organizations use it for annual, semiannual, or project-based reviews to ensure consistent assessments, track progress over time, and preserve a clear record for HR decisions, promotions, or disciplinary actions. The template typically includes employee and reviewer details, performance criteria, numerical or descriptive ratings, achievements, improvement areas, and a signature block for sign-off.

Why a Consistent Performance Review Template Matters

Standardized templates promote fairness, reduce bias, and create an auditable record of performance decisions. They support consistent goal-setting, streamline review cycles, and help employers meet documentation requirements for HR, compensation, and legal compliance.

Who Prepares and Uses Performance Review Templates

Typical users range from HR specialists to line managers and employees who complete or receive the review.

HR teams and people operations: Draft templates, set cadence, and retain final records for compliance and audit.
Managers and supervisors: Provide ratings, qualitative feedback, and development plans tied to job responsibilities.
Employees and contributors: Review feedback, acknowledge receipt, and collaborate on goal-setting and follow-up actions.

Clear role separation (HR administers, managers evaluate, employees acknowledge) improves accuracy and traceability across the review process.

Core Sections to Include in a Professional Template

A well-structured Performance Review Template groups factual data, objective ratings, narrative feedback, and next-step items into discrete sections for clarity and consistent use.

Employee Details

Name, job title, department, employee ID, manager name, and review period; used to match the record to HR files and payroll systems.

Performance Criteria

A list of competencies or KPIs with clear definitions and rating scales so all reviewers apply consistent standards across roles and levels.

Ratings Summary

Numeric or descriptive scores for each criterion plus an overall rating to support calibration, compensation, and promotion decisions.

Narrative Feedback

Space for concrete examples of strengths and areas for improvement; specific, behavior-based language reduces ambiguity and dispute risk.

Goals & Development

Documented short-term and long-term goals, training needs, and measurable success criteria with target dates for follow-up.

Signatures & Dates

Reviewer, employee, and optional HR sign-offs with dates to confirm review delivery and acknowledgment for the official record.

Required Fields at a Glance

Employee Name: Full legal name

Position: Current job title

Review Period: Start and end dates

Aggregate Rating: Numeric or banded

Reviewer Name: Manager or reviewer

Signature Block: Signed and dated

Step-by-Step: Completing a Performance Review Template

Follow these core steps to prepare, review, and finalize a performance evaluation while preserving an accurate and auditable record.

01

Collect data: Gather metrics, project outputs, and prior feedback.
02

Draft evaluation: Complete ratings and add behavior-based examples.
03

Review with employee: Discuss feedback and align on goals.
04

Finalize and sign: Obtain signatures and archive the record.

How to Set Up an Online Review Workflow

Configure a repeatable digital workflow so each review follows the same ordering, approval steps, and retention rules.

Template	Create a reusable template stored in your document library
Field placement	Add text, rating, date, and signature fields
Signer order	Set manager then employee signing sequence
Reminders	Enable automated reminders for pending signoffs
Access control	Restrict viewing to HR, manager, and employee

Where the Template Goes After Completion

Common routing patterns ensure the signed review reaches the right systems and people for storage and action.

Upload to HRIS: Store completed review in the HR information system
Manager archive: Manager keeps a local copy for development tracking
Employee copy: Provide the employee a signed PDF copy
Compliance archive: Retain in secure records for audits

Sharing Options and Platform Requirements

Performance reviews are commonly shared via secure eSignature platforms, HRIS integrations, or protected file stores.

Supported formats: PDF and DOCX are widely accepted
Integrations: CRM and HRIS connectors like Salesforce and NetSuite
Signer authentication: Email, SMS code, or SSO for secure attribution

Choose a platform that preserves an audit trail, supports the file formats you use, and integrates with your HR systems to automate routing and retention policies.

Typical Timing and Deadlines for Reviews

Establish clear dates for scheduling, sign-off, and filing so stakeholders meet expectations and records are timely.

Review cadence:

Annual or semiannual cycles depending on company policy

Advance notice:

Provide employees at least one week to prepare

Sign-off deadline:

Manager and employee should sign within 14 days

Appeal window:

Allow 30 days for formal response or comment

Archival timing:

File the signed review within 30 days of completion

Common Mistakes to Avoid

Using vague language like 'needs improvement' without concrete examples increases dispute risk and undermines development value.
Failing to document objective metrics or supporting evidence makes ratings hard to justify during compensation or disciplinary reviews.
Not following the prescribed signing order or skipping signatures can invalidate the record as an official HR document.
Retaining reviews in unsecured email or personal drives creates privacy, compliance, and data-loss exposure.

Key Risks and Potential Consequences

Discrimination claims: Incomplete records can weaken defense in EEOC disputes

Data privacy: Exposing PII may trigger privacy regulation breaches

Inconsistent ratings: Leads to morale issues and legal scrutiny

Missing signatures: Record may be treated as draft, not final

Retention lapses: Failing to retain records affects audits

Improper access: Unauthorized disclosures can breach policy

Comparing eSignature Pricing and Core Features

Basic pricing and feature differences affect total cost and compliance capabilities; signNow appears first for parity in comparisons.

	signNow	DocuSign	Adobe Sign	PandaDoc	HelloSign
Starting Price	$8/user/mo	$15/user/mo	$14/user/mo	$19/user/mo	$15/user/mo
Free Trial	7-day free trial	Varies by plan	Varies by plan	Varies by plan	Varies by plan
Bulk Send	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	No
Audit Trail	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes
HIPAA Compliant	Yes	Yes	Yes	No	No
Envelope Cap	No cap	100 envelopes/user/year	Not disclosed	Not disclosed	Not disclosed

Real-world Examples of Digital Review Workflows

Organizations of varying size standardize reviews and capture signatures digitally to reduce turnaround and maintain consistent records.

Optica Ventures — COO

Optica moved to digital reviews for faster completion and consistent records.

The interface is simple for internal and external users.
The company found that the standard template plus online signing reduced administrative follow-up and improved completion rates across teams.

Martin Properties — Founder

A small real estate firm used the template to formalize employee development.

The founder processes and executes documents online with compliance.
The practice allowed the firm to manage seasonal staff more effectively and keep accurate performance histories for licensing and promotion decisions.

Practical Tips for Accurate and Efficient Reviews

Adopt these practices to improve clarity, reduce disputes, and integrate reviews into broader HR processes.

Standardize rating definitions

Provide clear, role-specific definitions for each rating to ensure consistency across reviewers and avoid calibration confusion during compensation cycles.

Use behavior-based examples

Require at least one specific example supporting each negative or positive rating to make feedback actionable and defensible.

Automate reminders and routing

Configure the workflow to send automated notifications for pending sign-offs and to route completed reviews to HRIS for archival.

Limit access and log events

Restrict view permissions, keep an audit trail of access and edits, and record signatures to protect privacy and support legal defensibility.

Frequently Asked Questions About Using the Template

Answers to common operational, legal, and technical questions when preparing, signing, and storing performance reviews.

Need help? Contact support

Can I use electronic signatures?
Yes. Electronic signatures are legally valid under the ESIGN Act (15 U.S.C. ch. 96) and UETA where adopted. Ensure intent, consent, attribution, and retention to meet the ESIGN four‑part validity test.
Do employees have to sign?
Signatures are recommended to acknowledge receipt and discussion. If an employee refuses, document the refusal and follow company policy; an unsigned acknowledgment may not change substantive rating but affects auditability.
What authentication should I use?
Use a level of authentication proportionate to risk: email link for routine reviews, SMS or SSO for higher assurance. Stronger authentication improves attribution and reduces dispute risk.
How do I correct an error after signing?
Create an amendment or corrected review and have all parties sign the new document. Maintain both the original and corrected version with an annotation explaining the reason for the change.
Are performance reviews covered by HIPAA or FERPA?
Reviews rarely contain health data; include HIPAA safeguards only when PHI appears. For education staff, be mindful of FERPA if student information is referenced and limit access accordingly.
How long should I keep completed reviews?
Follow your retention policy: keep active records during employment and for several years after termination. Federal guidance supports minimums such as 3 years for tax-related documentation and 6 years for HIPAA-covered records.

be ready to get more

Join over 28 million airSlate SignNow users

Sign Now