Study Summary
A concise abstract of objectives, hypotheses, and intended outcomes to frame the submission and help reviewers understand the research question quickly.
A well-prepared request speeds institutional review, clarifies responsibilities, and documents compliance with privacy and human-subject protections. It reduces rework, protects participant rights, and provides an auditable record for the school and sponsor.
Different campus roles create and review these requests depending on study type and institutional structure.
Ensure each role signs or acknowledges the request as required by your institution to avoid review delays.
A student listed as the primary investigator who outlines objectives, methods, and timeline; responsible for day-to-day conduct and adhering to approved procedures and reporting requirements to the faculty advisor.
An institutional reviewer who verifies consent language, privacy protections, and risk level; issues approval or required changes and documents the decision in institutional records.
A concise abstract of objectives, hypotheses, and intended outcomes to frame the submission and help reviewers understand the research question quickly.
Detailed procedures, participant criteria, recruitment approach, instruments used, and how data will be collected to evaluate study validity and subject burden.
Sample consent forms or scripts describing how consent will be obtained and documented, including parental consent for minors when applicable.
How identifiable data will be stored, access controls, retention schedule, de‑identification steps, and any HIPAA or FERPA considerations.
List of required approvals (IRB, faculty, department chair) and the names or roles responsible for ongoing supervision and safety monitoring.
Projected start and end dates, milestones, funding or resource requests, and any institutional infrastructure needed to complete the study.
| Field | Configuration |
|---|---|
| Signature Type | Electronic signature with audit trail |
| Authentication | Institutional single sign-on or email + SMS code |
| Routing Order | Student → Faculty → IRB Coordinator |
| Storage | Institutional records system (PDF, immutable) |
Confirm acceptable file types, authentication, and any eSignature requirements before uploading to the institution’s portal.
Use platforms that preserve an audit trail; ensure signed PDFs retain timestamps and signer attribution for institutional records.
Submit well before data collection begins to avoid unapproved activity.
Expedited review typically 14–30 days, institution-dependent.
Allow 3–10 business days for advisor review.
Minor changes reviewed in days; major revisions may take weeks.
Retention begins on approval or study completion, per policy.
| signNow | DocuSign | Adobe Sign | PandaDoc | HelloSign | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | $8/user/mo | $15/user/mo | $14/user/mo | $19/user/mo | $15/user/mo |
| Free Trial | 7-day trial | Varies | Varies | Varies | Varies |
| Bulk Send | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | No |
| Audit Trail | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| HIPAA Compliant | Yes | Yes | Yes | No | No |
| Envelope Cap | No cap | 100 envelopes/user/year | Varies | Varies | Varies |
Student conducts a campus-wide survey on study habits to inform a thesis
Graduate student runs a controlled lab task involving noninvasive physiological measures