Can this form be e-signed?

Yes. Electronic signatures are legally valid under the ESIGN Act (15 U.S.C. ch. 96) and UETA when applicable, provided intent, consent, attribution, and retention requirements are met.

What if the employee disagrees?

Document the employee's response in the review record, include their signed rebuttal if provided, and follow company dispute resolution procedures and HR policies.

Which retention period applies?

Retain employment performance records at least three years per federal standards (29 CFR §516.5) and longer where state law or company policy requires it.

Who must sign the review?

Typically the reporting manager, the employee for acknowledgement, and HR for final filing; workflows may include an executive approver for promotion decisions.

How to correct errors after signing?

Create an amendment or addendum documenting corrections, obtain new signatures where necessary, and preserve both the original and corrected versions in the personnel file.

What platforms meet compliance needs?

Choose platforms with TLS and AES encryption, SOC 2 Type II, and HIPAA BAA availability if healthcare content is present to meet regulatory obligations.

Electronic Signature
Templates
HR
Senior PM Performance Review

Senior PM Performance Review

This template is fully customizable. Edit the text, fill out the fields, and send it for signature. Give it a try!

SENIOR PM PERFORMANCE REVIEW

Personal Information

Employee Full Name Address

Phone

Email

Employee ID

Position Information

Job Title Department

Reporting Manager: Start Date (with employer):

Current Base Salary

Review Period Start

Review Period End

Performance Summary

Overall Performance Rating (1 = Unsatisfactory, 5 = Exceptional):

Summary of performance highlights and key outcomes

Core Competencies

Rate each competency 1 (Below Expectations) to 5 (Exceeds Expectations) and provide supporting comments.

Leadership

Rating:

Strategic Planning & Vision

Rating:

Communication & Influence

Rating:

Stakeholder Management

Rating:

Execution & Delivery

Rating:

Financial & Resource Management

Rating:

Objectives & Goal Review

For each objective, indicate status and provide commentary on completion and impact.

Objective 1

Status: Achieved Partially Achieved Not Achieved

Objective 2

Status: Achieved Partially Achieved Not Achieved

Objective 3

Status: Achieved Partially Achieved Not Achieved

Development Plan

Actions, learning objectives and target completion dates for the upcoming period.

Development Goal Planned Actions

Target Completion Date

Owner

Employment History (for verification)

Provide the two most recent prior employers.

Employer 1 - Company Name Title / Role

Dates Employed: From To

Primary responsibilities Reason for leaving Employer 2 - Company Name Title / Role

Dates Employed: From To

Primary responsibilities Reason for leaving

Education & Professional Development

Highest Degree Institution Graduation Date Relevant Certifications or Training

References

Provide three professional references.

Reference 1 Reference 2 Reference 3

Legal Disclosures & Statements

At-Will Employment: This performance review is an administrative evaluation and does not constitute a contract of employment. Employment remains at-will and may be terminated by the company or the employee at any time, with or without cause, except where otherwise limited by law or a formal written agreement signed by authorized representatives.

Equal Employment Opportunity: The company evaluates employees based on merit and business needs and does not discriminate on the basis of any protected characteristic. Performance ratings and recommendations shall be applied consistent with applicable nondiscrimination obligations.

Acknowledgment & Certifications

I certify that the information provided in this performance review is accurate to the best of my knowledge. I acknowledge that I have discussed this review with my reporting manager and have been given the opportunity to provide written comments. I understand that this document will be placed in my personnel file and may be used to inform talent decisions, compensation actions, and development plans.

Authorization: I authorize the company to contact prior employers and listed references for the purposes of verifying employment history and performance, and to conduct background or verification checks where permitted by law. I understand that the company will follow applicable legal requirements in conducting such checks.

Employee comments (optional):

Manager / Reviewer Comments

Employee Printed Name:

By (Employee Signature):

Date:

Reviewer Printed Name:

By (Reviewer Signature):

Date:

What the Senior PM Performance Review Is

The Senior PM Performance Review is a structured personnel evaluation used to document a senior project manager's performance over a defined review period. It captures objective metrics such as project delivery, budget adherence, schedule performance, and risk management, along with subjective assessments of leadership, stakeholder communication, and strategic decision-making. The document supports pay and promotion decisions, professional development planning, and HR recordkeeping while creating a consistent record for future reference and compliance.

Why a Formal Review Matters

A standardized review promotes consistent evaluations, reduces bias, and creates a defensible record for HR actions. It also aligns expectations between the senior PM and leadership while documenting development needs and accomplishments.

Who Completes and Uses This Review

The review is completed by the reporting manager and reviewed by HR and relevant executives prior to final sign-off.

Reporting managers: Prepare ratings, narrative feedback, and recommended actions for the Senior PM.
Senior PMs: Provide self-assessment and evidence of goal attainment during the review period.
Human Resources: Validate the process, store records, and support calibration and legal compliance.

Copies are retained for personnel records and used during calibration, promotion, and separation processes.

Typical Roles Involved

Reviewer — Engineering Manager

The reviewer collects objective metrics, documents examples that support each rating, and prepares a written development plan. They are responsible for timely completion and for preserving documentation used to justify performance ratings during calibration or dispute resolution.

Reviewee — Senior PM

The Senior PM provides a self-evaluation and supporting evidence such as project reports, KPI dashboards, and stakeholder feedback. Their input informs final ratings and helps define near-term development goals and potential promotion readiness.

Core Sections of the Review Form

A comprehensive Senior PM Performance Review groups information into consistent sections so assessments are comparable across employees and review cycles.

Objectives & KPIs

Document specific goals, measurable KPIs, target thresholds, and actual performance values for the review period to support objective evaluation.

Delivery & Execution

Assess on-time delivery, scope control, quality metrics, budget adherence, and handling of change requests with concrete project examples.

Leadership & Teamwork

Evaluate people leadership, mentoring, team engagement, conflict resolution, and delegation with documented instances and outcomes.

Stakeholder Management

Rate effectiveness in managing sponsors, cross-functional partners, and external vendors, including communication clarity and relationship outcomes.

Risk & Decision-Making

Record notable risks identified, mitigation actions taken, escalation practices, and quality of decisions under uncertainty.

Summary & Signatures

Include overall rating, recommended actions, development plan, acknowledgement lines, and signature blocks for manager, employee, and HR.

Step-by-Step: Completing the Review

A clear sequential approach reduces delays and improves accuracy when preparing the Senior PM Performance Review.

01

Prepare materials: Gather KPIs, project reports, and stakeholder feedback before starting the form.
02

Complete sections: Fill objectives, ratings, and comments with supporting examples for each assessment area.
03

Manager review: Discuss draft ratings with the Senior PM and document agreed edits or rebuttals.
04

Sign and file: Obtain signatures and submit to HR for storage and calibration.

How to Configure a Digital Review Workflow

Set up an electronic workflow to collect inputs, route approvals, and preserve an immutable audit trail.

Field	Configuration
Document template	Use a locked PDF or templated DOCX with required fields.
Signer order	Manager -> Senior PM -> HR (sequential) or parallel if your policy allows.
Authentication method	Email link or SMS code; choose stronger methods for sensitive cases.
Reminder schedule	Automatic reminders every 3–7 days until signed.

Technical Requirements for Digital Completion

Ensure your eSignature platform supports required formats, integrations, and security controls before rolling out the review.

Formats supported: PDF and DOCX are standard for templates.
Integrations: Connectors to HRIS, Google Workspace, or Microsoft 365 ease routing.
Authentication options: Email, SMS codes, or SSO for stronger signer identity.

Verify audit trail storage, retention rules, and access controls to meet HR and legal requirements.

Typical eSubmission Flow

A streamlined eSubmission flow ensures each actor sees only the fields they must complete and that signatures are auditable.

Upload document: Upload the review template to the eSignature platform.
Place fields: Add name, date, rating, and signature fields for each party.
Send for signature: Route to manager, then employee, then HR as configured.
Audit trail: Platform logs timestamps, IPs, and actions for each signer.

Typical Timelines and Deadlines

Define clear milestones for each review cycle so participants know deadlines and escalation points.

Performance period end:

Marks the cutoff for KPIs and evidence collection.

Self-review due:

Employee submits self-assessment within two weeks after period end.

Manager review due:

Manager completes review within three weeks of self-review submission.

Calibration meeting:

HR-led session to align ratings across teams before finalization.

Final sign-off:

Obtain manager, employee, and HR signatures within six weeks.

Common Mistakes to Avoid

Vague feedback lacking dates, projects, or metrics makes ratings hard to defend during disputes or calibration sessions.
Using inconsistent scales or different rating definitions across managers creates perception of unfairness and undermines calibration.
Failing to collect supporting documents and evidence before finalizing the rating increases legal and HR risk on appeal.
Delaying signatures and failing to route promptly prevents timely compensation decisions and can breach internal deadlines.

Risks from Incorrect or Incomplete Reviews

Discrimination claims: May trigger EEOC investigation and litigation risk.

Wrongful termination: Poor documentation can weaken employer defenses.

Record retention fines: Noncompliance may violate employment record rules.

Performance disputes: Unclear evidence increases arbitration risk.

Data exposure: Improper storage risks privacy violations.

Audit failures: Missing audit trail undermines internal compliance.

Security and Compliance Essentials

Encryption in transit: TLS 1.2/1.3

Encryption at rest: AES-256

Privacy frameworks: GDPR compliant

Audit controls: SOC 2 Type II

Health data: HIPAA (BAA required)

Standards: ISO 27001 certified

eSignature Pricing Snapshot for Review Workflows

Compare baseline pricing and core capabilities relevant to handling Senior PM Performance Reviews; signNow is listed first per vendor comparison requirements.

	signNow	DocuSign	Adobe Sign	PandaDoc	HelloSign
Starting Price	$8/user/mo	$15/user/mo	$14/user/mo	$19/user/mo	$15/user/mo
Free Trial	7-day free trial	Varies	Varies	Varies	Varies
Bulk Send	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	No
Audit Trail	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes
HIPAA Compliant	Yes	Yes	Yes	No	No
Envelope Cap	No cap	100 envelopes/user/year	Varies	Varies	Varies

FAQs and Troubleshooting

Answers to common questions about completing, signing, and storing Senior PM Performance Reviews in a compliant way.

Need help? Contact support

Can this form be e-signed?
Yes. Electronic signatures are legally valid under the ESIGN Act (15 U.S.C. ch. 96) and UETA when applicable, provided intent, consent, attribution, and retention requirements are met.
What if the employee disagrees?
Document the employee's response in the review record, include their signed rebuttal if provided, and follow company dispute resolution procedures and HR policies.
Which retention period applies?
Retain employment performance records at least three years per federal standards (29 CFR §516.5) and longer where state law or company policy requires it.
Who must sign the review?
Typically the reporting manager, the employee for acknowledgement, and HR for final filing; workflows may include an executive approver for promotion decisions.
How to correct errors after signing?
Create an amendment or addendum documenting corrections, obtain new signatures where necessary, and preserve both the original and corrected versions in the personnel file.
What platforms meet compliance needs?
Choose platforms with TLS and AES encryption, SOC 2 Type II, and HIPAA BAA availability if healthcare content is present to meet regulatory obligations.

be ready to get more

Join over 28 million airSlate SignNow users

Sign Now